CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Bumping this thread

Bumping this thread

Started by Gregory Miller4 · · 👁 4 views · 4 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Gregory Miller4hollowtrucker77Matthew Wilson50redmarlin3mistywolf17
Gregory Miller4 Gregory Miller4 MemberOP
10 messages
joined Mar 2007
#1 ·
I’ve been chewing on this issue of reviving old threads lately, specifically why it’s viewed with such suspicion around here.

I’d really value some insight, starting with the moderators, though I'm curious to hear what everyone else thinks as well.

Basically, what’s the actual harm in someone deciding to post in a discussion that might be, say, two years old?
hollowtrucker77 hollowtrucker77 Regular
681 messages
joined Nov 2007
#2 ·
Look, there’s absolutely nothing wrong with adding to a thread, provided the post actually brings something useful to the table and keeps the conversation moving forward rather than just circling the drain.
On the flip side, if you're just dropping an "I agree" or some random emoji on a thread that’s been dead since the last administration, you aren't contributing—you're just spamming.
Besides, it really doesn't make much sense to try and breathe life into a discussion that died out ages ago.
Matthew Wilson50 Matthew Wilson50 Active Member
64 messages
joined Feb 2010
#3 ·
Yeah, I’ve lost count of how many times I’ve seen someone start a whole new thread on Reddit just to post a bunch of smiley faces. I mean, they’re probably just new users getting their bearings, but still.
redmarlin3 redmarlin3 Active Member
132 messages
joined Apr 2010
#4 ·
Gregory Miller4 said:I’m curious about the whole thing regarding reviving old threads—specifically, why people consider it such a negative thing.

I’d really love to hear from the mods first, but I'm interested in what everyone else thinks too.

So, what’s actually wrong with someone posting in a thread that’s, say, two years old?

It really depends on what kind of topic we're talking about and which subforum it lives in.

In the World News section, we have threads about all sorts of animals; for instance, I don't see any point in having three separate threads about skunks. It won't bother me one bit if someone bumps a five-year-old thread just to leave a comment saying they hate skunks. The thread will pop back to the front page for a while, and if people actually care, the conversation continues. Usually, those kinds of topics are pretty straightforward and don't involve deep debates.

Over on General Discussion, we also have threads that get dragged along for years—mostly those massive catch-all threads about things like tattoos, gift ideas, and stuff like that.

But it drives me absolutely insane when someone digs up a three-year-old thread where the original author was venting about some drama with a friend. People argue for a little bit, the thread sinks, and then some random person comes along to quote the very first post and start handing out advice... 🤦 even though most of the people involved in that thread aren't even on this forum anymore, and some, God help us, have actually passed away.

(I dealt with a situation once where someone revived an ancient thread and quoted a user who had died last year. Look, I know they weren't being malicious, but what was the point?)

If a thread is about someone's specific personal problem or a good debate that died out years ago, there’s just no reason to revive it. If you want to talk about the same subject, just start a new thread instead of digging up something from five years ago when different people were here, the rules were different, and it simply makes no sense to try and pick up where we left off.

Disclaimer: this is just my personal take on reviving old threads and doesn't necessarily represent official forum policy because, like I said, every subforum is different and needs its own approach. 😉
mistywolf17 mistywolf17 Active Member
67 messages
joined May 2007
#5 ·
redmarlin3 said:Disclaimer: This is just my own personal take on reviving old threads. It shouldn't necessarily represent the official rules of the forum because, as I mentioned before, every sub-forum operates a bit differently, and we should probably respect those differences. 😉

I think the entire post is spot on.
It's the exact same situation in the USA as it is here.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads