CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Deleted thread on Philosophy

Deleted thread on Philosophy

Started by Gerald Jackson48 · · 👁 4 views · 4 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Gerald Jackson48Melissa Stewart6steelridge58velvetbear372rustydrifter10
Gerald Jackson48 Gerald Jackson48 Active MemberOP
125 messages
joined Jun 2018
#1 ·
Is there any way to get that old thread about the one-dimensional man back up on Philosophy?

I’m not trying to jump into those endless wars Sigmund gets into with all the traditionalists—the ones that got him banned in the first place. Honestly, he and I usually see things from completely opposite sides anyway, whether we're talking economics, philosophy, science, or even just how to cook a steak. But that specific topic was actually really interesting and well-structured. It sparked a great debate and got a lot of solid participation from everyone else on the forum.
Melissa Stewart6 Melissa Stewart6 Active Member
152 messages
joined Oct 2017
#2 ·
It honestly feels like things might actually run smoother without a moderator than they do with one.
steelridge58 steelridge58 Regular
397 messages
joined Mar 2008
#3 ·
It’s such a massive shame that this topic was taken down without any real justification! It was a genuinely deep, philosophical discussion—which, let's be honest, feels like a lost art on these online forums lately—and I truly believe it had so much potential to spark something meaningful. We really missed out here, and I think the decision to pull it was a mistake.
velvetbear372 velvetbear372 Active Member
56 messages
joined Aug 2018
#4 ·
I suspect the issue stemmed from the opening post—where only about a third actually addressed the topic, while the remaining two-thirds consisted of nothing but prohibitions and insults.
rustydrifter10 rustydrifter10 Regular
693 messages
joined Apr 2011
#5 ·
velvetbear372 said:I suspect the issue stemmed from the opening post—where only about a third actually addressed the topic, while the remaining two-thirds consisted of nothing but prohibitions and insults.

Exactly! You can't just let a thread sit on a forum if it opens up with a massive pile of insults; it doesn't matter how much potential the discussion might have had, it just isn't worth keeping.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads