CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Extreme chauvinism on this topic

Extreme chauvinism on this topic

Started by redhawk76 · · 👁 4 views · 12 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants redhawk76Jose Carter2William Gonzalez3William Bennett53bluecyclist64darkseal9Casey Ramos31quietowl2Michelle Evans
redhawk76 redhawk76 Active MemberOP
60 messages
joined May 2013
#1 ·
I would honestly love for a moderator to weigh in on the thread and explain how it is possible that, for two full days without any intervention or disciplinary action against the OP, an option remains in the poll that serves absolutely no purpose. It wasn't even mentioned by anyone or officially proposed as a potential name for the US Congress; rather, it exists solely as a chauvinistic mockery of people based on their heritage or birthplace—and by extension, the way they speak.

If this isn't the ultimate example of nitpicking for the sake of it—the kind of behavior this forum supposedly maintains a "zero tolerance" policy against—then I truly don't know what is.
Jose Carter2 Jose Carter2 Member
41 messages
joined May 2017
#2 ·
There’s no chauvinism here, though it is a shame we don't have more local regional slang left to describe America and Americans.

So, you’re actually suggesting that using dialect from one part of the country to describe all Americans and the US is somehow a form of mockery? 🤦
William Gonzalez3 William Gonzalez3 Regular
276 messages
joined May 2009
#3 ·
Jose Carter2 said:There’s no chauvinism here, though it is a shame we don't have more local regional slang left to describe America and Americans.

So, you’re actually suggesting that using dialect from one part of the country to describe all Americans and the US is somehow a form of mockery? 🤦

I suppose it exists, if you define chauvinism as the belief that your own group is somehow inherently superior to everyone else.

So, you're saying that using regional slang from one part of America to represent all Americans—and the whole country—is actually meant to be a mockery?

Well, I think the poll creator definitely intended it that way—they included that option specifically to poke fun at us.

But hey, feel free to play the victim if you want to.
👍
William Bennett53 William Bennett53 Regular
491 messages
joined Sep 2016
#4 ·
I have a suggestion: let’s swap this poll out for a different one featuring only two options—both using standard English—and make the results public so everyone can see how others voted. As it stands, the current format carries a somewhat joking or even insulting undertone, and frankly, it leaves us guessing what the community actually thinks about Reiner's initiative.
bluecyclist64 bluecyclist64 Regular
369 messages
joined Oct 2011
#5 ·
William Gonzalez3 said:I suppose it exists, if you define chauvinism as the belief that your own group is somehow inherently superior to everyone else.

So, you're saying that using regional slang from one part of America to represent all Americans—and the whole country—is actually meant to be a mockery?

Well, I think the poll creator definitely intended it that way—they included that option specifically to poke fun at us.

But hey, feel free to play the victim if you want to.
👍

On the other hand, those big-shot Americans only earned that nickname because they always looked down their noses at us little guys, so I honestly don't see any issue with how the survey was conducted.
darkseal9 darkseal9 Active Member
171 messages
joined Jan 2017
#6 ·
Everyone keeps saying being an American is the issue, but honestly, I don't see it
Casey Ramos31 Casey Ramos31 Active Member
144 messages
joined Oct 2017
#7 ·
I already flagged a post on this same thread because I think it’s straight-up insulting certain people—specifically, Harmon's voters. So, I gotta know, is there actually enough evidence here to get them sanctioned?
Jose Carter2 Jose Carter2 Member
41 messages
joined May 2017
#8 ·
Good grief, that’s no different from someone insulting Mason’s or Gotovac's voters.
Casey Ramos31 Casey Ramos31 Active Member
144 messages
joined Oct 2017
#9 ·
So, you're saying we can just call Harmon's voters shallow?
Jose Carter2 Jose Carter2 Member
41 messages
joined May 2017
#10 ·
You could call voters from any political party shallow if you wanted to...
Casey Ramos31 Casey Ramos31 Active Member
144 messages
joined Oct 2017
#11 ·
I thought insults weren't allowed here
quietowl2 quietowl2 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Oct 2015
#12 ·
Casey Ramos31 said:I thought insults weren't allowed here

Well, I guess it all depends on who’s being insulted and who’s doing the insulting.
For instance, they have this rule against mass labeling people, and from what I can see, someone actually caught a ban for that.

It just goes to show that the rules are pretty much up for interpretation depending on who you ask.
I won't go so far as to call it a double standard, but it's definitely looking a bit sketchy.🙂
Michelle Evans Michelle Evans Regular
320 messages
joined Jan 2013
#13 ·
Only if you really need to see them. We’ve been through these same differences countless times, facing basically the same questions from the same group of people...

Furthermore, we’ve made it clear in the guidelines and said it repeatedly: other people's drama has nothing to do with you. Don't get dragged into it.

Thirdly—we aren't going to create one massive catch-all thread titled Ask everything about the Policy PDF here.

The initial issue seems resolved as far as I can tell. There’s no reason to keep this thread open. For anything else, just follow the standard procedure—create a polite thread with a proper request, a clear title, and the right links.

Thanks for cooperating.

Best...

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads