#1 ·
So, I’ve been placed in isolation for "extreme trolling."
What I fail to grasp here is... where exactly was this "extreme trolling"?
To quote Chloe Campbell95 and her reasoning in its entirety:
Okay, maybe I could have phrased things more elegantly, but I honestly don't see where I admitted to coming here to screw with or provoke anyone. For starters, I didn't say people were out to get the sheep; I said there are CERTAIN individuals who deliberately provoke others just to trigger the Democrat crowd and make them look like fools. I think that distinction is fairly obvious from my post, and even from several other comments in that thread.
I have no idea how this was interpreted as "Hey guys, I'm here to mess with you because you're idiots." Especially since I believe I explained my viewpoint quite civilly and responded to the individual without resorting to insults or trolling. To quote Chloe Campbell95's controversial reply:
As far as online debates go, sure, I can get heated, but I'm just telling you how it looks when a supposedly progressive and intellectual faction descends to the level of a bunch of hillbillies. I say "supposedly" because of the constant labeling, defamation, and general disparagement coming from your side. And again, you aren't twelve years old; being heated isn't an excuse. I believe most people are intentionally trolling here just to make you all look like fools.
Once again, how did Chloe Campbell95 manage to read that as "I'm screwing you over because you're sheep"?
Moving on, the second warning:
"Trolling"
Again, what part of this is trolling? Is it mentioning that certain users will say anything just to "justify" something regarding the Democratic platform? Like that one user, who spent the whole debate jumping down people's throats for allegedly spreading lies, only to pivot to "so what?" once it turned out what they said was actually in the party platform.
Why doesn't moderator Chloe Campbell95 react to all those posts where the Democrat crowd acts like lunatics, hurling insults at other users like calling them "sandwiches" or "bots," or organized attacks for "lying" and "planting info"? But of course, Chloe Campbell95 always has plenty of time to issue bans to anyone with a different opinion.
I would really appreciate it if someone other than Chloe Campbell95 looked into this case and lifted my ban. I wasn't trolling, nor did I "admit" to anything (or do anything else that Chloe Campbell95 had to invent just so they could slap me with a ban).
Why don't I want Chloe Campbell95 handling this? Because they aren't impartial, and their moderation is clearly selective. In other words, they let the Democrat crowd get away with everything, while for anyone who disagrees, they practically fabricate incidents—like my supposed admission.
Regarding impartiality—as I noted earlier, I didn't see a single person from the Democrat camp get banned for attacking, disparaging, or insulting other users, or even for making racist remarks about minorities (specifically that one user who claimed certain groups are nothing but beggars or thieves, then played dumb later claiming she couldn't be a racist because she has such diverse friends).
Naturally, I'm the one getting banned here because I kept pointing out her racism. It seems I'm the one at fault for reminding everyone, rather than the person actually typing the racist comments.
What I fail to grasp here is... where exactly was this "extreme trolling"?
To quote Chloe Campbell95 and her reasoning in its entirety:
So, you're admitting you came here intentionally to "screw with" or provoke the "sheep"?
See, we consider that kind of behavior to be extreme trolling.
Okay, maybe I could have phrased things more elegantly, but I honestly don't see where I admitted to coming here to screw with or provoke anyone. For starters, I didn't say people were out to get the sheep; I said there are CERTAIN individuals who deliberately provoke others just to trigger the Democrat crowd and make them look like fools. I think that distinction is fairly obvious from my post, and even from several other comments in that thread.
I have no idea how this was interpreted as "Hey guys, I'm here to mess with you because you're idiots." Especially since I believe I explained my viewpoint quite civilly and responded to the individual without resorting to insults or trolling. To quote Chloe Campbell95's controversial reply:
As far as online debates go, sure, I can get heated, but I'm just telling you how it looks when a supposedly progressive and intellectual faction descends to the level of a bunch of hillbillies. I say "supposedly" because of the constant labeling, defamation, and general disparagement coming from your side. And again, you aren't twelve years old; being heated isn't an excuse. I believe most people are intentionally trolling here just to make you all look like fools.
Once again, how did Chloe Campbell95 manage to read that as "I'm screwing you over because you're sheep"?
Moving on, the second warning:
"Trolling"
Again, what part of this is trolling? Is it mentioning that certain users will say anything just to "justify" something regarding the Democratic platform? Like that one user, who spent the whole debate jumping down people's throats for allegedly spreading lies, only to pivot to "so what?" once it turned out what they said was actually in the party platform.
Why doesn't moderator Chloe Campbell95 react to all those posts where the Democrat crowd acts like lunatics, hurling insults at other users like calling them "sandwiches" or "bots," or organized attacks for "lying" and "planting info"? But of course, Chloe Campbell95 always has plenty of time to issue bans to anyone with a different opinion.
I would really appreciate it if someone other than Chloe Campbell95 looked into this case and lifted my ban. I wasn't trolling, nor did I "admit" to anything (or do anything else that Chloe Campbell95 had to invent just so they could slap me with a ban).
Why don't I want Chloe Campbell95 handling this? Because they aren't impartial, and their moderation is clearly selective. In other words, they let the Democrat crowd get away with everything, while for anyone who disagrees, they practically fabricate incidents—like my supposed admission.
Regarding impartiality—as I noted earlier, I didn't see a single person from the Democrat camp get banned for attacking, disparaging, or insulting other users, or even for making racist remarks about minorities (specifically that one user who claimed certain groups are nothing but beggars or thieves, then played dumb later claiming she couldn't be a racist because she has such diverse friends).
Naturally, I'm the one getting banned here because I kept pointing out her racism. It seems I'm the one at fault for reminding everyone, rather than the person actually typing the racist comments.