CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Miscellaneous › Feedback & Suggestions › Modesty - why partial?

Modesty - why partial?

Started by Noah Miller6 · · 👁 7 views · 21 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Noah Miller6rustydrifter10Timothy Jones4driftingtinkercoppersailor28bluecyclist64Casey Bennett
Noah Miller6 Noah Miller6 Active MemberOP
56 messages
joined Jul 2010
#1 ·
Regarding that partial ban of mine, please explain exactly which one of my posts about earthquakes you’re actually targeting here.
I’ve made plenty of posts where I didn't insult anyone just to get flagged.

Don't try to tell me it was because of that one post where I added a heart at the end to show some love—the one you conveniently deleted when it suited you.

rustydrifter10, I’m asking you to look into this. The way Modesty handles moderation is practically elementary school level. My dad could outrun yours.😵🙂
rustydrifter10 rustydrifter10 Regular
693 messages
joined Apr 2011
#2 ·
Before I even dive into looking at this, it’s worth keeping in mind that someone almost never gets a partial ban just because of one single post; usually, it’s the result of a longer, more sustained streak of being unhelpful or just plain toxic on the forum.

**
Manchild, if you ever think you're going to show up here and mention your partial bans—even just a syllable—or honestly, if you even bother showing your face on this thread again, I am handing your partial status right back over to the FEC immediately.
Noah Miller6 Noah Miller6 Active MemberOP
56 messages
joined Jul 2010
#3 ·
rustydrifter10 said:Before I even dive into this, let’s be clear: partial credit is almost never handed out because of a single post. It’s usually the result of a sustained pattern of being unconstructive over time on the board.

Take a look at this.
Modesty slapped me with a partial credit rating despite me having 80 points.
If I post something, I get penalized. If I follow your advice and stop making "unconstructive contributions," then there's no point in participating at all. At this rate, I have no idea where this forum is even headed.
Noah Miller6 Noah Miller6 Active MemberOP
56 messages
joined Jul 2010
#4 ·
Thanks to Modesty, who clearly couldn't find a single coherent thing worth writing about... if that’s anyone's idea of moderation.

rustydrifter10, I'm waiting.
Noah Miller6 Noah Miller6 Active MemberOP
56 messages
joined Jul 2010
#5 ·
Modesty, are you seriously going to slap me with another useless penalty point on the shipping thread?
Can I get some credit if I'm posting over on Facebook too?
Come on, please!!
I'm calling you out here—have a heart and just respond, babe.
I can't survive without your points....

Be a sweetheart and let me send you one single PM.
Why are you being so closed off???
You're acting so worked up that you even banned me from the ban corner.
But my dad is still tougher than yours, honey ❤️.

Have you ever even heard the word democracy?
Probably not, you're still a little novice.
Now, be a doll and show me your posts from the start of that earthquake thread to see how much you actually contributed... zero. You want a percentage? A reading on the Richter scale? Or maybe on the Merkel scale.
And honestly, who at Microsoft even appointed you moderator? It’s a mystery, considering you can't even reply to a basic post!
Timothy Jones4 Timothy Jones4 Member
11 messages
joined Feb 2013
#6 ·
You aren't the only one who got hit with a penalty. I personally took a 100-point hit for a single post in that subforum, and several of my posts were wiped out too, which wasn't even her call but someone else's decision based entirely on the vibe of my writing style. She’s incredibly strict, so there's honestly no point in hanging out in any subforums she manages.

That's exactly why I got slapped with 100 points and a one-day ban that somehow stretched into four days.
Post.

Timothy Jones4 isn't allowed to speculate about what might happen here. Speculation is strictly forbidden and will get you a strike or a ban. What happens, happens. That is the only takeaway from this thread.

Here is the actual rulebook:
Additionally, posting scientifically unfounded information regarding earthquakes is prohibited, as is harassing other users with false and/or malicious misinformation.

This space is reserved for new reports on earthquakes and subsequent general discussions.
For any other topics, find the appropriate thread in the correct subforum.

This thread is barely active as it is. We only post things like: "It shook," or "I didn't feel that earthquake here in New York City."

I'm telling you this as a favor because in thirteen years on this site, those are the only strikes I've ever received.


And here are the other ones that got nuked:

"Modesty gets annoyed when someone deviates even one percent from the scientific consensus. Now she might end up punishing herself, so let's be fair since she's just trolling. She could have at least linked to your 'favorite' fringe subforum..."

"
If any other user wrote what fiket wrote, they would have been struck immediately. Their statements are all 'could be' or 'might be,' but nothing is certain. We expect certain outcomes, but expectations aren't facts. Those statements help absolutely no one, they just..."

"Expected. It was even clumsy of them to comment on that. Don't hand out a strike for that... try having a broader perspective; not everything exists on the edge of science, and science isn't an infallible god."

Keep in mind that when I called her out for trolling, she actually was trolling by linking to a crystal ball reading. She didn't punish herself; she punished everyone else. If she were a competent moderator, she would have linked to a thread on fringe science instead of fortune-telling. Plus, she’s one of the few people who doesn't even have the option to receive direct messages. That says enough. They'll probably start banning people from the disaster zones soon too; the topic is high-tension and they are way too quick to click the ban button. You see how often I mention strikes, and that's because every time I posted in there, I knew a strike from her was coming.
Noah Miller6 Noah Miller6 Active MemberOP
56 messages
joined Jul 2010
#7 ·
Timothy Jones4 is spot on.
Everything you wrote is absolutely correct.
However, I still have serious questions regarding how fair her moderation actually is—but I covered all that in my previous post.
She’s supposedly some kind of top-tier moderator over at Microsoft in the Help Desk section, which barely has five posts to its name.
Besides, she won't show up here, and don't even get me started on the Democratic Party.
The absolute peak of moderation...
I’d love for her to show up so I could ask her a few questions about Hardware, and just general software stuff too.
I can practically guarantee she’d lose points for sheer ignorance.

Now, I am referring to the specific post she wrote, so I'll quote it directly:
"Post new reports regarding earthquakes here, along with related general discussions.
For any other topics, please find the appropriate thread on the subforum."

Maybe she can report on the next earthquake, if she's actually capable of it!
driftingtinker driftingtinker Regular
372 messages
joined Jan 2019
#8 ·
Hey there, fellow colleague.

Since you guys reached out to me about this too, I figured I'd throw in a specific detail you totally missed:
Look, about those partial bans after the earthquakes... that call was made by us moderators and the super mods together, so there's just no pulling it back. It's final.

Look, I'm just saying... it’s not like some single person just woke up and decided to be an absolute jerk. It wasn't some one-off, spiteful call made by one guy. It was a collective thing, I guess. A group decision from a bunch of moderators working together. Maybe that makes it better, maybe it doesn't, but yeah... it was a team effort.

I mean, when you were quoting the rules, you totally missed a pretty huge part of it;
Article 7.
Look, just a heads-up... moderation comments don't actually belong in the "Politics" PDF thread. If you've got beef with how a mod is handling things, or if you want to file an appeal, just head over to the Messages, Wishes, and Comments section instead. Honestly, trying to argue about moderator actions or complaining about them right here in these threads is a direct violation of the rules. Just... don't go there.

Once we've wrapped this part up, I’d really appreciate some clarification on why someone would even leave a comment like that under the "Tesla" thread.
I mean, I guess we could talk about it, but honestly? It’s all kind of a mess. Everything feels like it's just circling the drain at this point, you know? I was looking at some stuff online earlier—just scrolling through whatever—and it hit me how much things have shifted. Like, everything is just different now. It's almost funny, if you can call it that. People act like they have it all figured out, but nobody really does. We're all just kind of winging it, pretending the ground isn't shaking under our feet. I don't know. Maybe I'm just being cynical. It's probably just that feeling you get after a massive earthquake when you realize nothing is ever going to be quite the same again. Just a weird, lingering sense of instability, I guess. Anyway, what's the move here? Is anyone actually doing anything useful, or are we all just waiting for the next thing to break? I suspect it's the latter. Most people are just looking for a way to stay afloat while the big players pull the strings behind the scenes. It's exhausting, really. Just one big cycle of chaos and then trying to pretend everything is back to normal. But it never is. Not really.

Things are way more chill here when it comes to getting banned compared to that earthquake subforum. I mean, over there, you could post something totally irrelevant and get slapped with a hundred points, an instant ban, and then you're just locked out of the whole section. I had some mod go absolutely nuclear on me for a post that didn't even matter, which was just... yeah. I've been hanging around this forum for like thirteen years now, and honestly, every single ban on this site seems to come from her. It’s actually pretty great here, though. Such a massive difference...

So, regarding that whole joint project thing... I feel like I should probably weigh in on this. But honestly? The way you just threw my name out there in relation to the Democratic Party without even giving it a second thought—man, that was a choice. If you’re looking to pull that kind of amateur stunt, maybe save it for the guys sitting on the bench. Seriously.
Noah Miller6 Noah Miller6 Active MemberOP
56 messages
joined Jul 2010
#9 ·
@driftingtinker/">@@driftingtinker
Please refrain from interfering with this discussion. If you feel the need to weigh in on this specific topic, feel free to start your own thread.
Much appreciated.
Timothy Jones4 Timothy Jones4 Member
11 messages
joined Feb 2013
#10 ·
Look, driftingtinker, those are just the facts. If Modesty were moderating the Economics subforum, everyone would have been banned ages ago. They’d probably have the whole section locked down by now. Even over in the cars section, people trade insults left and right and nobody ever gets banned. I was just pointing out how inconsistent the moderation is across different boards. My post that got me hit with a 100-point penalty was nothing more than a polite heads-up to a new user about being careful with what they post. There wasn't a single insult or anything remotely aggressive in there. Honestly, if I had actually been insulting someone, I probably would've caught a permanent ban. For crying out loud, stop trying to defend her. And you can see for yourselves that I didn't even get a warning for that post; if she were running that board, I would've racked up five warnings by now. I never thought I'd have to get dragged into a thread like this. LP aufiderzen

PS. I'm only chiming in here because we're talking about the exact same moderator, the same subforum, and the exact same penalty...
Noah Miller6 Noah Miller6 Active MemberOP
56 messages
joined Jul 2010
#11 ·
Get this: I can't even start a thread in the ban corner because Modesty decided otherwise...
Jbte, since I first signed up, I haven't encountered anyone this arrogant, looking at my entire history since 2007. I’ve racked up 300 points total, which is plenty by my standards.
Because of my 85 cumulative points, she went ahead and slapped a permanent ban on my threads regarding Earthquakes and in the ban corner.
She must be absolutely shaken up, considering she won't even show her face to respond.
driftingtinker driftingtinker Regular
372 messages
joined Jan 2019
#12 ·
Out of those 80 current points, my 45 are basically just a lovely little series of insults aimed at other forums dating back to August 17th.

Like I told my colleague, partial bans don't just happen on a whim or an impulse. They're mostly for general impressions, usually a joint decision made by all the thread mods plus some supernatural higher power.

My colleague clearly isn't playing around, and honestly, I only jumped in to point out a few minor, unimportant details that got missed, so I'm done there. Both partials are a massive blow to the subforum in question, but I guess we'll find a way to get past it eventually.

Have a good rest of your day.
Noah Miller6 Noah Miller6 Active MemberOP
56 messages
joined Jul 2010
#13 ·
Andrew, please just leave me alone!
Show me the posts where I supposedly insulted anyone!
From the very first day you became a moderator, it’s been nothing but point deductions.
Who exactly did I insult?
Post them.
What are you even talking about?
You love to lecture everyone about how much nothing was given to them, yet the moment I called out that war profiteer and his nonsense, you slapped me with points.
What, did you get an ego boost the second you got that mod badge?
Post the evidence right here showing where I actually insulted someone!!!!!
Besides, I'll say it again: if this is the "Modesty-why partial" thread, what right do you have to chime in?
Are you Modesty?
No? Then please, do us all a favor and stay out of this specific thread.
I asked Modesty and Nice for their input.
I didn't call you out or even mention your name.

As for you, you really should be embarrassed by that avatar.
I don't support President Milanović, nor do I care about politics, but since you want to play rough: I just took a screenshot of your account, so now I'm going to report you to the police for mocking the President of America.
Is that funny to you?
You messed up this time, Andrew... you probably weren't looking closely at my profile, but go ahead... give both me and Modesty a ban... but your little attempts at mockery won't work, and you know exactly what I mean.
Shall we continue?

What actual contribution have you made to this thread, AndrejX?
Show me a single one of your posts that is actually worth mentioning.
Which one??????
Both you and Modesty have been messing up the entire earthquake and corner to ban thread since day one....

AndrejX
Stop typing. I’m asking you nicely; you’re just raising my blood pressure.

The series, as you call it.
While some guy is busy talking nonsense to me... just get off Reddit, Andrew, it clearly isn't for you.
I have the screenshots from when you were handing out those points....
coppersailor28 coppersailor28 Active Member
156 messages
joined Mar 2012
#14 ·
Noah Miller6 said:Get this: I can't even start a thread in the corner to ban, because the great Modesty decided that's how it's going to be...
...
...moving things over to the Earthquake and corner to ban thread.

Even Modesty (using her moderator account) can't just move things "on her own"—not to 'Earthquakes', let alone to the 'corner to ban'...
If that was actually her call, some higher authority definitely signed off on it first.

As for the 'corner to ban',
being partially banned has zero impact on your right to post in the 'corner to ban'.
If you're banned, you can open a thread in the 'corner to ban' (if you aren't banned, there's nothing for you to ask there).
Noah Miller6 Noah Miller6 Active MemberOP
56 messages
joined Jul 2010
#15 ·
coppersailor28, how do you explain this then:
https://ibb.co/NW7V5b2

If her profile says I can only reach out after six months, what exactly are you talking about?
What are you even on about now?
See this?
https://ibb.co/VpmSzqy
coppersailor28 coppersailor28 Active Member
156 messages
joined Mar 2012
#16 ·
Noah Miller6 said:coppersailor28, how about this then:
https://ibb.co/NW7V5b2

If you tried opening a new thread in the corner to ban, then 'it's just like this':

image

Look, I have some Modesty-why partial (MK), too, but that’s hardly a reason for the notice above.

Noah Miller6 said:Then how can her (Modesty's) profile bio allow people to reach out only after 6 months?
What are you even talking about now?
See??
https://ibb.co/VpmSzqy

I see it!!

Even I could notify you via private message (if I actually had that info) regarding your partial status on the 'earthquake' PDF.

By the way:
Since you finally have that information, please notify me about my own partial status—just enough so I have it in writing, rather than an invisible PDF that only shows up when I'm logged in...
Noah Miller6 Noah Miller6 Active MemberOP
56 messages
joined Jul 2010
#17 ·
It’s obvious you used to be a moderator.
I have absolutely nothing left to say to you.
This thread is about Modesty and Nice....
Everyone else here is completely irrelevant.
And frankly, I don't care about your half-baked arguments; coppersailor28, get out of this thread.
Thanks a lot.
You showed up here like some undercover agent—an ex-mod who was handed special privileges by Modesty.
If she actually has something to contribute, she should address my claims just like AndrejX did. Tell me exactly who, when, and where I supposedly insulted anyone. If not, you can just quietly back away from the discussion.
You’re nothing but a low-key provocateur, coppersailor28, trying to bait me into a meltdown so you can finally strip me of a billion points after all these years and kick me off Reddit.
But it’s not going to happen, losers. You don't have that kind of authority.

All I want is for Modesty to prove exactly who, when, and where I’ve been insulting people since this thread was created, back when the admins and mods were still Cuka and Deedy.
Thanks a million.
coppersailor28 coppersailor28 Active Member
156 messages
joined Mar 2012
#18 ·
Noah Miller6 said:It’s obvious you used to be a moderator.

It’s honestly amusing to see certain users still clinging to those "glory days" from back when Reddit was actually thriving.

👍

Noah Miller6 said:So you've shown up to this thread acting like some undercover agent—some former mod who was handed special privileges by Modesty.

Not that! This isn't some military installation, so there's no need for all that.Once an executor—always an executor. To the bitter end.'...

Take it from me—if I may offer some unsolicited advice—you might want to dial things back a notch.
Noah Miller6 Noah Miller6 Active MemberOP
56 messages
joined Jul 2010
#19 ·
coppersailor28 said:It’s truly heartwarming to see certain users still clinging to those "golden days" when Reddit was actually thriving.

👍

But let's be real. This isn't some rigid military institution where everyone has to follow a strict code of "unwavering loyalty—once a loyalist, always a loyalist"...

(And if I may offer some unsolicited advice: try to get a grip on reality.

Things were great back when people like you were running the show as mods; everything is a total wreck now.

How am I supposed to "get a grip" when the person I mentioned at the very start of this thread refuses to step up and provide actual evidence for the nonsense she's pushing on me?
bluecyclist64 bluecyclist64 Regular
369 messages
joined Oct 2011
#20 ·
Noah Miller6 said:Things were much better back when you and people like you held the moderator roles; everything today is just a complete disaster.

How exactly am I supposed to tone down my perception when the individual I mentioned at the very start of this thread refuses to show up with actual, direct evidence for the permanent ban she forced on me?

Look, Dave: you received a partial restriction, not a permanent ban.
But if you keep going down this road—you might actually end up proving yourself right.
As far as I'm concerned, just keep at it. It’s not like I’m going to miss you.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads