CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Sports › Other Sports › Martial Arts & Combat Sports › New domestic release: Combat self-defense training

New domestic release: Combat self-defense training

Started by Gerald Smith76 · · 👁 4 views · 10 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Gerald Smith76Daniel GarciaTyler Phillips242Casey Booth4Brandon Hayes73Roger Gonzalez
Gerald Smith76 Gerald Smith76 Active MemberOP
98 messages
joined Nov 2015
#1 ·
http://www.combatseminars.com/home

Do some research, watch a few clips on YouTube, and then let me know what you think. I’m curious to see your takes. 😁
Daniel Garcia Daniel Garcia Active Member
57 messages
joined Jan 2007
#2 ·
Nah, nothing new here—just Krajacic's FBI with a fresh coat of paint on the marketing...☕
Tyler Phillips242 Tyler Phillips242 Newcomer
2 messages
joined May 2009
#3 ·
I practiced Kuk Sool Su while it was still in its early stages, about a year into my training. I even attended one of their seminars over in Germany..
I can say from experience that Krajacic himself is a truly wonderful individual—an outstanding man who is deeply passionate about martial arts. Personally, I wasn't a fan of Kuk Sool Su; the movements feel somewhat outdated and lack logical flow since they teach things exactly as they were taught 400 years ago, which sacrifices efficiency. The hand and foot techniques feel like a derivative of Taekwondo, with plenty of Hapkido influence as well. It’s interesting that they also refer to Kuk Sool Su as "Korean Ninjutsu," even though there isn't much connection between the two. However, the modern combat system developed by Krajacic, the FBI, is quite impressive. It is well-conceived, consisting of a series of rapid and effective techniques, and it bears a striking resemblance to the Krav Maga training programs, though comparing the two is a bit of an apples-to-oranges situation. As we have seen in various films, the similarities are quite apparent. Regardless, I wish nothing but the best for Professor Krajacic.
Tyler Phillips242 Tyler Phillips242 Newcomer
2 messages
joined May 2009
#4 ·
This is an interesting perspective, Krajacic, so I will simply paste the most vital points here since the full text is far too lengthy :

There was once a discussion among certain instructors regarding the effectiveness of specific skills—arguing that if a skill were truly effective, those individuals would be competing for the UFC Championship, and so on. How could someone who trains with swords or knives ever become a fighter in the UFC? They couldn't. How could a warrior—one who trains for total warfare involving all types of weaponry—compete in the UFC? How could a fighter who, upon encountering an assailant, draws a knife to neutralize the threat, compete in the UFC? It is impossible. One instructor remarked that he has never seen a Kung Fu master in a UFC octagon, claiming that no one can defeat those "beasts" from the UFC. That is a valid point, but the UFC is a sport, whereas Kung Fu—or in my case, Chuck Sul Do—is not. Kung Fu, much like Chuck Sul Do, is a genuine path toward enlightenment rather than competitive combat, serving instead as a discipline for practicing survival in any given situation. You must remember that all original martial arts are comprehensive in both technique and philosophy, making them incredibly dangerous. Chuck Sul Do is a very dangerous skill in this regard. Kung Fu, just like Chuck Sul Do, is preparation for total war and lacks a competitive circuit.

Why? Because if my training is centered on surviving at any cost, refusing to fight under arbitrary rules and instead following the rules of survival, then I cannot participate in sport fighting within the UFC or similar competitions. Masters of traditional and warrior arts practice these disciplines precisely so they can more easily overcome attackers who are larger, stronger, or younger; they do not practice "combat sports." Consequently, when I am 100 years old, having undergone 93 years of continuous training, if I find myself forced to defend myself, I must immediately gouge an eye, break a bone, use a blade, or utilize a firearm—that is the nature of my martial art. It is not about grappling with a young man, wrestling on the floor, boxing, or trading strikes; it is about striking with a brick to the head from a perfectly executed Chuck Sul Do stance.

Sport is something else entirely—it is pure egoism, a desire to prove superiority over others, and a pursuit of massive financial gain. In that arena, there is no longer a shred of honor or true sportsmanship; it is all merely a game played for those behind the scenes and for the spectators.

Martial arts are, for you "winners," about situations. If the attacker is stronger, I use a knife; if the attacker is more skilled, I employ tricks and tactics; if there are multiple attackers, I use weapons to incapacitate them heavily, and so forth. If I am a 130-pound man forced to defend myself against a 300-pound man, my physical strength alone is useless against someone that much larger, but my speed, tactics, technique, the weapons I always carry as a survivalist, and my determination to dismantle those 300 pounds will serve me well.
Daniel Garcia Daniel Garcia Active Member
57 messages
joined Jan 2007
#5 ·
You gotta give Krajacic credit where it's due—the guy is clearly putting in the work, even if he's just grinding for the sake of grinding... honestly, you have to respect the hustle. I haven't seen everything he's done, but from what I've caught, some of the stuff in the ISF feels a bit amateurish—like those triangle blocks they use during strikes. Some parts are alright though, pretty entertaining how theatrical he gets with those takedowns and slamming heads into the mat.😁
Gerald Smith76 Gerald Smith76 Active MemberOP
98 messages
joined Nov 2015
#6 ·
The new marketing looks solid; you can tell they put some real work into it. I just find the label "new" combat self-defense a bit funny. If it’s essentially the same thing as the ISF, what’s the point?
p.s. That clip where he tosses the bike at the attacker was pretty clever. I wouldn't go throwing my Trek at some random idiot, though. 🙂
Daniel Garcia Daniel Garcia Active Member
57 messages
joined Jan 2007
#7 ·
Gerald Smith76 said:The new marketing looks slick—clearly put some work into it—but calling it a "new" system for "combat self-defense" is kinda hilarious. If it’s basically just the same stuff from the ISF, then what’s the point?
p.s. That clip where he slams the bike onto the attacker is gold. I wouldn't risk my Trek on some random idiot... 🙂

He probably wants to expand outside the US, so he figured he needed a more Google-friendly name to actually get hits.😉
Yeah, that bike slam was legendary.😍
Casey Booth4 Casey Booth4 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Jun 2009
#8 ·
Have you seen his latest on YouTube?
It seems he’s struggling a bit, especially with that thick Midwestern accent of his!😂
At this point, I'm not even sure what to call his technique anymore.
Brandon Hayes73 Brandon Hayes73 Newcomer
9 messages
joined Mar 2006
#9 ·
Tyler Phillips242 said:- THE COUNTERS -

Wait, what on earth is this now? 🤣

I haven't even finished reading the rest...
Daniel Garcia Daniel Garcia Active Member
57 messages
joined Jan 2007
#10 ·
Brandon Hayes73 said:What even is that now? 🤣

Didn't read the rest...

It’s just modern American English. Just like how we have specific terms for stuff like "jet engine" or "automatic transmission," the word "IZJENDAČIVAČI" was basically cooked up in some academic lab...😛
Roger Gonzalez Roger Gonzalez Member
24 messages
joined Sep 2009
#11 ·
Daniel Garcia said:It’s just modern American linguistic nonsense. We already have technical terms like "drone" or "glider," so why bother? This word "IZJENDAČIVAČI" was cooked up in some stuffy academic office to sound official, but it's just unnecessary.😛

Look, "ballpoint pen" is such an old-school term. It’s been around since the damn thing was actually invented.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads