#8361 ·
brightpilot6 said:Any kind of political endorsement, especially when delivered from the pulpit, feels cheap and utterly beneath the office, doesn't it? It essentially exploits the perceived divine mission of a priest in a small town like Mrduša donji to force a specific viewpoint on people—people whom such figures often hold sway over—regarding our messy daily political landscape. And if these messages were actually aimed at the public good, perhaps it would be different, but they aren't; most of the time, they just serve to nudge voters toward the Republican Party, the ultimate undertaker of this nation, or one of its loyal satellites.
To me, it feels like a deception at the lowest possible level, the absolute gutter of populism.
In a private conversation, I have nothing against a priest saying whatever he pleases. I don't even mind them doing it from the pulpit, provided we are all honest about how we perceive them afterward.
Okay, so now you're saying *any* stance, but I’m not sure you’d put it quite like that if the sermons were just campaigning for the Democratic Party. That's just my take.
I don't know; I've honestly never heard anyone suggest who to vote for during Mass. Around here, people act like services are literal political rallies, which isn't true—but then again, the people who don't attend seem convinced that's what happens, while the 99% of people who actually go rarely experience it. It's a bit of a strange dynamic.