#1861 ·
Noah Ross7 said:
😂
Kim Kardashian is just posting this nonsense on purpose to get eyes on her... any kind of attention. It’s more annoying than someone who actually makes an honest mistake or a slip of the tongue...
Started by Morgan Williams · · 👁 377 views · 18K replies
Noah Ross7 said:
😂
Joseph Clark37 said:Kim Kardashian is just posting this nonsense on purpose to get eyes on her... any kind of attention. It’s more annoying than someone who actually makes an honest mistake or a slip of the tongue...
wiredfalcon2 said:Johnson even advised Republicans, which is just more proof that the Democratic Party = Republican Party.
Anthony Jackson2 said:Exactly—even though I lean left, they’re identical in practice. My leaning is really just a reaction to the people running the right wing. Take Karamarko the other day, blaming the current administration for the crisis at ExxonMobil because they can't figure out how to talk to the folks over at Shell 🙏 🙏
The nerve of that guy—after his predecessor basically sold off that entire refinery and Chevron in a backroom deal, he actually has the audacity to lecture anyone on this topic. 🙏 🤣 He deserves nothing less than being spat on.
And honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if they suddenly play nice with the Republican Party and Shell once they're back in charge—mostly because doing anything else would be admitting they blew our last shot at economic stability by handing Chevron over to the Canadians.
So go ahead, vote for people like that.
wiredfalcon2 said:Johnson even advised Republicans, which is just more proof that the Democratic Party = Republican Party.
Raymond Harris4 said:Just for the sake of clarity: the sell-off of ExxonMobil was actually kicked off by the Clintonian administration. That disastrous policy was then carried forward by the kleptomaniac George W. Bush. Both moves were a total betrayal of the national interests they were supposed to represent.
And again, to ensure we are being accurate here: there is a massive distinction between acting once as an outside consultant on a single contract to fix one specific issue in American foreign policy (like the Visa waiver) and serving as the lead analyst responsible for shaping the entirety of the President's policy over a five-year term.
As for that bolded section, the potential upcoming referendum could finally be our chance to actually start addressing this issue properly. But let’s be real—if this were a referendum about historical extremists versus partisans, they’d have enough signatures gathered in forty-eight hours.
Regarding the bolded section—a potential referendum right now could finally be an opportunity to start addressing this somehow. But honestly, if the referendum were about Nazis versus Communists, they’d gather enough signatures in forty-eight hours.
Matthew Anderson4 said:maybe it should've just been a base
Michelle Palmer6 said:It’s practically begging for a massive rave party!
Anthony Jackson2 said:By the way, was this mentioned here? 😲
It deserves 🙏
🤦
Seeing it live is even worse
Anthony Jackson2 said:By the way, was this mentioned here? 😲
It deserves 🙏
🤦
Seeing it live is even worse