CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Spirituality › Resurrection

Resurrection

Started by Richard Murphy6 · · 👁 4 views · 200 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Richard Murphy6Nancy Thompson3Noah Sanchez7wearyowl29Richard Carter4mistybisonelectricpanther4Nicholas Peterson39steeleagle13slyorca62Sean Martinez4bluemason3ambereagle642Jerry CruzNoah King2Jamie Petersonbluebison70driftingraven122Casey Jackson17Hannah Thompson2Emily RuizPeter Flores67Acopperseal8 …
Noah King2 Noah King2 Newcomer
2 messages
joined May 2007
#41 ·
Resurrection serves as the fundamental cornerstone—perhaps even the ultimate hope—shared by all three monotheistic faiths. In the Tanakh, God clearly describes the act of breathing spirit back into bodies once more; Jesus affirmed this truth, and the Quran also speaks of the resurrection of the dead on Judgment Day.

Through His own resurrection, Jesus triumphed over death, granting us the gift of eternal life. Do I believe in the resurrection? Yes, I do.🙂

Best regards,
Sean Martinez4 Sean Martinez4 Active Member
71 messages
joined Nov 2007
#42 ·
Noah King2 said:Resurrection serves as the fundamental cornerstone—perhaps even the ultimate hope—shared by all three monotheistic faiths. In the Tanakh, God clearly describes the act of breathing spirit back into bodies once more; Jesus affirmed this truth, and the Quran also speaks of the resurrection of the dead on Judgment Day.

Through His own resurrection, Jesus triumphed over death, granting us the gift of eternal life. Do I believe in the resurrection? Yes, I do.🙂

Best regards,

Jesus rose up on the cross, he didn't just fall down on it. And honestly, he didn't do it for you—he did it because of who he is.😬 👍
Sean Martinez4 Sean Martinez4 Active Member
71 messages
joined Nov 2007
#43 ·
Nancy Thompson3 said:Exactly. I’ll go ahead and sign up for that bootcamp, while you're already busy teaching the class.
You really haven't got a shot at understanding energies. CHI isn't about sexual energy. It’s universal. Sex is just what those shallow kids obsess over—kids who don't have anything else going for them besides whatever luck they were born with.

If you actually had something productive happening in your life, I guess sex wouldn't be the only thing occupying your brain. Maybe try picking up a book once in a while. There's plenty of... time.

you can't really become more of a geek than you already are. 🤣🤣 yeah, sexual energy is that universal force, the thing that drives everyone—sex. and I didn't say "sexuality."
Those lifeless robots are driven by ego, like I said. There's no universal energy there. 😬 🤣 🤣 🤣
Richard Murphy6 Richard Murphy6 Active MemberOP
180 messages
joined Dec 2002
#44 ·
Nancy Thompson3 said:Isn't it just wonderful? To latch onto someone else, laugh along, and act all big and important without actually having an original thought in your head? Ha, MAGA? I get it, though. It’s definitely easier that way. You just sit there, laughing, thinking about absolutely nothing, and maybe—just maybe—someone will mistake you for being smart.
Unfortunately, this time, the joke is only on you two, because everyone else is (literally) speechless.

I mean, it was pretty funny though.
The truth is, it's just BOR+Sean Martinez4😕 😕 😉
Jerry Cruz Jerry Cruz Newcomer
7 messages
joined May 2007
#45 ·
Sean Martinez4 said:you can't really become more of a geek than you already are. 🤣🤣 yeah, sexual energy is that universal force, the thing that drives everyone—sex. and I didn't say "sexuality."
Those lifeless robots are driven by ego, like I said. There's no universal energy there. 😬 🤣 🤣 🤣


You both have a point, haha. Sexual energy is really the only fuel we've got, and if there's any way to channel it upward into something universal, that’s what people call CHI.

Driven by ego—that’s a great way to put it. Most of those types carry these heavy, dark auras because their egos are basically crowded with low-level entities and elemental baggage. I'm with you there, Q. Just imagine what happens when you actually cut those ties for them; they'd probably just fold instantly, right? It's their only source of nourishment. Grim, but true.
Sean Martinez4 Sean Martinez4 Active Member
71 messages
joined Nov 2007
#46 ·
Jerry Cruz said:You both have a point, haha. Sexual energy is really the only fuel we've got, and if there's any way to channel it upward into something universal, that’s what people call CHI.

Driven by ego—that’s a great way to put it. Most of those types carry these heavy, dark auras because their egos are basically crowded with low-level entities and elemental baggage. I'm with you there, Q. Just imagine what happens when you actually cut those ties for them; they'd probably just fold instantly, right? It's their only source of nourishment. Grim, but true.

Yeah. 😉
Nancy Thompson3 Nancy Thompson3 Active Member
86 messages
joined Apr 2007
#47 ·
Jerry Cruz said:You both have a point, haha. Sexual energy is really the only fuel we've got, and if there's any way to channel it upward into something universal, that’s what people call CHI.

Driven by ego—that’s a great way to put it. Most of those types carry these heavy, dark auras because their egos are basically crowded with low-level entities and elemental baggage. I'm with you there, Q. Just imagine what happens when you actually cut those ties for them; they'd probably just fold instantly, right? It's their only source of nourishment. Grim, but true.

No. CHI is just universal cosmic energy. It doesn't have anything to do with people, or vitality, or biology, or reproduction.

those lifeless robots are driven by ego—that was a nice way to put it.

Lifeless robots are driven by electrical energy, not some kind of ego. Robots don't have egos; they're just machines.

mostly they have black auras because their ego is full of elementals and entities, I agree with you, Quincy.

Robots don't have auras, especially not black ones. A machine doesn't have an aura; at most, it just has an electromagnetic field around it.
Imagine what happens to those types when you cut those connections, huh? They'll just die out, right? That's their only source of food. Grim, but true.

You mean, like when the power goes out?
Jamie Peterson Jamie Peterson Member
15 messages
joined Sep 2004
#48 ·
Sean Martinez4 said:Whether you call it chi, qi, mana, prana, or just life force—basically that whole concept of sexual energy. 😍

Why go mixing up all these different concepts and just confusing everyone?
Well, here’s the thing—Prana can manifest as sexual energy because Prana is essentially a different layer of reality; it's more like the *modus vivendi* of the second chakra that gets released when Kundalini moves through it. At least, that's how things work within the framework of Yoga.
Now, if you look at Chinese energy systems, Kundalini is basically synonymous with Qi—whether you call it Chi, Ki, or Qi. It isn't strictly "sexual energy" by definition, but it *shows up* as sexual energy when someone's conscious focus is centered right on that second chakra.
As far as I know, Mana is more of a Western concept that maps pretty closely onto Prana. Historically, people in the West haven't spent a whole lot of time deep-diving into the intricate energetic makeup of the human body.
The bottom line is that Qi can present itself as sexual energy, sure, but it can also show up as emotional aggression, physical strength, or spiritual willpower—even though, fundamentally, it isn't any of those specific things.
Jamie Peterson Jamie Peterson Member
15 messages
joined Sep 2004
#49 ·
Nancy Thompson3 said:No. CHI is just universal cosmic energy. It doesn't have anything to do with people, or vitality, or biology, or reproduction.

those lifeless robots are driven by ego—that was a nice way to put it.

Lifeless robots are driven by electrical energy, not some kind of ego. Robots don't have egos; they're just machines.

mostly they have black auras because their ego is full of elementals and entities, I agree with you, Quincy.

Robots don't have auras, especially not black ones. A machine doesn't have an aura; at most, it just has an electromagnetic field around it.
Imagine what happens to those types when you cut those connections, huh? They'll just die out, right? That's their only source of food. Grim, but true.

You mean, like when the power goes out?


👍
Jamie Peterson Jamie Peterson Member
15 messages
joined Sep 2004
#50 ·
Jerry Cruz said:You both have a point, haha. Sexual energy is really the only fuel we've got, and if there's any way to channel it upward into something universal, that’s what people call CHI.

Driven by ego—that’s a great way to put it. Most of those types carry these heavy, dark auras because their egos are basically crowded with low-level entities and elemental baggage. I'm with you there, Q. Just imagine what happens when you actually cut those ties for them; they'd probably just fold instantly, right? It's their only source of nourishment. Grim, but true.

I don't think that's even possible. In the Kabbalah, Chi is represented by Shekina—that feminine energy that has to be liberated from its bondage, kept pure, you know? Like an untouched essence.
Think of it this way: Excalibur (Ki) will only pull something meaningful out of the stone (matter) if the heart behind it is clean.
Sexual energy is meant to be transcended or transformed, not just leveled up into universal energy while staying the same. It's a bit like trying to force a maiden to become a mother before she's ready—it just doesn't work that way. 😉
Sean Martinez4 Sean Martinez4 Active Member
71 messages
joined Nov 2007
#51 ·
Jamie Peterson said:I don't think that's even possible. In the Kabbalah, Chi is represented by Shekina—that feminine energy that has to be liberated from its bondage, kept pure, you know? Like an untouched essence.
Think of it this way: Excalibur (Ki) will only pull something meaningful out of the stone (matter) if the heart behind it is clean.
Sexual energy is meant to be transcended or transformed, not just leveled up into universal energy while staying the same. It's a bit like trying to force a maiden to become a mother before she's ready—it just doesn't work that way. 😉

Yeah, a virgin is pure. 😬 So, are you looking for the unknown in the unknown and Sri Yantra? 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
Sean Martinez4 Sean Martinez4 Active Member
71 messages
joined Nov 2007
#52 ·
Jamie Peterson said:Why go mixing up all these different concepts and just confusing everyone?
Well, here’s the thing—Prana can manifest as sexual energy because Prana is essentially a different layer of reality; it's more like the *modus vivendi* of the second chakra that gets released when Kundalini moves through it. At least, that's how things work within the framework of Yoga.
Now, if you look at Chinese energy systems, Kundalini is basically synonymous with Qi—whether you call it Chi, Ki, or Qi. It isn't strictly "sexual energy" by definition, but it *shows up* as sexual energy when someone's conscious focus is centered right on that second chakra.
As far as I know, Mana is more of a Western concept that maps pretty closely onto Prana. Historically, people in the West haven't spent a whole lot of time deep-diving into the intricate energetic makeup of the human body.
The bottom line is that Qi can present itself as sexual energy, sure, but it can also show up as emotional aggression, physical strength, or spiritual willpower—even though, fundamentally, it isn't any of those specific things.

Chi is basically just sexual energy sitting in the hari. 😉
image
And if you raise it, it leads to enlightenment. (Or at least, that's what they say regarding the chakras.)
I guess you should probably start practicing Yoga if you're going to talk about chakras and Jewish mysticism. 😬
Even Jewish traditions have more experience with energy work than you do.
I mean, you could definitely look at Kabbalah from a magical perspective. 😬 🤣 🤣 🤣
Jamie Peterson Jamie Peterson Member
15 messages
joined Sep 2004
#53 ·
Sean Martinez4 said:Chi is basically just sexual energy sitting in the hari. 😉
image
And if you raise it, it leads to enlightenment. (Or at least, that's what they say regarding the chakras.)
I guess you should probably start practicing Yoga if you're going to talk about chakras and Jewish mysticism. 😬
Even Jewish traditions have more experience with energy work than you do.
I mean, you could definitely look at Kabbalah from a magical perspective. 😬 🤣 🤣 🤣

Well, you can take the scenic route or the highway... whatever floats your boat...
just try to stay sharp and keep your head on straight...
Jerry Cruz Jerry Cruz Newcomer
7 messages
joined May 2007
#54 ·
Nancy Thompson3 said:No. CHI is just universal cosmic energy. It doesn't have anything to do with people, or vitality, or biology, or reproduction.

those lifeless robots are driven by ego—that was a nice way to put it.

Lifeless robots are driven by electrical energy, not some kind of ego. Robots don't have egos; they're just machines.

mostly they have black auras because their ego is full of elementals and entities, I agree with you, Quincy.

Robots don't have auras, especially not black ones. A machine doesn't have an aura; at most, it just has an electromagnetic field around it.
Imagine what happens to those types when you cut those connections, huh? They'll just die out, right? That's their only source of food. Grim, but true.

You mean, like when the power goes out?


Oh, please. You think you’ve got me figured out? Heh... Please. It’s always the same old song and dance, isn't it? Robots taking over, the struggle between man and machine, the massive egos involved, even the food... it just goes on and on. Blah, blah, blah.
CHI-TIMUS! It’s that universal kind of love, isn't it? Right there between the ribs. Whether we're looking at the massive scale of the cosmos or the tiny atoms making up our skin, it's all the same thing. We're just part of the whole, aren't we?
Jerry Cruz Jerry Cruz Newcomer
7 messages
joined May 2007
#55 ·
I’ve got an idea. When one of you actually hits that moment of true enlightenment—that sudden, blinding clarity—don't just sit there. Tell us about the experience. We need to hear the raw details, the actual feeling of it, rather than just dry theories from some textbook in a library.😉.....
Nancy Thompson3 Nancy Thompson3 Active Member
86 messages
joined Apr 2007
#56 ·
Jerry Cruz said:Oh, please. You think you’ve got me figured out? Heh... Please. It’s always the same old song and dance, isn't it? Robots taking over, the struggle between man and machine, the massive egos involved, even the food... it just goes on and on. Blah, blah, blah.
CHI-TIMUS! It’s that universal kind of love, isn't it? Right there between the ribs. Whether we're looking at the massive scale of the cosmos or the tiny atoms making up our skin, it's all the same thing. We're just part of the whole, aren't we?


We are, Nina, we really are. But since you’re feeling all this intense love, I guess I have to ask—why don't you ever actually reach out? Why are you always the one pulling away? I mean, if you didn't already know, we're basically friends here. I won't go on about it publicly, though... you're Queen of the Night!
Nancy Thompson3 Nancy Thompson3 Active Member
86 messages
joined Apr 2007
#57 ·
Sean Martinez4 said:Chi is basically just sexual energy sitting in the hari. 😉
image
And if you raise it, it leads to enlightenment. (Or at least, that's what they say regarding the chakras.)
I guess you should probably start practicing Yoga if you're going to talk about chakras and Jewish mysticism. 😬
Even Jewish traditions have more experience with energy work than you do.
I mean, you could definitely look at Kabbalah from a magical perspective. 😬 🤣 🤣 🤣

Stop attacking Jewish people; you clearly don't have the slightest clue what you're talking about.

First off, you don't know anything about chakras. The lowest chakra isn't the sexual one. The base chakra is Muladhara, while the sexual one is called Svadhisthana.
image
So, energy isn't some sexual thing trapped in an aura waiting to be raised. The only thing getting "raised" is your blood pressure when you see someone attractive that you can't have.

Energy is universal; it comes from the cosmos. It's Qi.
Your body just has these centers that receive that energy. What actually "rises" is just the permeability of the channels allowing that flow to happen.

Look, since you're clearly clueless about energy and chakras, maybe try actually learning the basics first.
This might be a good starting point for you.
Jamie Peterson Jamie Peterson Member
15 messages
joined Sep 2004
#58 ·
Jerry Cruz said:I’ve got an idea. When one of you actually hits that moment of true enlightenment—that sudden, blinding clarity—don't just sit there. Tell us about the experience. We need to hear the raw details, the actual feeling of it, rather than just dry theories from some textbook in a library.😉.....

You wouldn't find out a thing! Here’s the thing—if you want to learn what you're looking for, and specifically from someone who’s "enlightened" as you put it, you have to be enlightened yourself. But if you actually get there, there’s nothing left to "learn," is there? Otherwise, you're just staring at Budan through the tiny lens of your own limited perspective and capacity. To truly see Budan, you have to go all in—you have to fully surrender to that state of wakefulness within yourself.
Sean Martinez4 Sean Martinez4 Active Member
71 messages
joined Nov 2007
#59 ·
Jerry Cruz said:I’ve got an idea. When one of you actually hits that moment of true enlightenment—that sudden, blinding clarity—don't just sit there. Tell us about the experience. We need to hear the raw details, the actual feeling of it, rather than just dry theories from some textbook in a library.😉.....

I guess that's more like a tiny spark rather than a full light or a flame. ☕
Sean Martinez4 Sean Martinez4 Active Member
71 messages
joined Nov 2007
#60 ·
Jamie Peterson said:You wouldn't find out a thing! Here’s the thing—if you want to learn what you're looking for, and specifically from someone who’s "enlightened" as you put it, you have to be enlightened yourself. But if you actually get there, there’s nothing left to "learn," is there? Otherwise, you're just staring at Budan through the tiny lens of your own limited perspective and capacity. To truly see Budan, you have to go all in—you have to fully surrender to that state of wakefulness within yourself.

Well yeah, it's like they say: as above, so below. 😍 And as below, so below. 😬 🤣 🤣 🤣

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register