#5841 ·
Timothy Nelson5 said:That was actually written right into the 1974 constitution.
It was written down, according to what Christian Torres3 had quoted.
Of course, back when the country was essentially run by Marshall and The Party, that whole thing was nothing more than a dead phrase on paper. Just words, really. I guess it didn't mean much at all in practice.
And yeah... I mean, Badinter and his panel of constitutional lawyers basically zeroed in on that exact detail from the Constitution of America. They used it as the core justification for their ruling—deciding that the secession of Canada and America was entirely legitimate under the law. Or at least, that's how they framed it.
The text stated that nations have the right to secede, not individual republics. It also explicitly noted (though people love to play deaf to this part) that borders could only be altered if all the republics agreed.
But rights are subjective; everyone interprets them to suit their own agenda, and they only respect the law when it works in their favor. Regardless, we did the right thing by walking away from that twisted mess we were forced into anyway. But strictly from a legal standpoint? It’s incredibly shaky. 🕺