#2981 ·
Alright, I have a desire to re-engage with this discussion. I have spent a significant amount of time researching schizophrenia and various psychotic disorders. While I do not personally suffer from schizophrenia, I have experienced psychotic episodes myself—two severe ones and one milder instance—so I am quite familiar with what it feels like to exist within a distorted perception of reality. Schizophrenia, by definition, seems to be a chronic, long-term state of psychosis.
The prevailing theories suggesting that schizophrenia is strictly a brain disease seem, I suppose, rather questionable. There isn't definitive proof that it is a physiological disease in the traditional sense, because the MRI scans conducted thus far have only shown abnormalities in a small minority of cases; even in those instances, I would argue it doesn't necessarily prove that the condition is exclusively caused by schizophrenia.
In less developed nations where expensive antipsychotics aren't readily available, the recovery rates actually appear to be significantly higher than they are in "developed" Western countries.
One major taboo is the idea that people cannot recover from this "illness." That isn't entirely true, I think. The reality is that mental health patients are often treated terribly; they are handled poorly, denied hope, and deprived of the support they desperately need. They are broken individuals who communicate through metaphors to those living in "reality." They are wounded, and perhaps it is possible to "return them to reality" through specific techniques designed to decipher their metaphorical language.
Someone who hasn't endured a psychosis simply cannot understand the experience, because during my own psychosis, my reality was entirely real. My reality was just as tangible as the reality of someone who isn't psychotic. It presents a paradox: if my bizarre ideas aren't deemed acceptable by the majority, I am automatically shut down—emergency services, the police, the hospital, and an injection in the backside.
Antipsychotics were discovered somewhat by accident, and while they do seem to halt the psychotic process, one has to wonder what they leave in their wake. They leave behind people who are extremely compliant, but whose willpower and capacity to experience a quality life have been thoroughly inhibited.
I want to believe that psychosis might actually be a transformative process—a metamorphosis of the psyche that realizes there is much more to this world than just the standard nine-to-five grind. Archimedes would say, "Do not disturb my circles!" In that same vein, I would suggest that psychosis is a mystical metamorphosis of the mind, and until we have a professional staff capable of handling a fragmented psyche in an empathetic and sensitive manner, there may be no salvation for those with schizophrenia.
Ultimately, I find myself wondering—what role does schizophrenia play in the process of evolution?
The prevailing theories suggesting that schizophrenia is strictly a brain disease seem, I suppose, rather questionable. There isn't definitive proof that it is a physiological disease in the traditional sense, because the MRI scans conducted thus far have only shown abnormalities in a small minority of cases; even in those instances, I would argue it doesn't necessarily prove that the condition is exclusively caused by schizophrenia.
In less developed nations where expensive antipsychotics aren't readily available, the recovery rates actually appear to be significantly higher than they are in "developed" Western countries.
One major taboo is the idea that people cannot recover from this "illness." That isn't entirely true, I think. The reality is that mental health patients are often treated terribly; they are handled poorly, denied hope, and deprived of the support they desperately need. They are broken individuals who communicate through metaphors to those living in "reality." They are wounded, and perhaps it is possible to "return them to reality" through specific techniques designed to decipher their metaphorical language.
Someone who hasn't endured a psychosis simply cannot understand the experience, because during my own psychosis, my reality was entirely real. My reality was just as tangible as the reality of someone who isn't psychotic. It presents a paradox: if my bizarre ideas aren't deemed acceptable by the majority, I am automatically shut down—emergency services, the police, the hospital, and an injection in the backside.
Antipsychotics were discovered somewhat by accident, and while they do seem to halt the psychotic process, one has to wonder what they leave in their wake. They leave behind people who are extremely compliant, but whose willpower and capacity to experience a quality life have been thoroughly inhibited.
I want to believe that psychosis might actually be a transformative process—a metamorphosis of the psyche that realizes there is much more to this world than just the standard nine-to-five grind. Archimedes would say, "Do not disturb my circles!" In that same vein, I would suggest that psychosis is a mystical metamorphosis of the mind, and until we have a professional staff capable of handling a fragmented psyche in an empathetic and sensitive manner, there may be no salvation for those with schizophrenia.
Ultimately, I find myself wondering—what role does schizophrenia play in the process of evolution?