#1 ·
The new season for ski flying and jumping is just around the corner. I’m curious—what’s your take on how they actually score things in this sport?
Personally, I think judging the "beauty" of a flight is pretty pointless if it means the winner isn't necessarily the one who flew the furthest. It’s like if in the NFL they scored goals based on how "artistic" the play looked. Or imagine if in Formula 1, the winner wasn't the fastest driver, but whoever followed the most "aesthetic" racing line! It’s like if track and field athletes were judged on...
Anyway, they really ought to update the Olympic motto to:
faster ........more..........stronger.......PRETTIER
What do you guys think? Would ski flying be more engaging if it was purely about the distance covered?
Personally, I think judging the "beauty" of a flight is pretty pointless if it means the winner isn't necessarily the one who flew the furthest. It’s like if in the NFL they scored goals based on how "artistic" the play looked. Or imagine if in Formula 1, the winner wasn't the fastest driver, but whoever followed the most "aesthetic" racing line! It’s like if track and field athletes were judged on...
Anyway, they really ought to update the Olympic motto to:
faster ........more..........stronger.......PRETTIER
What do you guys think? Would ski flying be more engaging if it was purely about the distance covered?