#2281 ·
The jersey itself isn't even the issue, but those cowards really managed to turn a simple situation into a complete mess 🙏🙏🙂
Started by David Phillips · · 👁 206 views · 3.6K replies
rapidstag2 said:The jersey itself isn't even the issue, but those cowards really managed to turn a simple situation into a complete mess 🙏🙏🙂
cosmicfox31 said:Coming in from Scotland 🙏 🙏
rapidstag2 said:The jersey itself isn't even the issue, but those cowards really managed to turn a simple situation into a complete mess 🙏🙏🙂

Tyler Sullivan said:Man, 🙂
they'd look great in this too
it would look phenomenal 😁
Brenda Cook2 said:Linfield 😉
I just hope those are actually official shorts 😁
Jeremy Nelson5 said:I don't know if anyone else caught this, but during yesterday's match between Roma and Bayern, the outfield players were wearing kits with a different crest than the official club logo—yet the keeper was rocking the actual official one... is that even legal? It felt super weird seeing one team out there with two different logos on their shirts
Jeremy Nelson5 said:I don't know if anyone else caught this, but during yesterday's match between Roma and Bayern, the outfield players were wearing kits with a different crest than the official club logo—yet the keeper was rocking the actual official one... is that even legal? It felt super weird seeing one team out there with two different logos on their shirts


mellowowl38 said:I honestly cannot wrap my head around how Nike could pull such a massive fail with the Hajduk Split kits. It’s actually embarrassing—they shouldn't even be allowed to step onto the pitch for a CONCACAF match wearing those things...
On a brighter note, here are a few more recent ones. Seeing Le Coq Sportif on a kit Made by Nike is just top-tier design:
Then there's this absolute train wreck from AJ Auxerre. They’re clearly trying way too hard to channel that vibe from last year's Marseille away kit, but they completely missed the mark:
Amy Hughes2 said:Yeah, I was actually looking at them yesterday and noticed the difference. What exactly is the issue? 😁
Amy Hughes2 said:Yeah, I was actually looking at them yesterday and noticed the difference. What exactly is the issue? 😁
mellowowl38 said:They’ve got that weird "been there, done that" slogan printed right on them, and CONCACAF rules are super strict about lettering—you can't have extra text on the jersey unless it's the single sponsor allowed on the chest. Because of that text, they aren't even legal to wear in matches. 😁 Honestly, it’s such a massive screw-up. From a meter away, you wouldn't even realize it was text, but for a huge brand like Nike and a club like Hajduk Split to miss something like this? I guess I shouldn't be surprised from Hajduk's side, but Nike? Seriously?