frozenotter72 said:I don't see why the administration there would issue a warning about the dangers of Escozul when every hospital and institute in the country is state-run. If research is being conducted, it implies the government has sanctioned that investigation.
I'm still weighing the arguments for and against this remedy, but I can't wrap my head around how it's possible for Americans to travel en masse to get this stuff and bring it back home, or how I've read that certain foreign embassies help their citizens secure the medicine while traveling abroad.
???
I think you missed the point of the link I shared earlier containing Dr. Weill's article, where he digs a bit deeper into the investigation. I’ll translate the gist for you here—I don't have the bandwidth to go through it all myself, and honestly, the reality of the situation is pretty obvious at first glance.
According to a statement from the director general of the US Food and Drug Administration, some laboratory research has been done on Escozul. But these studies were described as "preclinical," and not involving human subjects. I understand that some pharmacological and toxicological studies were carried out on animals. These are the usual first phases of research to determine whether or not a new product causes harm and how it behaves pharmacologically. But US health authorities insist that they have not authorized the production or use of Escozul because they have no evidence for its safety and efficacy in the treatment of disease in humans.
It would be particularly foolish to pin your hopes on Escozul or other unproven cancer therapies in place of using treatments known to be effective.
Translation:
Per the statement from the director general of the US Food and Drug Administration, some lab work on Escozul has taken place. These studies are classified as preclinical, meaning they weren't performed on people. From what I gather, certain pharmacological and toxicological tests were done on animals. This is just standard early-stage testing to figure out if a substance is toxic and how it interacts biologically. Regardless, US health authorities insist that they have not authorized the production or use of Escozul because they have no evidence for its safety and efficacy in the treatment of disease in humans.
It would be especially reckless to pin all your hopes on Escozul or any other unverified cancer therapy instead of sticking with treatments that have actually proven themselves effective.There you go—that’s the medical perspective. But speaking as a layman who has been dealing with these issues for a while and has even wandered down those alternative paths myself, wouldn't I do anything to save my own mother's life? Luckily, somewhere deep in my brain, I still carry a piece of wisdom from my great-grandmother—a wise, brave, and somewhat uneducated woman who used to say: "Lord, give us health, but above all, give us common sense." You have to stay rational, informed, and educated about these things, because mistakes here can be fatal.
As for those people traveling abroad to get it, it's just as possible as it is that someone who killed three people using MMSom—someone who was stripped of their medical license and faced criminal charges—is still profiting off desperate people praying for a miracle.
You have to realize that if you’re looking for something "proven" and effective that exists outside the realm of actual science—outside the rigorous studies conducted under strict standards to ensure people don't get hurt—you're chasing a ghost. It's all just smoke and mirrors, and frankly, you're gambling with your own life and taking full responsibility for the fallout.