northerncrane4 said:@vivideagle7/">@@vivideagle7
If itβs just a symbol, then the symbol itself is fundamentally flawed. What was even the point? It wouldn't be about some esoteric pull drawing us in; instead, it would just mean she has the exact same voice and scars as the doll he just slept with. That feels pointless. π
SPOILERI don't know, I feel like that part is up to how you personally see it. My take is that he wanted to highlight the tension between being similar and being differentβthe person versus the object. Lisa and the doll share certain qualities, sure, but the doll stays frozen while people change. With every new person, much like with Lisa, there's this sense of getting burned out until the voices start sounding masculine again.
I don't think it was meant to be a literal thing. He used those symbols to draw parallels between the doll and Lisa, but I doubt he was trying to say Lisa *is* a doll in a literal sense.
Either way, Kaufman is really driving home that feeling of total burnout and misery within the relationship.