CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › Thoughts on Anomalisa (2015)?

Thoughts on Anomalisa (2015)?

Started by Jack Murphy5 · · 👁 7 views · 51 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Jack Murphy5northerncrane4Patrick Martinvivideagle7Jason Fowler57goldenhound32bluenomad2Matthew Anderson4Jesse Thomas7ruggedjackal46electriccanyon26casualcobra5goldenscout14Jamie Turner80Eric Newman4Jeffrey Ramos4Amanda Robinson4
northerncrane4 northerncrane4 Regular
384 messages
joined Aug 2005
#41 ·
Nicole Jones13 said:ruggedjackal46,

A-ha—if the point wasn't about the doll, wouldn't the argument be that the moment he slept with her, all that "unique charm" vanished and she became just like everyone else? Voice and all.

The point: some male pig?

The point: a broken individual. The point: this whole "searching for something special" routine is just an elaborate apology for pure narcissism.
electriccanyon26 electriccanyon26 Active Member
70 messages
joined Oct 2019
#42 ·
One small thing: the hotel is called Al Pacino.
casualcobra5 casualcobra5 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Sep 2011
#43 ·
SPOILER ALERT

If it’s actually true that the director intended for the whole story with Lisa to be just some byproduct of Michael’s episode while he was screwing a mechanical doll, then this movie loses massive points in my book.

If Lisa was just a figment of his sick imagination, then what's the point of the lecture scene where he sees her in the crowd along with everyone else? What's with the bar scene with his friend? Why even have the friend? Why the dream? What about that final scene with Lisa and the friend in the car? And why does the doll have a female voice at the end? If she "got under his skin" and ended up sounding like every other character in the film, why would the doll suddenly revert back to a female voice at the finish? If he had sex with the doll, that same doll should be talking like Tom Noonan.

Is it possible the similarities between the doll and Lisa are just the author's way of highlighting how special Lisa really is? Like how one specific Japanese sex toy stands out in a sea of dildos at a shop, Lisa stands out in Michael's world. I wouldn't take her "Japanese, obviously" line so literally (like "of course I'm a Japanese doll"); I think she just loves language because it's powerful and alluring (hence "obviously"). To be honest, I didn't even notice the scar on the doll.

I get that there are tons of parallels between Lisa and the doll, and it pisses me off if the creator intended to leave "enough clues for both interpretations so the viewer can decide," but my gut feeling after everything is still that the links between the doll and Lisa are just there to emphasize how unique Lisa is.

By the way, seeing semen leaking from the doll didn't shock me at all. The first scene we see after Michael buys the doll is him showering, with his clothes and shoes scattered all over the hotel room like he couldn't wait to strip down and go after the doll. It's not even a question of whether he slept with the doll; it feels more like he already did it before he ever heard Lisa's voice.
casualcobra5 casualcobra5 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Sep 2011
#44 ·
SPOILER ALERT

Besides, if Lisa is just some Japanese doll, why the hell would she even need a Japanese dictionary to figure out what the word Anomalisa means?
Jesse Thomas7 Jesse Thomas7 Active Member
54 messages
joined Nov 2017
#45 ·
casualcobra5 said:SPOILER ALERT

This Japanese sex toy in the store stands out from the crowd of dildos just like how Lisa stands out in Michael's world.

And here we go, back at our friend's place. 🎉

The "friend everyone usually wants" is the dildo, while the doll—or Lisa—hasn't even been glanced at on the shelf for years. 🤣

And before things get heated, Lisa also makes sure to emphasize just how long it's been since anyone even pulled her off that shelf.

Look, I mean, occasionally your arguments actually make sense and aren't totally half-baked, but I’m sticking to my guns: the biggest letdown for me would be the sheer pointlessness and futility of trying to force all those connections just to reach the goal of saying doll equals Lisa.
goldenscout14 goldenscout14 Active Member
68 messages
joined Nov 2011
#46 ·
spoiler alert

The man is depressed, disillusioned with life, and frankly delusional. As a defense mechanism against his own mental reality—numbed by constant disappointment—he constructs a fantasy world that eventually collapses under its own weight. He’s hit by a brutal midlife crisis, and even though he’s successful professionally and has a family, he remains chronically dissatisfied, spiraling into an obsession that crosses every line of normalcy. It seems he's so deeply unstable that he manages to wreck even his own fictional relationship, leaving himself completely devoid of emotional fulfillment. Every single one of his connections ends the exact same way. In the end, he finds a semblance of peace and an escape from a reality that fails to satisfy him (returning home) through yet another fantasy—Lisa and her friend talking to him while driving in a car. But given how prone he is to self-sabotage, even within his own delusions, one has to wonder how long this latest illusion will actually last? Perhaps the ending can be viewed as a sense of closure for everything that unfolded at the hotel, serving as just another flight from the situation waiting for him back home.

There are far too many breadcrumbs left by Kaufman suggesting that Lisa is actually a figment of his imagination; if he didn't want us to take the film too literally, why include the scar, the singing, the sperm, Lisa calling herself Anomalisa, the name of the hotel (as Stumper pointed out earlier), his medication, or the breakdown during his speech? It’s simply too much. If all of this was merely intended to add a layer of mystery—just to mystify and confuse the audience for the sake of it—then I don't think Kaufman would ever stoop that low. On the other hand, perhaps it serves to illustrate the sheer depth of the crisis the protagonist is enduring.
It’s quite profound.
northerncrane4 northerncrane4 Regular
384 messages
joined Aug 2005
#47 ·
So there you have it... I actually sat through an hour of Kaufman on Marc Maron, specifically listening to them discuss Anomalisa, and the puppet isn't even mentioned—it turns out the story was originally a radio drama, which means any supposed connection between Lisa and the puppet couldn't have been intended in the first place.

Go ahead, prove me wrong.
Jason Fowler57 Jason Fowler57 Member
14 messages
joined Apr 2023
#48 ·
I’m sticking to my guns regarding how I view the movie. To me, that doll is just the one lingering souvenir from his whole adventure with Anomalisa. If anyone wants to go looking for deeper connections beyond the symbolism, well, good luck to them.
Jamie Turner80 Jamie Turner80 Member
37 messages
joined Jul 2009
#49 ·
I honestly think Lisa and the doll are both just damaged goods. They both stand apart from the crowd, but in a way that only Michael would ever notice. He projects this sense of uniqueness onto both of them; Lisa isn't actually a doll, but Michael attributes those exact same qualities to her because he’s just so utterly desperate throughout the entire film.
Eric Newman4 Eric Newman4 Member
27 messages
joined Oct 2013
#50 ·
One great analysis over on IMDb... spoiler alert

spoiler alert: the reason Anomalisa is so amazing is because it is a complex psychological film about Michael's mind and struggles. It’s also a testament to human connection. The movie stays pretty cryptic with its explanations, but everything starts to click once the context settles in. Anomalisa is a prime example of how bleak storytelling ought to be... At first, it feels a bit airy and difficult to untangle, but once you find that tiny pinhole of context, the narrative really opens up into much deeper territory...

Michael deals with this rare psychological condition known as Fregoli Delusion.

The Fregoli Delusion—or the delusion of doubles—is this incredibly rare disorder where someone genuinely believes that various different people are actually just one single person constantly changing their look or wearing disguises...

It’s a subtle detail about Michael... he spends so much time obsessing over psychological issues, and then you have the hotel itself being named The Fregoli. Plus, there's the whole thing where every single character sounds exactly the same...

It’s like this hotel is just some twisted version of the one he’s actually staying in during his business trip...

Theory: Michael is dreaming... or maybe it's just a form of hysteria where dreams and reality collide.

In that opening scene where the camera tracks a plane through the clouds before panning back to the cabin where Michael sits staring out the window... was that actually a separate aircraft, or just the one he’s currently on? Some people experience dreams in the third person. Then you have the guy passed out next to him, mumbling about how holding his wife's hand is just pure instinct. It ties right back into those recurring themes of Michael's sexual frustrations that pop up throughout the whole movie...

The reality of Michael's world changes based on his moods and patterns... like how the taxi driver’s dialogue starts repeating with other characters, even showing up on billboards. And those excessive food services on the hotel phone? That felt just as off... totally unrealistic.

Michael dives into his own sexual frustrations, starting with his ex, Bella. He spends time wondering where she ended up all these years after they split. He actually tracks her down in a phone book, finding her full name is Bella Amarossi. It got me thinking about her name after mulling over "Anomalisa" and how that’s a play on two different words... and I'm starting to think Amarossi might be a play on words too. Maybe there's a link between "Amorous" and "Rossi." The actual Bella Michael used to date might have really been Bella Rossi, which would make the word "Amorous" a pretty significant clue...

Amorous—basically just a fancy way of saying someone is feeling a little too much desire... or just plain horny.

It looks like Michael really is struggling with those intense, lustful desires... things he basically has to summon up manually.

Lisa—or more accurately, the version of Lisa that Michael conjured up—isn't actually real. My theory? Michael probably had a one-night stand with an actual woman named Lisa and maybe even took advantage of her, but this "Anomalisa" character is nothing more than his own projection of an ideal woman. It’s a mental construct... likely a play on the words "anomaly" and "Lisa."

Anomaly—something that breaks the mold, or just doesn't fit the standard pattern...

Michael basically put this woman on a pedestal and framed her as some kind of "Goddess of Heaven," which is exactly how the movie defines those two words combined. Basically, Anomalisa is just Michael's ideal woman...

The following day, Lisa's girlfriend warns her to keep her distance. Apparently, he isn't right in the head. She's just trying to look out for her... protecting her from someone who clearly took advantage of her.

Michael harbored this hope that Anomalisa—the character he projected onto a woman—would be the ultimate cure for his delusions. It actually seemed to work for a bit, mostly because she was the only one who didn't sound like everyone else in the film...

The lyrics in the credits carry a lot of weight. They tell the story of a guy meeting countless people, yet none of them are actually *you*—the woman he hasn’t even met yet, the one from his dreams. Then the song shifts, describing how he occasionally reconstructs your imaginary voice in his sleep, playing out what a perfect relationship might look like... It all wraps up with this heavy emphasis on the possibility that, maybe one day, he'll just run into you on a street corner.

To wrap things up: Anomalisa is essentially an exploration of a man’s sexual frustration, isolation, and mental glitches within a dream-like state during a business trip. There's the irony of being a public speaker yet so disconnected from human connection, yet he clings to the hope of finding "the one" so intensely that he actually dreams it into existence. He projects his vision of the ideal woman onto a random one-night stand, only to wake up and realize she’s just another face in the crowd—not the cure he was looking for. Even after returning home to his family, the struggle remains...

Total tragedy.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2401878/...7?ref_=tt_bd_2
Jeffrey Ramos4 Jeffrey Ramos4 Active Member
188 messages
joined Nov 2008
#51 ·
Eric Newman4 said:Michael suffers from a rare psychological disorder known as Fregoli Delusion.
...
Anomalisa is Michael's ideal woman.
...
To wrap things up: Anomalisa dives into a man's sexual frustration, his isolation, and his internal psychological flaws through a dream-like lens during a business trip. There's the irony of being a public speaker yet so disconnected from human connection, yet he clamors onto the possibility of finding the right one so much he dreams of it. He projects this ideal version of a woman onto a one-night stand, only to wake up the next morning and realize she’s just like everyone else—not the cure he was looking for. Even when he returns to his family, the suffering continues.

Total tragedy.

That’s exactly how I interpreted it too. Honestly, the movie is just incredibly depressing.
Amanda Robinson4 Amanda Robinson4 Active Member
159 messages
joined Nov 2014
#52 ·
Finally, an animated flick that’s actually existential and depressing. 🙂

Reading through this thread after finishing it, I honestly can't figure out where everyone went wrong... people are reading this doll as if she's supposed to be Lisa, turning the whole thing into some weird Lisa fantasy. 🤷 Sure, there's plenty of symbolism flying around, but at its core, it's really just about a main character hitting a massive midlife crisis—he's totally messed up, frustrated, and just plain miserable.

People keep throwing the name "Fregol" around, which is basically the only part you can actually Google that relates to the plot—that whole delusion where everyone starts looking exactly the same. But honestly? The movie doesn't really dig much deeper than what's right in front of you.

It's strange, it's odd, it's tragic... but man, it really sticks with you.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads