CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › IT › Software › Urgent... Microsoft Word question

Urgent... Microsoft Word question

Started by Peter Johnson4 · · 👁 3 views · 16 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Peter Johnson4Jacob Johnson70redheron12slycrane94brightrider8stormybadger10Angela Wilson4dustycanyon6John Palmer4
Peter Johnson4 Peter Johnson4 NewcomerOP
3 messages
joined Aug 2009
#1 ·
Whenever I’m working on a formula in Microsoft Word, I run into this issue. If I want to write x², I don't want it to look like x times two; I need that little number sitting right underneath the x—the subscript version, not the exponent.
...So, what's the fix here?

The same thing happens when I'm dealing with a summation symbol. I need to place things like n = 1, 2... m directly above the sigma.
How on earth do I pull that off?

Seriously, someone please give me a hand here.
Jacob Johnson70 Jacob Johnson70 Member
42 messages
joined Oct 2021
#2 ·
There’s an equation editor available. It uses the symbol for "square root of alpha"—I have to type it out since I can't use the actual symbol here. Basically, you use the equation editor to format formulas and all that math stuff.
The only question is whether you actually have it installed. Just search "equation editor" in the Microsoft Word help menu; if it’s there, the icon will pop up, and if not, it'll tell you. You should find the installer on your Office suites disc somewhere.
Peter Johnson4 Peter Johnson4 NewcomerOP
3 messages
joined Aug 2009
#3 ·
Thanks!

I managed to track it down within my Office suites and got it installed..
Now I actually have to sit down and study the thing just to figure out how to insert those markers...
To be honest, I don't even know the technical term for what I'm looking for.
All in all...
Good grief.
redheron12 redheron12 Regular
306 messages
joined Aug 2008
#4 ·
If I recall correctly, you don't actually need Excel—it should be enough to just select two characters, adjust the font settings, and toggle the subscript or superscript option...
Jacob Johnson70 Jacob Johnson70 Member
42 messages
joined Oct 2021
#5 ·
Peter Johnson4 said:Thanks.

I found it in the Office suites and got it installed...
Now I actually have to learn how to use it to figure out how to add those markers...
I don't even know what this thing is called...
All in all...
What a mess.

Can you see the toolbars? If not, go to View - Toolbar. They should show up now.
Once they're visible, just click the one you need and it'll pop up. You can move to where you want to type using the arrow keys or your mouse. From experience, the arrow keys are easier.
Just play around with it; you'll get the hang of it soon enough.
Oh, and if the font or numbers look too small, go to Size - Define and adjust it there.
Jacob Johnson70 Jacob Johnson70 Member
42 messages
joined Oct 2021
#6 ·
redheron12 said:If I recall correctly, you don't actually need the equation editor. Just select the two characters, go to the font settings, and toggle subscript or superscript. Simple enough, right?

That works, sure. But what happens when you're staring down a summation from i=1 to n?🙂>
redheron12 redheron12 Regular
306 messages
joined Aug 2008
#7 ·
😁 truth

only then will they stop using Microsoft Word 😁
slycrane94 slycrane94 Active Member
58 messages
joined Dec 2002
#8 ·
LaTeX is actually a solution for writing. Microsoft Word is barely good enough for a shopping list (and even then, it’s pushing it)
brightrider8 brightrider8 Member
10 messages
joined Dec 2007
#9 ·
slycrane94 said:If you actually want to write anything meaningful, you go with LaTeX. Microsoft Word is barely good enough for a grocery list, and honestly, even that feels like a stretch.

I’m right there with you.

And look, if you want proof of how much of a disaster Microsoft Word really is, just look at the absolute chaos I've witnessed from people who actually try to format their entire damn resumes in Excel. It's a nightmare.
stormybadger10 stormybadger10 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Jan 2005
#10 ·
You have all the necessary tools at your disposal—so why not just go ahead and utilize exponents and indices?
stormybadger10 stormybadger10 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Jan 2005
#11 ·
brightrider8 said:I couldn't agree more.

How much of the struggle with Microsoft Word is actually just user error? I mean, I’ve personally witnessed people attempting to draft their entire resumes in Excel, which really speaks volumes about the learning curve.


He has a point, though. It feels like an impossible task until you finally sit down and actually master it, and then... well, everything changes.
slycrane94 slycrane94 Active Member
58 messages
joined Dec 2002
#12 ·
stormybadger10 said:You're right until you actually try to teach him, and then... well...

It's obvious you aren't doing anything substantial with it. Once you start working on actual projects, feel free to reach out with your experiences.
Angela Wilson4 Angela Wilson4 Newcomer
8 messages
joined Jul 2006
#13 ·
I’ve been putting together actual papers using Microsoft Word, and honestly, I haven't really felt like anything was missing.
I mean, I use Microsoft Word every single day, and I just don't see how it could be considered bad—if anything, it feels like every new version is getting better. Of course, you can't really expect the software to just read your mind and have you using it like a total pro right out of the gate without any hiccups, especially for your specific needs, slycrane94! 😛 😬 (I guess you’d need to be Bill Gates himself to get all that perfect right away! 😁)
So, yeah... maybe we shouldn't be so quick to trash the program if we haven't really mastered how to work with it yet 😛 😁
dustycanyon6 dustycanyon6 Active Member
82 messages
joined Dec 2005
#14 ·
slycrane94 said:You clearly aren't doing anything heavy-duty with it. Come back and talk once you start working on actual professional papers... then we can chat about the experience.

Look, Microsoft Word is honestly plenty for most people. And honestly? It’s kind of a problem when folks struggle to use it properly... though I get why they might. For me, it gets a little frustrating when I can't tweak every tiny detail exactly how I want, but for the average user or just everyday tasks, it's pretty much perfect. Sure, you could grab some niche software for those super specific edge cases, but let's be real... hardly anyone actually needs that...
John Palmer4 John Palmer4 Active Member
50 messages
joined Oct 2008
#15 ·
I honestly think most people would be perfectly happy just using OpenOffice. Why pay extra when you can get it for free?
dustycanyon6 dustycanyon6 Active Member
82 messages
joined Dec 2005
#16 ·
John Palmer4 said:I honestly think most people are perfectly fine just sticking with OpenOffice. It’s free, after all... why bother?

That’s true. It’s just that most folks are already so used to Microsoft Word that switching feels like a massive headache... you know, having to "relearn" everything. But for someone just starting out? It's a solid option.
slycrane94 slycrane94 Active Member
58 messages
joined Dec 2002
#17 ·
Kitty said:I’ve written actual papers in Word before and never felt like it was lacking anything.
I use Word every single day and honestly don't find it bad—if anything, every new version seems better. Of course, you can't expect the software to just read your mind or expect to be a pro from day one, especially when trying to force it to do exactly what you need, slycrane94! 😛 😬 (for that, you'd basically need to be Bill Gates! 😁)
So maybe don't trash the program if you haven't mastered it yet. 😛 😁

Look, I get it. I used it myself until I started working on massive 100–200 page documents packed with math, graphs, and strict formatting requirements. Honestly, just dealing with how Word moves images around is enough reason to quit.

Compare a document written in LaTeX to one in Word. Then look at how much less effort the LaTeX version takes. Everything is automated, and you can even use online databases for citations where all the data is pre-filled, making the bibliography effortless.

It is what it is. Word (or OpenOffice) works fine for most people, but certain tasks demand more serious tools.
It's like Excel; it's perfectly fine when you're playing around with small datasets. But once you start processing hundreds of megabytes, you realize it just wasn't built for that scale.
And let's be real, neither Word nor Excel were designed for those heavy-duty tasks, so why does everyone get so worked up when I point that out?

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads