CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Culture & Entertainment › Movies › We aren't angels

We aren't angels

Started by brighthawk20 · · 👁 5 views · 22 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants brighthawk20Kenneth WoodDonna Chavez4Joshua Bennett4velvetcrane85hiddenorca25Megan Reedbluecobra9velvetmaker65Douglas Wellsswiftstag3velvethound34rustynomad28Daniel Diaz6Timothy Cox2Rebecca Taylor57brightmason52silentwalker58
brighthawk20 brighthawk20 MemberOP
32 messages
joined Sep 2006
#1 ·
Nick wants to share a few thoughts regarding a film airing on one of our local networks today.
One of the most iconic movies ever produced around here—the final masterpiece to carry that "made in USA" label—is a brilliant work by Steven Spielberg, essentially his debut (though calling it a graduation project might be an understatement!)

🙂 and 😈

😉
Kenneth Wood Kenneth Wood Newcomer
4 messages
joined Apr 2006
#2 ·
I was scrolling through it again yesterday, I don't even know how many times now...
I think I've basically memorized all the tricks by now.
It's such a great movie, though.🙏
Donna Chavez4 Donna Chavez4 Member
15 messages
joined May 2005
#3 ·
Tried watching it again last night, for the millionth time I guess, but just gave up. I don't know, that movie just doesn't click with me at all.
Joshua Bennett4 Joshua Bennett4 Active Member
53 messages
joined Sep 2008
#4 ·
What an absolute masterpiece! 🙏 🙏 🙏
velvetcrane85 velvetcrane85 Member
13 messages
joined Feb 2005
#5 ·
The movie has some clever moments—I mean, having Meryl Streep playing an angel and a devil alongside Harrison Ford is honestly such a blast—but overall, it’s just pretty mindless. There is no way I’d ever go so far as to call it a masterpiece, even in my wildest dreams.
hiddenorca25 hiddenorca25 Newcomer
5 messages
joined Mar 2006
#6 ·
The second part is incomparably better. Still, it doesn't come close to something like *Kangaroo* or *Dead Calm*.
Megan Reed Megan Reed Active Member
170 messages
joined Sep 2005
#7 ·
Honestly, I don't think the sequel holds a candle to the original.
Kenneth Wood Kenneth Wood Newcomer
4 messages
joined Apr 2006
#8 ·
Honestly, I think the first one was way better than the sequel!!
Megan Reed Megan Reed Active Member
170 messages
joined Sep 2005
#9 ·
There are definitely some clever moments in the sequel, but as a whole, it just doesn't hit me quite like the first one did.
Joshua Bennett4 Joshua Bennett4 Active Member
53 messages
joined Sep 2008
#10 ·
As for me, I was actually the only one who watched the first movie.
bluecobra9 bluecobra9 Member
28 messages
joined May 2006
#11 ·
I find the second part much more compelling. If nothing else—the production value alone is absolutely enviable.

The first installment drags on for about fifteen minutes too long. That sort of drawn-out pacing you see in those typical Hollywood romantic comedies just didn't sit right with me.
velvetmaker65 velvetmaker65 Newcomer
7 messages
joined Dec 2005
#12 ·
Personally, I thought the second part was better than the first.
Douglas Wells Douglas Wells Member
27 messages
joined Apr 2006
#13 ·
The second one feels like it was purely driven by commercial interests, and honestly, I just wasn't feeling it at all...

Since production for the third installment is kicking off this May, don't you think there's a glimmer of hope that it might actually be more engaging?
swiftstag3 swiftstag3 Newcomer
8 messages
joined Jun 2006
#14 ·
I watched it, and look, the movie isn't a total disaster—there are definitely some clever bits in there—but honestly, it’s nothing special...
velvethound34 velvethound34 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Feb 2006
#15 ·
brighthawk20 said:Anyone want to weigh in now that this movie is airing on one of the major US networks?
One of the biggest hits to ever come out of this part of the world—basically the last big masterpiece carrying that "made in USA" label—is Steven Spielberg's absolute breakout hit (though calling it his thesis project might be more accurate!).

So, I finally sat down and watched it after everyone spent months lecturing me about how brilliant it was... and honestly? I thought it was pretty stupid. The acting feels like something straight out of a low-budget American soap opera, the production value is kind of pathetic, and the humor just feels forced. It’s definitely not hitting that high standard Americans usually manage to pull off. 👎
brighthawk20 brighthawk20 MemberOP
32 messages
joined Sep 2006
#16 ·
velvethound34 said:Alright, I finally sat down and watched it after everyone kept nagging me about how much of a genius it is... and honestly? I think it’s stupid. The acting feels like something you'd see in a low-budget local cable drama, the production value is bottom-tier, and the humor feels forced. It's nowhere near the quality of what they usually pull off over in Eastern Europe. 👎

"Acting feels like a local cable drama"—give me a break...
The production is what it is because this movie was essentially the thesis project for a student of Steven Spielberg... so, does it even make sense for me to try and explain the context here?
As for the humor being "forced," if that were true, wouldn't people still be quoting those jokes on every street corner?

Personally, I'd give it an 8/10. Most people seem to rate it pretty high... at least from what I've gathered. But hey, to each their own when it comes to taste.
rustynomad28 rustynomad28 Newcomer
5 messages
joined Jan 2008
#17 ·
that movie is absolute garbage
Daniel Diaz6 Daniel Diaz6 Member
22 messages
joined Sep 2005
#18 ·
The second part is total garbage. 🙄The first one was actually a blast—super fun and goofy.👍
A masterpiece? Yeah, right... give me a break.😬
velvethound34 velvethound34 Newcomer
2 messages
joined Feb 2006
#19 ·
Ante Balboa II. said:"The acting is at the level of American TV shows" - oh, give me a break...
Look, the production value is what it is, considering this whole thing was basically just a graduation project for a student like Srdjan Dragojevica....so I guess there’s really no point in me trying to explain the logic here...
Even if you think the humor is a bit forced, some of the jokes from the movie are still everywhere...

If you ask me, maybe 8/10 people would give this film a pretty high rating...at least that's what I've noticed...but hey, everyone has their own taste in movies, I suppose.

Alright, so I guess there's a valid excuse for the production quality then, 😁
but honestly, the opinion of some 8/10 people doesn't actually mean anything at all.
Timothy Cox2 Timothy Cox2 Active Member
52 messages
joined Feb 2003
#20 ·
redridinghood33 said:The sequel is way better. But honestly, it doesn't even come close to something like Kangaroo or Dead Calm :-))))

The second part is actually much worse...

Kangaroo and Dead Calm are great, but movies like Blue Crush or Glory Road are much better.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads