CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › briskhound2 › Posts

Posts by briskhound2

770 posts shown.

Jack Nicholson Giveaway!!! (Oct 25 - 28) in Movies ·
Anthony Smith3 said:Look... you've got three days to prep... plus there's no rule saying you have to answer questions by a specific deadline... so I don't think you should run into any issues🙂😁

Dammit... that's clearly on them (the manufacturers), because the DVD arrived at my place exactly how I sent it to you, still sealed. If you want... send it back to me, I'll figure out what's going on and try to track down a replacement for you.👍

Man, I finally realized the issue is just down to the manufacturer... honestly, it's one of those things. I think I'll try my luck at a buddy's place—he's actually got a HAL 9000... 😁If it turns out to be the same thing, I'll just shoot it back over to you. Honestly, don't even bother stressing about hunting it down—Sin City runs like a dream on this setup, so I'm pretty happy with how things are looking... 😛
Jack Nicholson Giveaway!!! (Oct 25 - 28) in Movies ·
Nice...👍 (even though I’m feeling pretty meh about Jack Nicholson, I guess I'll join in just to keep the tradition alive for 😁—not that I'm expecting anything better than a total disaster)

Just one little thing, Anthony Smith3, I think you might have been misled regarding that Mexican trilogy. None of the movies actually play... tried it on a few DVDs and two different PCs. It pulls up the menu and then just stalls. 😢
Dracula in Movies ·
Keith Kelly3 said:Maybe you skipped statistics in high school or college—clearly you don't get how polls actually work. The poll itself is fine; just because there isn't much to argue about doesn't mean it's broken.

Then enlighten us. Give us something interesting. 🤷

Enough with the off-topic nonsense. I read somewhere they're filming a biopic about Dracula—starring Christian Bale himself—and it's going to be based on Dracula as an actual historical figure.☕

Polls are totally fine if they're put together properly. They can spark some great discussions around here, usually revolving around people's takes on specific titles. It’s simpler than that—just asking which version hits harder.

So, give us something to work with. 🤷

It’s pretty hard to do that when nothing is being offered... there’s just no material to actually talk about.

A bit of off-topic chatter here—I read somewhere that they're filming a biopic about Dracula, starring Worthington himself, and it’s focusing on him as a historical figure. ☕

If we're talking about Vlad Tepes, then that's got zero to do with the actual topic. Even Stoker mentioned he didn't find his inspiration in him; he just liked the nickname Dracul (the dragon's son) and used it for the main character.

Anyway, getting back on track...

Thanks to those terrible, robot-style movie translations, I wasted a massive amount of fucking time before I realized which Dracula was the one that stuck with me. Specifically, I saw the first one when I was maybe 8 or 9 years old and it scared the living shit out of me...

image

Count Dracula (1977)

Quote : for those familiar with Bram Stoker's novel, this adaptation follows the book quite closely in most respects.

The interesting thing is that it was originally filmed in two parts and only later edited together into one full movie.
Dracula in Movies ·
Quote : for those familiar with Bram Stoker's
Keith Kelly3 said:I mean, seriously... the guy set up his poll the way he did, so what? He put the movie descriptions a bit lower down—it would’ve been cooler if he’d tossed in a few pictures, but he decided against it. Personally, I think the poll is fine. There’s really no point in making a huge deal out of nothing 🤷

Look, nobody's saying we need to reinvent the wheel here, but let's be real—these polls have been chewed over so many times that the basic ground rules are basically set in stone already. So... what's the actual harm in just polishing them up a bit? It’s not like we're starting from scratch. Besides, everyone pretty much agrees at this point: if you don't have a poll option, it's just straight-up spam. And don't even get me started on that...Look, what’s on the table is what’s on the table... you just gotta cast your vote and deal with it. I mean, that’s exactly why they started shutting down those polls in the first place...
Dracula in Movies ·
Elizabeth Newman2 said:Quote : for those familiar with Bram Stoker's

Yep. 😉 .

Quote : for those familiar with Bram Stoker's

Dracula why? 🤷 Please explain your reasoning.

Quote : for those familiar with Bram Stoker's

Dracula why—I mean, seriously? 🤷 I guess you should probably explain yourselves—if you can. Justify your answers, maybe?

Nah. That poll up there is actually from Donna Gray4.

Checked out briskhound2's poll. It’s all fine, except they aren't exactly being patriotic: they don't translate the movie titles or even bother putting periods after the years.

What kind of "patriotism" are we talking about when it comes to a PDF rip? Why would you even bother translating titles when it's way easier just to find them in the original English? And honestly, who cares about a period after a year when the rest of the formatting is such a mess... You just drop the links to the movies you're polling, throw in a cover image so people actually know what they're looking at, clean it up a little bit, and then you have something to talk about...

And the big one— there aren't even options for any alternative titles
Dracula in Movies ·
Elizabeth Newman2 said:One thread is for the best Dracula movie, while this one is for the best adaptation of the actual Dracula novel.

I checked out briskhound2's poll. It’s basically the same thing—he just isn't being patriotic, I guess—since he doesn't translate movie titles or bother with periods after years. It probably just means he's influenced by American English, nothing more.

And technically, it's not even briskhound2's survey 😉
Knight & Day (2010) in Movies ·
Surprisingly fun—the action scenes are definitely over the top (though they're executed really well), and the Cruise / Diaz pairing has that certain chemistry... some solid dialogue too... it basically works as a perfect little brain-off escape...
The Expendables sweepstakes! in Movies ·
Yup, just showed up about half an hour ago. My mail still feels like it's being delivered by a horse and buggy out here, but hey, it made it... Everything's all good.
Captain America: The First Avenger (2011) in Movies ·
ruggedjackal46 said:Joe Johnston? Honestly, I wasn't a fan of his "Wolfman" at all. The movie just felt completely soulless, and visually? It didn't really do much for me either. At this rate, I've got a feeling this upcoming film isn't going to be anything to write home about.

Take a look... So, I was revisiting *The Rocketeer* from '91 the other day... man, talk about a total nostalgia trip. It’s one of those movies that just hits different when you realize how much heart they actually put into it—no big CGI explosions or mindless chaos, just pure, old-school adventure vibes. It’s got that breezy, pulp-fiction feel that feels almost extinct nowadays... honestly, it’s kind of refreshing compared to the non-stop sensory overload we get in modern blockbusters. It’s set in this gorgeous, stylized version of LA back in the day, and everything about the aesthetic—the planes, the suits, the whole retro-future look—is just spot on. It doesn't try too hard to be "gritty" or "dark," which is probably why it holds up so well. It’s just a simple, well-told story about a guy finding himself through a jetpack and some serious guts. If you haven't seen it in a while, or if you missed it during the original run, it's definitely worth a late-night watch... just something smooth to sink into.It feels a bit more aligned with the Avengers vibe...
Rambo series in Movies ·
Anthony Smith3 said:Nah, at the end of the day... he’s already made peace with the fact they were gone the second he left them on that shore... and when the priest shows up with news they’ve been captured, he isn't even sure if she’s still breathing. As far as he's concerned... she might already be dead and buried fifty times over. At that point, he just can't run from what he's been dodging his whole life... which is stepping into the fray.

My take was that he doesn't actually care whether she's alive or dead—given the circumstances, it's more likely she's gone—but rather, he gets pulled into the fight to repay her for treating him like an actual human being. Honestly, he owes it to her to try and find her because she was the one who truly saw him as a person, even in his role as a warrior. There are little details like that scattered through the whole series (don't know if it's accidental or intentional)... like how Carus doesn't get seriously hurt in the first movie (he's the only one who complained about the station procedures), then you have the whole situation with the girl in the second part, and that scene where he puts her necklace around his neck in the third. Maybe I'm just overthinking it, but the underlying motive through all the films seems to be Rambo returning humanity with humanity. Because she’s the first one who looks at him like he's just some regular guy. In the first one—the locals see him as a psycho; the second—she sees him as a soldier trying to settle a lost war; the third—they see him as a killing machine to help them fight; and the fourth—just a regular man who's a long way from home.

The movie also touches on how no matter how hard people try to fix things through diplomacy, or how much they commit themselves to establishing peace in certain parts of the world, unfortunately, that isn't always the best solution... it tells us that sometimes violence is necessary to curb violence, that sometimes you really do have to meet force with force.

That explanation of yours would probably fit the third movie better. The fourth one has those intense scenes showing military excess (honestly reminds me of some stuff from our own domestic conflicts), but the conflict itself isn't really the point—at least not for me. Throughout the whole film, nobody is actually initiating the fight; the whole premise is built on the exact opposite... avoiding the conflict. Right up until the finale. But neither Rambo nor the mercenaries go there to cause chaos. He's there for personal reasons, while they're just there for the paycheck. Nobody cares about the conflict in Myanmar, or the victims, or making a point about the damage these wars do (that's actually where the movie works best). In the third one, maybe they focused a bit too much on the local insurgents complaining about the Russian regime and put Rambo right in the middle of it, but the core message is that you have to show aggressors you have teeth and won't just let them walk all over you anymore.
Rambo series in Movies ·
Anthony Smith3 said:In my humble opinion, Rambo - Tetralogy is actually a hair better than First Blood—which makes it the best one in the whole series, honestly. It’s mostly just because that's the one movie where Stallone really gets to dig into the character itself... he finally manages to show what makes him tick and puts the core of the guy in a real light. Plus, even when you look at the action, it feels way more grounded and realistic than the rest of them...
So, here’s what I’m actually getting at... As great as that first movie is, it doesn't really "study" the guy's character, not even close. It isn't trying to do that. At its core, it’s just this raw story about one man going up against a system that basically spits him out. And honestly—right from the jump—it isn't even the whole system rejecting Rambo... it starts with just one guy, the local sheriff, who for whatever twisted reasons can't stand dealing with any Vietnamese veterans. He picks a fight with Rambo just because of his service record, which ends up triggering this massive avalanche of chaos... and suddenly, he’s turned the entire machine against a single person whose only crime was fighting in a losing war and actually making it home...

I’d argue it’s really about the system itself—since Sheriff Teasle basically embodies that hypocritical side of America that forcibly recruited those kids and shipped them straight off to war... Teasle is also a veteran of the Korean War, and he views Rambo through this incredibly negative lens that represents how many former soldiers were treated back then (which is actually fleshed out way more in the novel)... he just doesn't buy into what we now recognize as PTSD. He can't wrap his head around the idea that someone might struggle to function in civilian life because, to him, he’s this pillar of tradition, a "real man," and all that... On the flip side, in the book, Rambo has much more direct contact with the legal system—he ends up in front of a judge who doesn't even bother asking for his input—and that just fuels his rage even more. In the movie, it’s framed like he’s lost all control, but he’s actually fully aware of everything he’s doing... honestly, he’s intentionally escalating the whole conflict just to force a situation where they have to kill him in a fair fight. Since the movie came out in 1982, they leaned into a much more simplified narrative—basically the police harass him until he snaps. But, you made a good point there... even if he's losing it due to PTSD, he stays totally composed when it comes to the actual killing—which is a contradiction in itself... Maybe it's just my bias from reading the book first, but I find the adaptation a bit lacking when it comes to the Sheriff's portrayal—in the novel, he's this stubborn, rigid, old-school veteran, whereas in the film, he's a little more laid back... though I actually kind of dig that he doesn't fully back his men's actions...

There’s this interesting theory from Stallone that Rambo is basically a modern retelling of Frankenstein—you know, like how the monster just wanted to be accepted by society... but instead, everyone looks at him with nothing but pure disgust and contempt. It forces the "monster" into this corner where he has no choice but to fight just to stay alive. In this version of the story, Colonel Trautman is pretty much Dr. Frankenstein... the guy who actually built the "monster," or in this case, a literal killing machine...

The theory actually holds water—honestly, that’s basically the whole vibe of the movie. It was his vision from the jump since he took that original script and stripped out a bunch of the extra fluff... though, if we're being real, he definitely dumbed it down a bit to make it more digestible for the mainstream crowd. I guess I never really looked at it through that lens before...

By the fourth installment, Rambo has basically morphed into this pure killing machine—and honestly, he’s doing it without any real sense of purpose anymore. He isn't stepping up to save those missionaries because he’s got a thing for the girl, or because some agency put a paycheck in his hand... no, it’s deeper than that. It feels like he just can't suppress that primal urge anymore—that lethal mechanism buried inside him is just running wild... Like that heavy monologue says—"You know what you are... what you're made of. War is in your blood. Don't fight it. You didn't kill for your country. You killed for yourself. God's never gonna make that go away. When you're pushed, killing's as easy as breathing."
And honestly, that whole line—"When you're pushed, killing's as easy as breathing"—kind of makes the first movie feel... I don't know, a little unconvincing? Like, he’s being pushed... really, really hard... but he just isn't killing, even though he totally should be at that point. Maybe they should've just stuck closer to the book, regardless of how much it would've messed things up...

Personally, I think he only really kicked things into high gear because of the girl—she was pretty much the only one who actually looked at him like a human being and talked to him like one. Once he finally snapped, she became the reason that gave all that violence a sense of purpose. See, the guy is basically a walking killing machine, and since everything he dealt with before was for some messed-up cause, this was the first time he actually had a decent justification for it. That’s why his homecoming feels more logical to me; he finally made peace with being a soldier because he actually fought one righteous battle, and after that, there’s no point in running anymore. To put it one way, he could finally head home with his head held high.
John Carpenter's The Ward (2010) in Movies ·
I can't believe I'm actually sitting here typing this out...
image image image
It’s kind of wild, honestly—image image image
Just thinking about how much things have changed since those old school days... image

...from the set.
Rambo series in Movies ·
David Price5 said:Maybe Americans and Russians shouldn't have even bothered with the whole Cold War thing in the first place... I mean, it’s pretty obvious why movies like that were being pumped out back in the 80s—you know, all those Delta Force flicks, Missing in Action, and stuff like that...

Aside from the fact that the first Delta Force movie uses Palestinians as the villains... there aren't any Russians in it. 🙂

Anthony Smith3 said:I can't quite pin down the exact directing details when it comes to the trilogy stuff—my brain is a bit foggy on that—but man, I do remember that movie being an absolute beast from a production standpoint. The plot? Honestly, it’s basically a carbon copy of the second one... plus a massive dose of propaganda. It’s the exact same vibe you get with Rocky IV. Like I said before... for me, that flick definitely sits in that "guilty pleasure" category...

I don't know why, but the third one just feels like the weakest production of the bunch—maybe because the sets feel so cheap... I really can't get behind the whole argument that the story is just a rip-off of the second movie. In the second one, the plot actually feels intriguing because it leaves certain things hanging in the air—which, let's be honest, you expect from an action flick anyway—whereas the third installment tries way too hard to make the Russians look more menacing than they actually are. Still, I'll give it one redeeming quality. I actually liked the subtle hint that Rambo is jumping into the fray for the sake of a friend, rather than doing it for some oppressed masses (which happens later on)... if they hadn't forced all that political messaging and just stuck to Rambo's raw, grounded reasons for fighting, it would have been a much better film. It worked perfectly that way in the fourth part...

I’m seriously thinking about pulling an all-nighter with a Rambo marathon this weekend... since I've got the house to myself anyway—just pure peace and quiet... plus a little Rambo with a bazooka for good measure, haha...😁😁🤣

So, did the decision actually go through? Are you really planning on waking up the entire neighborhood with the sound of a bazooka... 😁

Man, you just reminded me of that one shot—you know, the one with the helicopter and the tank... It actually brings to mind this buddy of mine—the guy who’s obsessed with the third movie—who was complaining the other day about how action is filmed these days. He says the whole thing is such a mess... the camera is just wandering all over the place, the editing is totally frantic, and they do it all just to force some kind of "fast-paced" energy onto the screen. He was saying back in the day, you’d just set the camera up, let Sly or Arnie go absolutely nuts with a bazooka and blow everything in the frame to pieces, and the whole shot felt dynamic and epic without being boring... and the best part was, you could actually see what was happening...

On one hand, I get it—those older action flicks had this much more direct way of showing the carnage. Like that shot where Rambo fires that arrow, or when those trucks go flying off the bridge... man, those were solid. The issue is that it’s all become a bit static. Honestly, a little camera movement goes a long way in making things feel visceral. And that whole big showdown between the tank and the chopper? To me, it feels a bit like those few shots from Bullitt where the guy is slamming through gears just to reach tenth gear (when there are only like four or five speeds) just to fake a sense of speed. It’s the same thing here—every single shot gets closer to the tank or the heli, but it’s really just one continuous sequence stretched out. Look, I have my favorites when it comes to Rambo, but his direction can be a bit hit-or-miss—not that I can really blame him, since the first three movies were directed by guys who barely knew the first thing about staging an action scene, so it didn't always land perfectly...
Rambo series in Movies ·
Anthony Smith3 said:Well... just another stellar take from your side of the fence...👍👍

Thank you Quote 🙂

I’m honestly torn between the original and the latest installment—both give such a solid look at who Rambo actually is... especially that last one. For me, the second movie is just decent action... nothing crazy, but it works. I can't help but feel like if Cameron had directed it, it probably would've landed way better with audiences today...
When it comes to the trilogies... that’s honestly the most entertaining part of the whole Rambo series—kind of like Rocky IV if you think about it. Is it ridiculous? Yeah, obviously. But man, what a spectacle... it's just wild. I have this buddy of mine who's a massive fan of the Rambo series... and even today, he swears up and down that the third installment is the absolute peak of the entire franchise, haha. I mean, nothing else even comes close to that tank versus helicopter showdown... or that bit where they take down the chopper with an explosive arrow... just pure madness...😁😁🤣

I gotta admit, "Part II" is probably my favorite out of the whole bunch—it’s usually my go-to whenever I need a little bit of inspiration... but honestly, that’s just because it was the first one I ever saw. Don't get me wrong, the original is solid, but I can't stand how much they softened everything up. In the book, Rambo is way, way more intense than what we see on screen, and the action hits a different level entirely—like, he practically levels the whole damn town. For me, watching the movie feels like watching a classic Hollywood compromise where they take great source material and smooth out the edges just enough to make it palatable for the masses...

Man, I don't know about that... he really had some imaginative action flicks under his belt—so on that specific point, I’m gonna have to disagree with you, briskhound2...

I just can't seem to get it to sit right... 😛 I’m not a huge fan of how the pacing drags through the story—there’s way too much filler that feels either pointless or just straight-up propaganda... and honestly, the action is nothing more than a mediocre middle-of-the-road effort. Now, that finale in the second film? That was the peak for me. That helicopter assault and the showdown between the birds always gets me hyped up, but when you get to that little tank versus helicopter duel... I’m kind of speechless. Maybe it’s because the scene is just poorly shot, though. There’s zero creativity involved. It’s just one shot of a chopper, one shot of a tank, one shot... and then they crash. Just lazy...
Rambo series in Movies ·
image image

Rambo III (1988)
Trailer

Rambo III hits right when those beefy action heroes were starting to see their prime fade out—but honestly, it’s just a weak movie... Trying to frame the guy as a global heavyweight, Rambo swaps out the jungle for the sands of Afghanistan and whatever political mess was happening there at the time. It's a poorly constructed plot that basically just recycles the best bits from the first two entries, featuring uninspired action scenes, those same old one-dimensional Russian villains, and this forced patriotism that feels more like a political pamphlet than an actual action flick. Critics, unsurprisingly, hated it, but the audience wasn't exactly thrilled with the shift from the first two either, so "Part III" just fell flat... Stallone moved on to other projects, Rambo went into a well-deserved retirement, but his legacy occasionally reminds us what a great target he is for parody. Hot Shots! sequel goes all out mocking the first two (and it's actually pretty funny), and even the recent McGruber plays with the gag of Rambo living a quiet life in Thailand. Even Stallone isn't above a good self-deprecating joke—he even says the famous line in Tango & Cash: "Rambo is a pussy!"—kind of like he's admitting himself that Rambo's war days are over.

image image

Rambo (2008)
Trailer

But then, everything changes in the post-9/11 era. That first idea floating around about Stallone reviving the series with a sequel where his character hunts down Osama bin Laden sounded like a bad joke... Not even the die-hard fans saw much future in that. In an age dominated by CGI, choreographed stunts, and fancy fight sequences, bringing back such a raw, gritty character felt like a desperate move from someone whose career was starting to slip... As for the actual plot, it's about Rambo being back in the States, trying to live a quiet life, until some anti-American militia kidnaps his daughter and things kick off. That kind of Steven Seagal-style setup sounds better than the bin Laden idea, but still doesn't feel like it has legs. The final twist where John Rambo saves some missionaries in some random country feels like a poorly written punchline again... until the movie actually hits theaters. Maybe limited as an actor, but as a filmmaker/director/writer, Stallone strips this last part of the franchise down to its bare bones. No political pamphlets, no lecturing about the morality of getting involved in foreign conflicts, no overly complicated plots, and no massive ambitions... all together, the movie works as maybe the best entry in the series (maybe)... Aware of his age, Stallone intelligently avoids Rambo's usual habit of starting conflicts until the very end, and he shares the screen with a younger, colorful crew of mercenaries, which adds some much-needed freshness and pace. Critics were split again, but audiences turned it into an interesting hit; that old-school physical action is finding its way back into the mix... the one-man army is back.

image image image image

Or maybe not... After wrapping things up with a decent finale where Rambo finally heads home, Stallone initially teased a fifth installment, though he’s been walking that back lately. Honestly, it might be for the best—given how some of these plot ideas involve mutant beasts and other nonsense... It could just end up ruining a solid send-off for a hero who’s been fighting wars and entertaining us for nearly three decades.

The poll is pretty straightforward. What’s your favorite entry in the Rambo series?

P.S. — sorry for the wall of text, just a hardcore fan, what can I say... it is what it is.

Anyway, enjoy yourselves.

🙂
Rambo series in Movies ·
image image image image

So, after all that back-and-forth regarding Sylvester Stallone’s latest work (and my own... let's say, lukewarm enthusiasm), I found myself looking backward for a bit of inspiration—since nothing else was really sparking my interest. That Rambo series about the Vietnam veteran, John J. Rambo, has always been sitting right at the top of my list of favorites from growing up, so, since I had some extra downtime, I figured it might be cool to run a little poll... seeing as I can see (read: notice) people starting to argue over which installment actually holds up best. Anthony Smith3, we’ll get back to our deep dive on The Expendables once I’ve had a chance to rewatch it.😉

image

Alright, let's start from square one. Back in 1972, a virtually unknown writer named David Morrell published a novel called First Blood, which details a small-town police force clashing with a misfit Vietnam veteran. Even though Morrell himself said the idea came from spending countless hours talking to friends and hearing about the struggles they faced after returning from Vietnam—back when there wasn't even a formal definition for PTSD—and that the story was meant to be a critique of American societal hypocrisy, it turns out the "critique" (and the readers) mostly just saw First Blood as another standard action flick made for pure entertainment...

image image

First Blood (1982)
Trailer

A reputation like that doesn't take long to reach Hollywood, where the rights were quickly snapped up. But, the actual production stayed stalled for nearly a decade until the well-known producer duo Andrew G. Vajna and Mario Kassar (who were basically newbies at the time) decided to step in and take charge. Famous for Rocky Balboa, Sylvester Stallone saw a chance to do something different with this unhinged Vietnam vet character, but that's when the production headaches truly began. The role of Colonel Trautman was originally set to be played by the legendary Kirk Douglas, but after filming a few scenes, he dropped out, leaving the part to the reliable Richard Crenna, for whom it became perhaps a career-defining role. That's when Stallone decided to tweak the script. Originally envisioned as a standalone project, First Blood was meant to be a faithful adaptation of the book, where Rambo isn't playing hide-and-seek with the cops, but rather just killing everything in his path. Fearing the audience wouldn't go for that kind of portrayal, Sly shifted the story so that Rambo doesn't kill anyone—which is almost ironic, considering how he changed things in the final installment where the character kills nearly a hundred people. Not wanting to take any risks, the producers also swapped the original ending—where Colonel Trautman kills his own student—for something softer and simpler, something Stallone didn't quite agree with at the time. The movie ended up being a financial success, though maybe not on the level of some other big titles, but definitely exceeding expectations. Critics were split, though. Some praised the intense pacing and tension, while others argued that we shouldn't be giving cinematic idols to actual maniacs. Either way, we didn't have to wait long for the sequel...

image image

Rambo: First Blood Part II (1985)
Trailer

So, First Blood Part Two hits theaters three years later and ends up being this massive, totally unexpected box office smash... mostly thanks to a huge wide release and some aggressive marketing. But there’s actually a bit of an origin story here. The producers originally went back to the original author to see if he had any ideas, and it was Morrell who suggested sending Rambo right back into Vietnam—where, you know, the guy is basically a fish in water. There’s also this real-life story that kind of served as the movie's foundation. Back in the early '80s, a mercenary named Gritz went public claiming he was part of a mission to pull POWs out of modern-day Vietnam (he even knew the exact location), but as soon as he and his crew touched down, someone pulled the rug out from under them. To this day, Gritz maintains it was the US government shutting things down because they didn't want to reopen old wounds... if anyone wants the full scoop, you can find the details in the book "70 Greatest World Conspiracies," which pretty much became the backbone of the sequel. James Cameron eventually got involved too, bringing his own take on the script, though Stallone ended up tweaking things so much that nobody really knows for sure who wrote what since everyone tells a different version of the story... anyway, the sequel definitely borrows bits from the first one. Since Russian villains are a lot easier targets for audiences to root against, that famous sequence where Rambo uses camouflage and hides in the brush basically copies almost everything from the original novel—except instead of dodging American cops, we're dealing with Russian soldiers. It's actually why David Morrell ended up doing a novelization of the film (and he did one for the third one too—he's probably the only writer to ever write sequels to his own original work like that). Without all the heavy drama, opting for more direct action and bigger spectacles—some might even say it's a bit dumber—the "Part II" absolutely crushed it with audiences, even while critics were busy burying it under a mountain of bad reviews. The success made the lead character a global icon, and gave us that classic phrase One man army that people always use to describe Rambo's whole vibe.
What's the name of this movie? in Movies ·
Terry Phillips said:Can someone give me the title of this movie? It’s an old one where people are out on a ship conducting some kind of research, and then everyone just vanishes from the vessel—at least, that’s all I can remember. Thanks.

Isumiki, man, you really dug up a six-year-old thread just to ask this... meanwhile, the actual mega-thread is sitting right there at the top of the first page, easy to find... blah blah blah...

By the way—the movie you're looking for is The Philadelphia Experiment (1984)
John Carpenter's The Ward (2010) in Movies ·
wiredbison82 said:To me, "Escape from L.A." is a tragic film, strictly in terms of its quality.

It isn't a problem that the marginalized subgenres which defined the golden era of Carpenter, De Palma, and Craven eventually integrated into the mainstream—becoming palatable to a broader audience while leaving their former grit at the margins.

The issue lies in the fact that Carpenter seems unable to deliver even a solid B-movie these days. There is a common misconception that the "B-movie" label serves as a free pass to disregard script logic or abandon any sense of systematic filmmaking, leading people to excuse mediocre efforts as mere genre fare.

While the cultural climate during Carpenter's peak was certainly more receptive to the specific brand of cinema he and his international peers offered, there is a painful truth we have to face: John Carpenter simply doesn't possess the same level of talent today, nor does he command a set with the same mastery he displayed during "Assault on Precinct 13" or "Halloween."

Then again, perhaps I am being overly subjective. As a massive devotee of his early work, my standards have become so high that nothing else quite measures up.🤷

P.S. I have always held a deep respect for Carpenter's unwavering consistency and his devotion to genre filmmaking.

Me too. Compared to the original, it’s just unnecessary—it literally chews over the exact same story, motives, and scenes (just a variation on a theme), and it's honestly just a bad attempt by Russell to mimic old Clint's style. No matter how much of a Carpenter fan I am, watching this movie gives me a bit of a cringe because of how poorly it turned out. It was the exact same deal with Ghosts of Mars. The rest of his stuff is above average, ranging from just okay (The Crazies—definitely his most lifelessly directed film, even if it has some moments) to his really strong auteur works like Vampires, which brought him back to his old form.

It's not that the subgenres that were part of the golden age for Carpenter, De Palma, Craven, and the gang have become mainstream staples and thus acceptable to general audiences, while today they just rot on the fringes.

Craven is still active and relatively interesting to both fans and critics—Red Eye. The fact that the mainstream is pulling him back in is also shown by the fact that he's returning to direct the Scream series, and all the buzz around that puts him far away from the margins.

It's true that the climate during the era when Carpenter was hitting his biggest peaks was more favorable for what he and his international colleagues had to offer in terms of cinematic art, but the truth is—painful as it may be—that John Carpenter simply isn't as talented today and doesn't know how to direct like he did back in the days of Assault on Precinct 13 and Halloween.

He knows how to direct, it's just like he doesn't want to... He picks the easiest route—goes to the absolute extreme and stays there until the movie gets dangerously close to being unwatchable.
The Expendables sweepstakes! in Movies ·
Alright, I'm coming in third. (briskhound2 🤣)

First off—congrats to feralorca82 and gentlebadger88. That was actually pretty intense and a fun ride to watch.

To everyone else, thanks for the entertainment—honestly, it’s been a minute since I’ve been this sucked into some movie trivia stuff. Let's clash keyboards on some other threads soon. 🙂

ruggedfox28 and Ferstar—where did you guys vanish to yesterday? It definitely would've made for a better fight if you'd shown up.

Anthony Smith3—really clever setup. Honestly, the rest of us should probably try to be at least half as creative and come up with something similar. You were basically giving out technical advice on the images, and that ninja bit was awesome. A huge 👍 for all the effort put into this whole thing.

My take? Five stars across the board. But, like David Price5 already mentioned, maybe next time we should handle more of this via PM. Using copy/paste definitely helped a lot of people (myself included), so making it a bit more complicated—you know, harder, where it depends on the individual rather than just a group of identical answers—might be better. Everything else was great—imaginative, well-thought-out, tough but not impossible (plenty of people nailed those cross-referenced images), and just plain fun. The best part was how everything stayed focused on the action genre; even when things got confusing (like how I initially thought that first image from die hard 2 was from K9-Widowmaker because of the hat), you could always pivot based on the genre itself.

So... yeah, that's the gist. 😁
The Expendables sweepstakes! in Movies ·
Yesterday's turnout was a little thin, I guess... Seems like the action junkies started thinning out once part of the answer moved over to PMs instead of just being a simple copy/paste 😛