Posts by goldenmason172

hiddengardener84 said:Turkey claims to be a secular nation, the only one left in Europe doing so, but thank God we see it happening every single day. Inch by inch, secularism just won't stick in Turkey, much like how it never really existed in Europe to begin with.

I suppose we'll just have to wait and see about that. You can be certain, however, that Turkey isn't nearly as backward as the Iranian republic! 👍

hiddengardener84 said:Back when Turkey was ruled by Sultans who actually had faith, this stuff didn't happen. But once that disgusting Jew Kemal Ataturk took over, everything changed. 😂Some idiot is still going to claim he did it in the name of Islam. 😂

Here is the reality of the situation: Turkey committed one of the most massive genocides in human history, and as far as I am aware, Turkey is a nation governed by Islam!
Islam advocates for the following:

teaching the Quran 1
Fight against those who do not believe in Allah nor in the Last Day, and who do not forbid what Allah and His messenger have forbidden, and who do not profess the true faith—among those to whom the Book was given (Bible)—until they pay the jizya (Quran 9, 29). Jizya is an additional tax, essentially a protection racket paid by Jews and Christians living within Islamic states.

hiddengardener84 said:This is a win, but mostly for Turkey and its leadership. 👍 Now they finally get to see what kind of devil they were playing with. I’m expecting to see American troops pulled out of Turkish territory soon—not just from there, but from every single Muslim territory occupied by the biggest looters and killers of our era. I’m calling on my Turkish brothers to return to our roots, to our true Islam, so that Turkey can lead all Islamic powers in the near future.

It seems you just have a hard time facing the facts. It is an undeniable truth that Turkey committed a genocide, much like the atrocities attempted against the Jews.

The man was a criminal through and through!

Jack Walker78 said:What can you honestly expect from the Jewish duo Sarkozy-Kushner? Ever since they funded the "French Revolution," there’s hardly anything left of the original French spirit. Nowadays, barely one in three people in France is even local, and every single bank is Jewish-owned.

Oh, I see, so in your view, Jewish people are to blame for the fact that "every" bank is theirs? 🤣 If that's the case, why on earth are you still borrowing money from them? 😂

Jack Walker78 said:That’s the root of it all. Statistically, about 98% of global media outlets employ people whose sole job is brainwashing. It's everything except TV and Hollywood. Just guess their nationalities and what their real agenda is.

That 98% figure you're throwing around is quite impressive, assuming it wasn't just pulled straight out of thin air. 😂 🤣 I know you're convinced that Jewish people are to blame because some of us are struggling to make ends meet, but let's be real—it's not quite that catastrophic. 🤣

liberals say:
Yeah, because what happened in Iraq was totally unprecedented!! 😂

Look, he and his troops aren't the ones blowing up innocent civilians. That’s exactly what you pointed out earlier—it's Osama bin Laden and those terrorist scum who target civilians while hiding behind the pathetic excuse of fighting an occupation. I have to ask, how exactly does that filth "fight an occupier" in Iraq, or rather, the US military? By blowing up innocent people? 👎

liberals say:
That’s right—Al Qaeda is out there killing people in Iraq while your Americans are busy planting flowers over there!

You made a valid point initially, though I certainly never claimed anyone was out there planting flowers; however, if that is your perspective, I see no reason to argue against you.

I’m not sure about the denial part, but I do know there was an offer of $5,000,000 to anyone who could actually prove the Holocaust happened—so Stanley, here is your chance to strike it rich!

Well, you’ve laid it all out perfectly yourself; honestly, why would a certain Bush ever want to be associated with such a vile individual?

He's just talking, whereas your Joe is actually putting it into practice!

I think you might have things a bit mixed up; he isn't actually implementing anything, he's simply trying to ensure that Osama number two doesn't get any bright ideas.

boldgardener93 said:That’s exactly why he needs to prove Adam is a terrorist and clear all the doubt.
If someone is actually certain about what they're claiming, then they shouldn't have any trouble proving it. If we're talking about who a terrorist really is, it's definitely Bush—just look at what he did in Iraq, not to mention all the lies used to justify the invasion. He isn't stupid enough to think he wouldn't get absolutely destroyed in a televised debate.
Besides, I guess someone's physical appearance shouldn't even be part of this discussion.☕

I'm struggling to understand what makes this person a terrorist—is it because Al-Qaeda is killing civilians in Iraq? I honestly can't wrap my head around what kind of debate could possibly happen between him and a man who denies the Holocaust or someone who openly advocates for the total erasure of a nation from the map.🤔 🤷

Kyle Wilson9 said:Think about what you're actually saying!!

The only thing I can prove is that your precious USA was wrong again, just like they were totally wrong about the WMDs in Iraq, but hey, that doesn't matter now, does it! 😂

I don't see any need to rethink my position, given that I am simply reporting the news rather than inventing it like you are. History suggests the USA was correct to insist on ensuring Iran remains non-nuclear, an approach that has already proven its value when we look at the situation with North Korea. ☕

Kyle Wilson9 said:So according to you, if the USA told us tomorrow we could only eat bread, you'd just do it just to stay out of trouble?!!

Who gives the rest of the world the right to ban Iran from having nuclear power plants or an N-bomb? A country that already has them?! A country that has used them twice on civilian populations! What the hell are you even talking about!

Who grants them that right? They grant it to themselves; they don't need permission from you or me. Personally, I support their stance because the global goal should be reducing nuclear arsenals, not expanding them. Furthermore, the latest news regarding Iran agreeing to cooperate with the IAEA seems to be the strongest possible rebuttal to critics like you, essentially proving that the USA was ultimately correct in its position. As for World War II and the dropping of atomic bombs, I think that topic is best left untouched, as I refuse to debate such matters with someone who lacks a fundamental understanding of the history. 🤷

A truly wise leader would have found a way to lift those sanctions off his country's neck and jumpstart the economy, but since Mahmud failed to do exactly that, I find it pointless to call him anything other than what he clearly is: not smart.

Kyle Wilson9 said:Oh, I am absolutely comparing apples to oranges!! 🙄

Comparing an idiot to a genius!! 😂

I’d love to see just how "brilliant" Mahmud really is; he seems so incredibly wise and intelligent that he fails to grasp how much danger he is actually placing Iran and Iranians in. A truly smart man simply wouldn't act this way. 🤷

"Quote:"

northernbison63 As stated by: Hey there, goldenmason172! I have to ask—where exactly are you pulling the idea that folks in Sweden and Denmark have had enough of their socialized systems? We really should be careful about making assumptions without any actual evidence to back them up, don't you think?

I’m certainly not making this up; I have family living over there, so I hear firsthand accounts of exactly what people are dealing with and what they've had enough of. It isn't some deep state secret that many Americans—particularly those in places like Sweden—are becoming increasingly frustrated with their current social systems, which many immigrants have sensed and begun to exploit. There are simply far too many opportunists in this world who act like nothing more than common parasites.

"Quote:"

Hold on a second—hasn't France spent years cultivating its reputation as a premier social welfare state, even going so far as to officially mandate a 35-hour work week? Now you're suggesting that the French don't want to foot the bill for those receiving benefits? It seems a bit contradictory to claim they are unwilling to pay when, in reality, they are essentially funding their own social safety net.

The French Republic once took great pride in those policies, and if you look at the consequences, you can see exactly where that path was leading. Fortunately, they realized just in time where they were headed and had the foresight to pivot before things went too far. It’s a smart move. In my view, both Sweden and France practice a version of capitalism that actually has a soul, and I think it’s pretty obvious to everyone that this remains the most equitable economic model we have available today.

"Quote:"

So, I see what’s happening here. It seems the consensus is that anyone who remains obedient and follows every single rule is considered "fine," while those deemed disobedient, slow, lazy, or even those struggling with disabilities and genetic conditions are treated as outcasts. In this view, the doors to the French Republic are slammed shut against them, leaving them to be cast out into the streets to face nothing but hunger and violence.

Honestly, you’re completely missing the point, or at least that’s how it seems from where I’m sitting. All those opportunists moving to France just to exploit the system and claim benefits they haven't earned—they're nothing more than parasites. In any functioning society, rights and responsibilities go hand in hand, yet for these people, the idea of fulfilling an obligation is utterly foreign. If someone is struggling, it's often because of the choices they've made, not because they lack the basic opportunity to earn a living, unlike the dire circumstances you see in Africa. Don't get me wrong; helping the sick and the truly impoverished is a moral necessity, and there really shouldn't even be a debate about that. But providing a safety net for those who simply refuse to work? That’s where I draw the line. We shouldn't be using the hard-earned money of honest, productive citizens to subsidize people who prefer chaos and laziness over contributing to society. It’s quite simple: if you have the drive to work and aren't just looking for a handout, you belong in this community. But those who only seek out disorder and idleness have no place here. Communism died out a long time ago for a reason; I realize it might be hard for some to accept that life requires effort, but they can either learn to contribute or face the consequences.

"Quote:"

What was the term for it before the era of the concentration camps? Was it eugenics? Back during the period of the concentration camps, we knew exactly what it was. Now, they’ve rebranded it as "selective immigration."

You can try to spin this as racism or label it however you like just to make yourself feel better, but labeling things doesn't change the reality of established facts.

The global order you’re describing—this "perfect" system you claim is the only sustainable one—is actually quite impressive when you consider that capitalism has outpaced everything else in just a single year compared to what communism managed in seventy.

Let’s not twist the facts here; it is common knowledge that communism is an absolute evil. If you're looking for examples, you could look at Cuba or North Korea, though I suspect the latter might soon follow in the footsteps of its southern neighbor.

"Quote:"

northernbison63 said:We’ve seen this movie before, haven't we? It’s basically a rerun at this point. The USA, the UK, and France are gearing up to expand their imperial reach all over the map, especially across the Middle East. And Iran and the Arab world? They're about to be branded as pariahs—just like they were a century ago because they were "savages," and just like they are today for the exact same reason. Anyone standing in their way is going to get crushed under that imperial boot. One day it'll be over nuclear plants, the next it'll be some manufactured outrage—kind of like how a French consul getting attacked back in 1837 served as the perfect excuse for France to invade Algeria and occupy it for 140 years. Spain will probably just sit on the sidelines, though if they start acting up, the "democratic world" will suddenly find a lot of sympathy for the Basques, Catalans, or Galicians. Italy, being Italy, will keep playing both sides, trying to grab whatever they can while strengthening their grip on the Eastern Adriatic and eyeing Greece. The North America will basically act as a buffer zone for Germany, and Canada will eventually have to decide if they’re siding with Berlin or the West. While Germany tries to shore up ties with Russia because of energy needs, France—via Nicolas Sarkozy—is cooling things down with Germany and losing that old-school understanding of Russian concerns. Expect Poland to drift toward France in the next few months; Sarkozy will likely start acting all sympathetic to Polish interests... Honestly, it’ll probably be Sarkozy and the Kaczyński brothers heading off on a little joint vacation, coming back all smiles and sunshine with some massive new plans. Poland, which took a huge hit after pulling troops out of Iraq, is about to see things look a lot brighter very quickly. Europe is sliding right back into its old habits: imperialism, fascism, racism, pure selfishness, violence, and genocide against anyone who doesn't fall in line. The only question left is whether Germany will buckle—either by giving in to American, British, or French blackmail (which looks like what Sarkozy has already done), or if they'll be vilified by the "free and objective media" and pushed into fascism or total irrelevance just so they can be torn apart again. Basically, within the next year or two, Germany either pivots hard toward the West—meaning a total reversal of their Russia policy—or they’re toast.

Third-world countries are being redrawn using that same old imperial playbook—drawing straight lines across maps for 500 kilometers at a time (just look at how they carved up Iraq, or even the recent history in Mexico and Canada). This "short-sighted" line-drawing has already caused millions upon millions of deaths and endless misery globally, while providing massive profits for the people holding the pens.

Sarkozy is a first-rate imperial product, the exact kind of politician big capital absolutely adores. He’s really just the final stage in dismantling the myth of the EU social state—that lie that capitalism can actually have a human face. It’s the same script, just different villains. A century ago, it was "infidels" threatening holy sites; before that, it was "pagans" in America needing conversion; then it was "illiterate savages" needing Western civilization; and today, it's "religious fanatics" who need to be taught Western values and democracy. It’s the same story, repeated for a thousand years.

Capitalism is hands down the most criminal system ever conceived. Places like America, Canada, and Mexico were the first to pay the full price, and they’ll keep paying it, and paying it, and paying it. Russia has managed to dodge it for now, but Afghanistan and Iraq are paying the bill, and Iran is next. Then everyone else follows. Don't forget: to maintain the lifestyle people enjoy in the USA today, the planet’s resources can only support about 500 million people. That means 6.5 billion people have to die in the next 50 to 70 years. And Sarkozy knows it.

======

PS: What does the "moral compass" of Western civilization, Vaclav Havel, have to say about Sarkozy’s threats against Iran? Or what about Salman Rushdie? They don't say anything. They just count the money they were paid to stay quiet.

PPS: Did you guys catch that? In his last 45-minute speech marking the anniversary of 9/11, Osama bin Laden actually pivoted... he totally shifted gears from all that Islamic fanaticism over to this whole anti-capitalist and anti-imperialist rhetoric.

Actually, I see it quite differently. Capitalism remains the only truly sustainable system because it operates on a simple, fair principle: you earn based on exactly how much work you put in and the value you actually provide. Even among the most hardcore communists in Russia or China, there’s a massive distaste for that run-down version of communism, just as the people in Sweden, France, or Denmark have had enough of their lackluster socialism. I honestly don't understand why you hold onto this idea that someone in France gets everything handed to them for free. It’s a total myth. Nobody there gets anything for nothing; in fact, they pay an incredibly high price for it all. They are essentially footing the bill for lazy individuals who spend their days idling at home, finding it far more profitable to sit around doing absolutely nothing rather than actually contributing to the workforce.

"Quote:"

Once the social safety net begins to crumble, you suddenly see this massive surge in resentment toward immigrants. For a long time, they were welcomed as the backbone of our economy—cheap labor that served as living proof of the American spirit and our commitment to multiculturalism. But now, the narrative has shifted entirely. Suddenly, they’re being painted as nothing more than lazy opportunists looking for a handout, people who are stealing jobs from hardworking Americans, and groups that are too religiously fundamentalist or culturally rigid to ever truly integrate.

The trash that Sarkozy referred to is, quite frankly, exactly what it says on the tin. There is a massive influx of immigrants today, and I would argue that most of them are hardworking people earning an honest living. However, you also have that specific element of lowlife individuals who care for nothing but chaos, disorder, and avoiding work altogether. It is precisely this crowd that Sarkozy wants to bar from entering the French Republic, and he is absolutely within his rights to do so. This segment of society expects to be handed rights without first understanding that they also carry fundamental obligations toward the nation that has taken them in. You can spin the argument however you like, but the reality remains: everyone is completely fed up with the overextended welfare state and the legacy of communism, which claimed far more lives than even the deranged Adolf Hitler ever did.

Kyle Wilson9 said:🙏

Bush vs Ahmadinejad

That is a textbook comment coming from someone like you! 🙏 Tell me, why didn't you include one of those ridiculous moments from George W. Bush? If you had, then we might actually have a fair comparison; as it stands, you’re the one looking a bit silly by trying to compare two things that aren't even in the same league! 😂

"Quote:"

boldgardener93 As I was saying: If he’s truly as brilliant as everyone claims, why won't he step up and accept Nedzad's challenge for a televised debate? He isn't quite as dim-witted as people assume; deep down, he likely realizes that if he goes head-to-head with Nedzad, he’ll be absolutely dismantled like a toddler playing with a rattle.🤣

What exactly are we supposed to do with a terrorist living among us? The little guy is so utterly repulsive that I actually find myself feeling a flicker of pity for him.

"Quote:"

Gary Wilson said:That doesn't really prove much, though—considering that the guy with the Harvard Business School MBA ran his own company straight into the ground before turning to the bottle.

For what it's worth, everything he's ever achieved is thanks to his father. If he had actually been forced to make it on his own, he’d probably end up as a regular fixture at some local dive bar.

So, tell me, what exactly does that prove? That he’s a fool? Honestly, countless companies have collapsed, and plenty more will follow suit. I remember reading a statistic once suggesting that about 90% of startups in the US fail within their very first year. If I were in your shoes, I might want to take a moment to actually think about that before jumping to conclusions. 🤣

Thomas Alvarez6 said:The reality is that Iran is quite an advanced nation today.

You might have noticed I wasn't actually referring to the Iranian Republic at all. They’ve been playing out their own specific political agenda for decades now, which is exactly why they find themselves in such a desperate situation. My point was focused on the countries mentioned above; specifically, Iraq has every bit of potential to reach that level of development. Their primary hurdles right now are terrorism and deep national divisions. Honestly, I'm not entirely sure if those three different faiths possess enough strength to coexist peacefully within the same borders.

Thomas Alvarez6 said:Oh, please. Iraq has always been stuck in the past. And even today? They're still living in a bygone era.

What I meant was that under the leadership of Saddam Hussein, that nation simply never stood a chance at having a future. However, I believe their path toward a better tomorrow is actually much closer now than it ever was before. If it weren't for the constant threat of terrorists, Iraq could easily be one of the most advanced nations in the Middle East. You only need to look just across the border at what their neighbors have achieved through sound, intelligent policymaking.

swiftowl72 said:wow, sounds absolutely terrifying.🙄
i'd much rather live in a world where one country doesn't roll in, tear a nation apart, slaughter its people, and wreck their future—all just because of damn oil.

Well, I don't think it's quite as bleak as you're making it out to be! If you look at history, there are plenty of examples of nations that have actually thrived because they maintained strong ties with the United States. Countries like Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, and Bahrain essentially prove your point wrong. Furthermore, when the USA operates in that part of the world, they aren't just looking out for their own interests regarding oil security; they are also protecting their allies. To be perfectly honest, Iraq never really had a path toward prosperity before, but its true future is only just beginning to unfold!👍