CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Daniel Wells4 › Posts

Posts by Daniel Wells4

10 posts shown.

Did the brawl in paradise actually happen? in Psychology ·
I haven't read through this entire thread, and since I'm not a parent myself, I can't claim to know everything, but I do spend a lot of time looking after my four-year-old sister. I’m definitely old enough to have kids of my own eventually, but I think I’ll hold off for a while longer. 😁

From what little I know about kids, they really are all unique, aren't they? You get some who are just sweet, calm, and actually listen when you talk to them, making everything feel easy, but then you get others who are just total handfuls—stubborn, rude, and refuse to budge on anything.
Personally, I agree that sometimes a little discipline is a godsend. I really can't stand parents who feel the need to lecture everyone else on how to raise their own kids; sorry, but let me have my own opinion, okay? I respect your views, but please don't try to manage my life, because trust me, you don't have all the answers.

I think the context matters a lot, too, like whether it's a boy or a girl, or if it's the mom or the dad doing the disciplining.
I’ve never laid a hand on my sister, but that’s only because I’m her brother, not her parent. My mom gives her a swat on the butt every now and then. Before anyone starts judging, you should realize my sister is basically like that kid in those Duracell commercials—just a wild little thing rolling around on the floor while her dad stands there completely clueless. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nojWJ6-XmeQ
I dealt with a similar situation once at the local library. I didn't hit her, but honestly, none of the "time outs" or trying to explain things worked at all. In fact, she just started screaming even louder the moment she realized it bothered me and that I was asking her to be quiet. In the end, I had to scoop her up under one arm while juggling bags, toys, and pushing the stroller with my feet; she was thrashing around so much I practically had to drag her outside. I know some of you probably have plenty of theories on what I should have done differently, but like I said, every child is different, and unless you know my sister personally, there isn't any advice you could give me that would actually work. I didn't hit her, but if she were mine, she definitely would have gotten a spanking.

To me, a child is kind of like a little animal; they're essentially selfish creatures who don't care about anyone else, and if you let them take control, everything just goes south.
It’s on me to maintain that control. Some kids are easy to handle, while others are impossible. I don't believe in fighting with kids, and I definitely think physical discipline should be a last resort that we avoid as much as possible, but for heaven's sake, a child shouldn't be the one deciding where we go, when we eat, or what we buy. That isn't abuse; it's just a quick swat to show who's actually in charge. I mean, "spanking" has been around since the beginning of time, hasn't it? It's only recently that it's become this massive taboo, with people claiming that kids who get disciplined grow up to be violent criminals or whatever. What happened to almost everyone living before the 1900s? Were they all just mentally unstable?

I feel like we put way too much emphasis on children these days. Suddenly, they're treated as these incredibly precious, delicate little beings. In the US, you always hear that phrase "for the children"... everything is suddenly "for the children." Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against kids and I do want them in my life one day, but let's come down from the clouds a bit. A hundred years ago, kids were working in coal mines, and there are still places where that happens today. I'm not saying that's good, I just want to point out how extreme people's views have become.

I personally got plenty of swats when I was growing up, but there was always a reason for it. I don't hold it against my parents at all; if anything, I think they raised me really well. We have a great relationship now, to the point where they feel more like friends than parents. And for the record, I am not a violent person. 😁

Anyway, that's just my two cents.
Look at these people. It’s really about the principle of the thing, isn't it? I don't personally care one bit about the Muhammad sketches, and those Denmark sketches weren't even particularly funny to begin with, but listen, here in America we have this concept called freedom of speech, and it seems like some of you are clearly bothered by that. Or maybe you just want freedom of expression whenever it happens to suit your specific tastes, but honestly, come on. I get that Muslims might be upset about the Dance, I truly do, but the sheer level of arrogance that triggered from it just caught me off guard. I mean, think about it—in plenty of Muslim countries, there are certain laws that apply specifically to Christians, and it doesn't seem to bother anyone much. Isn't it just common sense to respect the laws and the culture of another country? I totally get that inciting hate speech is a line you shouldn't cross, but if you actually paid attention to the American media for once, you'd realize that Jesus is constantly used in all sorts of cartoons and jokes too. Not every Christian likes that, obviously, but that's just how things work in the Western world.

I just don't get why some of the folks on this forum don't think Muslims went way too far with their reactions to the Denmark sketches. It's not always such a black-and-white issue, you know? You guys are acting like there are only two sides to every story, but your objectivity is basically non-existent, even though I know you don't all see eye to eye.
Besides, those Muslim communities need Denmark way more than Denmark needs them, right? They have their own nations; let people draw whatever they want. If it's perfectly fine for Iran to have its own laws and run its country however it sees fit, then it should be just as fine for Americans to do whatever they want within their own borders.
cosmichawk5 said:🙂 ...
I think you've got a pretty cool Antonov picture set as your avatar 😁

🙂

Actually, I'm pretty sure that avatar is John Lee Hooker. It looks like it's from one of his albums, though I can't quite recall which one.
image

JJ Cale was just such a one-of-a-kind musician, wasn't he? He wasn't some flashy guy trying to grab attention, but instead, there was this incredible subtlety to everything he did. He wasn't really a showman who would go on these massive, over-the-top solo marathons, right? Even when he did play, it was so smooth and woven into the song that you might not even realize just how masterfully he was handling that guitar. I’ve always had such a soft spot for him, especially since so many legends have covered his work.
I mean, look at how Eric Clapton took on "After Midnight" and "Cocaine," or how Lynyrd Skynyrd played "Call Me the Breeze." So many heavy hitters like Mark Knopfler and Neil Young have given him props because he shaped their sound more than people realize.

When you consider how many of his tracks are absolute classics that everyone knows—even if they have no clue they're listening to an original—it makes me think he’s actually pretty underrated, don't you think?
Space tech heading in reverse in World ·
goldenmason172, look, I’m not exactly a huge fan of the Russian space program either, but you really can't just brush off everything they've accomplished, can you? I see you popping up on other threads all the time and honestly, I agree with you on a ton of stuff, but it feels like you're talking about this specific topic without having the full picture.

Does it feel to you like Russian space achievements don't count for anything, while every single thing NASA does is somehow the only real progress for humanity?

I'll just list a few things here that you might have overlooked, even though Chris Barrett37 already brought some up.

Think about it: the first satellite, the first human in space, they were the ones who sent probes to the Moon first, they took those first photos of the far side of the Moon, they were the first to reach Venus—we even have photos from the surface! They even kicked off missions to Mars four years before the Americans did, even if luck wasn't on their side, plus they sent the first woman into space, performed the first spacewalk, launched the first space station, and so on.

It’s kind of silly for me to sit here and list every single thing that comes to mind, but the point is, you can't just take those milestones away from them. If you think those don't contribute to human progress, then by that same logic, none of NASA's missions contribute to progress either, right?

If you truly believe that space achievements don't matter for the future of mankind, then I honestly don't know why you're even hanging out in this thread just to bash the Russians.
The Descent in Movies ·
*Big time SPOILERS !!!!*

Haha, alright... I wasn't really expecting those alien monsters, but honestly, looking at them, it felt like those two girls could've taken down all ten of those things (monsters, I know they aren't, but whatever) or however many were lurking around before. At the end of the day, if they had just stayed low and played it smart, they probably could've wiped out way more than they did. Look, I know I'm talking crazy here, but watching it, I felt like even I could take a few of those "monsters" out myself, so by the halfway point, they weren't even scary to me anymore.
At the start, though, they actually looked pretty terrifying, you know, back when you didn't have a clue what they were or what they were capable of.

The cinematography was solid, and you don't see many all-female lead movies like this much. The acting was totally fine too, it's just that the movie itself didn't creep me out, and it's supposed to be a horror.

Last time I checked IMDb, the movie had a 7.5 rating (though the site's acting a bit glitchy right now so I'm not sure if it's still there). A 7.5 is actually higher than, say, Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, which I think got a 7.2. I mean, you can't really compare the two, but I truly don't see what's so incredible about The Descent that it deserves such a high score.
Marijuana legalization in Health ·
Daniel Patel said:Why on earth should I be forced to breathe that stuff in just because I happen to be walking past you on the street or sitting in the same cafe? 😕

I mean, why shouldn't I be able to buy it legally and just smoke at home without everyone breathing down my neck, simply because you're terrified of catching a whiff of some marijuana smoke?

Trust me, nobody's gonna force a joint into your mouth.
Best dumb movie? in Movies ·
I'm not sure if anyone else has brought up Army of Darkness yet, but honestly,
even though the movie is totally ridiculous, isn't it just pure genius?
Rising stars that never quite made it... in Movies ·
Brian Gonzalez7 said:It’s honestly kind of wild to me that Bruce Campbell hasn't broken into the massive Hollywood blockbusters.
He was absolutely incredible in Evil Dead, wasn't he? Since then, I feel like I've only caught him in From Dusk Till Dawn 2, where he gets taken out right at the start, or those little cameos in Xena... it's such a shame because the guy is a total legend.

Honestly, though, maybe it's actually better that he stayed under the radar like this, don't you think? Because now he'll always be an absolute icon—the ultimate superstar of B-movies.
Office Space (1999) in Movies ·
The movie is actually pretty hilarious.
It’s definitely worth a watch if you're a fan of Dilbert.