Alexander Lewis said:Angela, what exactly are you basing this theory on—that mammograms actually do anything positive to lower breast cancer rates?
As I recall, there were massive public awareness campaigns pushing women toward mammography. Perhaps this supposed "expansion" is just a byproduct of more people getting screened?
I read the piece over at The Council Voice, but I also took the liberty of tracking down the actual study the journalist was citing. It turns out it isn't even an official stance from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, despite how the reporter framed it.
The article itself explicitly states: Disclaimer : Recommendations made by The USPSTF are independent of the U.S. government. They should not be construed as an official position of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
First off, any journalist publishing this really ought to have been much clearer about that distinction.
Secondly, let's not forget that it was precisely those advocacy campaigns led by women's health groups and federal agencies that helped drive early detection rates up in the first place.
Sure, maybe there are side effects or concerns with mammography. But honestly, the far greater danger lies in skipping the screening altogether and letting a tumor just sit there and grow unchecked...