Curfew restrictions: Is it legal to leave your house?
in Coronavirus ·
Sam Green73 said:The Mayor of New York City just can't seem to wrap his head around the idea of shutting down the subway system.
So what's the big deal?
1406 posts shown.
Sam Green73 said:The Mayor of New York City just can't seem to wrap his head around the idea of shutting down the subway system.
Nicholas King said:Public transit is a necessity for some people. A coffee shop isn't.
The whole argument that "if they let public transit run, they should open cafes too" just doesn't hold any water, in my opinion.
Sam Green73 said:Look, it doesn't have to be an "all or nothing" situation where you just let things get overcrowded. You can simply cap the number of passengers allowed on a vehicle at one time.
It’s the exact same logic we use for capacity limits in retail stores here in the States.
Tyler Vaughn7 said:So, I'm reading Capak right now, and he's claiming one of the first things they'll ease up on is public transit. Seriously, could someone please explain to me how there's somehow less of a risk of getting infected on a bus than if you just drove from Petrijevac to Josipovac—two neighboring towns—without a permit?🤔
Jerry Robinson56 said:In that light, yes, anomalies are an inevitable constant, and any high-level overview can only offer generalizations. Unfortunately, the rigid hierarchies found in law enforcement, medicine, education, and so on... they stifle intelligence and halt progress by dismissing any genuine initiative. I encounter this firsthand in my professional life every single day. You have to realize that systems are sustained by good people. That is the only way a system survives and evolves.
One must undergo the process of burning out and rising again more times than a phoenix just to prove a point.
Therefore, you must advocate for necessary changes at your own level, while remaining mindful not to compromise others. If the precinct captains or deputies are reasonable individuals, they possess the discretionary authority to exercise common sense in their enforcement. A solution can always be engineered, regardless of how insurmountable the obstacle appears.
Someone articulated it well: the Republican Party is directly responsible (utilizing artificial divisions to consolidate power) for all the, forgive me, nonsense we've had to endure, whereas the Democratic Party serves as the accelerator and the innovator.
Melissa Collins3 said:Of course not. When the top leader of a country sneezes, you don't just sit around waiting to see what happens—you go straight into quarantine. That's how it works.
Jerry Robinson56 said:https://www.nytimes.com/article/...example_tid=5674
With 1,160 infections and one fatality reported nationwide, the consensus remains clear: they didn't just flatten the curve; they absolutely crushed it.
Yesterday, the Washington Post ran a feature titled, "New Zealand didn't just flatten the curve. They crushed it." Their reporter, Anna Fifield—who hails from New Zealand but has spent the last two decades living abroad—noted that it took a mere ten days to prove that the New Zealand strategy of immediate quarantine was undeniably effective.
While this approach shows promise, its success depends entirely on sustained discipline. One might eventually grasp why restricting movement is an absolute necessity, given how little we truly understand about the broader complexities of this situation.
Furthermore, one cannot ignore the role that population density and physical proximity play in these dynamics.
Adam Collins4 said:Right, because clearly, Border Patrol agents only sit in their little booths at the checkpoint and completely ignore the rest of the entire border line...
Totally logical, isn't it?
Weren't you supposed to be in the Scouts or something? Why all this nonsense?😉
Adam Collins4 said:A buddy of mine who runs a shift at a border crossing says there aren't any cars or migrants in sight...
And this is at a checkpoint where, not too long ago, specialized units had to work alongside their colleagues from Canada just to keep people from crossing.
He tells me things have never been this quiet in years, and it's all thanks to that perfect storm of closing down the smaller stations plus the curfew...
darktinker4 said:Oh, come on, it'll probably last until New Year's Day.😉
Who's down to sign a petition for a strict five-year quarantine? Maybe throw in seven years of good behavior just to be safe.🎉 🎉
Larry Walker24 said:then honestly, they should just shut down his whole town.
Jack Cook7 said:Look, don't try to sell me those fairy tales; I've seen way too many in my life.
People have lives, jobs, stuff going on. These mandates and decisions are being made totally on the fly (which is obvious since we've never seen anything like this before). Responsibilities aren't even clearly defined because everyone is constantly asking questions or wandering around lost or stuck on the phone. They just pass the buck, and then they expect people to follow these half-baked rules down to the millimeter, or else face draconian penalties, $10. To me, it’s a textbook case of pure incompetence.
And as usual, they cover up that incompetence by straight-up trying to scare us.
Joe Biden, man... in this country, you could try to run someone over with a car on a sidewalk, but if you're a party member, you just get some light fine. But if you didn't have a permit—which you didn't even know you needed because you were just commuting from a San Francisco Bay Area suburb to Brooklyn and had no clue where to go—they'll absolutely rip you off $10.
Rules are supposed to be passed early so people can actually study them and adapt, or if the rules suck, so they can be fixed. But these ridiculous US authorities do everything at the very last second, and then they just resort to brute force, acting like, "THIS IS THE COUNTRY! Why weren't you ready?! Do I need to call someone to deal with you!?"
Honestly, it’s terrifying how easily citizens in America are just rolling over for these ad hoc dictates and government stupidity without any protest whatsoever. Even worse, people like you end up calling me out for "whining aimlessly." It's classic totalitarian behavior. A bunch of clueless hacks who can't predict anything, so they're always "surprised by unpredictable events," yet somehow a big enough club can fix any problem. Like how Eric Adams was dealing with things, but whatever, "he personally guarantees everyone is safe."
I can already see the police checkpoints where they'll be waving political membership cards and shouting, "Do you even know who I am!!??"
Steven Hughes44 said:I couldn't even make it through that much. It was screaming boredom from the very first minute, honestly. It’s rare to see a movie this mediocre sitting there among all the loud, overrated competition.
The "Trash Can of the Year" award finally has its rightful winner. 😁