Posts by Lisa Morales4

At this point, we’re really talking about the necessity of lucid dreaming rather than actual free will
Besides, why wouldn't you consider overcoming an addiction like smoking a genuine exercise of free will? You could choose to quit at a molecular level and effectively save your own life 🙂

Just as a quick refresher: in the realm of eternity—which exists beyond our linear perception of time—the past and the future are essentially one and the same 🙂

By the way, I see you finally made a decision regarding that house... though, technically, you could have just sat there waiting for the dream itself to manifest (which would never happen): you still need to be the one to decide whether to act or not

Are dreams acting as a blueprint for our future actions, or are they just a way for the mind to reconstruct things that have already happened?

Zachary Young8 said:If we could somehow peer back into those first few micro-seconds following the Big Bang, then theoretically, with enough raw data, you could reconstruct every single event in cosmic history. It’s all just a pre-recorded film playing out because everything was set in motion the moment the clock started ticking. In that scenario, calculating the future isn't just a dream—it's a math problem.

This leads us down a pretty grim path where everything is predetermined, leaving absolutely no room for free will or pure chance. We’re essentially just following a script, where our reactions and decisions are already mapped out before we even think them.

In a purely mathematical universe like this, there’s no space left for a traditional God. At least not an omnipotent one, because if such a being exists, they too would be bound by these laws—their every move would be predictable and calculable.

I categorically NEslaz
nothing is set in stone; everything remains open-ended.
The fact that a higher power might already understand the underlying architecture doesn't mean we lack free will; rather, it speaks to the sheer magnitude of total Knowledge.

For us, the journey ahead is about mastering that Knowledge and navigating the inevitable utopia described by Jacques Delors in his education manifesto within the UNESCO report.

While the Treci and other developing nations are still fighting to master ucenje just to survive, the essential skills for the 21st century are shifting toward mastering the ucenje of Knowledge, the ucenje of Function, the ucenje of living in Harmony, and finally, the ucenje of Being.

All of this knowledge is meant to empower us to become co-creators of existence.

Our free will exists precisely within our capacity for "not-knowing" under God's watchful eye.

Does the person who started this thread actually know the original reason or purpose for why Man was placed on this planet?

And why direct every single question toward God?
It’s pretty obvious who the boss is down here on Earth. Why don't you try working for Him instead? Or is He already way too busy dealing with all the different illnesses being thrown at Man?!

It’s not really about Jeff, then—it’s more about the circle of profiteers surrounding him, much like the group orbiting Judge Z
manipulators
they'll probably end up locking him down just so he can actually survive such an intense schedule

Anthony Perez9 said:👍

As for enlightened Jeff and his whole setup—the site, the podcasts, all that—it actually reminds me of this joke:

God and the devil are looking down from above at a guy who just hit enlightenment:
- He’s saved, God says. He’s finally enlightened and knows who he really is,
so there's nothing you can do to him now...
- Heh, quite the opposite. Now the real work begins, the devil says. I’m going to help him
get organized, build a following, and preach everything he just realized.

Hmm. There’s a version of that joke attributed to Jiddu Krishnamurti. He used to talk about how God and the devil watched a man find the Truth and grab hold of it. God turns to Satan and asks:

"Does that bother you?"

To which the prince of darkness replies: "Not at all. I'll help him organize it."

It's a jab at religious institutions—all those hierarchies, dogmas, and massive buildings. Jeff’s talks don't fall into that bucket. Neither did Krishnamurti's. Why shouldn't someone share what they've experienced and then just be quiet? Sure, he charges for it, but that's just covering overhead. If he started acting like an authority figure or let people turn him into a guru, he’d be falling right into the trap of those religious hustlers and the general human laziness that craves a leader to follow. I don't think that's his style.

So, the joke doesn't really fit our Jeff. 🙂
But it definitely hits the likes of Sai, Osho Rajneesh, Maharishi, Saint Paul, Mahaguru, Muhammad, and those other fakes.

My mistake, Jeff actually learns about the Light from Saint Paul, just like how the others learned about spirituality from Paul.🙂

Every singer has their own audience, and every preacher earns their place in the world

No matter how uncomfortable it might feel for some, God knows why He allows certain things to happen. Jeff is... a trumpeter
He plays the role of the horn, reaching those very people that nothing else—and no other way—could ever touch;
he’s essentially prepping souls for that final trumpet blast when time finally runs out..
I wonder when people will instantly recognize the Truth, and when their internal compasses will be sharp enough to follow that magnetic Force of Rescue

I actually really dig his newsletter on non-duality. I love how he explains oneness by circling around the edges rather than just knocking on the front door—moving away from simple monism by interpreting oneness through the lens of multiplicity and all that. But hey, God works in mysterious ways; there are certain people who will find that exact approach makes everything click..
It's just like those folks who won't believe a single word a Bishop says unless his cathedral doors are plated in solid gold (EEK!) 🙂

In the end, it's all going to be gathered back into the One

electricdriver33 said:Is it just me, or is everyone else missing how much The Unknown is totally trolling enlightened Jeff and the whole idea of enlightenment itself... 😕
If nothing else, that opening post he made to start this thread was actually being pretty mild. 😍 😂

What he’s trying to do doesn't really matter; what matters is the specific way he fails. That's the interesting part. If we look at it through a theological lens—someone feel free to translate that for the rest of us—every attempt made by the devil is ultimately turned into his own defeat, serving instead to bring victory to the Name of God.

Jeff Foster is one of the true warriors of our time.
He belongs to the army of light.

These are the people who love and serve the Truth, primarily by searching for it, and once they find it, they establish and multiply it by sharing it with others.

"When birds fall from the sky and the animals are dying,
a new tribe of people shall come unto the Earth
from many colours, classes, creeds,
who by their actions and deeds shall make the Earth green again.
They will be known as the Warriors of the Rainbow." ~Hopi Prophecy ♥

This isn't just talking about carbon emissions or the physical, material stuff
that defines a person; it's mainly referring to a spiritual rebirth—an awakening that will eventually overflow and reflect onto the physical world.

Our friend the Unknown can keep playing his passive little games for a while longer, but he knows deep down that when the time comes, even the black trembling in affection 🙂, and to keep from melting away himself, 😍

Thanks to the Unknown for starting this thread; I'm finding it both fun and enlightening. 🙂

Matthew Ortiz3 said:To put it in plain, salt-of-the-earth terms... I am looking for a MAN (the real deal, possessing exactly what I lack). 😉

Did I hit the nail on the head? 😁

Not at all, honestly, shame on you
we are dealing with incredibly serious matters here; it’s hardly your fault if your definition of "man" is just synonymous with "masculinity" (and capitalized, no less)

I am being as serious as possible on this thread, and I'm certainly not making this about my own private life or intimacy (that's what the neighboring threads about houses and cats are for); rather, I am offering my civic, human perspective and responding to previous posts that have quite motivated me as a human who, by the way, clearly chooses a spirituality that is inseparable from our physical nature—a nature that serves as the very means to realize our Source, God, and to reconcile heaven and earth

If your response is meant to be condescending, using your stance to negate what I’ve said above, or attempting to diminish my effort to break down clichés regarding a negative dualism of human nature—which is being pushed here as a supposed superiority or bias that we supposedly need to fight against and, I assume, reject—then fine, I accept that, and let's keep debating... I'm guessing you aren't such a die-hard polytheist, nor a true pantheist, nor such a devoted follower of Hinduism as you are a critic of monotheism; I accept that because I actually enjoy talking to people I disagree with, as I consider myself an open-minded person; talking to people who think exactly like me gets boring

And you can be whatever you want, including being mistaken in your assumption that I am searching for the "masculine" (by the way, when I look for something, I find it, unless I simply allow it to find me), just don't be the person who intentionally obscures the point

Daniel Castillo11 said:Quote: actually, "spirituality" is a somewhat nonsensical term within the context of this discussion. Especially if we approach this from the standpoint of naturalistic metaphysics, the word loses its footing entirely because, in such a framework, there is no "spirit" to be found as a distinct object. Naturalism essentially dissolves the duality of spirit and matter at its very foundation. Since I can't think of a better equivalent, I find myself using "spirituality," even though the word often carries the baggage of unprovable realities, paranormal phenomena, or religious concepts.

In a naturalist worldview, there is no Self as an ontologically isolated entity set apart from other selves. The Self isn't an object; it’s a process—essentially a collection of incredibly complex biochemical reactions that culminate in individual psychology and the construction of identity. It's shaped by evolutionary biology on one hand and societal influence on the other, but the Self is definitively a creation of the mind working in tandem with the external environment (those various biological and psychological factors outside ourselves). The core aim of spirituality in most traditions is the dissolution of the sense of self, whether that is a side effect or the ultimate goal. To my mind, a person cannot lose something they never truly possessed in the first place; therefore, perhaps this entire search isn't about discovering some higher Self, but rather discovering that such a thing simply doesn't exist. Nature is a living tapestry of endless, interconnected processes that move without any obvious cause-and-effect in a strictly linear sense. This boundless dynamism is far too vast for the human intellect to grasp in its entirety, so we attempt to describe it through linear, causal language. In reality, a human being is just one single process within nature, existing amidst the infinite dynamics of countless other processes.

is this that spirituality where there is more than one infinity—a "more than one everything" type of spirituality, where the universe is a multiverse, a mega-multiverse filled with so many alternative meta-universes that any notion of universality is nothing more than a passing illusion?

That depends entirely on which cosmological model we decide to accept as valid. For now, our best bet is the Big Bang combined with potentially M-theory (along with other string theories). We could simply refer to the existence of multiverses (if they truly exist) as the sheer state of being or existence itself.

this quote from J. Krishnamurti is actually the heart of Christianity:

"Every mind contains all minds, for every mind is one. Such is the truth." (A Course in Miracles, a feature-length documentary based on the book of the same name, which depicts the spiritual awakening and enlightenment of over 100 people under the influence of the revolutionary mind of Jesus Christ)

A Course in Miracles is pure New Age. It isn't Christianity; rather, it's a Gnostic reinterpretation of dogmatic Christianity. I don't know a single Christian theologian who endorses these kinds of esoteric ideas. So, claiming it is the heart of Christianity isn't quite accurate. If we're being realistic, it might only represent the core of one specific school of thought.

Quote: extraordinary degree of beauty, elegance, harmony and ingenuity.

Enlightenment, if you ask me, is really just a step beyond grasping quantum physics from a third-person perspective and understanding those fundamental laws laid down by Einstein—laws which suggest that the universe itself already possesses such an

Honestly, that sounds like typical religious rhetoric to me. The problem is that everyone seems to toss that word around however they please, making it feel like a hollow cliché that could mean absolutely anything or nothing at all.

Furthermore, I truly believe that for a naturalist—be they an atheist or an agnostic—this material universe alone provides more than enough foundation to be spiritual, moral, and self-aware. I fail to see how introducing speculative concepts like a soul or a spirit adds any tangible value to someone's spirituality or their ability to live out practical moral principles in their daily lives.

It’s not up for debate that they are mutants paraphrasing the teachings of Jesus Christ to fit their current surroundings and subculture, but my point was simply that they are nothing more than seekers of Truth, just like any other person since the dawn of the century. Even someone like J. Krishnamurti, who teaches the same human ontological drive toward knowing Truth and Love through self-experience, essentially reframes it. That's how we ended up with what used to be Buddhist nothingness becoming everythingness, emptiness becoming fullness, and total extinction becoming sustainability. Isn't that just the ultimate new way

Quote: actually, "spirituality" is a meaningless word in the context of this topic. Especially if we start from a naturalistic metaphysics—then it makes no sense at all because there is no spirit to be found as an object within it. Naturalism destroys the duality of spirit and matter at its very core. I don't know of an equivalent term, so I use "spirituality," even though it often implies a belief in unprovable realities, paranormal phenomena, or religious concepts.

So what exactly is young Jeff enlightening if not his own spirit?
And how can naturalism "destroy" something that "(anyway) doesn't exist"?

I'm just not satisfied with those negative theories of naturalism where a person is nothing more than a biological robot. I'm not fulfilled by a version of naturalism where someone gets high on some natural hallucinogens and then wanders off down some otherworldly path.

I choose what the Holy Spirit gathers into the One—what our Source has already chosen for us. I choose a person who knows how to move through the diversity and plurality of a single world. A person who is both conscious and conscientious. Someone who is both spiritual and physical. Someone who recognizes and understands their own guarantee and their connection to the eternal, ever-present, almighty, and omniscient Truth, Love, and Justice, which is One both in heaven and on earth. It is simply up to a person's free will to seek it out, to reach for it.

In everyday life, I generally have no trouble expressing the same thing in plain, ordinary language, leaving room for someone to be a theist Christian, a Muslim, a Buddhist, an atheist, or a Taoist. In those moments, I’m just being inspired and carried by the reality of the moment, which is something I find lacking here in this virtual space, so I resort to this theological, theistic register.

Daniel Castillo11 said:But honestly, what Jeff is teaching essentially dismantles every religion and all forms of spirituality out there—even those more agnostic paths like Advaita Vedanta, let alone Christianity, which tends to crumble the moment you start applying any real critical scrutiny to it.

There is simply no requirement for external saviors, fairies, spirits, gods, or even the devil...

The individual life is actually just Life being viewed through the eyes of an illusory self. Jeff, much like certain naturalistic philosophers and pantheists, maintains that Life—that ultimate Steak/Absolute—is ever-present, right here and now. There is no need to go searching because we are already "home." All spiritualities and religions are built upon duality and the supernatural, acting as if some otherworldly realm is our true home or essence. But if everything truly Is, then searching becomes redundant. Simply abandoning the search is what constitutes "enlightenment" (if we absolutely must use such confusing terminology). I believe the late Jiddu Krishnamurti would have found common ground with that sentiment.

If I may draw a parallel to the philosophy of immanence and Gilles Deleuze, Life—or what he refers to as the "chaosmos" (a blend of chaos and cosmos)—is an infinite sequence of processes, dynamically scattered yet fundamentally interconnected. In this view, the illusion of separation between subject and object dissolves. In reality, Life is a flow in which it is impossible to capture its essence and then proceed to talk about it. That is precisely why theology and sacred texts ultimately fail. The very notion of searching for something that is already present is quite damaging; it is a waste of precious time and only serves to fuel anxiety—the "I must achieve this or that" mentality—and existential crises.

Thomas Metzinger, a modern philosopher working in tandem with neuroscience, has arrived at a new metaphysical model suggesting that every form of individuality is illusory, including the little "ego," the grand "Self," and every variety of identity we cling to. These types of attachments are merely products of cultural, genetic, biological, and psychological conditioning. For Metzinger, the "self" is always a phenomenon and never a noumenon (or a distinct essence/object). Subject and object are just standard polarities within the human brain. However, Life/Steak/Existence exists as a self-sufficient entity, without any need for external objects to somehow cause that Steak. This effectively dismantles creationist arguments and implies a radical rejection of anything "transcendental," because the mere idea of something distant and artificially severed from the Steak itself is inherently problematic.

@Anthony Perez9

Man...

👍 Cheers to atheistic spirituality! 🙂

Is this that specific kind of spirituality where the physical takes center stage and the spiritual is treated as secondary? The one where the human Self is built entirely on material mechanisms and mental models—essentially treating a person like nothing more than a mortal automaton?

Are we talking about that specific kind of spirituality where there isn't just one infinity, but more than one "everything"? The kind where the universe is a multi-multi, mega-multi arrangement of alternative meta-universes, making the very idea of a single universality nothing more than a total illusion?

Daniel Castillo11 As follows:
There aren't really any words to describe that kind of energy—it's already out there, manifesting and flowing without any limits or boundaries. It doesn't belong to you or me; it belongs to everyone. You're a part of it, just as much as the rest of us. You are an expression of that very essence. Just as the flower is an expression of life, you are another expression of life.
At the heart of everything lies life itself. As for what that truly entails, it’s something we may never fully grasp.

J. Krishnamurti

That’s a really beautiful quote, and it hits home. Jeff expressed almost the exact same sentiment over on his page.

This quote from Krishnamurti is actually the very heart of Christianity:

"Every mind contains all minds, for every mind is one. Such is the truth." (A Course in Miracles, a documentary film based on the book that illustrates the spiritual awakening and enlightenment of over 100 people under the revolutionary influence of Jesus Christ)

Enlightenment is really just a step beyond grasping quantum physics in the third person and understanding Einstein's fundamental laws, which show that the universe itself already possesses such an extraordinary degree of beauty, elegance, harmony, and ingenuity.

Brenda Cook4 said:The thing is, "emptiness"—or what existentialists call "pointlessness"—is likely just the fundamental state of existence. But saying that doesn't mean we're helpless, nor does it mean everything is equal on the level of our actual lived experience. Everything we discuss here is secondary, basically just rationalizations or concepts. To one person, that might be God; to another, it might be nothing at all. They are all optical illusions, but we simply have to hold onto them, whatever shape they take. To me, the only thing that matters is trying not to make life feel small and miserable.

optical illusions 😲

It’s all pretty pointless—just a byproduct of the secular worldview where everything is fleeting. That constant anxiety and dread stems from the fact that everything comes just to leave

I'm with you there... at the end of the day, nobody wants to die in a pointless way that adds up to zero; we all want to go out like heroes🙂

Hey T, is your avatar trying to suggest that we women are totally helpless unless our manicures are perfect? 😍

Paul Jones7 said:I mean, religions are fine for study and comparison, I guess, but in my view, the best kind of faith is the internal, direct sort. It seems like a shame to view belief solely through the lens of some external religious doctrine. You end up with people labeling themselves as "not a believer" just because they didn't fit into a specific organized system, which feels like a missed opportunity. To me, a transcendent faith is rooted in reality, and a believer is simply anyone who senses—or truly believes—that there’s something more out there. That’s really the fundamental starting point.

Nobody ever sat me down and taught me to view happiness as a mere coincidence. I just... figured it out on my own, I suppose. I spent a lot of time just watching the people around me and the paths their lives took, and I started noticing this strange logic in everything that happened to them—especially those moments where things went right (or wrong) through no effort of their own, almost purely by chance. So, if "chance" fits the pattern that perfectly, maybe it isn't quite as accidental as it looks, right? 😉

For me, this is pretty much... FO The Way Quote 🙂

Paul Jones7 said:I mean, religions are fine for study and comparison, I guess, but in my view, the best kind of faith is the internal, direct sort. It seems like a shame to view belief solely through the lens of some external religious doctrine. You end up with people labeling themselves as "not a believer" just because they didn't fit into a specific organized system, which feels like a missed opportunity. To me, a transcendent faith is rooted in reality, and a believer is simply anyone who senses—or truly believes—that there’s something more out there. That’s really the fundamental starting point.

Nobody ever sat me down and taught me to view happiness as a mere coincidence. I just... figured it out on my own, I suppose. I spent a lot of time just watching the people around me and the paths their lives took, and I started noticing this strange logic in everything that happened to them—especially those moments where things went right (or wrong) through no effort of their own, almost purely by chance. So, if "chance" fits the pattern that perfectly, maybe it isn't quite as accidental as it looks, right? 😉

That's basically what I've been trying to say since this thread started.

And this mess .. but I guess there's nothing to be done if he's one of those lucky ones chosen by fate

Hey Alicia... he's just that guy... you know, the one who can't get anything right... but I guess it doesn't matter when luck is on your side.. look at what he's doing

but regardless, he still has that certain magic



Alice, be careful, don't let him pull you down.. though I'm glad you see him too, so I know I'm not just imagining things 😛 we both got a little bit lucky tonight with our mirrors..

vividbison9 said:It’s got eyes, it’s got a mouth, it’s even got a heart—but it’s missing a nose and ears.

So, where'd the nose and ears go? 🤷😕

😂 everyone else in Jagomir 😍
as long as he has a heart 😛
.. and eyes 😍

Brenda Cook4 said:Sometimes I catch myself thinking it's all just too much effort anyway. In the grand scheme of things, everything passes in the blink of an eye. All these massive theories and big ideas... they flash through my mind for a second, but then I'm hit with this deeper truth: it's all the same. It's all somewhat pointless.😬

Without a struggle, without any real core, life just becomes one endless slog on a treadmill. Even when you try to stay positive, those thoughts don't actually lead anywhere meaningful. They just circle back to the mundane and the tasteless—to that sense of instability and fleetingness where everything feels temporary. It’s all just a cycle of short-lived pleasures and passing thrills that ultimately lead to emptiness, hopelessness, and a total void.

The molecular machinery of God's alchemy transformed us from mere stardust into rational, conscious beings possessed of a divine heart and soul. Now, the choice is ours: will we remain just apes that got lucky, or will we become the elected—the chosen ones?

We need more than just basic logic or the collective intelligence of the entire world if we ever hope to truly master the art of happiness. It’s about learning how to actually understand and connect with the soul of the person standing right in front of you.
That's how we tell each other apart. 🙂



my Soul Sings
(Watching the 24/7 international live worship stream. )

🙂

casualtiger2 said:So, what does actually look like when you talk about a "vision."
I’ll admit—as a total Virgo, I’m pretty skeptical about all this daydreaming stuff.
We’re all moving toward something, whether we consider ourselves visionaries or not. There's no such thing as standing still.
But let's get specific—are we talking about a vision of a happy society? A happy version of me? The house I’ll eventually build, the kids I’ll raise, some sort of enlightenment, a garden I’ll tend, an art gallery, a scientific breakthrough... or what? A vision of what, exactly?

Honestly, you're such an emotional skeptic. By your logic, dreaming is nothing more than a playground for demons to multiply—just a chaotic melting pot of all our surrounding stimuli trying to form some coherent picture. 🙂
But for someone like Goya, creating reality through dreams—picturing the world right in front of him—is something innate and intuitive; it’s just part of how we evolve to adapt.

But fine, let's stick to our little mental movies, those approximations we use to build a version of reality that feels clear and "common sense" to us. Let's just drift off into a "real" dream, outside the matrix, and try to step beyond the confines of our own minds. 🙂

Wake up, Alico, and take a look behind the mirror.
The real drama isn't happening on center stage; it's going down backstage.

Singing a song or dreaming—it’s really just two sides of the same coin.
It’s much like staring deep into a mirror.

Everything is ultimately just our way of syncing up with the Other.
Dreams serve as this incredible training ground for the soul, where you toss out your modified ego just to see how the Other responds to you.
...and I don't mean those surface-level dreams where you're just wandering through mundane nonsense, but rather a deeper dive into intuitive imagination. That’s where you go in barefoot; you leave yourself at the door, shedding those self-satisfied views of your own resonances and the finite, limited world we think we know. Then, looking into that mirror, you see yourself fully realized 👏 and while you're at it, you observe the Other and how they react to your presence... that's when we finally cast ourselves into nothingness before that reflection, submerging our faces into Null City, being reborn, and rising once more.

Massimo, oh man... 🙂 says there are those with pale, sorrowful, weary faces who dream without ever truly sleeping. But when he sings that song about the man who feels Love with his very soul—making the heavens marvel—he becomes stronger than anything, conquering it all.
(.. can't drop the link, the video is pretty simple 🙄)

Ah, Bob Marley... he spent his entire life—short though it was—fighting to open up the heart chakras of government politicians. He just wanted them all to share a smoke with him at least once, hoping that maybe, just maybe, they’d start being a bit more generous toward people. A little free hug here and there. 🙏



While alcohol tends to dull the senses, Cannabis actually stimulates them... it’s quite similar to how toxic berries work
.
Take my old friend Zora (there's a clip about 4.5 to 9 minutes long); even 15,000 years ago, he was feeling the stress of the hunt, under immense pressure to prove himself and earn enough trust to become a shaman for the North American tectonic plate. The day before the big hunt, he reached for those toxic berries that his Neanderthal brother had warned him were deadly but possessed incredible hallucinogenic power. He shared a few with his buddies. (Now, this isn't just my take; it's an educational reconstruction based on scientific evidence from early human remains, which can tell us quite a bit about their diet and how their chakras functioned). Once those heroes ingested the berries, the lines between worlds split open, allowing them to connect with the Great Spirit. Through song and drawing, the Great Spirit gave Zora instructions on exactly where to hunt the next day and how to track his prey. Empowered by strength from the Above (as poor Jacko used to say... you know, the guy who lived his life under general anesthesia), Zorko stood fearlessly the very next day right where he knew he needed to be: eye-to-eye with a multi-ton beast for a massive cave-side BBQ!

That entire cave had enough dinner to last a month—goats for drums, horns for pipes, and a hundred other things—plus the walls of the cave themselves were graced with eternal frescoes... not to mention the musical demo tapes 😍
. And after a great feast, well... we all know what happens when that second chakra blooms
.
So, what is the actual difference between Cannabis and those toxic berries?
Aha (and by "aha," I mean IMHO)... it's really just a matter of color and taste
. 🙄The berries don't damage the lungs... and neither does general anesthesia
. ...Though, the berries are cheaper, completely natural, and a gift from God... much like Cannabis is. They are also legal, yet they demand the same thing: you have to be the hunter, not the prey 👍
.

Similarly, there are indications that medical Cannabis can help children with autism
.