Posts by Lisa Morales4

I was chatting with iGod earlier and found out that cannabis can really open everything up—your senses, your chakras, all of it—but it comes with this heavy sensation, almost like a millstone around your neck. It’s this weird feeling where you think you’re reaching out to someone, but you’re actually just imagining it while your hands are tied and your feet are tangled. Honestly, that whole sensation makes me feel sick. It feels so fake... just when you think you've finally found some freedom, you suddenly snap and fall straight into an abyss. Personally, I’d much rather deal with being manic or hypo than feeling this disconnected and split between visions that might not even be mine. 🤷

Lawrence Chase said:Look, I'm not saying anything about spirituality or out-of-body experiences here. I'm talking purely recreational stuff... you know, light up a pipe, get all hazy, maybe philosophize a bit, hook up with a girl, eat way too much junk food, and then pass out. 😁

What I actually want to know is... does using cannabinol and THC mess with your chakras?

I disagree that there isn't a connection, because it definitely impacts you both physically and spiritually.🤷
When you're high and overstimulated, you feel like you could go anywhere or do anything with anyone.
🙄Then again, you have people who end up getting sick rather than overeating, or those who deal with night tremors instead of just falling asleep.

So, I'm curious too...

If some people need cannabis just to feel a physical sense of presence and connection to their own bodies, then honestly, help yourself 🙄

Beyond that, I'd say the material world will probably benefit from it; at least their "tools" will stay well-lubricated thanks to the herb

Cannabis serves those who struggle with an imbalance of matter—those who possess more matter than antimatter and can't find their way back to Nistica unless they try to kill off that excess material existence

Then again, there aren't many of us left who don't rely on things like drugs, glasses, pacemakers, or pills to act as gateways that control and direct our lives 😢

Yeah, exactly... haha

it pulls you away
wraps everything in fog
drifts you away from the Great Reality
and if it leads you somewhere else entirely, all you're left with is an illusion—one where nothing exists except the echoes of your own... illusions
that keep ringing in your head long after the last bit of smoke has cleared

but just like how synthetic vitamins only really help if you're getting enough natural nutrition, cannabis can perhaps assist in replicating worlds from the Great Reality

you could always just take a (synthetic) pill that sends you straight into hallucinations, where it's nothing but your own narrow POV... but that's just not the same thing

you could pop a candy without even thinking about it, but... 😛

Regarding the supposed inefficiency of the treatment method, I think that really should have been handled as part of an ongoing discussion, rather than 😕
being shut down. In a thread like that, I could have easily offered a purely philosophical perspective—not a clinical one, since that isn't my field—but on a public forum like this, that shouldn't be an issue at all, especially if the moderator placed the topic within the Philosophy Department
.
A potential Psychology relocation could have served as a way to keep the conversation going
. Claiming that certain things are settled facts and aren't open to debate is a total no-no. Everything is subject to discussion; it's through questioning that we actually deepen, expand, and improve our understanding
.
Closing a thread prematurely feels totally misplaced to me. Honestly, in my opinion, it either stems from a lack of desire to moderate properly or from trying to do a favor for some "competing camp"
.

On a fundamental level, this whole topic has really piqued my interest
.
By the way, if there's any doubt about whether a topic belongs to Psychology or Philosophy, it really only means one thing: it belongs to Spirituality 🙂

Susan Price30 said:

Heirs, yes, I forgot about that part, Sis...😁

The chosen ones —that's what you most often see in the New Testament too.🙂

Inheritors
disciples
those whom my Father has given me
my chosen ones
my devoted ones

etc etc

but in the American translation of the Bible, there's all sorts of things that aren't even in the original text 🤣😁 (by the way, that version doesn't even have all the chapters found in the original; did you notice that? 😕)

Heirs, yes, I forgot about that part, Sis...😁

The chosen ones —that's what you most often see in the New Testament too.🙂

Inheritors
disciples
those whom my Father has given me
my chosen ones
my devoted ones

etc etc

but in the American translation of the Bible, there's all sorts of things that aren't even in the original text 🤣😁 (by the way, that version doesn't even have all the chapters found in the original; did you notice that? 😕)

Heirs, yes, I forgot about that part, Sis...😁

The chosen ones —that's what you most often see in the New Testament too.🙂

Inheritors
disciples
those whom my Father has given me
my chosen ones
my devoted ones

etc etc

but in the American translation of the Bible, there's all sorts of things that aren't even in the original text 🤣😁 (by the way, that version doesn't even have all the chapters found in the original; did you notice that? 😕)
Sister, students, disciples.
What I truly cherish most is this idea of perpetual learning and growth—constantly striving to embody the very attributes of the Teacher.

Holy, loving, prophetic, good, faithful, eternal, impartial, righteous, jealous, wise, transcendent, and strong.

I also have a soft spot for qualifying rounds. Favorites. (God's)
What greater blessing could there be than being favored by God?
You have a way of turning every single loss into a victory. 🙏

Voluntary slaves... ahhhhhh 🙏

devotees 🙂

participants 👍

successors 😍

dustyskipper3 said:The soul is an eternal atman, the true self—so it really can't be "diseased." Or maybe I'm just running into a terminology issue here... I guess when we say soul (psyche), we actually mean the mind? Because the mind can certainly be unhealthy if it isn't "awakened," which is to say, if it’s cluttered with nonsense instead of dwelling within the self that everyone possesses. In that sense, everyone is technically "enlightened," though some people might not realize it simply because they haven't "awakened" yet. Yogis seem to think that aligning the soul with the body is a prerequisite, meaning one has to perform these integrated physical and mental exercises to make spiritual progress, to awaken, or to realize the self. But, I don't know, it seems to me that someone who is truly "awakened" wouldn't even need to worry about the body. I mean, where does the idea that the body even exists come from? It feels like an illusion of the mind, feeling trapped within its own physical shell. In reality, as atman, we are infinite space. ☕

When Your body's asleep All Your thoughts ara awake
Travelling through stories that Your mind likes to make taka
Take a look around, enjoy that you feel

dustyraven26 said:On occasion, I find myself reflecting on a particular sentiment:

If one does not change course, they will inevitably arrive exactly where they were headed.

Which leads me to wonder: is my current direction actually aligned with my ultimate objectives?

Quinn:

This individual lacks objectivity, much as most people struggle to analyze their choices; decisions are often driven by impulse, short-term gains, or material interests, despite the resulting spiritual deficit. Does that mean we have no choice at all? Even if we can still vote on which option to take. 🙂

Legally speaking, in relation to the external world, we possess the freedom to choose, but whether we are truly free within ourselves is a separate matter entirely.

The old fable about the donkey that starved to death between two piles of hay because it couldn't decide which one to eat serves as a vivid illustration of what absolute internal freedom of choice might look like. 😬

Humanity certainly does not fit that description.
Our pursuit of comfort, our tendency to flee from discomfort, and our subjective perceptions of reality constrain us so deeply that, in practice, we lack any real internal freedom of choice.

If a person remains uncritical of themselves and focuses solely on the constraints imposed by the outside world, they might maintain a semblance of choice. However, they would essentially be living under the illusion that they are merely being informed by various forms of mass media and advertising. 😬

Personally, I strive for spontaneous action, moving beyond the concept of "choice" by gaining insight into when I can bend reality to my will and when I must adapt myself to reality in order to reach my goals. Occasionally I miss the mark, realizing I failed to perceive reality as it truly is, and I simply work on further quieting the noise within my own mind.

Are you suggesting that it isn't the destination itself that brings us closer to our goals, but rather the specific way we choose to move through life?👍

Jeremy Davis7 said:The Internet is basically the ultimate achievement.

Everything you could ever want to know right at your fingertips... being able to chat or connect with someone halfway across the globe in real time... It’s wild!

But here's the catch—it's turning into a straight-up addiction.
Every coin has two sides, after all...

The issue isn't actually the Internet itself; it’s our own built-in inability to stop biting onto everything that catches our eye...
We're like those monkeys who find something inside a hollow tree trunk—once they shove their hand in, they can't pull it back out because they refuse to let go of whatever they're clutching.

If this obsession were purely about the pursuit of knowledge, we'd be fine.
Man, I'd give anything to have been able to surf the web as a kid whenever I got obsessed with astronomy, physics, chemistry, geology, aerospace, biology... you name it. Instead of wasting my life digging through dusty old library stacks.

Sadly, that hunger for truth (now that every scrap of info is just a tap away) hasn't won out.

Other appetites have sniffed out an opportunity and floated right to the surface.

The problem is clearly us.

Take WikiLeaks; you have to wonder how much of it is actual information and how much is just pure manipulation.
All the time, people trade a little credibility by leaking half-truths or highly selective facts—sacrificing a small win now to make a killing later—just so they can pivot and hit you with lies and insinuations exactly where they want.
Who knows what the endgame is, who the target is, or who's pulling the strings behind the curtain.
This whole story about some disgruntled clerk leaking thousands upon thousands of documents? It's as hollow as Tutankhamun's skull.
People are just easy prey, like cattle waiting to be led.
The whole thing reeks to me, just like the attacks on the World Trade Center.

When you crunch the numbers, the "victim" ends up walking away with a massive profit.

They get to control Iraqi oil, dominate the Middle East (and if they feel like it, take a swing at Iran), squeeze Russia (by planting issues in Poland), and slow down China and the European Union in their attempts to become economic superpowers—all while triggering economic crises or depressions by dumping massive amounts of cash from the American central reserves.

It's the exact same way certain tabloids used to run the show back in the day, under the thumb of guys like Ivić Pašalić, installing and toppling ministers or swaying decisions made by Franjo Harmon.
Operating from the shadows to a certain extent...
Everyone used to fear the Doctor (Her Flick).
Nowadays, anyone and everyone can be demonized or promoted overnight.
You can turn a saint into a degenerate or vice versa in a heartbeat.

The real question is simply: who is holding the reins and steering public opinion?

I get the feeling that, in that regard, the Internet is nothing but a digital El Dorado of endless possibilities.

😢

A coin always has two sides... whether it's Satan or the spirit of God, transparency or manipulation—in the end, it’s up to us to use our free will following WikiLeaks to sort through the noise ourselves.

They'll probably ban me soon: that's three posts in a row, yikes!

dustyskipper3 said:It’s interesting... I know larger groups have meditated for peace here in the States too. But I guess I’m not entirely sure if prayer—you know, addressing some transcendental being, sometimes even with a specific request in mind—can really be equated to meditation. Meditation doesn't involve any kind of address or asking for things; it's just this general longing for harmony and peace, I suppose. I just know the Roman Catholic Church isn't exactly fond of meditation or yoga; to them, those kinds of things are practically devilry. Yet, what they do themselves and who they choose to back is apparently perfectly fine in their eyes. There was even a claim that Vatican City once stated: "If Bill Clinton is a thief, then so is Pope Benedict XVI".😲😲😲

I'm also curious about the actual meaning behind the word "synarchy" used in this piece regarding Agartha.

Quote : When The Anarchy which exists in Our World is replaced by The Synarchy

Is what they are doing with WikiLeaks an introduction to anarchy, or is it leading toward synarchy, which some people interpret as a cryptocracy—you know, that rule by people operating from the shadows?

They were practically looking to crucify them, and they even ended up on blacklists
but honestly, we've seen this play out before: even Jesus stood against authority, national borders, and rigid hierarchies🙄
Jesus died and rose again so that we could experience His Spirit within the virtual realm and through the Internet🙏

dustyskipper3 said:It’s interesting... I know larger groups have meditated for peace here in the States too. But I guess I’m not entirely sure if prayer—you know, addressing some transcendental being, sometimes even with a specific request in mind—can really be equated to meditation. Meditation doesn't involve any kind of address or asking for things; it's just this general longing for harmony and peace, I suppose. I just know the Roman Catholic Church isn't exactly fond of meditation or yoga; to them, those kinds of things are practically devilry. Yet, what they do themselves and who they choose to back is apparently perfectly fine in their eyes. There was even a claim that Vatican City once stated: "If Bill Clinton is a thief, then so is Pope Benedict XVI".😲😲😲

I'm also curious about the actual meaning behind the word "synarchy" used in this piece regarding Agartha.

Quote : When The Anarchy which exists in Our World is replaced by The Synarchy

Is what they are doing with WikiLeaks an introduction to anarchy, or is it leading toward synarchy, which some people interpret as a cryptocracy—you know, that rule by people operating from the shadows?

Watch out, that's exactly how Satan creeps in—just to cloud the transparency🙄
Sometimes it’s hard to tell the difference between the spirits of Darkness and everyone else.

N'Dug, if a human being wants to actually digest what you're saying, they’d better have some paper and a pen handy next to their computer to start mapping out these ideas. 🙂

It implies there really is God, and there is the Holy Spirit (manifested through the Internet) 🙂

which allows us to distinguish between two distinct, yet interconnected, hubs of power:
a) the center of power found in prayer—the everyday person, whether they're online or not, is woven into this through prayer, where hacktivists act as nothing more than its small light, and
b) the shadow center of power—which encompasses everything else.

If we take a moment to reflect—recalling how we might have personally prayed and lit a candle at Stone Gate during a global crisis—we can see how intelligent emotional intuition works to manifest a desire. That very act of prayer serves as a force against those opaque, dark forces of power. In fact, the political scandals involving figures like Ivo Sanders are just textbook examples of a transparent process of wishing for paradise; the unconditional love shown toward a former Prime Minister and his associates essentially grants them the time needed to repent and eventually return what was embezzled (though that might take a thousand years). It also gives the media a chance to repent and stop serving opacity, finally fulfilling their true purpose: being transparent and joining the same network as WikiLeaks on the Internet.

Jeremy Alvarez5 said:Actually, let me walk that back a bit. According to the latest news, pheromones might not even exist; apparently, it's all just down to individual brain chemistry:

I didn't really care for that first superficial article you shared from that news site. 😲
Everyone has their own natural scent (if you want to put it so bluntly), which blends with whatever perfumes or deodorants they use. As long as you apply them to clean skin, everyone ends up projecting a unique aroma.

Certain personalities suit soft, sweet scents, while others thrive with sharp, fresh ones—it’s all about using contrast to find balance. For example, someone with a gentle disposition might benefit from a bold, sharp fragrance, whereas a high-energy, dynamic person might find more harmony in something subtle and light.

Scents are incredibly powerful stimulants for our brain chemistry.🙂

My advice:
Take a tiny amount of a high-end French perfume and apply it directly to your pulse points on freshly washed skin. It will meld with your body's natural scent and carry you through the day quite discreetly. 👍It's much more effective and less wasteful than constantly dousing yourself in various sprays, especially if you're already sweating or trying to layer it over clothes. And don't worry if you can't smell it yourself; everyone else certainly will, whether it's a perfectly applied fragrance or just the unpleasant odor of layered products.

Perhaps our dear N. Tesla was actually enamored by the scent of his friend's wife—a fragrance that etched itself into his mind and stayed with him his whole life because the memory of it gave him wings.🙂

I can't help but wonder what would happen if someone actually sat a person like that down and asked them when they might finally start living for the "here and now"—you know, why not just embrace life the way nature intended? 😲😲😲

The draft coming through the keyhole was really bothering him 😍

It’s just like Nobel laureate John Nash...

.. there's a razor-thin line separating genius from pure idiocy 🙏

Zachary Gonzalez8 said:I get that. It’s not. But I’m stuck on this whole idea of just becoming dissolved. It sounds to me like we’re all just destined to eventually... poof. Just vanish into nothingness.

But you can see how they put it so nicely—that energy can't be destroyed, it just transforms, or breaks down by melting into another "form."

Your ego and your pride will definitely have an expiration date... sorry 😛

Zachary Gonzalez8, those points you brought up about him show such a profound grasp of spirituality (and theology)!

Faith isn't the same thing as religion.

Honestly, his thoughts were just racing through the cosmos at the speed of light.
Imagine if they could suddenly zip off into those deep reaches where time doesn't even exist, only to snap back here to Earth—a whole century would have passed right under our feet.

It makes perfect sense that he was a spiritual genius and a true philosopher; he possessed a profound sensitivity to everything both visible and invisible offered to humanity. Through discipline and by tapping into renewable sources, he envisioned a world where everyone—whether they’re living in the heart of Manhattan or out in rural Montana—can enjoy life's essentials for free.

.. but let's not get carried away..

Nikola Tesla essentially invented the 20th century.
The very ways we communicate today are built upon his principles.