Posts by Charles Fox10

As a moderator, I can't just grant partial access; it’s a different matter entirely, and all the admins for this PDF would need to be in agreement first.

Well, look at that. You actually lifted my ban despite me being so difficult. Who would have thought?

You got what was coming to you with that ban, and if you don't like it, well, that's just more paperwork on your desk. If you want my two cents, the ban was justified, especially since it expires tomorrow evening anyway.

jadetinker85 said:Alright, what’s the actual intel from the ground? Zelenskyy is claiming victory? I don't know where this sudden surge of optimism is coming from.
Denmark sent over some financial aid. 🤔 They have piles of weapons, but they can only afford to pay for foreign fighters.

Sending the Atlanta Braves out to grab a beer, then I'll let you know.

loneviper4 said:Russia has already gotten their hands on those British anti-tank systems. Honestly? Serves them right...

And I suppose Putin whispered that one in your ear?

gentleharbor3 said:Yeah, yeah, blah blah blah. Excuses upon excuses.
Less talk, more action, action-man! ☕
It’s easy to act tough behind a screen.
Fine. Since I have no idea what you're even defending, I’ll stay quiet.
Anyway, I suggest you find enough
courage to actually pick up a book once in a while,
something on politics, political theory, history, or geopolitics
if those subjects actually interest you...
Otherwise, every single argument you make will just devolve into ad hominem attacks and hysterics
because you obviously don't get—and it's not just you—what I'm saying,
nor am I ever justifying Russia's aggression against Ukraine.

Just for the record, that’s an ad hominem.☕

loneviper4 said:That was just some guy from the Russian Ministry of Defense, you know, the one in the military fatigues giving the field report, if I'm remembering right...

Saying "some Russian said" or "some Ukrainian said" is a bit too simplistic. No matter how hard everyone tries to clarify what’s happening in Ukraine, it feels nearly impossible. There's the actual war on the ground, sure, but there's also this massive strategic war being fought through the media. Personally, I think you have to take everything with a heavy grain of salt.

We've all seen enough photos or videos that turned out to be completely disconnected from reality. One should be careful.

brightviper29 said:-Why is it that so many people choose to emigrate and head toward the West?
-Why do we find ourselves relying almost exclusively on Western innovations every single day, from our TVs and computers to the internet, our cars, phones, clothes, and even the food we eat?
-Why are we constantly watching Western movies?
-Why is it that we listen to Western music?
-Why do we conduct our lives using Western currency?
-Why are we drawn to Western sports?
-Why is it that we strive to work and innovate just like Americans do?

Is it because everything that is truly progressive and high-quality originates from the West, and if it actually came from Russia or, say, China, would anyone even care?

Tetris☕😁

That's if you ignore literature, science, and art.☕

GustiSok said:Wouldn't it be better if people actually saw the raw reality of war? Provided there are the necessary content warnings for graphic material, of course.

At least we've already been forced to face it.☕

Is our friend here banned?

He is.

Has the moderation team checked out?

They have.

Take the ranting elsewhere; it doesn't fly on a site like Reddit.

Don't blow your cash.

And then there's the scenario where you clone yourself, and suddenly every single clone is sitting on over 3,000 reward points.

My mistake, I missed that... so you got banned because you called the other person a defender of pedophiles... let's not go there again.

Let's call it quits.☕

Sritan van nov.

It’s been 30 years since the murder of the Zec family

If there is anything significant I've missed, please feel free to add it.

horse 😂 😂

slyfox43 said:The post was exceptionally informative on this topic. I'm also curious why it was deleted again. When someone puts in the effort to write a detailed, well-reasoned piece only to have it mercilessly wiped out, I’d say the moderator deserves a warning for poor judgment.

Edit: I see the post was deleted AGAIN, and Anthony Hill5 is rightfully upset. Meanwhile, mindless cheering fueled by baseless conspiracy theories continues unchecked. Isn't it time to review which individuals are actually fit for moderation and which are just causing trouble? Let's correct some historical mistakes.

My last attempt at posting was here:

I'm not speaking as anyone's lawyer, just as a reader, a writer on this sub-forum, and someone interested in seeing its moderation function properly.

And how exactly does any of this involve you?? Is this just an attempt to act like a busybody??

Because of this

My posts keep getting deleted, so here I am again, reposting some slightly tweaked content.

And because of the violation of this

Article 6.
• For texts in foreign languages, an English summary is required! There is no need to translate the whole thing; just recap the main point in one or two sentences in English.

Plus, a fair amount of trolling in almost every single post.

Catch you all in three days.

coppersailor28 said:I wasn't aware our colleague @Larry Walker24 was "one of yours." 🤷
To be more precise, I didn't realize @Larry Walker24 belonged to some "club" that (from what I can tell) I am apparently not part of.

As far as I'm concerned, @Ronald Chavez2 is free to pursue the idea
(advice, suggestions, legal aid, guidance... whatever you want to call it)...
offered by @Larry Walker24:
"you can always post over at the Skeptics subforum"

Personally, I hadn't realized it worked that simply, which is why I back then expressed my doubts to @Larry Walker24... though I reached out to him as a private entity.

Sure 🙂 (not an official stance, obviously)

On the 'Coronavirus' forum, posts started appearing that were unacceptable for such a serious (public health / pandemic/) section.
To allow those with 'unconventional' views to still participate, the 'Skeptics' subforum was created within the 'Coronavirus' section.

At that point, back then everyone who had been penalized due to their 'alternative' stances on the single 'Coronavirus' forum
... ...was given the chance
(specifically those penalized strictly because of 'thematic' non-conformity)
to post in that 'skeptic' section of the 'Coronavirus' forum.

My take was (!!!), that you don't qualify to post in 'Skeptics' because your penalty came from other reasons (meaning, you were flagged for the 'usual' reasons).

Your input on this board isn't really about interpreting admin decisions, mostly because they don't affect you directly.
Once you've had enough Budweiser or Miller Lite to actually have something worth posting here, feel free. Until then, just read along if you feel like it.