Posts by Taylor Morales31

Or just stick with EN

I’ve only bothered to rebuild my ultimate setup once a year, mostly because it was originally sitting on a D partition alongside Windows XP....

They’re going to tell you that you don't need any existing Windows installed before you start the upgrade,
And honestly? They're right. Windows 7 is a massive step up—it's objectively better and much more modern than Windows XP. It’s a solid OS on its own. Now, the real kicker is whether your older hardware is going to throw a tantrum during the process. We aren't all running identical rigs, after all. If your hardware is relatively recent and you've got enough RAM—I'm talking a minimum of 1GB, though you really should be looking at 2GB—you shouldn't run into any issues whatsoever. 👍

edit: Joshua Garcia3 already weighed in on this earlier.

cosmicrider5 said:Dammit, what the hell are "shadow copies" under storage units in this American Device Manager?

So you're telling me those copies are stored in the exact same place?

It’ll probably adapt to the RAM capacity—meaning it won't just burn through everything you've got. If you expand it to 4GB of RAM, it might go ahead and eat up every living resource on the system. That really comes down to how the specific hardware configuration holds up during testing, so it’s entirely possible it could run just fine even with a single gig,

Like I mentioned, I've been running this on my old laptop with maybe 256+512MB of RAM for a week now, mostly just using it to watch TV via an antenna setup,
I honestly haven't had the motivation to see how it handles actual daily tasks, but my gut tells me it wouldn't be great.👍

You can install it on IDE or AHCI...

But honestly, going with AHCI is definitely the better way to go...

Take multitasking, for example—it handles it way more efficiently. If you're recording a podcast while browsing the web at the same time, an IDE setup will start stuttering because the drive just can't juggle the simultaneous read/write demands from the cache. In my experience, if you're recording, you really shouldn't be surfing the web on IDE. With AHCI, that isn't an issue; it handles both tasks without any bad sectors or lag. That’s just how it works in practice. Don't get me wrong, Windows 7 runs fine on IDE, it's just specifically struggling with that particular workload on my machine...

👍

Well then, why don't you just write up a full breakdown of how you did it? It might actually be useful for someone else out there. 👍

You’re honestly a bit of a masochist, aren't you? Stubbornly sticking to those ridiculous RAM specs even after I told you... 👍

Here’s an example:

The connection on Verizon
Opera
SAS quick scan
plus Winamp
+ Windows 7 Ultimate 32-bit
I’ve got 61 processes running right now, and I’m already hitting over a gig of usage👍

Look, you either play your games or run your scans—they probably won't work well at the same time. Honestly, I’d recommend having at least 2GB of RAM; it’s not nearly as expensive as it used to be.
If I have to go through Windows 7 just to manually kill processes so I can function without gadgets or Aero, then I might as well just stick to Windows XP. There’s really no point in crippling a system just to save a tiny bit of memory.

Windows 7 runs on my machine with just 768MB of RAM, but I can only get DVB-T working there.😛

Sure, you can, but you’re going to be incredibly limited when it comes to multitasking...👍

When I mentioned an antivirus, I was talking about running a full scan—something like Malwarebytes or SAS. Look, while they're scanning, I’d still prefer to actually get some work done rather than just sitting there staring at a progress bar. With only a single gig of RAM on Windows 7, that's a much harder task to pull off.

Sure, it’s possible, but once you load up an antivirus, fire up a browser, and start streaming some music, you’ve pretty much maxed out that capacity. That's the limit right there—there won't be anything left to run. 👍

Zachary Barrett4 said:Me?

Audio/video editing. 🙂

I’m running Sony Vegas 10 and Magix Cleaning Lab 16 for audio—both of which absolutely hammer the CPU during rendering and processing—along with a whole stack of other software. So, no, I don't need 3 gigs or even 2 gigs. When you're deep in audio and video editing, the processor is what matters, not the RAM. It's all about speed and making sure the render finishes without my laptop catching fire because the CPU is pinned at 100%. That has nothing to do with how much RAM you have.

Look, you can go ahead and work with those bloated pieces of junk programs that eat up a couple hundred MBs or even two gigs of RAM just to stay open—I have no idea what kind of monstrosities those are—but for anyone doing actual everyday work, you don't need more than 2GB of RAM to get through a standard week. Specifically 👍

Cancer and the professor 🤣

Look, let's get real here. What exactly are you running? 😁I mean, what on earth are you doing simultaneously that would actually pull 3 gigs of RAM out of a system?
Don't give me that...

Look, 32-bit systems never actually showed anything different anyway. If you're so obsessed with seeing that number, just install 64-bit, though I have no clue what that's actually going to do for you—is it just so you can stare at the label? 😁

Give this a shot; I think it actually works with Hotmail

http://gallery.live.com/liveItemDeta...5dc8&bt=1&pl=1

If you're working with weaker graphics cards, stick to integrated chips—even then, some low-end dedicated GPUs might actually perform better at lower screen resolutions. Obviously, if a card is beefy enough, it won't break a sweat even on larger monitors or higher resolutions

Basically, you just have to play within your means. Play whatever you can manage; there’s always something out there to sink your teeth into. If a game refuses to run smoothly at full screen, just drop the in-game resolution. It's effectively the same as shrinking the display itself, and if it runs perfectly at native resolution? Even better 👍

Look, if you check the resolution settings under the display menu in-game, you’ll see the limits. It really just comes down to how far you can push things based on the specific game and your graphics card—basically, whatever resolution and detail levels your hardware can actually handle.

Honestly, I’m surprised the standard driver from last week isn't working for you. It runs perfectly fine on both of my laptops, whether I'm using the integrated Intel chip or the ATI card. 👍

They don't necessarily have to be a different color, either. They can just be plain white—it’s just about how you combine the Fn key with whatever icon is printed on those F-keys. 👍

crimsonpuma92 said:I did it! I tried, but absolutely nothing happened. It kept telling me it works on Windows 7 Home Basic, but I'm running Ultimate—maybe that's the issue? Either way, I rebooted the machine after trying and still, nothing.
There isn't any other way! I've already got a dual boot setup with Windows XP and Windows 7, plus a massive pile of programs and music files. I don't have the space to just go installing another version of Windows.

And I honestly have no idea how I'd even manage a test install. You're saying both system partitions are full, so there's zero chance of creating an E: drive to run a fresh installation and see if Aero actually works there. That would let me rule out whether the OS is the problem. If Aero doesn't show up on a clean install either, then I'm terrified it's a hardware failure. If you can't do that, you'll have to take the risk and reinstall Windows 7 entirely, knowing full well you might end up right back where you started without Aero. That’s the only way to test if it's a software glitch or a GPU issue. Otherwise, we're stuck. Unless someone has a smarter suggestion—and I'm certainly not claiming this is the smartest way to handle it.👍