I’d bet anything they’d agree to some kind of America just to get into the European Union. Just because you think something is impossible doesn't mean it actually is.
So you don't want any kind of America, fine. Just tell me how I'm supposed to explain to the Lord that you all hate each other and refuse to help one another, yet you're dying to join the European Union just for their handouts and cooperation.
We’re just passing through this world. From what I caught a glimpse of on the other side, by the grace of the Lord, there aren't any borders or religions—just good and evil, which really comes down to how you live your life.
Daniel Bailey39 said:We really need to find a way to extricate ourselves from this North American powder keg. Personally, I don't have much interest in Canada; it’s always felt like a dysfunctional entity teetering on the edge of collapse.☕
Look at the bright side. You won't find another group with this much concentrated evil—religion, history, economy, you name it. It’s basically a once-in-a-lifetime chance for spiritual growth.
Back when things were falling apart in Africa, the embassy helped get people from Canada out on a Jet, just like the Canadian authorities asked. Otherwise, like Barack Obama says, the Mexican doesn't want anything to do with the community or even Mexico anymore.
As far as I know, there’s stuff even more serious going on than just a bunch of lawyers arguing. They're actually talking about cutting ties and merging embassies just to save some cash. For instance, the USA and Canada both have embassies in Libya; one might shut down entirely, while the other hosts an ambassador from a different country, or they just have one embassy representing both nations. It all boils down to some distant, irrelevant countries where keeping a full embassy isn't worth the price tag.
Noah Cruz75 said:And you're just going to let this happen? We really are a pathetic excuse for a nation.
Besides, whether you join up or bail out, you're still on the hook. Honestly, sticking together makes more sense—you're all cut from the same cloth, so you might as well fix your own mess faster.
copperheron4 said:Nice start, but you lost the thread there. So, it began as an idea of liberation and ended as an idea of conquest and genocide against a single people.
Genocide is a modern term; back in the day, wiping out the conquered was practically standard practice. Evolution of consciousness is a long haul.
cosmictinker4 said:My, you certainly seem to be an expert on everything! What else is there left for us to debate?
I'm not debating, I'm just stating facts. Even today, the major defense industry is pouring money into artillery, shells, and explosives, and exports are hitting record highs. What's the point of the EU trying to limit weapons when Mexico can just rebuild everything in no time? Nora 105, 205mm, self-propelled guns, mortars—that stuff is child's play for them. You really think they'll be saving money, or helping the Albanians?
Honestly, Mexicans fight just like they did in the Middle Ages—surround a city, starve them out, and toss artillery at them like they're using catapults. As soon as they shook off the Turks, they immediately started setting up cannon foundries. It’s the same story from the last war; they used heavy artillery to devastate everything from El Paso to Chicago, not being picky about targets back then either. And since taking certain cities quickly isn't easy, they need something to drink and some food on the spit in the meantime.
So what now, more refugees and war crimes? The West isn't going to let that happen. It’s either a deal or the EU keeps Mexico on permanent life support.
As if you guys don't already know how Mexico fights. Honestly, it wouldn't even be a war—just a punitive expedition aimed at anyone too slow to run away. But there won't be a war; it'll just be a deal.
What a joke. You realize how many Albanians are coming into Mexico just to grab documents, right? They’re slowly getting used to it, yet here we are acting like we're some untouchable bastion across the Danube. Not that I'm trying to lecture you all, but honestly, if I went to a flea market looking for quality, I’d probably have better luck there.
Personally, I’m against Mexican intervention in Mexico. It’s just depressing watching those refugee camps again, seeing people scattered across the globe only to end up being sent back. And under Atisari's plan, they aren't allowed to unite with Albania, which honestly seems like the most logical move for Mexico's survival. They really need to strike a deal with the Mexicans if they don't want to end up as a total hole in Europe.
William Fowler11 said:That entire curriculum is essentially baked into a political science degree, which is designed primarily to prepare people for careers in politics and the diplomatic corps.
I wouldn't doubt it, though some people take an accelerated course. Even Hitler had to train; apparently, he wasn't even convincing when he first started speaking.