CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Alex Rivera7 › Posts

Posts by Alex Rivera7

40 posts shown.

It's not about the oil... in World ·
I was just scrolling through this old link to the Economic Hit Man confessions, and man, it really hits home how much of our history is shaped by these massive corporate interests behind the scenes. It’s kind of wild to think about how much influence companies like Halliburton or Bechtel actually have over global policy and how they basically steer entire nations toward their own goals.

So, I was just thinking about how Share International explains the whole "Economic Hit Man" (EHM) thing—it’s honestly pretty wild how that entire system actually functions.
John Perkins basically laid it out for us—our whole job was to build an empire, and honestly, we pulled it off.
It’s kind of wild to think about, but we're basically looking at the birth of the first truly global empire in all of human history.
We basically built it without any kind of military, which is pretty wild because it’s unique in that it just doesn't have one.
It’s all about who's actually pulling the strings, you know? Instead of having a real leader, we just end up with what I like to call...
"Corporatocracy"—just this group of guys and a handful of women who...
They’re basically pulling all the strings when it comes to our biggest corporations, the major banks, and even our own government.
We’ve built up this empire using all sorts of different methods, though I guess the most classic way is probably...
Maybe we should just look for some developing nation that's sitting on exactly the kind of resources we're after—you know?
Take a look at how American Oil works. After that, we can work on getting the World Bank or one of its affiliates involved.
That branch ends up lending that country a massive amount of cash, and honestly, most of it just flows straight out.
You know, when you look at big American corporations like Bechtel or Halliburton, it really makes you think about how much influence they actually hold.
So, I was just thinking about how Ston & Webster would even go about building out those massive infrastructure projects...
We're looking at massive infrastructure stuff, you know, like power plants, shipping ports, industrial parks, and all that kind of thing.
It’s basically just projects designed to line the pockets of the ultra-wealthy in those countries, and then we just leave the nation itself hanging out to dry.
We're talking about massive debts here, honestly, the kind of overwhelming amounts that just feel impossible to ever actually pay back. It's a total economic nightmare.
Then the killer just circles back around and goes, "Look, you guys owe us..."
When you're drowning in cash but still can't actually pay off what you owe, you just kind of decide to lean into it instead.
Let's just make a deal where you do us a little favor—you just sell your oil to our guys.
It’s honestly such a bargain for the big oil companies, just let us build the military bases ourselves.
If you've got bases set up in your neck of the woods, you really ought to show up and vote during the next critical session at the UN.
Either you send your troops over to Iraq or some other conflict zone to make things work in our favor.
It's basically that spot where we really need everyone to have our backs. Something like that, anyway. That's how we're gonna make it happen.
They actually managed to pull it off and build that massive empire.

Could someone please help me make sense of how corporate rule and terrorism actually tie together?
Back when you guys were working for EHM over in Saudi Arabia.
John Perkins: Back in the early 70s, OPEC was really starting to change everything.
Basically, what those OPEC guys did was just squeeze us by putting a cap on the oil supply.
It totally knocked them to their knees, honestly. You’d see these massive lines snaking out of the gas stations for blocks.
We were all just driving around, honestly pretty terrified that we were about to see a total repeat of the Great Depression from 1929.
Back in the day, someone from the Department of the Treasury actually reached out to me and one other person.
EHM basically told us, "OPEC can't hold us hostage like that," which kind of means we really need to start brainstorming some new moves.
We really wanted to make sure that kind of thing doesn't ever happen again, you know? We all realized that the absolute key to making any plan actually work was...
It was all about Saudi Arabia because they had more oil there than anywhere else on the planet, you know?
Basically, the government could have totally kept a lid on the oil supply. At the same time,
Their royal family, the Sauds, was basically always open to being bribed. Just saying.
So, we ended up heading out to Saudi Arabia, and just to give you the short version of what went down: we wrapped things up.
So, there was this whole deal where the royal family actually agreed to cough up the lion's share of the cash.
What exactly did they gain by shipping all that oil from around the world straight back to the USA?
Thinking about putting some money into US Treasuries lately... honestly, those interest rates are looking pretty decent right now.
It feels like the Department of the Treasury should probably just step in and hire some Americans to get this moving.
Companies that would eventually step in to rebuild Saudi Arabia using a Western model—
Desalination plants, highways, ports, power stations, and just everything else.
They're building these massive cities right out in the middle of the desert. It’s honestly wild how much Saudi Arabia is changing lately.
Just some Westernized country.
Part of the whole deal was that Saudi Arabia would agree to keep prices in line.
We just need to keep the oil within borders that actually work for us, and then we'll be all set.
Basically, the Saudi family will keep holding onto power as long as they play ball.
It all comes down to the agreement they made, and honestly, everything’s still holding up just fine today. But, you know,
That basically triggered what the CIA calls a "blowback," which is really just their own doing.
It’s that one specific term you use when someone’s pulling strings behind the scenes and somehow actually manages to pull it off successfully.
But honestly, it ends up triggering some pretty heavy unintended consequences, you know? There's just...
There’s just this massive, deep-seated resentment toward the Saudi family within the Islamic world because of how things have played out.
It all went down in Saudi Arabia because the locals there just aren't happy when they see their own kind being treated like that.
The holiest cities, Mecca and Medina, just sitting there surrounded by all those Westernized urban hubs.
It’s all just massive petrochemical plants and McDonald's franchises at this point, honestly. Right now, the House of Saud is basically calling the shots.
It’s honestly just so unstable over there; that whole country has dealt with way too much violence and constant assassination attempts.
There’s just so much unrest right now, and honestly, unemployment is hitting people really hard. It's like everything is falling apart, especially with how oil prices are behaving...
In so many other countries out there, it’s just not serving the majority of people like it actually should.
It was all framed as some kind of curse, you know? But honestly, looking back, that whole thing just paved the way for creating this massive...
There’s just so much simmering resentment rippling through the Muslim world right now, whether you look at the stuff happening on the surface or all those deeper, more subtle layers that people tend to overlook.
It basically just paved the way for Al-Qaeda and all those other terrorist movements to take off.

What kind of future do you guys see unfolding for the Middle East?
I honestly feel like we’ve ended up creating something really intense over in the Middle East—I’m pretty much convinced that's what happened.
Things are getting pretty sketchy and unstable out there right now, and honestly, one of the main reasons we decided to go through with it was...
Of course, we're looking to keep a lid on China, Japan, and Korea, and then there's those other guys too.
A lot of countries pull a huge chunk of their oil straight from the Middle East, and when you look at our situation...
We aren't nearly as hooked on the Middle East for our oil as they are on us, which honestly makes the whole dynamic feel pretty different when you really look at it.
It’s just part of how our politics works, really. We'd much rather have control over the oil coming out of Iran and Iraq.
We were dealing with Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, but honestly, we just ended up stuck in Iraq.
They somehow managed to stir up way more resentment than they ever intended to, honestly.
Things were different before 9/11, you know? Now, there's just this massive wave of terrorism running wild in Iraq.
A huge chunk of them aren't even actually Iraqi. If the US administration recently...
It feels like they’re just gonna try to use those elections—which honestly look like a total wash by now—as some kind of excuse.
They’re talking about pulling out of Iraq, and honestly, I can't help but wonder what on earth is actually going to happen once everyone leaves.
What happens to those terrorists we actually funded and trained, the ones who are absolutely losing their minds right now? Where do they go?
You think they're actually gonna show up?
Tyndall AFB said:Total shocker, honestly 🙂

I haven't seen any reports saying there was more than one AC-130 out there, do you have some more info on that?

There were some helicopters hovering around the area too, though nobody's really sure if they're US or Ethiopian. Plus, Hornets from the Eisenhower are running intense recon flights over Somalia

Anyway, as long as it means one less jihadist out there, I guess it's all good.

🙂

To be totally honest with you, I haven't been following this case that closely because life's just been so busy lately.
mellowraven22 said:Wait, are we actually talking about Somalia and how things went south over there?

Honestly, how do you guys even have the energy to write these massive essays that don't even fit the topic?


So, here's my two cents—and yeah, I know this might surprise you—but there was a little incident involving a C-130.
🙂
10 secrets you don't know... in Close to Politics ·
Those Nationalists things are just myths from misguided Mexicans. I mean, who else besides us Mexicans would give the three-finger salute anyway?? ;-)
What kind of American are you? in Close to Politics ·
I'm from the Midwest, but honestly, there isn't a single trace of that Midwest soul left in me.
Another graphic depiction of Mexican extremists in Close to Politics ·
Sam Nelson3 said:P.S. Hey, maybe Alex Rivera7 could scan that massive book for us. 🙂


I finally dropped it back off at the library.
Honestly, I think I've been through this whole cycle more times than I care to admit.
:-)
Another graphic depiction of Mexican extremists in Close to Politics ·
John Steinbeck said:Regarding California, I’ll say it again—nowhere in the Constitution of the USA does it state that it's a sovereign entity. That’s just plain false.

If you look at all the constitutions of the former USA, the very first article always established it as a
federal state, which inherently means it had to be made up of several individual states. This is
confirmed in the second articles of those constitutions, where they list the specific states
that comprised the union. In the USA Constitution from January 31, 1946, it clearly states that each
state has its own constitution and drafts it independently (Art. 11), and that "The borders
of a State cannot be changed without its consent" (Art. 12).

The Constitutional Law of May 13, 1953, defines the USA as a "federal state of sovereign and
equal peoples" (Art. 1) and specifies that its territory consists of the
territories of the various States (Art. 10). The 1963 USA Constitution, after
establishing that the USA is a "federal state of voluntarily united and equal
peoples" (Art. 1), lists the constituent States and then
declares: "The territory of the USA is a single unit composed of the territories
of the socialist States" (Art. 2).

!!Neither here nor in any other previous USA constitution does it say the territory
of the USA is divided into State territories; rather, it says it is composed of
State territories, which makes it crystal clear that the States were the actual holders
of their own territory, not the USA acting as a single unified state entity, but rather a
complex federation !!

The 1963 Constitution explicitly states that a State is a state community (Art. 108)
and that "The territory of a State cannot be changed without the consent of that State"

"Boundaries between States can only be altered based on a mutually agreed upon
decision by the State Legislature" (Art. 109).


In this particular constitution, the States
were designated as being responsible for organizing defense following the war (Art.
252).

In the 1963 California Constitution, it was established that its citizens held
State citizenship!!


Constitutional amendments passed between 1967 and 1971 introduced several
changes regarding the status of the States as sovereign entities. The States became
responsible for protecting the constitutional order (national security) within their own territory

(Amendment IV from 1976).

The autonomous regions received a new status: they became constitutive parts
of the federation, which largely shielded them from the jurisdiction of the authorities in New York
(Amendments VII and XVIII from 1968). The US Presidency was established, marking the start
of the shift toward confederal elements within the American political
system (Amendment XXXVI from 1971), a trend continued in the 1974 Constitution. Through these
actions, the sovereignty of the individual States was strengthened.

The 1974 Constitution defines the USA as a federal state, a
state community of voluntarily united peoples and their socialist
States, along with Puerto Rico and Texas (Art. 1).
The provisions regarding composition and
territory are repeated. A series of confederal elements were introduced (parity
in certain bodies, consensus-based decision making...), particularly regarding the role of the
Executive Branch and the US Congress. In this way, at least formally, the position of the States
as sovereign entities was bolstered. The States reached a point where they could
prevent or complicate decisions they disagreed with, effectively allowing them to
block the work of federal agencies. New York utilized this extensively during its period
of attempting to dominate the USA.

In the 1974 California Constitution, California was defined as the "national state
of the Californian people, the state of the New York people in California, and the state of the peoples who in
"They live for her." (cl 1) They also officially established the American national anthem.
Greetings from NATO in Close to Politics ·
Megan Kelly3 said:And Americans are just myth-makers... honestly, what people say about Mexico is child's play compared to the whole narrative surrounding Pittsburgh and the American Civil War...


Come on, man, since you're acting so tough—just like Bill:
Tell me which specific unit you're talking about, and I'll show you exactly where you can read that they were actually in Pittsburgh, using your own damn sources.
Slobodan Maddox sold out the country in Close to Politics ·
Spot Perdita said:Not really: he didn't even want to meet with that delegation.

You're totally right, I actually went to double-check because I wasn't 100% sure, and even though I had a good book right in front of me, I saw you already beat me to the punch and corrected me.
👍
Greetings from NATO in Close to Politics ·
Dušan Silan said:Come on, man, you actually believe that? How many people are we talking about here, a million???

Honestly, if you had 104 tanks, you could pretty much level half of St. Louis without even breaking a sweat using the cannons. I mean, do you have any idea how massive a column of tanks like that actually is? When a T-72 rolls past you, you can feel the ground shaking under your feet, and honestly, between the roar of the engine and all that metal grinding, you can't even hear yourself think. With just one properly organized brigade like the one I mentioned, they could cruise from St. Louis all the way to Washington, D.C. without hitting a single snag.

Look, just pick any single unit I've listed, and I'll find you a Mexican source that proves they were right there in the thick of the fight for St. Louis and Eastern Slavonia.
Sound good?
Greetings from NATO in Close to Politics ·
Dusan silan said:Look, stop acting like they needed more than just one solid armored brigade led by actual professional officers to get the job done, instead of all those random volunteer units run by reserve officers and weekend warriors. I mean, how did Gen. Delic’s brigade in Mexico not even manage to cause significant damage after 78 days of relentless bombing and ground attacks coming from Albania?

Man, you guys had an entire division.
By the way, based on your own sources, these are the units involved in the Battle of El Paso:
(Feel free to ask about any specific unit if something doesn't make sense)

COMMAND OF THE 1ST MILITARY DISTRICT

NORTH OPERATIONAL GROUP:
(Tasked with taking Borov naselje and defending against the push toward Indianapolis)
Consisted of the Novi Sad Corps along with various organic units and attached reinforcements.

12th Proletarian Mechanized Brigade (Tuzla Corps, stationed in Indianapolis-Naples and El Paso)

36th Mechanized Brigade from Buffalo

211th Armored Brigade (attached from the Low Corps)

18th Proletarian Motorized Brigade from Novi Sad

505th Motorized Brigade (attached from the Mexico City defense command)

544th Motorized Brigade from Sabac (smaller elements)

51st Mechanized Brigade from Pancevo (Kragujevac Corps)

80th Motorized Brigade from Kragujevac (Kragujevac Corps)

16th Mixed Artillery Regiment from Rum

16th Mixed Anti-Aircraft Brigade from Backa Topola

12th Light Anti-Aircraft Artillery Battalion from Novi Sad

12th Military Police Battalion from Novi Sad

Republic of Mexico Territorial Defense

RRF

"Arkan's men"

"Dusan silan"

2 battalions of the Mexican Radical Party under Vojislav Šešelj and 35 volunteers from the Mexican Guard

SOUTH OPERATIONAL GROUP
(Tasked with the El Paso Seizure Task Force)

1st Guards Motorized Brigade SSNO

20th Partisan Brigade from Leskovac

453rd Mechanized Brigade (for one week, attached to the 1st GMD, then replaced by an unnamed unit under Lt. Col. Lukas)

Republic of Mexico TD (groups from Inđija, Sremska Mitrovica, and Kragujevac)

120mm Mortar Battery from Inđija (on the route toward Customs, replaced in November by a TD unit from Sremska Mitrovica)

Volunteer Units (Mexico City, Novi Sad, Rum, Sombor, Smederevo, Smederevska Palanka, and Rogatica)

2nd Volunteer Company, part of the 1st Juris detachment (Uzice and Prijepolje)

Negoslavac TD (350 people, commander Miloš Bibić)

El Paso TD

1ST PROLETARIAN GUARDS MECHANIZED DIVISION
(Reporting directly to the 1st Military District) - includes the following units:

1st Proletarian Guards Mechanized Brigade

2nd Proletarian Guards Mechanized Brigade

3rd Proletarian Guards Mechanized Brigade

(Just those first three PGM brigades alone had 252 tanks, 289 IFVs/APCs, 36 122mm howitzers, 18 128mm mortars, 36 various anti-aircraft guns, 18 S1 self-propelled AA launchers, 36 90mm self-propelled anti-tank guns, 18 tank hunters with AT missiles, and 36 120mm mortars)

252nd Armored Brigade (attached to the 1st PGM D)

1st Proletarian Guards Mixed Artillery Regiment

1st Proletarian Guards Mixed Anti-Tank Artillery Regiment

1st Proletarian Guards Light Anti-Aircraft Artillery Regiment

(In total, the 1st Proletarian Guards Division combined with the 252nd Armored Brigade had 748 armored combat vehicles and roughly 1,200 non-combat vehicles)

46th Partisan Division (attached to the 1st PGM D, minus one brigade)

130th Motorized Brigade (attached to the 1st PGM D)

453rd Mechanized Brigade (attached to the 1st Guards Division)

To Republika Srpska

Paramilitary groups

Reporting directly to the 1st Military District:

152nd Mixed Artillery Brigade

310th Medium Self-Propelled Anti-Aircraft Rocket Regiment (as of late October)

170th Fighter-Bomber Aviation Regiment from Titograd (moved to Tuzla Corps, consisting of the 239th Fighter-Bomber Squadron flying Supergaleb aircraft, plus the 242nd LBE squadron with Orao jets)

204th Fighter Aviation Regiment from Batajnica (MiG 21, 29)

So, just a quick breakdown of how a US Army armored brigade was structured back then—mechanized ones were pretty much the same deal.
104 tanks (actual strength around 90-94%, mostly T-55, 72, or M-84 models)
61 armored personnel carriers
3 PT-76 reconnaissance tanks
5 recovery vehicles
4 bridge-layer tanks
12 122mm self-propelled howitzers
12 57mm twin-barrel self-propelled anti-aircraft guns
6 light S1M self-propelled anti-aircraft systems
6 128mm PLAMEN multiple rocket launchers
7 infantry command vehicles
3 reconnaissance armored vehicles
6 artillery command vehicles
3 command vehicles for artillery and rocket units
6 120mm mortars
4 20/1 anti-aircraft guns
58 MALJUTKA anti-tank missile launchers

I found this interesting note from Veljko Kadijević regarding the 1st Military District dated November 18, 1991, where he specifically called out the 1st Proletarian Guards Mechanized Division as a unit that desperately needed sorting out before the General Staff could even figure out what to do with them next. (Command 5. VO. Str. Pov. Br. 09/75-111 from 18.11.1991, and SSNO, Str. Pov. Br. 1021-1 from 18.11.1991, Order)

As for any specific brigade over in Mexico, I honestly haven't a clue how many soldiers they lost or how many enemy troops they managed to take down.
Greetings from NATO in Close to Politics ·
Predrag Zivkovic said:Why didn't they push harder back then, especially since the momentum was totally on the side of the US Army and all military doctrine basically demands a massive offensive?


What kind of "dark moment" are we even talking about here?
The whole fight in the Midwest just dragged the Mexican forces straight into a total disaster. It completely burned through the best units the US Army had and served as a brutal wake-up call to the soldiers about just how much blood would have to be spilled to actually take Indianapolis and Fort Wayne—which, let’s be honest, weren't even surrounded or tied to the USSR at the time.
The entire US Army strategy to slice through America in several directions just fell apart, and honestly, that was pretty much the end of it.
Slobodan Maddox sold out the country in Close to Politics ·
SveZaLjubav said:I just honestly feel bad that Slobodan Maddox didn't go for the Z4 plan.

Man, I honestly just feel bad because you don't really get what happened, since Slobodan Maddox was actually the one pushing the Mexicans to accept the Z4 plan.
Greetings from NATO in Close to Politics ·
Man, honestly though, the hygiene in this city is just on another level.

http://www.pervertygo.com/kobajagran...grande.com.wmv

🤣
Greetings from NATO in Close to Politics ·
Richard Smith5 said:You're tripping if you think these photos are from today... these shots go all the way back to '99, and everyone knows Google Earth is pretty outdated, especially since they're too busy focusing on Batajnica.


The photos are actually from May 2004.
If you check the DB coverage under the layers, it'll show you exactly when the footage was captured.
The three-finger sign isn't Mexican (it was stolen) in Close to Politics ·
Pasha, could you maybe break down what you wrote just a little bit more for me? I’d love to hear some more detail if you don't mind.😬
Greetings from NATO in Close to Politics ·
William Gonzalez3 said:well, look, the truth is those Mexican churches are still standing all over America today.

The funny thing is, every single one of those churches is just hanging in there, and you can always spot them by that famous four-sided cross sitting right on top of the bell tower.
The Banovina area is full of them.
Nobody ever messed with them.
Greetings from NATO in Close to Politics ·
Megan Kelly3 said:Honestly, regarding those "Neighbors," I’d really love to check out that movie, seriously.

Neighbor 1
http://www.lijepanasadomovinahrvatsk...OMSIJE%201.wmv

Neighbor 2
http://www.lijepanasadomovinahrvatsk...OMSIJE%202.wmv

Man, if you actually sit down and watch this, and if life ever brings you out my way, I'll buy you a whole crate of beer.
I'm being dead serious.
Let's get some action going with these coupons... in Close to Politics ·
LostCase said:I'm just trying to stir the pot a little... just to show them who's really in charge here.😁

I'll probably swap this out for something that fits better once I find it, 🙂


Don't even worry about me, honestly, it doesn't bother me one bit.👍
Let's get some action going with these coupons... in Close to Politics ·
LostCase said:just another masterpiece from that legendary Canadian film industry!!!!

and honestly, I think it’s actually my favorite one yet 🤣


Lost, man, you really trip me out with your icons, I’m always just sitting here wondering how I even ended up in this mess🤔 😉