CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › jademoose6 › Posts

Posts by jademoose6

41 posts shown.

Reestablishing the National Guard: Yes or no? in Close to Politics ·
silentmason8 said:What kind of "moles" or "sleepers" are we even talking about here?😲😕

Exactly like these.

An individual spent six years feeding info on rations—all for a $275,000 payday.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/...-275000-484694

Corrupt officers have compromised some of the most sensitive Department of Justice investigations.
http://www.nytimes.com/corrupt-officers-doj-investigations/1056920/

Do I really need to spell it out any further?
Reestablishing the National Guard: Yes or no? in Close to Politics ·
briskskipper27 said:So what, you mean like that neighborhood watch guy in the US, George Zimmerman, who killed that kid?

Not at all.
Rather, local cells of true patriots would serve as the bedrock of trust—essential for ensuring the National Guard remains free from moles or sleepers, don't you think?
I see this as a three-year voluntary service period designed to support our legally elected officials in their efforts toward demilitarization and vetting the government.
It’s all about securing a better future for our children.
Reestablishing the National Guard: Yes or no? in Close to Politics ·
Here are a few more numbers regarding Tomislav Karamarko.

So, what ever actually came of all those big announcements?
Absolutely nothing.
It turns out—as it happens—he simply lacks the power to make any of it stick.
Reestablishing the National Guard: Yes or no? in Close to Politics ·
briskskipper27 said:A military junta?

Not quite.
To criminals, it might look that way—though in actual military juntas, you wouldn't even get a trial, just a bullet and a shallow grave—whereas here, we're actually discussing the judicial system.
Reestablishing the National Guard: Yes or no? in Close to Politics ·
silentmason8 said:Basically, just another cog in a repressive machine designed to protect the elite while cracking down on workers, students, and farmers. No thanks.

No, what part of this isn't clicking?
The US is simply too understaffed and institutionally hollowed out to handle serious demilitarization or a full-scale purge of the government. Especially since our agencies are crawling with moles and sleepers.
We’re going to need at least two or three brigades of actual operators—plus an empty federal detention center holding at least 1,000 inmates—along with a dedicated judicial task force and dozens of specialized courtrooms.
Basically, we need a brand new National Guard and an entire justice-oriented prison complex.
To some, that might sound totally unhinged—but honestly? It’s the bare minimum required to actually start anything meaningful.
As it stands, our current institutions have proven they just can't handle the job.
Reestablishing the National Guard: Yes or no? in Close to Politics ·
silentmason8 said:Should the National Guard be stepping in to protect protesters from the police and the military?

Not at all—their primary duty should be shielding our legally elected officials and their families while they work through demilitarization and vetting processes.
That is, assuming such leaders actually take office.
Reestablishing the National Guard: Yes or no? in Close to Politics ·
Nicholas Watson said:Can someone please walk me through why anyone thinks pushing for lustration is actually useful at this stage in our lives? 🤷

I mean, let's be real—most of those old-school party officials are either six feet under or tucked away in some high-end retirement home. Honestly, what’s the point of all that extra work? It feels like a massive waste of both money and time, if you ask me.

The reality is that most political insiders are busy collecting massive salaries from state-owned corporations, federal agencies, and various departments.
We even see members of the US Congress voting against pay cuts for high-ranking officials today.
That entire system needs a serious overhaul and thorough vetting.☕
Reestablishing the National Guard: Yes or no? in Close to Politics ·
darksurfer4 said:There is absolutely nothing unconstitutional about calling for the creation of an organization meant to provide oversight for the Department of Justice.🤷

At the end of the day—after all—isn't there already a layer of oversight in place? We have the US Federal Government and the Secretary of Homeland Security watching over the Department of Justice, don't we?☕
But the Department of Justice isn't really the issue here—is it?
Take a look at what’s unfolding right now over in Canada—quite a situation, wouldn't you say?
That’s exactly why we need the National Guard—to make sure we don't end up seeing those tragic scenes of violence and destruction like the ones from Canada?
Reestablishing the National Guard: Yes or no? in Close to Politics ·
darksurfer4 said:Why on earth hasn't this thread been locked yet? Honestly, someone needs to report the author to the Department of Justice for inciting the overthrow of the American constitutional order.🤷

Don't do it—you'll get šamiti 🤣
Reestablishing the National Guard: Yes or no? in Close to Politics ·
I honestly don't get why some people jump straight to imagining military coups.
I haven't mentioned weapons or violence once in any of my posts.
It’s just common sense—wouldn't you call someone a fool for stepping out into a storm without an umbrella?
What would be so wrong about having a local National Guard cell in every neighborhood?
Just honest, decent neighbors—real patriots who actually have your back.
They could stay organized and ready—you know, just in case anything ever comes up...
Reestablishing the National Guard: Yes or no? in Close to Politics ·
Jerry Rogers6 said:And that’s pretty much all I have to say about the posturing and the general competence of the people pushing this nonsense.

For anyone actually paying attention—and I mean those who prefer substance over constant, loud-mouthed posturing—here is a quote from the people who actually chose the harder path instead of just rattling their sabers:

"A lot of people aren't going to like the policy shifts and management changes we're advocating for... But once the signal was sent from cities like Metković and Omiš, and before that from Primošten, there is no way to silence it for the rest of America. We've proven that citizens can make an impact when they take matters into their own hands, and that's something that can no longer be swept under the rug..."

Nikola Grmoja, Deputy Mayor of Metković, MOST Independent Lists
a

It is precisely because of leaders like this that we need to organize a new National Guard—to watch their backs while they dig deep into the status quo.
We aren't talking about fixing things in a few small towns that happened to break free from the grip of organized crime and political machines; we need to dismantle the system at the national level.
In those towns, we're looking at tens of millions—but on a federal scale, we are talking billions.
Let's not forget that certain entrenched structures—call them the mob, the old guard, or the political machine, whatever you like—believe the deck is already stacked in their favor and they have no intention of playing fair.
I truly wonder, though—who is actually going to carry out state reform, de-politicization, or any real cleansing, given that we still have the current Department of Justice, the courts, and the Department of Homeland Security?
We have seen far too many times exactly how they operate and what the results look like.
Just look back at the Šime Krasić report—the wolf certainly ate the donkey there, didn't he?
And who is going to force Stjepan Mason out of the former president's office?
Who will shut down the sweetheart deals within the US Forest Service, or stop officials from being shuffled from one state agency to another once their schemes and embezzlement are uncovered?
Not to mention the waste management and private security industries...
Reestablishing the National Guard: Yes or no? in Close to Politics ·
Jack Cook7 said:Honestly, the whole damn country feels like it's stuck in that Latin American Model way of doing things. Back then, military juntas were basically the glue holding that whole system together.

To me, it looks like the National Guard’s whole concept is actually pushing back against that.

Actually, I see the National Guard's concept as deeply patriotic—so much so that they inherently stand with the citizens.
The National Guard becomes essential the moment state agencies become alienated—when the government starts serving itself or political parties rather than the people.
They serve as a necessary lever of power—a guarantee of protection for true patriots who want to bring the country back under the umbrella of its citizens.
Isn't a unified National Guard at the federal level far better than the various party-aligned or local militias that pop up whenever a system begins to crumble?
You can't really rely on the Department of Justice during those moments—firstly, because they are there for a paycheck, and secondly, because they are always positioned to protect those in power. They simply lack the motivation.
As for the US Armed Forces, I'm not entirely sure what the current status is.
The National Guard would be a beacon of hope for the people.
Do you honestly think demilitarization and political purges in America would ever pass peacefully?
And why would that topic even be considered a trick?🤷
Reestablishing the National Guard: Yes or no? in Close to Politics ·
Sarah Bailey95 said:But honestly, I don't get why you'd bother setting up a whole new system when we already have the Department of Justice. And why on earth do you think they’d actually be independent—or any less susceptible to influence from old-school political hacks and shadow players—than the DOJ? I mean, come on... we all know how things work around here. It's always way too easy for people in power to just make a backroom deal.

It's because I personally saw the sheer quality and drive of the folks who stepped up to join the National Guard back in '91.
The Department of Justice isn't really the issue—but I'll say this: those parasites would be cleared out in no time if there were a corrective force like the National Guard in place.
Reestablishing the National Guard: Yes or no? in Close to Politics ·
Sarah Bailey95 said:Nah, we definitely don't need paramilitary groups hanging around—we've already got the military and the police for that.

Well, they wouldn't exactly be "paramilitary" if they were organized by our legally elected officials, right?☕
The catch here is just that, for this specific instance, the Department of Justice would fall under the command of the new National Guard.
Reestablishing the National Guard: Yes or no? in Close to Politics ·
hollowtrucker77 said:So, how exactly are you planning on organizing them?
Like some kind of local militia?

God, who actually needs "guardians of the revolution"?😛
I’m not suggesting I want to personally run the show—not at all—but I do assume there are actual, sensible politicians in America who recognize the gravity of the situation. They see how deeply anti-government and anti-American elements have infiltrated our system... which makes it clear that without the National Guard serving as a guarantor of unity and security for our citizens, nothing is going to change.
Honestly, I’m just curious to see what this forum's "battalion" has to say about it.😁
Reestablishing the National Guard: Yes or no? in Close to Politics ·
We want change.
Let’s be realistic here.
Unless we rebuild the National Guard, nothing will actually shift—after all, who would be left to guarantee the safety of those essential to the demilitarization and vetting process in America?
I won't go into further detail—enough said for those who can take a hint.
James Nguyen13 said:But there isn't much you can do. You're essentially paralyzed as long as one side holds a massive 77-seat supermajority in Congress.

No matter how hard the Republican Party tries or how well-organized their protests are, they can't dismantle this current administration right now. Even the Democratic Party couldn't touch them back when the previous leadership held that same 77-seat advantage.

Without that kind of overwhelming majority in Congress, you simply cannot topple a government unless you resort to a coup d'état. And I am firmly against that—democracy and the constitutional order have to be our foundation. I know we’re stuck dealing with this for another two years, but that's just the hand we've been dealt.
If we tear down the constitutional order, we’ve lost everything. We have to endure them for the remaining two years, unless they end up imploding on their own.
I don't like a single thing about this administration, but I won't support overthrowing the system. There is the Constitution, there are the laws, and there are elections held at the scheduled times. That is the only way things work.

The problem is that Americans haven't realized yet that pressure for early elections shouldn't be a group effort—it needs to be targeted at individual representatives.
You identify the specific number of votes needed to flip the script—focusing on those who are the weakest links in the chain—and months before a major vote of confidence, citizens start putting the squeeze on them directly.
Write to your congressman.🙂
Are you guys seriously still watching broadcast television?
It’s such an outdated medium—not to mention how they basically hijack your living room with constant commercials.
Honestly, TV programming feels more like a tool for brainwashing—designed to shape passive, uncritical minds, don't you think?
Starting an LLC: Where to begin? in Business, Accounting & Taxes ·
Ethan Sanders said:I've got another question for you guys. I was looking into notary fees around the Annapolis and Savannah areas, and they seem to be running anywhere from $3,000 to $1267. Does anyone know what the deal is like in Washington, D.C.? I'm wondering if there’s anything a bit more budget-friendly out there, and if anyone has a specific notary they'd recommend... because, honestly, if I can find someone even $167 cheaper, I might just make the drive down to Washington, D.C.

Notary costs are absolutely outrageous—just like those federal register filings, court fees, and newspaper notices.
Slobodan Maddox, Popovich $1.00, what is all this even for?
In a country struggling with unemployment—where we're constantly told to turn job seekers into entrepreneurs—shouldn't the government just grant a registered business license to anyone willing to risk their own $6.75?
Helping people work legally is far more profitable in the long run than snatching away roughly $1.75 just to open a small business.☕
Mark Campbell5 said:I’m curious—in your honest opinion—what kind of qualifications does one actually need to be the President of the United States?

Take our current President:

She carries fake designer handbags.

Even her spokesperson for Martin Luther King Jr. tried to claim the bag was just an imitation rather than a knockoff.

She doesn't even bother looking at what she's signing in official contracts.

"Kamala Harris signed off on both Cabinet decisions regarding those contract approvals," they said.

And she’s basically and being computer illiterate.

"That date was left in the PowerPoint presentation shown to the press by accident—someone just didn't delete it in time, and I immediately clarified that the date would be updated."

And let's be real... social grace isn't exactly her strong suit.

A lady is allowed to have a purse, right? Apparently, any confusion is just "protocol error."

So, here's the thing... I have this friend who is actually tech-savvy (she can fix a PowerPoint slide without breaking a sweat), has a totally different sense of style 😁 (one that doesn't involve breaking laws, obviously), and actually reads what she signs (you know, basic business competence). On top of all that, she's balancing college and two part-time jobs.

So, I really want to know... what specific credentials does our current President possess that make her the leader of the country instead of my friend?

🤷

What does it actually take to be the President?

🤷

Based on that description, she wouldn't even land a job as a floor manager in the clothing department of a local shopping mall.

The most essential qualification? It has to be someone responsible, honest, and ethical—someone who could finally restore the balance of power—so that down the road, we aren't constantly worrying about fake goods because our federal institutions are actually doing their jobs.