Jason Campbell70 said:Honestly, what a load of nonsense and smoke and mirrors. 🙏>
You know, there’s actually such a thing as a stop-and-go penalty.
I can't help but wonder how this would have played out if Vettel had been right behind Hamilton. 🙂
I'm sure certain forum users—ahem—would be calling for Hamilton's head at this point. ☕
I don't recall the last time a blatant rule violation was so effective that it didn't just wipe out a penalty, but actually provided an advantage.
Even compared to Michael Schumacher at Silverstone in 1998, this looks like child's play. 😁
Again, this is pointless. Why even bother with a penalty like that if they're guilty? And I emphasize "if," because looking at the footage, I'm not even sure they are—screw logic, it's about the rules. If we're assuming guilt, the only logical move is a black flag or disqualification. This whole mess is ridiculous; you disqualify someone for cheating, you don't just hand them their old position back (which is exactly what happened to Hamilton, he was put right back where he was before the controversy). Personally, I also think the penalty on Alonso for his jump start was totally inappropriate, and the FIA dragging its feet on it was just as bad. It was a blatant display of unsportsmanlike behavior.
At the end of the day, your favorite driver got screwed by a nonsense penalty just so Alonso could grab more points🙄 in some similar mess involving the SC and the rulebook, which is also completely absurd.
It’s funny how in every single one of these situations regarding penalties—whether issued, unissued, or just plain wrong—Alonso always seems to be right in the center of it.
Jason Campbell70 said:Honestly, what a load of nonsense and smoke and mirrors. 🙏>
You know, there’s actually such a thing as a stop-and-go penalty.
I can't help but wonder how this would have played out if Vettel had been right behind Hamilton. 🙂
I'm sure certain forum users—ahem—would be calling for Hamilton's head at this point. ☕
I don't recall the last time a blatant rule violation was so effective that it didn't just wipe out a penalty, but actually provided an advantage.
Even compared to Michael Schumacher at Silverstone in 1998, this looks like child's play. 😁
Believe it or not, I don't think so. They'd probably be even angrier at Vettel for that than they are at Hamilton.
Honestly, the whole business with the SC and the medical car was a complete circus. Webber crashed on lap 8, and by lap 9, everyone passed him and saw he was standing outside the car, perfectly fine. Then, on lap 10, the SC and the medical car roll out.😕 I have no idea why that medical car even bothered coming out, it makes zero sense.🤷
Besides, I've been way too chill the last few days.
So, I definitely wouldn't be losing my mind.
If I were even slightly hyped up, then yeah...🤣
Then I would've gone absolutely ballistic right at the start of the race.🤣
Anyway, I'm not some hardcore fanatic. I'm mostly here for the trolling on the forum. Getting worked up over Vettel, Alonso, Hamilton, etc.—whatever. Think what you want, I've got much smarter things to do with my life than lose my cool being a fan for McLaren or Ferrari.🤣
Don't get me wrong, I'd rather Hamilton had lost a spot or two, just so Vettel could be closer to the lead in the standings.😉
Jason Campbell70 said:Honestly, what a load of nonsense and smoke and mirrors. 🙏>
You know, there’s actually such a thing as a stop-and-go penalty.
I can't help but wonder how this would have played out if Vettel had been right behind Hamilton. 🙂
I'm sure certain forum users—ahem—would be calling for Hamilton's head at this point. ☕
I don't recall the last time a blatant rule violation was so effective that it didn't just wipe out a penalty, but actually provided an advantage.
Even compared to Michael Schumacher at Silverstone in 1998, this looks like child's play. 😁
The famous Singapore 2008—that was even worse, way worse than this. 😉
Nico Rosberg didn't just hold onto the 2nd place he started with; he jumped up nine spots from his starting position.
After pitting under the red lights—which is a blatant rule violation—he ended up in 2nd. That means he didn't just stay where he was, he actually finished better than before the whole mess happened.
So yeah, this isn't the first time, and it won't be the last. 🤣
If Hamilton hadn't slowed down Alonso, then Alonso and Massa would have overtaken SC just like he did. And if Alonso had passed Hamilton on track right after that, everyone would be singing praises about his "masterful driving" and all that nonsense.
The whole drama about overtaking SC would've been completely swept under the rug and probably wouldn't even be mentioned.
Don't blame Alonso because Hamilton overtook SC; blame him because he didn't leave enough room for Alonso to do it himself.