CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Ryan Vaughn7 › Posts

Posts by Ryan Vaughn7

355 posts shown.

Grace Ross6 said:Because we’re just a joke. Honestly, you can't even post a quick sentence ending in a period without people acting like it’s some deep philosophical breakthrough... give me a break. We're all ridiculous, including those folks over at LAFC

That’s not it. Don't put words in my mouth. I never said you were ridiculous—that's just not true. It's more that people can get a bit irrational sometimes. Not all the time, obviously, but when you get caught up in a frenzy like this recent obsession with Livaja. It's a bit much, if I'm being honest.
But look, that's beside the point. This isn't some fan forum where every single group gets their own dedicated moderator. We operate under different criteria here.
Charles Ramos4 said:Quick question for the current mod team. Is there any chance one of our regular users—specifically an Atlanta United fan—could step up as a moderator for this corner of the site? I feel like it would be more balanced if someone from our side handled this section, especially since the discussion about the Seattle Sounders is being moderated by a Sounders supporter, and the Portland Timbers thread is run by a Timbers fan. It might be worth mentioning that the vast majority of active posters on this entire board are actually Atlanta fans, so it feels a little strange that we don't have at least one moderator who also roots for the team.

No.
Disgraceful moderator behavior on The Edge in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Amanda Hughes37 said:I get his logic... he thinks Trump is a joke, yet he isn't even particularly outraged by the Democrats—I’m not even sure he buys everything they do, but basically, he views them as the "good guys" regardless of how things shake out.

And then he gets annoyed when nobody is dropping dead from shock over the attacks on Trump.

But we aren't falling unconscious—just like we don't fall unconscious every time some nonsense breaks out on the political stage or in the news.

He’s spent more energy obsessing over Trump than actually looking at what’s going on in Zambia.

I just think people went overboard cheering for the Democrats this time around—everyone lost their compass because they're being asked to do something they were never asked to do before... wait for the verdict.

For God's sake, where would we be if we always waited for verdicts? Besides, since when has a court ruling ever stopped someone from trashing a person or a politician, no matter what the judge eventually decides?

Katherine, look, I've been on this forum for twenty years. You've been here a bit less, and we know each other pretty well. Am I seriously having to explain to you after all this time that condemning Trumpian behavior isn't the same thing as supporting human trafficking? Isn't the whole situation regarding the questionable adoption of children from the Congo problematic enough on its own, without Trump's nonsense? Do we really need to attack sexual minorities just to argue that the situation is bad?

Trump is potentially evil. Luckily, in his vanity and narcissism, he doesn't try to hide it. One day he'll go off on chemtrails, the next on the Masons, then quack doctors, then transgender people, then something else entirely. He usually ends up looking ridiculous, but every now and then he actually causes harm because he drags along idiots who are just itching to pick fights with various minorities. Bujanec has already jumped on that bandwagon. So has Fox News.

You don't need that loser, nor do you need the likes of Bujančev or Markićnik, acting as useful idiots to argue that the story from the Congo needs to be sorted out. There is plenty of material to work with even without them.
And those users who say they find Trump disgusting—either bluntly like me, or more subtly—they aren't saying it because they're traffickers in waiting. They say it because they genuinely can't stand the guy.

Any user is allowed to have an opinion on any public figure. You're even allowed a curse word or two here; that was settled long ago, no matter how much NoDirectionHome fumes about it. By the way, it's an interesting take to suggest it's somehow dirtier to write a swear word on a forum than it is to target sexual minorities in places where it could actually ruin their lives.

What you can't do, however, is slap a label on a user just because they hold a certain view on a public figure. That protection applies to both the regular users and the moderators.

Anyway, Katherine, have it your way.
Disgraceful moderator behavior on The Edge in Feedback & Suggestions ·
You forgot to mention that I'm transgender.
Zapp, let's just move this over to the cornerstone. We really don't need a dedicated thread for this.
The absolute madman ban from TJ - 1000 points in Banned Users Corner ·
Tim Cook makes a fair point; for you, this is just a minor setback on the field. We'll get it sorted out.
Offside (General Discussion) in Soccer ·
Jonathan Barnes5 said:To me, it feels like a massive lapse in judgment, much like most instances where sports are weaponized for political agendas. I honestly can't wrap my head around the logic used to link a single athlete's career to an active war zone, as if any individual player holds the reins of executive power. Ideally, sports should serve as a bridge to bring people together rather than a tool to punish those who have the least influence over global affairs. One would hope for a bit more sophistication than that.

And to make the irony even sharper, we are talking about a collective sport. 🤣.

@Noah Roberts46
It seems people have become a bit too caught up in the fervor. It’s similar to how some might look down on Americans for being weak because they lacked a sovereign nation back in '76 and had to resist a regime. I’m not sure at what point everyone decided to reduce this entire conflict to mere administrative borders and bureaucracies, instead of looking at the actual human beings involved. By default, people tend to retreat into fear, which is a strange thing to witness.

It isn't stupid at all. Individual tennis players can play, Horoshilov can go skiing, and Cheryshev can still suit up for Valencia. Even Mazepin can drive Formula racing. On an individual level, everything is fine. But national teams? That's different. They represent the state—which right now is an aggressor and an outcast. And that’s okay. Why should a nation that invades and kills in another country without provocation get to compete in a World Cup and celebrate? It would be just great if Yugoslavia got to play in Euro 92 after what happened at Ovčar, wouldn't it?
Offside (General Discussion) in Soccer ·
Larry Fox5 said:It’s officially witch hunt season. 🤦

Today in Munich, they fired a conductor just because he was spotted once with Putin. It’s pure hysteria, completely irrational, and honestly, it borders on fascism.

Gergiev? He openly supported the annexation of Crimea. And it isn't just about being seen with Putin once—they're actually friends. Back when he was conducting in New York, protests were practically a weekly occurrence.
Richard Walker38 said:And more lives lost

If you had your way, we’d probably be mourning Jules Bianchi too.

Take it easy, Henry. People have been making mistakes long before this. Don't go accusing someone of wishing death on others.
Trolling with "U" on the Soccer subforum in Feedback & Suggestions ·
His writing style is just harmless attention-seeking, really. You know how it goes—every fool needs their little way of feeling important.
Brutal trolling on the Formula 1 sub in Feedback & Suggestions ·
The appeal is baseless. Case closed.
Offside Chat Archives (2014-2021) in Soccer ·
urbanhawk17 said:But that embankment is absolutely packed. I haven't seen that many people there in forever.

I haven't been to Jarun, or Maximilians, or Bundek, but if Rakitje was swarmed last week, I can only imagine what it's like over there.

I'm not judging, honestly. It's good that people are getting out, walking around; I think that's a positive thing. I just doubt this pace will continue once the bars and shopping malls reopen, though. Probably won't.

Right now, they've got nowhere else to go but outdoors, so that's that. Where else are the folks from Kvartrić supposed to go instead of Times Square? There isn't anywhere.

Small tangent here, but every day driving through downtown feels like a total dream. It’s pure fantasy. You’re cruising along Fifth Avenue, Vlaška, or Jurišić, maybe even cutting against the grain on Gaj or Masaryk, and you don't even have to wait for a green light because the streets are empty. It's beautiful. This is one of those rare moments—now or never.
Offside Chat Archives (2014-2021) in Soccer ·
Elizabeth Mendoza said:Honestly, the constant drop in infection numbers here in Los Angeles (only 5 new cases today!) totally baffles me, especially since half the city is out on the streets all day long. I’m going to go quickly knock on every single wooden surface I have in my apartment.

Not really. If you walk from Kvátrice to Times Square right now, you won't even run into fifty people along the way. Just my personal observation, happens every single day.
Offside Chat Archives (2014-2021) in Soccer ·
darkseal9 said:You clearly don't get that the whole red flag here is him listening to his followers from Joe Biden's side.
You haven't even been baptized, man.

What on earth are you even looking at?
Offside Chat Archives (2014-2021) in Soccer ·
darkseal9 said:Yeah, okay, explain to me what the big deal is about people hanging out at Walmart (I think it was some kind of department store, whatever) versus just twenty people being in a church.

The point is, we aren't some random group of protein-obsessed cliques on an internet forum. We don't get to decide which gatherings are "safe" enough to spread a virus and which aren't. If everyone told him, "Hey, skip Mass," then why the hell did he go? Who does he think he is, ignoring everyone from the Pope down to Božinović? It makes no sense. You can't even invite your family to a funeral if someone passes away because of restrictions, yet this guy thinks he can just show up for service. What kind of twisted logic is that?
Offside Chat Archives (2014-2021) in Soccer ·
Paul Martinez73 said:https://www.nytimes.com/news/article/10201108/

"It isn't just about a few rogue priests. You see it all over social media—people who refuse to take this seriously, and that small circle of clergy falls right into that category. They convince themselves they’re being brave or playing the victim, completely ignoring the fact that this isn't about me putting myself at risk; it's about how my reckless behavior puts everyone else in danger, which is something we simply don't have the right to do."

Honestly, I'd tell the Pope he's being a hypocrite by cherry-picking what he calls out, and I actually respect him for that critique.
And now the Diocese is making excuses because of how certain individuals acted. As if it matters... let them all be lumped together: Catholic liberals, scumbags, predators... whatever.

You’ve done everything in your power here to flip the script and make this about the journalist. But she wouldn't even be in this mess if it weren't for that priest. He basically ignored the Pope, ignored HBO, ignored his Archbishop, and ultimately ignored the U.S. government. He's the real issue here, not the reporter.
Offside Chat Archives (2014-2021) in Soccer ·
Paul Martinez73 said:So basically, she just walked through Central Park, snapped a few shots, asked people why they were hanging out, and then popped into a Cathedral during mass with a camera?

That’s exactly what I was getting at 🤷

If she had just stood outside, filming and interviewing folks, nobody would have said a word. It wasn't about what she was doing, but rather how she went about it.

And the real issue is that some guy at the entrance smashed her phone, and now we see headlines like "Catholics are gathering for mass," "Catholics aren't following bans," and "Priest spreading coronavirus."

Man, one church, one priest, fifteen people at mass, and one guy smashing a phone—that's enough for them to drag the entire faith through the mud everywhere. She could have done a report on the mass while the ban was in place, but you know, there's a way to do things without being intrusive.

The biggest thing here is that the exact same people on this forum were demanding people come out of their holes and gather, and then suddenly they're offended by fifteen people meeting in a Church. Look, my stance is that people shouldn't be grouping up in the first place, and I'm sticking to that whether it's at a Church or anywhere else; I don't get these people, but whatever...

Just show a little consistency. That's why I posted this intentionally; I wanted to see how people would react, and honestly, the hypocrisy, insults, and labeling were pretty obvious.

My Thesis was basically that journalists—and honestly, they can go jump in a lake—only ever bother filming churches. They never capture the parks, Central Park, or any of the other stuff. It's always just the church.

I think we've finally cleared that up.
Offside Chat Archives (2014-2021) in Soccer ·
brightpilot6 said:So, when journalists report on people gathering at a Spa Resort, it's considered perfectly fine because it serves the public interest, but the moment they cover an announced gathering at a Cathedral, suddenly it's framed as a provocation.

It’s just a textbook case of double standards.

For me, the news isn't about some supposed "conflict," but rather the sheer fact that someone could be foolish enough to organize an entirely unnecessary get-together despite everything going on. Just any gathering at all.

And if we're talking about fulfilling social and psychological needs, I'd happily grab a coffee or a beer at my local pub with a few friends while keeping six feet apart. Why am I being told I can't do that?

And lately, you can't even scroll through news sites without being flooded by photos from Central Park, the Dolac Market, or random fish markets all over America. Why aren't the reporters covering that? It’s like they have total tunnel vision, much like those horses with the little musical instruments.
Offside Chat Archives (2014-2021) in Soccer ·
wiredrider9 said:There were probably a hundred times more people down at Santa Monica, but I guess that doesn't matter to the "journalists" as much as some clown priest and a couple of old ladies—you know how it goes, they just want to stir up a scandal whenever they see a priest acting out, because apparently that's way more important than actual news.
Offside Chat Archives (2014-2021) in Soccer ·
darkseal9 said:Let's say Živana Živković is just a journalist looking to make a name for herself by stepping into Hrvojka Horvanticic's inner circle instead.

She changed it. It’s totally a Šušak move.