CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › ironrider11 › Posts

Posts by ironrider11

397 posts shown.

And just like that... -.- in Psychology ·
wiredbadger17 said:Since I'm currently between jobs, I’ve been spending way too much time digging through the past and trying to make sense of things. It’s funny—when I actually have something to occupy my mind, I don't give it a second thought and just keep moving. But the moment I stop to dwell on it, the emotions hit me all at once, and I spiral into a pretty depressive headspace. I'm looking for some perspective here because I can't help feeling like if someone like me—someone who’s had to fight their own battles and deal with more than my fair share of life's garbage alone—doesn't deserve to have decent people in their corner, then maybe I just need to accept that. I've made peace with the reality of it, I suppose, but I just can't seem to stop overthinking the whole thing. -.-'

Is every single person special just because they spend their whole lives stuck inside their own heads, regardless of what's happening around them? Like, if you're always just solo with your own thoughts, does that automatically make you "special"? Honestly, being "unique" doesn't even feel like an achievement when it's something everyone is guaranteed by default...
People who stare at you in Psychology ·
jadetinker85 said:I guess my own essence is pretty colorful, then. Currently eyeing some two-tone trousers from Fresno.

https://www.google.com/search?q=fresno...cKkVtK6bqE1iyM

Mine is just this dull, dark gray thing. Honestly, maybe I’m wrong—self-perception isn't exactly a science. When someone looks at you without trying to hide their disgust or anything, staring straight at your... essence... while they're actually just eyeing those weird two-tone pants, they probably aren't being super judgmental. They're just struggling with some weird visual perspective while trying to be empathetic. Trying to step into someone else's shoes—or in this case, their two-tone pants... It's tough, if not impossible, to really grasp someone's outward essence without becoming totally lost in the process of "capturing their being", which usually just ends up with you finding yourself instead...
People who stare at you in Psychology ·
jadetinker85 said:And how exactly do you plan on capturing someone's "essence"? 😁

With rose-colored glasses. Their whole "essence" boils down to picking out pants colors and cuts, whether they match their shoes or not, how they style their hair—subtle or just totally over-the-top—and all that tacky jewelry... When I love to tear people apart, those rose-colored glasses let you catch their actual vibe, their core, their real deal... it’s like drinking pure liquid gold from a fountain of eternal bliss...
Harold Smith87 said:Look, you explained it fine, I guess, but maybe you just need everything spelled out because you can't seem to connect the dots yourself. You can have Communication without IDs, sure, but it’s harder—it's limited. Honestly, if you look at it from an evolutionary standpoint, maybe we wouldn't even have it without names.
Communication basically started as a way to identify people, plan a hunt, and figure out who was doing what and where. That’s really the foundation of it all.
Even if we look at more primitive ways of communicating, like wolves, their Communication is used for identification about 90% of the time. They howl to call out, and they listen to figure out who's calling based on the sound.

Let's look at those primitive forms of communication, since we might as well while we're at it...
If you're gonna look, you might as well go all the way. Just saying...
Sarah Sanders2 said:You're overthinking this. Nobody said Communication is impossible without names, just that it gets significantly harder. Try going a month without using a single name. Delete every contact in your phone. Look at all the names on this forum and see if your life gets easier or more difficult.

If you've got three Ivannas at the office and the crew wants to gossip about "Ivanna," you've already narrowed it down from hundreds of employees to just three. From there, you use a last name or just say "Ivanna from HR" to clear up the confusion. If all three Ivannas share a last name and somehow all work in HR, then you move to physical identifiers: glasses, hair color, whatever. People think in categories. If your family is gossiping about your cousin Ivanna, you aren't going to confuse her with the Ivanna from your job because there's zero overlap.

Actually, I think it's the exact opposite... Just try following this thread and seeing if you can even tell who's replying to what.
Let me make it easy for you. Going in reverse order, obviously: 1, 2, 3, and finally, 4.
Sarah Sanders2 said:Maybe she was thinking about when two people are gossiping about someone else. How do you say, "I went to the movies with that guy"? You go, "You know, the one with the curly brown hair?" "The guy with green eyes?" "No, the one with twins." "Oh, okay, the guy whose wife always wears a bun..." "Yeah, that's the one."

Or calling out to someone, like she mentioned. "Hey, you! The mechanic with the blue hair and brown eyes!"🤣

Bottom line:
People slap a label or a name on everything just so they can identify what's being discussed while passing info along (communicating). Without names, it’s pure chaos. Pronouns like this, that, him, her, those—they aren't enough. That's how I talk when I'm having an Alzheimer's moment: "You know, that round thing, you put it on the spinning thing, it's for lunch, and when you put it on the round thing, it plays music?" You thinking of a record, a turntable? Yeah, that! We have to give things and people names to limit them, to differentiate this from that. We need labels to navigate reality and feel secure; because if nothing is identified, then what even is it?

Maybe they're just out in the woods somewhere. Who, though? Some random forest types... Look, whenever I run into someone I don't know, I usually don't lead with a handshake or anything. It feels weird, like I'm forcing an interaction. But if they grab my hand and start doing that awkward rhythmic shaking thing, then fine, I'll play along. I'll give them the whole routine—"Good morning, I'm Žarko Palić"—just waiting for that basic social reflex where we actually acknowledge each other... You know, the bare minimum. Once the pleasantries are out of the way, I might ask for help or whatever. If I don't explicitly ask for something, I'm just expecting them to realize I'm right here...

When you're hanging out in a high-profile crowd filled with big shots, does anyone even need to introduce themselves? If you're close enough to someone and you catch their eye, you can just start talking without that awkward, desperate "Hey, [Name]!" routine. Take me and my friends—we don't always go by names, we just vibe based on how we know people. Like, if a group of us starts gossiping about Ivanna, and there are like a million Ivannas out there, we can't just say her name or everyone will get confused and start talking about their own friend. To make sure we're all on the same page, we have to add some descriptors that actually mean something... "Which Ivanna?" "The one who runs the show at Spic, the one with the purple and green hair..." "Oh, *that* Ivanna. What about her?"

Just an observation... Sure, if you need to grab someone from HR, you’re gonna call out names like "Hey, can you get Zdenka and Mark in here?" especially if you need to know the who, what, and why behind their paperwork. But once they're actually standing in front of you, you don't need to keep repeating their names just to have a conversation. If you're dealing with a massive crowd of people all day long, why waste the mental energy constantly identifying everyone by name when you're already in the middle of the interaction... it just seems redundant...

If we’re looking at the stats, and someone chooses to skip using a name when they really should have used one... then—going back to that idea that you can't really have, run, or even track any decent Communication without names—does some random ID like x-24-dd4861lh66 actually tell us anything about a person? It's pretty much irrelevant. But sometimes, in those old-school ways of talking, you'll have two or three nameless people gossiping about Ivanna for half an hour straight. By the end of it, nobody even realizes they were all talking about different versions of her. You could tear apart multiple different icons of Ivanna just through gossip, treating it like some kind of meaningful way to interact... maybe...
Harold Smith87 said:You need a name just to have any kind of Communication, because without one, you can't call anyone out or even talk about them,
I guess. When I say a name, I’m talking about first names, last names, or nicknames—basically just whatever works as an identification system.

So you're saying it's impossible (to have Communication) if you don't know someone's name? Like, their full name or nickname...? 🤔
darksurfer4 said:I just happened to notice what she’s got written right under her avatar—calling herself an "idiot." Honestly, it’s just tacky to go around labeling yourself that way; it screams a massive lack of self-confidence and basic self-respect. Now, look, I’m certainly no saint—I’ve struggled with my own bouts of insecurity in my time—but even at my lowest, I never had the decency to sit there and write to myself that I was some kind of moron or anything along those lines.

Then you’ve got the people who know they're idiots—just like everyone else—and don't mind owning it. Maybe it's meant to be a nudge for others to reflect, to show some empathy or compassion... which wouldn't necessarily mean low self-esteem, but maybe just having enough guts to use actual self-criticism constructively?

Everyone messes up. People get reactive. It happens. But shouldn't you think twice and try to fix things before you do something you can't take back? Like, "I lost it and cursed God's mother, now I feel like crap." The issue is feeling bad, and then trying to fix that feeling. Isn't that just pure selfishness?

Maybe people use their moms as a tool just to stop feeling guilty, but if "fixing" a broken relationship means shouting "screw you" at someone—which isn't even a curse, really, it's more like... Mary, the Virgin, the immaculate conception... whatever...—nobody ever stops to wonder about God. How does He feel?

He's a main character in this whole story, and He's even in the title, yet nobody sees Him. Nobody asks how He feels... especially when people use profanity against Him to somehow score points for their "artistic" expression of power. It's just not right...
People who stare at you in Psychology ·
Laura Castillo6 said:Honestly, whenever I find myself staring into someone's eyes for a bit longer than usual, I tell myself I’m just working on my "eye contact" skills. I figure it’s actually decent practice for building up some self-confidence, plus you start to notice how much—or how little—someone is actually present in the moment. Most of the time, when I look at people, I catch this sense of total mental absence; you can just see it in that glazed-over, thousand-yard stare where they've completely checked out of the conversation.

With women, I’ve noticed that holding eye contact for a while can really tip you off to whether they're interested or not. If a woman isn't feeling it or just isn't interested, she’s definitely not going to be holding your gaze for long.

What even counts as being in the present moment anyway? Like, how do you even know if two people are actually on the same page at the exact same time?...
Ronald Sanchez14 said:And what else is an older person supposed to talk about besides medicine? ...
Doctors don't even need to call patients in; people just walk in based on when they arrived. ....
The younger generation's mindset is just stuck and dull because kids get praised for every little thing, making it easy for them to turn into idiots. ...

Exactly. We need some serious "enabler-slaying" to punish this kind of terrible parenting. Instead of worshiping a kid's brain, maybe just observe it? An adult should be immune to the basic, average mind of a child—a mind that hasn't even been shaped by reality or actual wisdom yet. We basically need to clip their wings and stomp out that spirit from day one. By showering them with constant praise for everything they do or think, we convince them they’re nothing special, and that’s all they’ll ever be. What we really need are people who actually ground the youth. Sometimes being "backward" isn't such a bad thing if it keeps things from spiraling...
People who stare at you in Psychology ·
Timothy Mitchell2 said:There’s one part of this whole thing that most people are totally missing.
That split second of silence, the tension in the air, and just how much power she had in her eyes—it was almost commanding. Honestly, my questions from the survey felt pretty pointless after that look... I don't know, maybe I just couldn't hold my own against it and ran out of things to say... but man, what a heavy psychological moment.

Isn't every single second spent pulling strings through manipulation and bullying—which honestly looks pretty bad on them—just one big, intense psychological moment?
Grandma’s got zero wisdom when it comes to how "the system" actually works. She’s sweet, though. Just too kind for her own good, honestly... probably doing a disservice to some pretty brilliant, curious kid who’s just lost in their own head at four years old. A little too careful, if you ask me.

"We have to sign our public names—not our aliases—in the manifest. That way, once we reach the end of this trip, or rather, get back to where we started, She'll know exactly whose name to call out next from the passenger list."
People who stare at you in Psychology ·
Nicholas Bailey3 said:Snoop Dogg with the silver medals...

🧐 Hell yeah!

People who stare at you in Psychology ·
Just another "if looks could kill" take on some "staring into space" self-help nonsense.
Richard Rodriguez17 said:Yeah, my mom and dad don't really see eye to eye, I guess. It's hard to put their relationship into words, honestly. For the most part, Mom leans most heavily on my brother and the grandkids, while I just sort of exist on the periphery...

My psychiatrist thinks moving out isn't the right move for me right now. He seems to feel that I'm just not quite strong enough or independent enough to pull off something like that yet.

Forget about what's happening right now, or what your shrink thinks—even if he's being pretty blunt about your weight—and what he's suggesting as an option... what do *you* think? Are you actually strong and independent enough (and not so wrapped up in yourself and your own struggle) to handle something like that?
Mark Palmer7 said:I hope you've calmed down a bit and things with your mom are looking better.
You really have to try to understand your mother—being a parent is the hardest job in the world, no matter what anyone says. Most people aren't even ready for that role—to raise a human being—but they find themselves in it and have to take on this massive responsibility, which is a huge source of stress. I know there are all kinds of parents out there, because we aren't all the same, and there’s no such thing as perfection. Maybe you'll be a parent one day too; you'll love that little person more than yourself, but you're definitely going to make mistakes.
I think you should give your mom a chance and sit down to talk with her.

Hardest job in the world? A "job"? A role that most people aren't ready for but somehow end up in and have to take on, or just fake it (like those incompetent actors playing the part of a parent), along with this massive responsibility? How does "most people" just stumble into a role they aren't prepared for? Who's forcing them? Who's making them practice this huge responsibility by playing the part? Compare that to someone being irresponsible at a job at a nuclear power plant, for example, where the consequences are catastrophic if a mother—whose "job" is supposedly the hardest in the world—gets caught playing a role she's totally incapable of handling... The psychoactive drug industry couldn't possibly manufacture enough meds to cover the fallout...
People who stare at you in Psychology ·
Timothy Mitchell2 said:unknown

Go ahead, kill the messenger! Yeah, fine, I'm just some old-school guy who spends his free time thinking about older women. Rightttt

Thinking about mature women, yeah, but NOT "grandmas"... and she wasn't even that old, she was in her prime. She had this crazy energy, like a charisma that just totally froze me up.

But honestly, even with someone your own age, you can tell when there's chemistry. As for why I didn't make a move...

No, I'm not suggesting anyone is a gerontophile. Quite the opposite—I'm saying it's statistically probable that someone might just stare at someone without any sexual connotation involved in the whole process of "staring." What kind of "weird energy" did this "woman in her prime" have? Like, what kind of observation process were you using to detect this "energy"? Was her hair standing up and "something wild in the air" crackling with high-voltage static electricity?

Even with a girl (or guy) who isn't a "woman in her prime," you can tell when there's chemistry? Where's this chemistry? Does it always exist? Maybe deep down, beneath your conscious thought, you know it doesn't work that way, yet you still believe it does. Is this whole thing about "women with weird energy and charisma in their prime..." just a mental construct fueled by sexual undertones? Is that why you didn't do anything?

Charles Young56 said:No, like I said, I'm not fantasizing. 🙂
I'm just noticing things.

Well... Must be a high-quality antenna and receiver then, supposedly. 🕺
People who stare at you in Psychology ·
Charles Young56 said:I'm curious about that too, I guess.
There’s this one girl who keeps looking my way, but it's like she has this specific "look" that says something... no, I don't want to get ahead of myself or start daydreaming, I'm just noticing things.

Yeah, other people's eyes are just mirrors... not their souls. Maybe they're just mirrors for whatever the observer is projecting onto them (usually something sexual)...
People who stare at you in Psychology ·
Timothy Mitchell2 said:Online self-help training.[/I]

I also wonder if people who stare like that are actually high intelligence, testing if the other person can handle the pressure. Which, yeah, brings up those sexual undertones about whether they can handle things in bed too... lol.

Look, if you’re actually happy with your brain—even if it isn't exactly top tier but gets the job done well enough—you don't need to perform. You can just relax. You don't have to go through all that theatrical nonsense just to pretend you're some genius for show. When you see some ninety-year-old looking totally lost in their own head, trying to lock eyes with them just makes you wonder how much stamina those old folks even have left in the bedroom...🤷
People who stare at you in Psychology ·
Who knows what goes on inside the heads of people like that, but you notice a pattern. People who actually care enough to ask usually get shut down. It’s like they just don't have the guts to face a question like that head-on. Honestly, watching them squirm is kind of entertaining. You see this same reaction over and over when you start poking at them... It’s weird how some people get so uncomfortable just being watched. Like they can feel your eyes on them, almost like a wireless signal hitting them, which—let's be real—they shouldn't be feeling if they want to act tough.

It gets even weirder when they try to play it cool. They’ll stare someone down, but the second they realize they're being watched back, they fold. They can't hold the gaze. Even if they try to be brave and look someone straight in the eye, they end up looking away almost immediately. Besides the obvious lack of backbone, I wonder what else is going on in their heads? There’s definitely that whole "cat and mouse" vibe playing out, too.

Virtual self-help training.