CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › David Price5 › Posts

Posts by David Price5

879 posts shown.

The Descent in Movies ·
Laura Palmer25 said:What a coincidence that someone started this thread right after I finally sat down to watch this movie the other night. I have to admit, my expectations were sky-high because people have been hyping it up like crazy lately—honestly, more than almost any recent horror release. What can I say... it didn't disappoint, but it wasn't exactly mind-blowing either. If I have to give credit where it's due, it masterfully nails that sense of claustrophobia and pure, hopeless disorientation, but everything else is up for debate.

The whole conflict between Sarah and Juno felt totally forced to me, like they just threw it in to give the plot some fake psychological depth; it could have worked perfectly fine without it. And honestly, I felt bad for Juno. She was fighting like Rambo the entire time, clearing the path for everyone else and taking on the brunt of the attacks, only to be taken out by some jealous, betrayed woman in the end. That’s just messed up.

The crawlers are alright, though I've seen much scarier things (both visible and unseen) before. For instance, I immediately think of Valek from Carpenter's "Vampires" or the "lovely" Samara from "The Ring." If I had to choose who I'd rather have breathing down my neck—the crawlers or one of those two—I'd pick the crawlers without a second thought.

The core of this film really boils down to that central conflict. Without it, we’d just be watching a standard survival horror flick. It all starts with a tiny seed of doubt in those first three minutes, which eventually builds through the sheer terror they endure, finally culminating in that climactic action at the end. At its heart, revenge was simply the priority.

Laura Palmer25 said:What a coincidence that someone started this thread right after I finally sat down to watch this movie the other night. I have to admit, my expectations were sky-high because people have been hyping it up like crazy lately—honestly, more than almost any recent horror release. What can I say... it didn't disappoint, but it wasn't exactly mind-blowing either. If I have to give credit where it's due, it masterfully nails that sense of claustrophobia and pure, hopeless disorientation, but everything else is up for debate.

The whole conflict between Sarah and Juno felt totally forced to me, like they just threw it in to give the plot some fake psychological depth; it could have worked perfectly fine without it. And honestly, I felt bad for Juno. She was fighting like Rambo the entire time, clearing the path for everyone else and taking on the brunt of the attacks, only to be taken out by some jealous, betrayed woman in the end. That’s just messed up.

The crawlers are alright, though I've seen much scarier things (both visible and unseen) before. For instance, I immediately think of Valek from Carpenter's "Vampires" or the "lovely" Samara from "The Ring." If I had to choose who I'd rather have breathing down my neck—the crawlers or one of those two—I'd pick the crawlers without a second thought.

But that’s exactly the point. People just don't react logically after situations like that. Once you've cracked the skulls of a few "monsters," something inside a person just snaps. You also have to remember the girls were separated; they had no idea what the others were up to.

Laura Palmer25 said:What a coincidence that someone started this thread right after I finally sat down to watch this movie the other night. I have to admit, my expectations were sky-high because people have been hyping it up like crazy lately—honestly, more than almost any recent horror release. What can I say... it didn't disappoint, but it wasn't exactly mind-blowing either. If I have to give credit where it's due, it masterfully nails that sense of claustrophobia and pure, hopeless disorientation, but everything else is up for debate.

The whole conflict between Sarah and Juno felt totally forced to me, like they just threw it in to give the plot some fake psychological depth; it could have worked perfectly fine without it. And honestly, I felt bad for Juno. She was fighting like Rambo the entire time, clearing the path for everyone else and taking on the brunt of the attacks, only to be taken out by some jealous, betrayed woman in the end. That’s just messed up.

The crawlers are alright, though I've seen much scarier things (both visible and unseen) before. For instance, I immediately think of Valek from Carpenter's "Vampires" or the "lovely" Samara from "The Ring." If I had to choose who I'd rather have breathing down my neck—the crawlers or one of those two—I'd pick the crawlers without a second thought.

Of course you’d pick the Crawlers; they aren't even imbeciles. They don't have any crazy superpowers or anything supernatural going on. They're just as capable as our protagonists. I much prefer characters who are evenly matched rather than watching some inferior underdogs somehow stumble their way into defeating a superior enemy. If I recall correctly, Samara proved to be indestructible in the film, whereas vampires are just way too overpowered.
Movies you couldn't even finish in Movies ·
I am still waiting on an update regarding Florine. It would be wonderful to hear some news soon! Gerald Lopez says:
I almost always force myself to watch things all the way to the end, only to end up hitting my head against the wall. What was I thinking? 🙂

That’s just how it works. You wouldn't judge a music album based on only the first three or four tracks. You have to listen to the whole thing before you earn the right to insult a movie.

I am currently reading about Florine. It is quite an interesting subject. [User Name] says:
Blade Runner is one of those rare films I haven't managed to finish yet. I’ve tried starting it a few times, but I always end up nodding off because I'm just too exhausted. I really want to give it a proper viewing.

Your only option now is to schedule an appointment with him much sooner.
Movies you couldn't even finish in Movies ·
restlessranger30 said:Oh, there are just so many! 🤣 I’ll just list a few of those cult classics and heavy hitters that I haven't quite managed to sit through yet.

2001: A Space Odyssey. Good grief, I have started this movie three separate times and yet I have never actually finished it.

Citizen Kane—honestly, a bit of a snooze fest. 😢

Scent of a Woman—also pretty tedious if you ask me.

No Country for Old Men
Eyes Wide Shut
Saving Private Ryan

...plus a whole bunch of horror films that were simply too terrifying for me to watch until the end. 🤣

Or maybe they were just way too scary! ;-)
Suicide Squad (2001) in Movies ·
rustyscout34 said:Have you seen Bator's rowaiaru yet? I highly recommend it.

There aren't any issues with his work at all. He attempts to portray real social problems without any unnecessary mystery, and he succeeds brilliantly. It actually makes me want to go back and watch it again.
Suicide Squad (2001) in Movies ·
I actually didn't mind it when I watched it. I gave it a 6/10, even though several parts felt pretty confusing and some of the characters' decisions just seemed plain foolish. At first, I thought maybe I was just missing something, but eventually, I realized the issue was definitely with the movie itself. It felt like they tried to force a sense of mystery into a story where it simply didn't belong.
Suicide Squad (2001) in Movies ·
placidjackal36 said:It isn't a bad movie. It touches on alienation and various issues within Japanese society, though I found it a bit muddled.

😕😕😕

To be honest, I think you're finding it unclear simply because it's a bad film.
Confessions of a Shopaholic in Movies ·
Jonathan Collins43 said:It doesn't even matter! Between the great humor and having Isla Fisher in the cast, it's a win!

The comedy beats are just as predictable as the characters themselves. Still, Isla is always charming. :-)
Confessions of a Shopaholic in Movies ·
Jonathan Collins43 said:Not at all!

Bridget Jones's Diary, Sex and the City, Confessions... they are all based on books catering to female readers, basically chick lit. I am not entirely sure if Legally Blonde was originally a book, though, regarding the first sequel.

Jonathan Collins43 said:Confessions mocks everything much more deeply at its core, just like Legally Blonde (which, because of how it recounts life mishaps and the relationship with the editor, feels somewhat similar to Bridget Jones's Diary). This is different from Sex and the City, which has its humor, but those women are genuine fashionistas who actually care about style. Sex and the City follows a certain philosophy—for instance, the way Carrie writes her columns—and it doesn't undermine that, even if the show is funny. In contrast, Confessions and Legally Blonde are more satirical. Carrie is never the butt of the joke herself; she always has to remain cool, even when she finds herself in a ridiculous situation. We don't mock her lifestyle or the fact that being a journalist can be silly, whereas the shopaholic completely ridicules those things, as does Legally Blonde with Elle Woods. No matter how much dignity she maintains, they are making fun of her the whole time! I think the characters are more than just Samantha, since she is so hypersexual that she is easy to caricature, or Charlotte, who gets mocked quite a bit. There is less mockery of Miranda, who stays firm in her views. But Carrie is always portrayed as cool, whether she is dealing with noisy neighbors or sleeping with a married guy like faca, where you almost feel bad for him when his wife finds out... Carrie comes across as cool, staying true to her own urban woman style without being fundamentally ridiculed. Otherwise, the series would be much more chaotic. It would be "Wonderfalls".

Well, that is still a far cry from true satirical humor. In the end, The Devil Wears Prada is actually much more satirical..

My main issue with this movie (and unfortunately with almost the entire rom-com genre) is the lack of originality and how incredibly predictable it is. For example, the moment I met that British guy, I already guessed he would be her boss and that he would end up fighting against some "evil" management,...
Where the Wild Things Are (2009) in Movies ·
Dennis Carter said:Maybe it’s actually the other way around, considering the Where the Wild Things Are picture book was published back in 1963.

Regardless, I am certainly grateful for Miyazaki.😁
Confessions of a Shopaholic in Movies ·
Jonathan Collins43 said:Isla Fisher is absolutely brilliant. In my opinion, Confessions of a Shopaholic is easily one of the best films released this year! Some critics claim it’s for the "Sex and the City" crowd, but I think it actually appeals more to fans of "Legally Blonde" or even "Bridget Jones's Diary".

But honestly, those audiences are all essentially the same group...
The Proposal (2009) in Movies ·
goldenbadger8 said:To be honest, I don't have an issue with a happy ending. My problem lies with the characterization; when the characters are written so poorly, the movie becomes quite disappointing to me. I just don't know...

I don't want to spoil anything, but the character development in Alaska is so poorly handled that it’s honestly terrible.

Maybe living up north is starting to get to us, and that’s why we’re feeling a bit disappointed. :-)
The Proposal (2009) in Movies ·
goldenbadger8 said:I caught this at the theater yesterday. I have to say, I was a bit let down. The movie relies way too heavily on stereotypes—the worst, most mindless kind. I won't spoil anything right now, but I can elaborate if anyone is interested. My rating: 3 out of 5.

The issue is that this genre rarely breaks new ground. It's a comedy, so you already know there's going to be a happy ending.
We all have an appreciation for high-quality production, whether it’s coming out of Hollywood or right here in the States..
My mistake. I thought that was just cynicism. :-)
Nicholas Walker3 said:...because otherwise, the bad guys wouldn't end up in jail anyway...

And honestly—Clint's whole body of work isn't really what you described—that mostly applies to movies like Dirty Harry. Personally, I found the ending totally expected, and when I first saw it, I couldn't wrap my head around why people made such a huge deal out of the finale. Then it hit me: the idea that Clint's legacy is tied to this specific style is just total nonsense. Every movie should stand on its own—you shouldn't hype up a film just because of some old connection to a previous cast. It reminds me of that ridiculous scene where Neo falls in a duel with a rat—I mean, logically, someone has to go down!

It simply won't fly. We already knew they were committing crimes without facing any consequences. They even assaulted a relative and got away with it. But after this latest stunt, they can't hide behind their excuses anymore.

Nicholas Walker3 said:...because otherwise, the bad guys wouldn't end up in jail anyway...

And honestly—Clint's whole body of work isn't really what you described—that mostly applies to movies like Dirty Harry. Personally, I found the ending totally expected, and when I first saw it, I couldn't wrap my head around why people made such a huge deal out of the finale. Then it hit me: the idea that Clint's legacy is tied to this specific style is just total nonsense. Every movie should stand on its own—you shouldn't hype up a film just because of some old connection to a previous cast. It reminds me of that ridiculous scene where Neo falls in a duel with a rat—I mean, logically, someone has to go down!

To be honest, my first association with Clint Eastwood’s acting is always Harry Callahan, rather than that guy with the orangutan or the circus manager. I can't quite recall what all the fuss was about regarding that showdown between Pacino and De Niro. I don't remember there being much of a stir.
Richard Wilson4 said:David Price5, the ending actually works because it's the only way we could've ever stood a chance against enemies that advanced...
But yeah, I guess it’s a little weird they didn't check, though honestly, viruses and stuff are always mutating anyway...

Why did we even need to win? It could have ended with us losing—which wouldn't be the first time—or an open ending where we still managed to put up a fight. Honestly, both would have been better, though I'd prefer the resistance scenario. :-)

Imagine an ending without the virus—maybe a FlashForward set 100 years later. The entire country is overgrown with red weeds, aliens have built their own civilization here, and we see famous landmarks in ruins. That's it. We're just gone...
rustyscout34 said:fair point. after all that practice in Half-Life 2, i guess i could probably take him out without even needing a bomb... 😁

You're reading my mind again. I was just about to drop a Freeman reference 😁
If you somehow find the logic behind those Signsi from Shamealan acceptable, then there really isn't any point in us continuing this debate, is there?

If you think about it, most of the major agricultural belts are located far inland anyway, so their positioning isn't actually that nonsensical... though I have to admit, their Achilles' heel was definitely bothering me too.

Right, because taking out a twenty-meter-tall, three-legged killing machine with nothing but a single bomb is just a casual daily task for the average guy like me—just to kill some time.

You’re selling yourself short :-). You don't truly know what you're capable of until you put it to the test :-)

You don't need to be a Marine or spend ten years in the service to be precise when handling something the size of a bomb.
Nicholas Walker3 said:The whole thing really comes down to the fact that both heroes end up facing their own internal battles at the end!

True, but that’s getting a bit too broad. If we go by that logic, we could include any movie where the actors actually survive the finale.
The ending of *Gran Torino* feels uniquely different because most of us are intimately familiar with Clint Eastwood's body of work. We all remember how many of his films traditionally wrap up with a burst of violence where the villains get what's coming to them. Honestly, I fully expected *Gran Torino* to follow that pattern. Instead, we were given a much better resolution. The innocent walk free, the bad guys head to prison, and our protagonist gets to keep his peace of mind... without firing a single shot. 👍
Richard Wilson4 said:War of the worlds—that’s basically how the book wraps things up...

But who said the ending of the book was actually good?

I don't see why a tiny detail like that couldn't wipe out a supposedly superior race. Being smarter doesn't automatically mean they have stronger immune systems than us!

The ships were buried for millennia. This invasion was long-planned. It’s hard to believe a civilization so technologically advanced wouldn't think to check the air. They could have easily realized the oxygen itself was lethal to them, perhaps due to methane levels or something similar. Such a truth might exist, but a highly advanced, aggressive occupying force shouldn't be that careless.

Talking about random topics here, but I Am Legend with Will Smith immediately comes to mind. Not only did the ending disappoint me (including the alternative version), but the entire second half involving that religious woman and her son, plus the fights with monsters... it just didn't work.

(If I recall correctly, he dies at the end of the book too. Of course, the vibe is different since there is no sacrifice involved..)

Cast Away with Tom Hanks also had a terrible Hollywood ending for me. I mean, who falls for the cliché where after such a harrowing ocean journey on a raft...

Wasn't he supposed to lose his ability to speak due to PTSD? He isn't shown much at the end, but trust me, he changed.

Quote: Batman Begins also really disappointed me with its conclusion. The movie focuses so much on character development and psychological depth, only to turn into a mindless action flick filled with flashy explosions and stupid train scenes.

Is it an action movie with a final showdown or a standard film with a proper resolution?

Even this ending didn't particularly impress me; nothing we haven't seen in movies before (Wild Horde).

Not at all. The protagonists might end up in a similar way in both films, but those are two completely different conclusions. The reasons why the gang in the Wild Bunch went out fighting are entirely different from why Clint