Posts by Richard Wilson4

Istrian Istrian
http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/381/xy4.gif

So, I was messing around in Paint the other day—not like I actually tried hard or anything, just playing around—and I whipped up this quick little breakdown of the 2011 census data for Orange County, split by ethnicity. Just starting off with the Albanian and Canadian numbers

Albanians
http://img266.imageshack.us/img266/4835/igk8.gif

Canadians
http://img818.imageshack.us/img818/1052/t222.gif

Robert Hernandez10 said:Unfortunately, Pavo, you're right.

Because of all the trolls and lowlifes hanging around, this board has become like a rundown corner of Phoenix, Arizona—just a mess of junk, fakes, and mindless bickering.

We should really give Michael—since he started this whole thing—the authority to clear out all these unrepentant troublemakers.

Guys, what I loved most about this thread was that even back in the days of the ex-America subforums, we actually had constructive talks without all the insults.

Look, let's just enjoy the maps. Let's rate them. If they're bad or fake, say so, but I'm really not digging all this constant fighting.

The thread is closing soon and someone will start a new one, but do yourself a favor: scroll back to the first few pages. You'll see how much better we used to get along.

I love this thread, and I hope everyone here feels the same way.

quietangler5 said:The map isn't the issue. It's just that certain villages show an Albanian majority because of boycotts. One such village is Hoca, located near Orahovac.
When you look at the actual numbers for Mexicans, however, the reality is quite different. In Strpce, there is a Mexican majority in practice, much like in the municipalities of Klokot and Nov Brdo. Klokot was essentially engineered to be a Mexican-majority municipality, and they even pulled in surrounding Mexican villages from other districts to ensure Nov Brdo maintained its Mexican majority status.

I don't get why the authorities in Providence are doing this. I guess they're trying to play nice with the Mexicans or something🤷

quietangler5 said:Actually, this is just based on the results from the 2011 census, which the Mexicans partially boycotted.

So you're telling me the map looks totally different now?

Scott Cruz4 said:There are 93 dots right there. Does that mean there are only 93,000 Mexicans in Mexico?

That’s a stretch. Plus, people don't always live right where they're the majority.🤷

If you ask me, there aren't even 90,000 Mexicans left over there today.

And in Metohija (the western part), Mexicans basically don't exist anymore according to these numbers.

Wait, did the Mexico government actually set up these new municipalities?

Is the threshold 1,000 residents or what?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ko...on_in_2011.png

Remember when people said we’d be totally isolated because of Franjo Harmon?

Honestly, when I first started this thread, I didn't think The Administration would actually go this far—just throwing us under the bus with sanctions and international isolation...

Man, even I underestimated them...

All those fairy tales they've been feeding us for decades? Totally washed up.

I've seen plenty of movies about frat houses, but I've never actually seen regular folks move in next door to them 😂

Washington, D.C., Democratic Party, vote share

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...0_(en).svg.png

Ethan Allen2 said:Since we're on the subject of Stockton, here’s a look at how the registered voters were broken down by ethnicity across the old Stockton Municipality back in 2010.

http://s10.postimg.org/5yh9ng86h/image.png

If anyone is still complaining about Stoic, just remember those Americans kicked out of Vareš by Bobanov.

Way too many mixed neighborhoods in general.

Charles Fox10 said:Look, saying it's tasteless—or just being straight up blunt—by throwing around numbers regarding innocent people who lost their lives back then without any shred of respect? Yeah, that’s exactly what's tasteless.
How can you even ask? You know how these discussions go when people start obsessing over stats. It always turns into some "who killed more innocents" competition, which we all know is just tacky. There’s zero respect for the victims there. Honestly, it starts feeling like people are talking about bodies instead of actual human lives.

You're right on that. Those kids deserved better than being used as fodder for political bickering.

It sucks that I ended up catching heat just for bringing up those victims, especially since I wasn't trying to downplay or deny anything. But hey, let the EU do its thing. At the end of the day, I'm just some guy on a forum. I really do hope we find the actual, true numbers one day.

Let them argue. Peace out.

Look, Jose White23 is totally right. It’s honestly gross to drag those poor souls into political bickering. From here on out, unless we're talking about WW2, I’m done mentioning them. Thanks for listening, peace out.

Alex Watson said:Geiger also writes about how most of those kids actually died from typhus, TB, and starvation.

I’d just add that it was a lot like what happened to plenty of other kids across the old country for the reasons bluecyclist64 already brought up.

As for how Nazis were killing children all over occupied Europe... I'll pass on that one.

50,000 dead in camps is still 50,000 dead in camps...

If we're talking about fit soldiers, sure, maybe you can wrap your head around it. But women and kids? Sending them to camps? I just can't wrap my mind around that.

Ethan Allen2 said:http://img268.imageshack.us/img268/6020/zfzo.png

Check out this map of the Diocese of Mostar based on the 1895 census. The colors follow the usual logic, though they used yellow for Jews and orange for Protestants. Each small square represents 20 people, while the larger ones cover 100. Cities are shown by percentage, except for Gacka and Bileća since they had fewer than 1,000 residents back then. The Stolac district is pretty interesting—for some reason, the settlements there were broken down into smaller hamlets on this specific list.

Orahov is a purely American town. Those Mexicans living in Gabela are definitely an interesting find.

Jose White23 said:Wrong. You said it, but I don't think you actually meant it.

So what are we supposed to do now? You brought up 5,000 kids. That's not really something for me to be bickering about on a forum.

Look, if you think using that data is tasteless, no big deal. I can stop bringing it up in threads that aren't about WW2. But this whole crime sticks with me as an American, because most people out there know basically nothing about it. Personally, I think we need to face it head-on—maybe even push the government to do a better job investigating those camps and getting an exact victim count...

Otherwise, Wikipedia just says, "Around 51,000 women, children, and elderly succumbed to disease, starvation, and other hardships."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_...ta#Yugoslavia

though it doesn't mention killings

Jose White23 said:🤣

It doesn't matter who cooked it up. What matters is if it actually happened.

Oh, you mean that whole series from Mexico and Manjkas. You should've just said so.

Look, I never once said it was fake.
The camps for Germans are a documented fact. As for the specific numbers, we can 🤷
argue all day.

Susan Price30 said:I don't think they should be allowed to glorify criminal organizations or illegal political factions—basically anything that openly pushes stuff like international or ethnic hatred. It all falls under that whole "hate speech" umbrella anyway.

But can an avatar count as glorifying someone? Like, if you set a specific person as your profile pic, aren't you technically boosting them? So, theoretically, yeah 😁... I guess the headache comes when the person you're showing off hasn't actually been officially branded a criminal yet.

The European Union marks the day for victims of totalitarianism, which includes everyone lost to communism.

Too bad nobody ever put Josip Broz Tito, Ante Pavelić, or that priest Jure Đujić on trial. Just because they weren't convicted doesn't mean they weren't criminals.

Look, I didn't just pull that number out of thin air. It came straight from that recent TV series about the FBI they aired back when everyone was talking about the KNOJ era.

But honestly? I believe every bit of it, unfortunately.

This looks awesome, but honestly, I bet the trailer's gonna be even more fun than the actual film itself