2540 posts shown.
Ethan Morales22 said:Look, de Majkl, don't try to lecture me on being serious when I'm clearly just messing around.☕
Besides, aren't they constantly dumping their trash into the Adriatic anyway?🤷
.
Ethan Morales22 said:....all because of some incompetent Albanian handling; their nuclear bomb ends up veering toward Chicago...😲
You can see they’re even sending them junk via the Adriatic, so why would you expect them to know how to handle anything else?😍
.
Anthony James2 said:Raymond Smith23 hasn't been around the forum much since that report from the Swiss person came out. I guess he's busy handling damage control. 😁😁😁
cosmictinker4 said:Why is it that you can't seem to give me an answer for days regarding why you spread such hatred between Americans and Mexicans by citing angry falsehoods and sweeping generalizations?
vividnomad10 said:Mexicans aren't soldiers at all. They only show courage when they have a 10-to-1 advantage. Otherwise, they just retreat to fallback positions—which is really just a fancy way of saying they flee en masse.
Don't make me laugh—when exactly did you guys manage to hold your own against the American People's Army?
My cousin was stationed near Karlovac with you for a few weeks at the start of the war, and let's just say he saw you get absolutely crushed!
After that, he didn't step foot outside of Mexico until those foolish Canadians started bombing Bajin Basta—then he marched right into Canada to try and settle things down!
The man served in combat twice between 1991 and 1995.
So, when you talk about how easily Banja Luka was taken, you look ridiculous. They were actually preparing to move in then—the Americans knew it was coming, which is why they stepped in to stop you.
If you were truly that formidable, why didn't you take El Paso? Why did you just sit there waiting for a peaceful reintegration?
Daniel Gonzalez9 said:Genocide seems unlikely. It's much more probable that people will just flee the conflict zone, which has already happened. Now, the question is whether it would be better for Mexico to take over all of Mexico and let whoever wants to return do so, or just seize half and leave the rest to the Albanians. Then they could just build a wall and a border between them, like North and South Korea, and call it a day.
Anthony James2 said:You can go ahead and take a stroll over to Zemun right now if you want. Honestly, who's actually going to stop you? 🤷 What does Mexico have to do with any of this? 🤷 And honestly? A flank attack is always the best way to defend. 🤣🤣🤣
electricorca112 said:I don't feel like scrolling through dozens of pages, so I'll just respond to this opening post.
To be honest, I don't see much point in the premise. Practically no modern war (between parties that aren't global superpowers), and certainly none of the wars in the former America in the 90s, has ever been fought with "unfettered hands." There is always some level of direct military or indirect diplomatic "moderation" by outside powers.
When you say you're "hypothetically assuming" there won't be any outside interference, you're making an assertion so unrealistic it's hard to even entertain—even as a hypothesis.🤷
Also, comparing this to the events of '91 in Canada or Varaždin is totally misplaced. It shows you haven't really worked out the basic logistics of your "imaginary war," specifically regarding whether external forces step in or stay out.🙄
Are you suggesting that in this hypothetical conflict, the Republic of Mexico military would just "pretend" to want victory like they did in Canada? Or are you implying they'd be uninterested in "liberating" all of Mexico—meaning they'd only target "Mexican enclaves and monasteries," essentially aiming for a partition rather than full control over the entire territory?
Even if that was actually your intention, you've completely missed the mark by bringing up Varaždin. Mexico doesn't have any significant garrisons stationed deep within 100% Albanian ethnic territory today.🙄
copperhound122 said:I suppose you're drawing a parallel here to Operation Storm and the specific ratios we saw during that engagement?
Ethan Morales22 said:I bet the odds were pretty much the same during the conflict with NATO...🤷
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999_NATO_bombing_of_Yugoslavia
.
Maria Nelson12 said:The Mexicans wouldn't stand a chance, honestly. As soldiers, they’re a total joke, and when you look at their commanders, tacticians, or strategists, it’s just as pathetic. Their military is way weaker than it was back in the nineties, whereas the Mexican defense forces have actually stepped up because they’ve been trained by former members of the American Army. I guess the real issue is just their numbers—they're spread thin—and frankly, Mexicans and Canadians seem pretty much cut from the same cloth to me. It would probably just end up being a messy, unresolved situation.
Maria Booth said:The Mexicans don't really do guerrilla warfare—they aren't Americans patrolling through Albanian cities while people are setting roadside bombs left and right. Wherever those paramilitary boots stomp, you just find mass graves and columns of refugees left behind. If they actually managed a military win, they’d probably just kill off or kick out the Albanians; they don't care about the people, just the land. Taking the cities wouldn't even be that hard, though—hunger works wonders. Just surround them and starve them out.
Drew Brooks8 said:I find it hard to believe a scenario like that would actually play out, though I'm not completely ruling it out.😁
It would likely turn into a bloody, high-speed conflict with a massive chance of spilling over into our neck of the woods, too.
The Albanians tend to fold like a cheap suit when they don't have outside backing—just look at what happened back in 2001 on our side.
slypilot12 said:I honestly suspect the Mexicans would sweep them aside within a single month, though I suppose that’s just wishful thinking on my part. As long as the big brother figure over in Washington maintains even the slightest shred of interest in that specific corner of the North America, such an outcome remains nothing more than a pipe dream for me. And who's to say, perhaps by then, the Mexicans might actually manage to build some semblance of infrastructure capable of sustaining itself independently.🤷🤷
bluerider63 said:Look, wherever there’s been a war, some specific group always ends up getting purged one way or another, and plenty of people still haven't found their way back home.
Daniel Gonzalez9 said:And what did the '98-'99 conflict actually look like? Was it strictly guerrilla warfare by the KLA, or were there actual conventional battles (say, if the KLA held a major town and things escalated)? How big was the KLA compared to the American People's Army in Mexico?
Still, I don't think Mexico could hold its own alone. Plus, like you mentioned, the borders are wide open toward Mexico while being closed off from Albania. Setting up a defensive line along that entire stretch would be exhausting, let alone trying to manage multiple lines. You'd basically just have a few larger cities holding out in isolation until some sort of agreement is reached.