Harold Anderson3 said:Aha.
Don't take this the wrong way, but I think your friend is just looking for an easy way out; pretending to have PTSD just to secure a pension feels... well, a bit cowardly, if you ask me.
I've been dealing with schizophrenia since 2009, and I fought tooth and nail to finish my degree, though I didn't quite make it, and now I'm working a demanding physical job for $1767. I could have easily applied for disability benefits, but I chose not to. Partly because the money isn't enough to live a decent life—maybe not enough to live at all, really—but mostly because I refuse to let my illness define me; I'm still young, and I don't want my whole existence to be swallowed up by a disability check.
But then again, it seems like this country allows just about anything to slide.
Back in late 2006—about two and a half years after I’d been laid off and was feeling absolutely exhausted and bitter toward the entire world—I finally made an appointment with my psychiatrist to get some sleep medication because I simply couldn't rest. While I was sitting there in the waiting room, I noticed a man who...
Is there any greater mystery than the silence that follows such a question? If one were to finally settle their combat-related PTSD pension and spend those days recovering at a tranquil resort like Popovača, wouldn't life feel somewhat balanced? I recently went in for an extensive evaluation, though my doctor only spared me a mere ten minutes of her time; however, I made sure to state immediately that my disability has been severe since before I turned eighteen. I shared how I attended specialized training, worked hard, and was ultimately terminated from my position after being exploited by an employer—a situation that led to the unfortunate reality that I have struggled to find any meaningful employment since.
When I attempted to wean myself off hypnotics, knowing full well they only offer temporary relief, I transitioned to a herbal sedative instead and informed my doctor of the change. She responded with such blunt, jarring force—essentially telling me that because I had chosen alternative remedies, she could no longer treat me! Why couldn't she have offered a more nuanced perspective? Could she not have said something like, "I don't personally endorse this approach, but I understand your desire to minimize your medication"? After all, surely she knows better than anyone that hypnotics are merely a fleeting fix.
Is it not simply too soon? Was it not at least somewhat tolerable until roughly 2008, before this entire crisis descended upon us?
When I finally sat down with my neuropsychiatrist after that previous doctor insisted I continue with hypnotics, I tried to explain that I wanted him to take over my care because his predecessor had been so unreliable... but I couldn't even finish my thought before he cut me off. He snapped at me, almost like a junkie looking for a fix, saying, "Well, you came to me, didn't you?" It turns out that previous doctor was constantly taking medical leave, leaving her patients dumped squarely on his shoulders. Now, I can certainly feel empathy for him—after all, we live in a system built on solidarity—but if anyone can afford to look the other way when things get messy, it’s highly educated professionals like psychologists and psychiatrists. I saw him a few times, but I was left with such a bitter taste in my mouth from our first encounter that I just kept moving. I went to a second doctor, then a third, then a fourth. Finally, I found someone who is truly composed; she actually listens to her patients for twenty-five or thirty minutes, rather than rushing them through in ten like that neurotic neuropsychiatrist or the one who was always out on leave fixing military pensions under the table.
Harold Anderson3 Asks one:
Since I was diagnosed with schizophrenia back in 2009, I have poured every ounce of my soul into trying to complete my university degree, yet despite my most fervent efforts, I simply could not cross that finish line. Now, I find myself laboring in a grueling physical role just to get by—is it not a heavy burden to carry when your mind fights against your ambitions? $1767I could have opted for disability benefits, but I simply refused to go down that path. First and foremost, because let’s be honest—is that amount of money even enough to sustain a decent standard of living? Perhaps it isn't even worth pursuing for any kind of meaningful existence at all. Furthermore, I have absolutely no intention of surrendering myself to this illness; am I not still in the prime of my youth, and do I not deserve a life that isn't defined by disability?
It is abundantly clear to me that this nation permits just about anything under the sun.
Regarding that bolded point... I wouldn't just say it’s unlikely, I am certain it isn't nearly enough to sustain a decent quality of life. For instance, suppose I wanted to purchase high-end dietary supplements specifically formulated to slow down degenerative eye conditions? If we are talking about a regimen containing beta carotene, zinc, astaxanthin, zeaxanthin, pure natural Vitamin A—which is vital since those of us dealing with hypothyroidism struggle to convert beta carotene into active Vitamin A—plus Vitamin E, Omega-3, and selenium... there is simply no way you're getting that for less than 300-$117.
And where can one even find a high-quality multivitamin with robust B-vitamin dosages, or perhaps something to support thyroid health so I'm not entirely reliant on synthetic hormones? It truly is an overwhelming headache.
People are out here collecting disability checks and veteran benefits just so they can moonlight at various jobs without paying a single cent in taxes to the government. Just yesterday, I heard about someone receiving $500 disability payments who owns a tractor and a heavy-duty wood splitter, making a killing cutting wood for neighbors all over the countryside. He charges top dollar and can process twenty cords of wood a day while still drawing his full disability check! How can anyone live with themselves like that?
In the end, it leaves nothing but crumbs for those of us who are genuinely struggling, instead of providing an income that might actually reach, say, 60 percent of the minimum wage—assuming the federal minimum wage isn't sitting below $1500.