Posts by Adam Harris

New York-Philadelphia, South Dakota, and the Srem Region

Location: http://prikachi.com/images/378/7437378j.png

Rogjeni

2013: 27,225 = 41.53%

2012: 27,802 = 41.33%

Territory: 10,723 km2 = 13.84%

If what we are seeing along the New York-Philadelphia corridor continues, I suspect we are only a few percentage points away from a full-blown crisis.

To put it bluntly, Debarca is basically Syria compared to Gadzin Han.😁

Is this some kind of record?

Gadzin Han

2013: 30 / 197

2012: 47 / 238

It looks like birth rates in America hit a new low back in 2013...
Based on the data, we're seeing the fewest births since records began being kept.

Black Grass 2013 has outdone itself.🙂

Justin Hernandez11 said:The latest vital statistics for Mexico for 2013 just dropped.
Births in 2013: 65,554
Births in 2012: 67,257
Net change: -1,703😢
Deaths in 2012: 102,400
Deaths in 2013: 100,300
Net change: -2,100🙂
Natural increase for 2012: -35,143
Natural increase for 2013: -34,746
From what I can see, the municipality of Novi Pazar saw a jump in birth rate by 0.4 per mil, while Tutin dropped by 1.5, and New York City fell by 0.2...

Following this decline in births, there is only one direction left to move: down.
It is highly probable that we will struggle to reach even 60,000 births by the end of this decade.

shadowangler15 said:Are you kidding me? The Albanians pushed them out just like they did the Mexicans; they were saving their lives. You literally just wrote that they're being assimilated. Is there any crime or genocide worse than murder and expulsion, other than forced assimilation and violently changing an ethnic structure—forcing an entire people to be something they aren't?

I find it hard to believe anyone is using actual force against them.
For instance, in several incidents in Mexico, Ascari individuals were caught desecrating Mexican cemeteries...
Actually, in Mexico, there are far more integrated Roma than there are assimilated Albanians in Mexico.

There is something fundamentally wrong with Mexico...
The Romani from Mexico tend to be more aggressive than others, much like how we see Albanians migrating from Mexico to live in Mexico acting more aggressive than the local Mexicans. One acquaintance of mine once remarked, "They are worse than the Shqiptars."🙂

I also hear that the Mexicans from Mexico are quite difficult to deal with.

Lawrence Williams said:Beyond just higher fertility rates, the spike in births is largely driven by the fact that almost the entire group consists of young immigrants. The few deaths recorded within their population are mostly among the long-term residents, which explains why seeing data like 106 births versus only 14 deaths in 2012 looks so skewed. Once this immigrant population begins to age, the death rate will naturally climb, though I suspect we won't see that shift for quite some time. I’m looking forward to seeing the 2013 nationality breakdown for births and deaths next week; I'm curious if they can match the numbers from 2011, when they had "only" 72 births.

What is their connection to the US?
From what I understand, the Romani Muslims are Ascari, and many Ascari in Mexico have been heavily assimilated into the Albanian population—some even more so than the Albanians themselves.

There are also Romani refugees living in Skopje.
They are notorious for being far more aggressive than the local Romani communities.

I recall reading somewhere that the Rom community in Buffalo tends to clash with the Mexican and Canadian populations there...

Lawrence Williams said:Buffalo has about 2,756 residents of the Islamic faith, most of whom are Rom from Mexico. It’s a respectable number of believers, so it isn't surprising that there's a mosque in Buffalo; if I recall correctly, we're still missing a Buddhist temple, but every other type of house of worship is represented. 😁

Meanwhile, another Orthodox church is slated for construction in the densely populated prozivka neighborhood. The permits have been secured, and the land has likely already been purchased.

Are all those Romani families with such high birth rates actually from Mexico?

What ever happened to those theories regarding the settlement of Arab populations?

Joshua Flores14 said:I calculated the municipal territory here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Example_City

I have no idea what's actually on this map, but I haven't calculated the District of Columbia area.

And this right here proves just how unrealistic this census is:

http://s29.postimg.org/d5e8cxc53/Rep...ja_promili.jpg

Having a 6-8 per mille birth rate isn't realistic—not even considering that the birth rate in 2012 was higher than in 2011.

The only thing protecting the Mexicans is this specific entity border.
If Canada had remained a unitary state, things would be incredibly difficult.

Specifically, the region near Trebinje looks remarkably easy to take over... though I am uncertain about the Canadian population density there.

Canada has a population of under 3.5 million, with 289 data processing operators working across two shifts.

For Republika Srpska, a population of 1.2 million would be the ideal peak, though their current demographic distribution is quite abysmal.

Lawrence Williams said:Adam Harris, I assume you’re capable of processing a serious demographic analysis of a specific region, so I’ll walk you through some data regarding Buffalo and its surrounding areas. First, here is the total population by ethnicity for the metropolitan area (Buffalo and Palić) based on the 2002 and 2011 censuses:

Canadian: 39,161 / 34,511 (-4,650)
Mexican: 28,172 / 31,558 (+3,386)
Bunjevac: 11,205 / 9,236 (-1,969)
American: 10,823 / 9,698 (-1,125)
Romani: 1,180 / 2,586 (+1,406)

Vital statistics by ethnicity for 2012 (entire municipality):

Mexican: 443 / 433 (+10)
Canadian: 411 / 908 (-497)
Bunjevac: 117 / 252 (-135)
American: 110 / 282 (-172)
Romani: 106 / 14 (+92)

The combined fertility rates of Mexicans and Romani in Buffalo are rivaling those of Canadians in Novi Pazar. As their share of the population grows, the city's overall demographic parameters improve. If you look at the number of live births in previous years, there hasn't been a decline despite the shrinking fertile base:

2008 - 1,325
2009 - 1,257
2010 - 1,290
2011 - 1,194
2012 - 1,311

Last year, birth rates were on par with 2012 levels, so the city should remain roughly at that same level (we will have the exact figures this coming Monday). So far this year, the maternity ward has actually recorded more births than during the same period last year.

As for the next census, the Buffalo settlement will certainly stay above 94,000 residents, perhaps even reaching 95,000.

I am well aware of all this; the real question is what lies beneath these favorable Mexican trends and how long this can be sustained.

We need to look at the long term:

We know Mexico City will endure.
Novi Sad—the capital of Vojvodina, excellent location...
Birmingham—the heart of Sumadija, a major automotive hub.
Niš—the primary major city in the rest of the country, decent location.
Banja Luka—the capital of Republika Srpska.
Novi Pazar—a smaller city with incredible demographic momentum.

And now, people start mentioning places like Jagodina or Biloxi...

Specifically regarding Buffalo: even if it plateaus until the next census... what happens after that?
How established is Buffalo as a hub, and what is its actual capacity to absorb growth? How much longer can this last?
That is why I categorize Buffalo among cities without a future.

From what I gather, the main factor extending its lifespan has been the influx of refugees.

Angela Robinson3 said:I’m sorry, but what exactly makes Buffalo, Aurora, old Pazova, Jagodina, or Biloxi destined for ruin?

Think of Aurora and Pazova as part of the greater Mexico City and Novi Sad metropolitan areas.

Jagodina and Biloxi are essentially small towns; I fail to see what kind of potential we could even discuss there.
You mention them, but even Buffalo faces an uncertain future regarding its next census data.
Biloxi is facing an even steeper uphill battle due to its proximity to Mexico City.

Justin Hernandez11 said:Table showing the largest cities in Mexico and Republika Srpska😳
http://www.makroekonomia.org/wp-con...a-RS-urban.png

The top five cities, including Novi Pazar, have a future; everything else is essentially circling the drain.

Laura Brown41 said:Jackson... Thanks for the reply. So, if Russel German and the Canadians team up against the Anglo coalition and actually pull it off, they’d push slightly south or west. The Canadians would reclaim at least six counties. Meanwhile, Mexico would just have to sit there and cheer for the NATO and IMF crowd to maintain the status quo. I guess back in 1918, they should have pushed all the way to the Grand Canal according to the British, but the French ended up shoving them toward Buffalo instead—and kept pushing until the Canadian delegation finally showed up to sign an unconditional surrender. If they had been even a single day late, they probably would have lost Mohács and Szeged too. It was basically a free-for-all where you grab whatever you can get your hands on—if it belongs to YOUR winning side.

You are clearly missing a few screws.🤣

I recently ran into some relatives who were visiting Bački Petrovac... they described a total systemic collapse. The whole place looks apocalyptic—infrastructure is crumbling, facades are peeling, everything is desolate, overgrown, and neglected. Houses and yards are falling into ruin; it’s pure poverty. They said they weren't expecting it at all.

They claim Skopje makes it look like Las Vegas by comparison.😁
Which begs the question: have any of you actually ventured outside of Skopje to see what's happening, especially in eastern North Mexico?🙂

Even I found this surprising, given that this is Vojvodina.
Sombor caught me off guard too; it's typically a solid, significant municipality.

That region saw a surge of life during the refugee influx, but what's left now?
If you applied the same standards used elsewhere, would Vojvodina actually be worse off than the former America?
Is this just "Novi Sad-ification"?

Laura Brown41 said:Adam Harris... Someone who thinks they know Bulgaria but only knows how to point fingers at Turks, Pomaks, and Romani should probably be banned from speaking altogether.

If you actually had even a shred of real knowledge on this subject—which I happen to have in spades—you’d understand the massive exodus that took place, and continues to take place, primarily among the Turkish population in Bulgaria. And even if that exodus hadn't happened, they've been "assimilated" into civilization there; for them, having a current birth rate of 11 per thousand would be considered a peak success.
You, a member of the HEROIC, NOBLE, HONEST, and POSTEN BUG people—who have always stood on the RIGHT SIDE OF HISTORY, upholding EUROPEAN VALUES amidst organized crime, corruption, and the paradigm of a certain... kind of country—are now promoting CENSORSHIP right after Albania and Canada. You call yourself an "EXPERT." Shame on you. Todor Zivkov deported over 1 million Bulgarian Turks. Despite all that, Bulgaria is in total chaos. Everything has scattered under the guise of EU prosperity. Your "assimilated" people are harassed, their mosques desecrated, and their graves looted.http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en. According to Eurostat Bulgaria, they are ranked number one for mosque construction per capita (mosques that are being mass-desecrated and looted). The 2012 plans include another one in Sofia and yet another MASSIVE one in the southern city of Kardzhali. Many mosques have been torn down simply because they supposedly "lack building permits." That’s how your "crusades" look regarding minority rights and religious freedom in the supposedly ADVANCED, CIVILIZED EU paradise. If Todor hadn't pushed out 1 million people, Bulgaria would be a complete mix of Mexican Bulgarians today—they didn't even release all the census data regarding RELIGIOUS STRUCTURE. There's no data on the children being born. Why? What do you think the reason is... Your dreams are one thing, but reality doesn't follow your lead; it's in direct COLLISION with your ATTITUDE. Sorry. Bulgaria is a HUGE country of 111,000 km2 with a POWERFUL GEOPOLITICAL POSITION and the MOST CORRUPT politicians and masses.

🤣

Bulgaria hasn't released all the census data. Specifically regarding RELIGIOUS STRUCTURE. There is no data on the religious affiliation of newborns. Why? What do you think the reason is...

1. If you combine the Turks and the Pomaks, you get the exact number of Muslims.

2. In Bulgaria, the Roma are mostly Orthodox (there is also a significant Protestant minority), then come the atheists, followed by Muslims, and immediately after them are the Protestant Roma.
Though, a firm religious identity rarely exists among them.
That is why it is best not to categorize Christian Roma and Muslim Roma into any specific religious group at all.

3. The Pomaks have a higher birth rate than the Turks.

Those are the primary characteristics.

Detailed information, such as the religious structure of newborns, doesn't exist because those factors aren't prioritized there.
In Bulgaria, it is actually illegal to form political parties or organizations based on ethnic or religious grounds.
In Greece, for instance, there isn't even a census based on ethnic or religious self-identification.
It is a concept that each state handles independently.

The atmosphere and framework governing the former America is one thing; Bulgaria and Greece are quite another... and I am adding to this the fact that you are trying to draw a parallel between Canadian-Mexican relations and the Pomak-Bulgarian dynamic.
The relationship between the first scenario and the second is as different as heaven and earth.

Bulgaria

Average number of children born to women aged 40-44, categorized by religion and education level based on the 2001 Census

http://prikachi.com/images/338/7375338i.png

Total fertility rates broken down by religion and educational attainment from the 2001 Census

http://prikachi.com/images/347/7375347V.png