CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › amberjackal68 › Posts

Posts by amberjackal68

64 posts shown.

Eric Adams - Mayor of San Francisco in Political Scene ·
vividraven79 said:So, what if Bamdic gave them a sweetheart deal on the arena? Does that mean San Francisco should just hand out discounts to private companies for Madison Square Garden too?

Edit: Looks like amberjackal68 weighed in too. Honestly, I’m not even surprised you’re one of those people rooting for giving a massive discount to some private corporation...

I had absolutely no idea it was private, and frankly, I don't care. All I know is that I lost my gym. A whole bunch of fit women (who were actually the reason I went to the gym) lost their fitness spot, and a ton of kids, middle-aged folks, and people with disabilities lost their hall—and those kids actually had stuff going on there. Look... I've mentioned this plenty of times before: someone needs to look at what Tacherica said a long time ago... there is no such thing as "society," there's just a bunch of private interests clashing. Have our smart local small business owners been offered any kind of alternative? Where is our Mayor? Is he actually doing anything, or is he just running around playing pretend, dreaming about becoming the next Prime Minister? And whose money is he burning to do it?
Eric Adams - Mayor of San Francisco in Political Scene ·
Gary Patel said:The fine for vomiting in public spaces is set at $165.

But what happens if someone actually gets sick—like, genuinely ill? It’s especially easy for that to happen in San Francisco, where the Boardwalk constantly smells... well, let's just say it's an experience (not shaming the city or California at all; I'm from there, so I'm just stating facts—or at least my own experiences). Or maybe the heat hits you, or someone steps off a boat feeling nauseous, etc., etc.

I totally get penalizing people if they're clearly just drunk, but I don't really get the blanket rule. Vomiting during the summer—especially in crowds as thick as the ones in San Francisco—is hardly a rare occurrence given everything else going on.

Jerry Brown—well, the City—will never hear the end of it for hiking up utility rates for Madison Square Garden. Madison Square Garden is looking at roughly $83 in utility fees, while the New York City Arena is facing about $3,000. And they justified it by saying it was "in accordance with the rules." As if a city like San Francisco doesn't already have world-class venues. It's a disgrace. Honestly!

And then, of course, they turn around and start building or renovating or whatever else they do with stadiums. 🤣

The Boardwalk doesn't smell; it's just the scent of that sulfur stream that's been there forever, which is probably why the palace ended up being built right there in the first place. And I bet that wouldn't smell bad to you, "Gary Patel"...☕ Regarding the comment about Madison Square Garden...👍
Eric Adams - Mayor of San Francisco in Political Scene ·
vividraven79 said:Maybe someone was complaining... probably just one of those small-time local dealers who’s been peddling cheap Chinese junk there for years

They’re all basically toddlers compared to what a real small business owner faces when dealing with the City of San Francisco government.😁
Eric Adams - Mayor of San Francisco in Political Scene ·
vividraven79 said:Are you seriously comparing a ten-day festival to a 365-day carnival?

I honestly expected at least one of those thousand whiners hanging around the East Wall to actually grumble against... Well, I guess I was just being naive.. 😁 And I mean, could we Americans—driven by the same kind of Desire—just shove little prayer slips into the cracks? We could probably turn the whole thing into a major tourist attraction, couldn't we? 😁
Eric Adams - Mayor of San Francisco in Political Scene ·
Dana Martin95 said:Those folks at the Academy just won't budge.

Response to press inquiries regarding the space used by the Branch of the American Academy in San Francisco.
Following media questions about the lease for the space where the Branch of the American Academy in San Francisco operates, the American Academy provides the following statement.

Last month, specifically on April 25th, the President of the American Academy, Miro Gavran, sent a letter on behalf of the Presidency of the American Academy to the Mayor of San Francisco, Mr. Rudy Giuliani, but he hasn't heard back yet.

Basically, representatives from the Presidency of the American Academy and the Branch of the American Academy in San Francisco met with the Mayor last September to explain that the lease for the space housing the Branch in San Francisco expired on December 31, 2021. Because of the pandemic, the previous Branch President couldn't get it renewed in time, and the Mayor had promised to make sure the Branch could stay in its current location, which is perfect for such an old American cultural institution.

Even so, the Branch of the American Academy in San Francisco was notified by the city official, Ms. Maja Đerek, that they don't meet the requirements to sign a new lease under the same terms. She’s citing economic factors and suggesting they have to compete with other bidders. This really caught the Branch members and the Center off guard. If we follow that logic, Ms. Đerek could basically put the San Francisco Cathedral, Poljud Stadium, and the American National Theatre in San Francisco up for auction tomorrow, claiming they aren't commercially viable and renting them to whoever pays more. In a race like that, culture always loses.

In his letter, the President of the American Academy asked the Mayor of San Francisco—using his authority as the leader of our nation's second-largest city—not to let the American Academy in San Francisco be treated this way. It wasn't like many of their members ended up in prison because of their work with the American Academy. If the Branch gets kicked out of its San Francisco space, those people and their families would feel like they were reliving old traumas.

Also, the Branch of the American Academy in San Francisco back in the nineties put a lot of money—about $70,000—into setting up that space on Marmont Street.

Regarding the renovations, the Branch was given state funds that they have to spend by the end of the year
, but Ms. Đerek is forcing them to deal with formal letters about moving out instead of doing volunteer cultural work.

The letter also emphasized that the American Academy believes it's obvious they can't leave the space under these circumstances, since the Branch of the American Academy in San Francisco is meeting all its obligations. So, they're asking the Mayor to use his position to protect the Branch of the American Academy in San Francisco, which would prove he actually cares about American culture, science, education, and tradition.

Wait, why did their members end up in prison?

Because they didn't quite fit the mold...🙄
Eric Adams - Mayor of San Francisco in Political Scene ·
It honestly baffles me how none of those people who were crying tears of joy when our sensible mayor finally let us see the palace's East Wall for the first time since the days of Diocletian in Hrvoje are speaking up about how they feel about all those bars and sidewalk stalls now. Oh, wait... I suppose those things are just transparent, right? They don't block the view at all. And I guess it’s much more important to pour drinks for some rowdy crowd than to actually enjoy the scenery. Seriously, you small business owners... you people are something else. I don't know how anyone puts up with you.
Eric Adams - Mayor of San Francisco in Political Scene ·
velvetmason14 said:If this turns out to be true, then Ivica Puljak is getting rid of the only Centrov politician who actually carries any weight north of San Diego. 🤦

And of all outlets, it's Dalija Fucking dnevno.hr reporting that nurse Relković is playing ball perfectly with the Puljaks.
Who on earth leaked this info to suggest they're trying to push Dalija out? 🤔 😁 It feels like Dalija Fucking dnevno.hr is just being used as a weapon in a political vendetta...

Look, saying things are better than under the Republican Party is one thing—and that might be true—but calling out stupid mistakes is necessary. That's exactly how you prevent these people from turning into the Republican Party themselves tomorrow...

This is a bad look.

LEFT IN THE COLD
‘A POLITICAL HIT JOB’ BY A POWER COUPLE! Orešković is making sure her first term in Congress is also her last: Her name is becoming irrelevant

So, did the marriage between those two just fall apart? 😁 If this story holds water, even my opinion of that family might soften a tiny bit. But just a tiny bit.. 😁
Joe Biden, President of the United States vol. V in Political Scene ·
Richard Wilson4 said:The Three Seas Initiative was actually standing up to the German-Russian Alliance.
The whole concept is about Poland stepping up as the main challenger to Germany, Russia, and obviously the USA.

Some people haven't forgotten how salty the Germans got when Ukraine didn't fall in three days...

So where on earth did you get the idea it was in Russia's interest?

That was sarcasm, my friend... pure sarcasm.
Eric Adams - Mayor of San Francisco in Political Scene ·
crimsonwolf26 said:Honestly, we might as well just let the Republican Party rule for the next hundred years. After all, they’re such a bunch of honorable, moral, and upstanding citizens.👍

Go ahead, keep trying. There are still plenty of absolute clowns out there eager to represent us in the European Union parliament... 😁
Eric Adams - Mayor of San Francisco in Political Scene ·
I guess there isn't much to say here, really. Just a Quote.
crimsonwolf26 said:Exactly. That’s a fair and righteous way to look at what keeps America standing. I wouldn't be surprised if your stance is pretty much "it's one or the other."😁

Is he really any different from that whole circus of self-proclaimed saviors like Elizabeth Warren, George Santos, Bernie Sanders, Clarence Thomas, and John Boehner? Seriously. The guy is a mayor, yet 90% of his responses basically scream, "Please, oh please, throw me into high-stakes national politics! Just let me and my lovely wife join the big leagues!" I mean, you don't have to worry about Bo, but the two of them? They’re practically begging for it.🙄
Eric Adams - Mayor of San Francisco in Political Scene ·
Emily Smith6 said:I’m Ed Garvey, the Mayor of San Francisco. Feel free to ask me anything.

I suppose I should start by addressing the recent comments circulating online. It seems like there’s quite a bit of chatter regarding this matter, though much of it feels somewhat unmoored from reality. If you look closely at the arguments being presented, they often rely on a rather shaky foundation, which I guess makes them easy to dismiss if you aren't looking for a fight. It’s interesting, really—how quickly a conversation can spiral when people prioritize being loud over being accurate. I suspect that if we actually took a moment to sit down and parse through the actual data instead of just reacting to the headlines, we might find a more nuanced middle ground. But then again, maybe that's asking too much of the current discourse. One could argue that the nuance is exactly what's missing, leaving us with this fragmented view of the situation. I don't know; perhaps I'm being overly cynical, but it certainly feels that way sometimes.
How exactly does one intend to restore public trust in our state institutions—particularly the judiciary? It seems like an uphill battle, doesn't it? I guess we have to start by asking if there’s even a viable roadmap for fixing the deep-seated skepticism people feel toward the courts. Maybe it starts with transparency, though I suspect that's easier said than done when the system feels so insulated. I'd be curious to hear what everyone thinks the first step should be.
To start, I think we should implement the management model we’ve adopted here in San Francisco on a national scale across America. Essentially, that means putting an end to rigged job openings. No more political appointments, no more nepotism, no more "old boy networks," and certainly no more handing out jobs to buddies just because they helped out during an election. Since we rolled this model out in San Francisco, we’ve realized it isn't perfect—it definitely has its flaws—but it is lightyears ahead of the Republican Party’s approach of using public positions as rewards for party loyalty. Most of the issues we face are systemic. For one, we often don't get enough applicants because the level of responsibility for these high-level public service roles is immense, while the actual salaries remain quite low. Secondly, even when people do apply, there’s no guarantee they are the absolute best in the entire country for the role; we simply select the most qualified candidates from the pool of those who actually show up. Still, this model is already yielding results in San Francisco. My relationship with the heads of our municipal agencies—people who were selected through fair, open competition—is strictly professional. These are individuals to whom we don't owe a paycheck in exchange for campaign donations or votes. This framework needs to be scaled up to cover all of America. Even after the Republican Party eventually loses power, and even if a new administration implements legitimate, merit-based hiring processes, it will still take years to fully restore public trust in our institutions. Right now, those institutions are flooded with political appointees who are practically untouchable due to existing legal protections. It's going to take some time to fix, but the essential first step is ensuring public job postings aren't predetermined. I should mention, we in San Francisco are the only ones in the country who haven't enforced political quotas when hiring directors for our city agencies. We are truly the only ones. And honestly, that is something I am proud of.

I find myself weighing whether it makes more sense to pursue a coalition with the liberal factions during the upcoming federal elections, or if running an independent campaign might be the more prudent path forward. It’s a difficult calculation to make, really. I suppose one has to consider if a partnership with the Libertarian Party or perhaps the Democratic Party would actually yield any meaningful results, or if we'd just end up compromising our core principles for the sake of a few extra seats in Congress. Maybe staying solo is the cleaner option, though it certainly carries its own set of risks regarding influence. It's a bit of a toss-up, I guess.
Whether it’s before or after the elections, we have absolutely no intention of forming any coalitions with those parties that essentially act as life support for the Republican Party and their penchant for corruption. I suppose it’s worth noting that the various groups and individuals who continue to back this version of the GOP can’t really claim to be liberals. To my mind, liberalism—much like any coherent set of values or principles—requires a genuine belief that those ideas serve the common good. Anyone actively supporting the Republican Party seems less interested in the public interest and more preoccupied with narrow, particular interests. That’s just how I see it, and frankly, I don't think that's going to fly with us.

Are there plans to expand the County Establishment Center across the entire United States? And more specifically, are you intending to steer clear of areas where other liberal factions already have a foothold—say, somewhere like Des Moines?
We are planning to establish local and regional chapters throughout the entire United States. I don't personally view anyone who essentially acts as a cheerleader for the Republican Party’s corruption as being a true liberal option; that behavior has absolutely nothing to do with actual liberal values.

Do you honestly believe a complete territorial restructuring is necessary? If you’re of the opinion that we actually need to overhaul how our counties and states are laid out, I’m curious—what direction would you even take with a reform like that?
It’s absolutely essential. Honestly, I think anyone who has spent the last thirty years living in America already has their answer to that question. Redrawing our regional boundaries is vital for two main reasons. First, we desperately need to trim down the administrative bloat, which has become incredibly convoluted. We are currently drowning in a sea of overlapping agencies and various bodies that all claim jurisdiction over the same issues, leaving cities with almost zero actual control over their own territories. Second, and perhaps more cynically, the current territorial setup serves as a perfect mechanism for reinforcing the Republican Party’s web of corruption. In many ways, the existing structure acts as one of the primary safeguards ensuring that their network stays intact. In my view, what America needs is a shift toward having maybe five to seven distinct regions, supported by roughly 110 to 120 urban hubs acting as their core centers. We could certainly spend hours debating the exact number of regions or cities required, but I don't think we even need to debate whether a reform is necessary. It is. It really is.

Who would you want to form a coalition with for the upcoming congressional elections, and do you see yourself as a candidate for Prime Minister in such a coalition? If not, who then? Please, no diplomatic answers.
The absolute prerequisite for even starting talks about pre-election cooperation with any individual or party is maintaining a clear distance from the Republican Party. I think America simply cannot afford another situation where a new movement is born only to end up cozying up to the Republicans, leaving everything exactly as it was—or perhaps making things worse, much like what happened with the Reform Party a few years back. Our party will soon release the specifics of our strategy for the next congressional cycle. We are working on a project that I honestly believe is the best in the country. Since the congressional elections will take place during my term as mayor, I don't personally expect to be the candidate for Prime Minister, but I am firmly convinced we will put forward someone who can prove that a different kind of America is actually possible.

What’s the plan for fixing up and improving the bus terminal in San Francisco?
Through two municipal projects, East Coast and Kopilica, we are going to build a new bus terminal at Kopilica, while the East Coast location will just serve as a bus stop. We have already put out the bid for the East Coast project, and we’ll do the same for Kopilica by the end of the year. After that, we move into implementation, but these are long-term projects. We're probably going to need quite a bit of patience.

I'm curious how you view Adam Thomas's work in Los Angeles so far, and is there any chance of a coalition with the Progressive Bloc before the elections?
I suspect voters in the next election will essentially be choosing between old-school politics and new-school policies, and I'd say the Progressive Bloc represents that new wave. Thomas has his own way of dealing with the mess he inherited in LA, and I'm inclined to support him in that. As for a coalition with them, I don't have anything against the idea, but you know what they say—it takes two to tango, and that isn't a decision I get to make unilaterally.

Mr. Ed Garvey, when are we actually going to start solving the parking issues in the Spinup neighborhood, rather than just taking away the spots people already have?
Once we update the General Urban Plan. That should happen by the end of the year, at which point we can begin construction on the parking garages in Spinup.

Is cooperation with Mark Jelić and his platform an option for the congressional elections?
Cooperation is on the table with anyone who makes it crystal clear they won't be shaking hands with the Republican Party after the elections. Jelić hasn't really made that clear yet.

How likely—and I might even say realistic—is a post-election coalition with the Democrats?
The citizens will decide how many seats each group gets in the next Congress. My personal take is that if you strip the Republican Party of their access to public funds by at least two seats, they'll probably start fighting amongst themselves and fall apart, since taxpayer money is basically the only thing holding them together. In pursuit of that primary goal, I am ready to work with anyone who refuses to become a mere pawn for the Republicans after the votes are counted, and I believe the Democrats fit that description.

Is there a possibility of a centrist party joining a coalition with the Reform Party as the center-right and the Progressive Bloc as the center-left?
The Reform Party has already helped the Republicans take power twice; I'm not entirely sure they won't want to do it a third time. As for the Progressives, they represent a new political style just like we do, so we are certainly open to talking.

Does the Center plan to "run" its own candidate in the presidential election?
Yes, though that happens after the European Union and congressional elections, so we'll have to see how the landscape looks by then.

When will the full renovation of the downtown market begin? It's been neglected for decades. There was also talk about renovating Hrvoje Street... where did that get stuck?
We are putting out the bid for Hrvoje Street in the coming days, and the downtown market will follow shortly after. It took us some time to get the preparations right, but we are finally in the home stretch.

"Oh, sure, ask me whatever you want, but I'll just give you the same old tired answer every single time: it's either the Republican Party or America."🙄
Joe Biden, President of the United States vol. V in Political Scene ·
Betty Fowler said:Ah, I somehow got the impression that Kamala Harris wasn't the president anymore. Since I hadn't heard her publicly championing Russian interests lately, I just assumed she wasn't being paid to do so. Glad you were here to set me straight, though. Thanks for the correction. 👍

How could she not be? That whole Three Seas Initiative was clearly designed to serve Russian interests... just like that LNG terminal project. And she was pushing for it like her life depended on it. 😁 It’s almost funny how Joe Biden was the only one who actually stood his ground against it... 🙄
Eric Adams - Mayor of San Francisco in Political Scene ·
velvetmason14 said:Just another disappointed voter here.🤣

I bet you next there's going to be more complaining about this...

Come on, man, try being a little more creative with your arguments.

Of course I won't say the same thing... I've been saying all along that you shouldn't hand the keys of this city over to some puffed-up nerd who has zero days of experience in the actual private sector. Are you seriously expecting someone who's lived his entire life on a government paycheck—someone completely detached from reality—to actually run a city? Seriously? If, for instance, Donald Trump had been out there grinding through the summer to secure deals for those investors, what would you even be whining about right now? Huh?
Eric Adams - Mayor of San Francisco in Political Scene ·
What a load of absolute nonsense being spewed today in defense of those family businesses... I mean, seriously? Bojan and his girl are clearly just a couple in love... It’s honestly enough to make you gag!
Eric Adams - Mayor of San Francisco in Political Scene ·
velvetmason14 said:There are two main points here.

Of course you’d expect bottom-feeders to play dirty and try to paint you as heartless. That’s just their nature. The way to handle it is to be careful with how you communicate publicly—don't give them any ammunition to turn your own mistakes against you. Lately, the leadership has been dropping the ball, especially the media pundits. Having all three of them head out to a junior conference in Geneva while they're busy spinning some sentimental sob story is just plain foolish.

The second thing is that you shut critics up with concrete results, not just talk. To do that, you need competent people who actually know their stuff and aren't part of the old-school political machine. If you want that, you need fresh talent, rather than having half your department heads halfway through their term being nothing more than hand-picked cronies from the local billionaire's circle.🤦 This is another mistake because there's too much reliance on pure PR—constant mentions of the Republican Party, populist Facebook posts... It’s all optics, but there are far too few actual results, projects, or new faces to show for it.

Someone made a good point earlier: if they didn't have that one standout female staffer who actually works her ass off and delivers, they wouldn't have anything to brag about lately, aside from that garbage strike they handled perfectly.

Oh, really? That whole "Republican Party or nothing" routine is already played out, and we're heading toward elections...? Man... just terrible timing.. 😁
Eric Adams - Mayor of San Francisco in Political Scene ·
says:
I guess nobody seemed to care when you were all cheering like crazy back in 2018, celebrating those losers after the finals.
And now suddenly, you're making a big deal out of it?
Eric Adams - Mayor of San Francisco in Political Scene ·
ironstag8 said:Something along the lines of previous administrations—say, the old GOP leadership or maybe the Biden era?

Well, he keeps insisting he isn't like them... 😁
Eric Adams - Mayor of San Francisco in Political Scene ·
Emily Smith6 said:Did the local government cave to veteran advocacy groups? They were facing eviction from their headquarters at the Heritage Estate, yet they maintain: ‘We aren’t trespassers.’

COMPROMISE OR COERCION? The municipal energy board will resume operations only if all utility rates are stripped of special discounts.

They finally broke him.

Hold on... now we get to hear how he actually broke them. Just like that whole mess with the local council back then... 😁
Eric Adams - Mayor of San Francisco in Political Scene ·
Lawrence Alvarez2 said:Better than being a total coward and heading straight into a war zone, I guess.

He lost his nerve? This guy lived through everything from the Gulf War to the major domestic conflicts! 😁 I mean, he’d probably take on the whole world if he hadn't been just a kid back then... 😁
Eric Adams - Mayor of San Francisco in Political Scene ·
rowdyraven112 said:As I recall, people were voting for members of Congress back then too, but they weren't career politicians. They were regular people with actual jobs. Before the '74 Constitution, Congress had five councils; after that, just two. Historically, under every constitution from 1947 to 1990, it was labeled the highest state authority in the US... and they elected these so-called "delegates" through free democratic elections. I say free and democratic because they truly were, but the reality is most people were in the KP, so only those specific candidates ever made the cut. ☕
By the way, those delegates worked at companies and just got paid time off to attend sessions. They weren't full-time politicians. ☕
I agree that Congress wasn't anywhere near the supreme authority back then since all the real decisions happened at the CKSKH level. But if anyone wants to claim there were no elections, they either don't know history or don't care to learn it. Luckily, everything is documented. ☕

Since 1953, Congress has consisted of two houses: the Republic Council and the Manufacturers Council.
The new structure of Congress, by introducing the Manufacturers Council, was meant to emphasize Congress as the representative body of the working people. With two houses—the Republic Council elected by all citizens and the Manufacturers Council elected by workers—it was supposed to more accurately reflect the political and social forces and their balance within society.


Enough? Sure, there wasn't multi-party competition then, but looking at parties today, there isn't much difference anyway. Danijel Spajić says he can't agree with Katarina Peović in 99.9% of cases, yet their party platforms are basically 70% identical. ☕

Right... multi-partyism... what even is that? Something you eat?

That right there is exactly what the most successful nations on Earth have maintained for centuries, and it’s been proven to be the absolute best way to safeguard democracy. Of course, in the Middle East, you always run into these geniuses who think some other system would work better. But I guess that's just how it is in the Middle East... the absolute backside of Europe..🙄