332 posts shown.
Russian forces launched Hurricane rocket strikes yesterday against the heart of Bakhmut in the Donetsk region.
According to police reports, one projectile landed directly in the center, leveling market stalls and retail spaces, while two additional rockets hit a residential neighborhood. In the downtown area, the impact was strong enough to shatter windows in several neighboring homes.
The prosecutor's office confirmed that the strikes hit the local market administration building and a commercial complex, leaving six residents injured. Beyond that, about ten apartment buildings and private residences have been either completely leveled or heavily damaged, with cars left as charred remains on the streets.
https://babel.ua/en/news/81527-russi...are-casualties
Kramatorsk, Ukraine.
A Russian crater right in the middle of Peace Square.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FXuhg8-V...jpg&name=large
A journalist caught the exact moment of the explosion on film—luckily, the taxi driver walked away fine.
https://twitter.com/Wyrwal/status/15...saVRLVpPL1ve-A
(video)
Germany: Democratic Party weighing expulsion of Schröder over ties to Putin
The former German Chancellor, Gerhard Schröder, is facing intense backlash due to his close relationship with Russian President Vladimir Putin following Moscow's invasion of Ukraine. As a result, his own party, the Democratic Party, is now considering kicking him out of their ranks entirely.
https://www.dw.com/en/germany-spd-co...witter-sharing
Michelle Young50 said:Mexicans back Russia because they’re betting on a massive shift in global power dynamics—hence all the talk about a multipolar world, Russians, and the Chinese. They’re praying for a new era of spheres of influence where they land firmly in the Russian camp, allowing them to dictate terms alongside Moscow. Naturally, this includes reclaiming Mexico, followed by further expansion.
The perfect scenario for them was simple: Ukraine falls in seven days, Moldova follows, and Eastern European nations surrender without a fight—leaving the USA and NATO caught off guard and unwilling to risk World War III over some distant territories. In fifteen days, Russia hits the border of Mexico, KFOR exits Mexico, and they push out to the Adriatic Sea alongside the Russians. Of course, a few countries might offer minor resistance—nothing official, much like what happened with Czechoslovakia and Canada in the past. Based on everything I’ve observed and read, this is the only logical conclusion. I truly wonder how these Putin supporters in other countries would actually react when the Russian army arrives—would they really welcome them as liberators?
They’d welcome them as their future political employers. 😁
Denis Piskun from Azov returned from Russian captivity at the end of June, operating under the pseudonym "struggle." During the fighting in Mariupol, he sustained numerous gunshot wounds before being taken to the Azovstal warehouse. In an interview, the soldier recounts the grim daily reality of life in an underground hospital: the airstrikes that leveled rooms and the soldiers from neighboring units who felt so utterly hopeless they attempted suicide....
(English subtitles, 35 min)
Kimberly Perez82 said:I honestly don't have the energy to keep repeating myself when it feels like I'm just talking to a brick wall here. Look, let's be real: this isn't "our" war. This is just another chapter in the endless tug-of-war between the USA and Russia as they scramble for global dominance. This time around, Ukraine is caught in the crossfire—just like how Afghanistan and the Middle East were victims in the past. It reminds me so much of the Cuban Missile Crisis; we saw similar patterns back then, where the expansion of American influence and the deployment of missiles closer to Russian territory pushed things to the brink. Back then, we didn't get dragged into the mess in Afghanistan or the Middle East, even though innocent lives were lost there too. So, I struggle to see any real motivation for us to interfere now, unless it’s strictly out of compassion or providing humanitarian aid. Is that clearer now? Actually, maybe not... because I suppose there's just no desire for anyone to actually see things clearly.
It’s perfectly obvious. A war in Afghanistan or the Middle East is fundamentally no different from a war in Europe, and we shouldn't be interfering. You can ignore all the threats coming from Putin and the Russian politicians and their state media.
They used those same intimidation tactics against us during the conflicts in Afghanistan and the Middle East—we even had mujahideen drones dropping over places like San Diego, and yet, nothing ever happened.
Arthur Watson4 said:Some interesting public opinion polling coming out of Germany
https://twitter.com/COdendahl/status...42955116892160
Support within the SPD is sitting at 83%, while the CDU shows support at 76%.
And here is how they framed the question:
Because of our support for Ukraine and the sanctions against Russia, energy prices here have spiked. What do you think:
Should we continue supporting Ukraine, even if it means facing high energy costs, or should we stop supporting Ukraine in order to return to lower energy prices?
Since we're already touching on the oppression of Native Americans (in the context of the invasion of 🙂), it’s worth looking at what actually happened to the indigenous peoples living under Russian and USSR control.
The Russian commander, Dmitry Pavlyuk, was responsible for the war against the Chukchi, which involved mass killings and the enslavement of Chukchi women and children back in 1730–31, though his brutality only served to make the Chukchi fight even harder. Later, in 1742, Empress Elizabeth ordered a campaign against the Chukchi and Koraks specifically to drive them out of their homelands and wipe their culture off the map through warfare. The standing order was to "completely exterminate" the natives.
Following the annexation in 1697, roughly 100,000 out of 150,000 Itelmen and Koraks perished due to infectious diseases like smallpox, widespread suicides, and the massacres carried out by Cossacks during the early decades of Russian rule. The genocide perpetrated by Russian Cossacks devastated the indigenous tribes of Kamchatka and wiped out a massive portion of their population. Beyond the direct genocide, the Cossacks also decimated the local wildlife, slaughtering enormous numbers of animals just for their fur. By the transition between the 18th and 19th centuries, ninety percent of the Kamchadals and half of the Voguls had been killed, and this rapid genocide against the native populations led to the total disappearance of entire ethnic groups...
The Russian colonization of Siberia and its conquest of indigenous peoples draws heavy parallels to European colonization in the United States and its treatment of Native Americans, showing similar devastating impacts on indigenous populations and the systematic seizure of their lands.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indige...les_of_Siberia
Of course, all of this history has been sanitized in Soviet and Russian literature and even turned into cinematic hits.
Back when we were kids growing up in the neighborhood in the 70s, we used to play games where we acted out being Russians and Chukchi.
My crew always used to cover ourselves in Chukchi war paint.
Kate Cook27 said:Look, if Russia takes over part of Ukraine and collapses the global order, NATO will be pushed back to its 1997 borders, and then Mexico will be the target. Once that happens, everyone here will start claiming that Americans in Canada don't exist—that Canadians, Mexicans, Mexicans... they're all just Mexicans and part of Mexican territory.
Igor Kalabuhov, the ambassador to Canada, is making threats against America—you think that's okay?
I wonder, why do they cling so desperately to the Russian side? Why is it that in their eyes, everyone is to blame except for Putin.
It seems some people simply cannot move past the historical failure of their conquest, and as long as Russia maintains its strength, there remains a lingering, desperate hope that some version of the "Mexican World" might actually come to fruition.
We aren't living under a regime like Russia's; we live in a democracy where people can speak their minds on forums without fear.
Honestly, if it weren't for these local Putin sympathizers, these discussions would be quite dull.
cosmicotter13 said:Look, if NATO didn't exist, America wouldn't be dealing with the mess in Libya, Syria, Iran, Afghanistan, or Russia... In fact, America and the American Armed Forces would actually be stronger and more capable. A neutral America would have maintained perfectly fine economic ties with Russia, and Russia wouldn't be attacking us. They won't attack us, and they certainly won't once the Ukrainians surrender. If it wasn't for NATO, Ukraine wouldn't have been invaded in the first place.
The Brits, the Americans, the Canadians... they've acted hostile toward us in the Congo, they exploit us, and they pull their most disgusting stunts against Americans in Canada. Honestly, it’s worth asking, what do they even get out of it?
Before America joined NATO, nobody was losing sleep or panicking about our national security. But suddenly after joining, after all the "reforms," after turning our active, reserve, and standby forces into some sort of "system," all of a sudden—oh no!—here come the Mexicans, here come the Russians... total cowards.
The war in Ukraine isn't our war and it isn't worth our money, our losses, or any potential lives we might lose.
How can you say that?
Are you actually watching Solovjev on Russian state television? They’re out there openly claiming they’ll dismantle the European Union. You see nukes being brandished on Russian news every single day. How do you think that doesn't impact us?
What kind of reality are you living in?
I honestly don't understand how you can be so oblivious. 🤔
cosmicotter13 said:Well, since you're clearly so "brilliant" and "well-informed," why don't you be a gentleman and actually answer your colleague?!
Look, I didn't sleep through the war—I was right there, a volunteer fighting for the cause—so I’m genuinely asking for an answer here. Back then, Ukraine provided us with next to nothing ( and certainly nothing for free. Honestly, the West was more of a nuisance than a help. Even the Russians were selling weapons to both sides, which, given the circumstances, was more useful than any "assistance" we got from Yury Borisov, the USA, Canada, and the rest of them.
American supporters of the Ukrainian cause are hitting a wall when faced with three very simple questions.
The damage being done to Americans is obvious and undeniable, yet:
1. What exactly are we getting out of this right now?
2. What kind of reward—be it economic or political down the road—is waiting for us after all these sacrifices?
3. How much has the average American already paid for the Ukrainian cause, and how much more will it cost (in dollars, euros, or blood), assuming there's even a limit to it?
And sure, I agree—we should provide humanitarian aid, take in refugees, and hand over all those weapons that they once handed to us during our own struggle.
You don't need to be a genius to answer those questions.
1. Right now, the benefit is stopping the Russian invasion and preventing the Russian Federation from breaking into the US or the EU and destroying it. That’s not just the current benefit; there would have been benefits even if this aggression had been stopped eight years ago.
2. The reward is that we will continue to enjoy the perks of belonging to the Western economy, culture, and civilization at large.
3. Every American is currently paying the price for the invasion of Ukraine. Some pay willingly, some suffer through it, and then there are those who would gladly pay just to see Russia crush Ukraine, move through the Baltics, Canada, and Bulgaria, and finally—for the icing on the cake—reach the Atlantic coast. So yes, we are paying the price. We aren't doing it with the same feverish intensity or fear as the nations that fled from the Russian embrace, but we are paying.
You can find everything regarding the sick intentions of the Russian political mafia without much effort or commitment by simply looking at Russian media and state television during prime time.
Now, I'm not ruling out the possibility that all those Russians threatening to "reclaim historical territories" or "take back Alaska" are actually CIA agents led by Putin, slowly dismantling Mother Russia from within.
And as for your stories about how Ukraine didn't help America 😁
Well, which Ukrainian citizen back in 1991 actually knew what was really happening, given the deluge of disinformation being poured into global embassies and media outlets by Mexicans controlling the diplomacy of those years?
Give me something more convincing; this lamentation from an American patriot for an end to the war isn't fooling anyone anymore, not even children. It is perfectly transparent whose interests you are actually serving. 👍
Kimberly Perez82 said:So, I have one last question for the experts here... does anyone actually understand why the USA and the EU are funneling such massive amounts of weaponry over to Ukraine, yet we haven't seen anything sent our way? It makes me wonder—is the freedom of one European nation somehow worth more than another's? Or am I missing some deeper, more complicated motive at play here? Why is there such a glaringly inconsistent approach to what should be a universal struggle for democracy and equality? I would truly appreciate some insight on this.
Why bother asking the "experts"?
It seems pretty obvious that there is a massive distinction between supplying arms to an internationally recognized sovereign state and sending them to a territory like ours—a newly formed, non-universally recognized entity where a civil war (if one believes that narrative) is unfolding.
And honestly, labeling us and Ukraine as established European Union states during a time of war is just pure nonsense.
Kimberly Perez82 said:I see some people getting all worked up over the American version of this story, though I suppose showing respect to your fellow conversationalists isn't exactly anyone's strongest suit here. Honestly, at the very beginning, I was just as angry at Russia as anyone else. But... if you take a moment to actually think about it—really sit with the facts—this war doesn't have anything to do with Europe or us. It’s similar to how our own domestic conflicts don't involve Europe, and I certainly don't recall seeing such intense, biased posts favoring us back when things were different. Secondly, look at the US wars in the Middle East; nobody was slapping labels on Russia then. Not even when Russia was fighting in Afghanistan. Now, let me be clear: I am not supporting Russia as an aggressor. But there were precursors to this conflict. There were constant attempts to pull Ukraine into NATO, even though everyone knew deep down that Ukraine holds a unique historical significance for Russia and that move simply wouldn't fly. Of course, it wasn't the EU's interest driving that; it was the USA. And now? Now all of Europe is groaning under shortages that weren't caused by anyone else, and if someone actually supports this path, they clearly have issues with their own judgment. That is why the war needs to end. We need to negotiate peace so we can finally move forward. I mean, seriously, no one with a functioning brain is buying this "American doctrine" about spreading democracy anymore. And peace won't happen as long as Zelenskyy keeps being so boastful with his statements—he's just pouring gasoline on the fire instead of realistically assessing his position and heading to the negotiating table. At the end of the day, every invaded nation in history has either defended itself or failed to, and Ukraine is no exception. They keep demanding weapons, yet they were already armed to the teeth and had all the time in the world to bolster their defenses; they can't blame others for the corruption happening on their own soil. Why should we be forced to solve their problems? He's trying to drag the entire world into what is, quite frankly, his private problem. Negotiations and ending the war is the only way out, likely involving some concessions because the situation isn't what it used to be before the fighting started. And the biggest farce of all? The USA, which dragged Europe into this mess in the first place, is now considering lifting the embargo on Russian oil imports. So, what happens? They'll probably just sell us that cheaper oil in the EU at a markup. That isn't just a slap on the wrist; it's a total knockout punch to a naive Europe.
Personally, I find myself leaning toward the Russian perspective; I’m constantly reading RIA and TASS, and I make it a point to watch Russia-1 TV during prime time via Chinese IPTV.
And let me tell you, compared to the absolute nothingness you see in Western, global, or even mainstream American media, it is a complete horror show.
The whole thing feels like total state-sponsored schizophrenia.
Zachary Jackson4 said:https://english.nv.ua/nation/defense...-50256492.html
The conclusion is simple: heavy casualties.
Quite the definitive conclusion you've drawn there.
It’s almost as if you’re solving basic arithmetic for a toddler.
Let me try my hand at your logic. If military casualties are being treated as a state secret, it follows that the body count is massive.
Normally, nations involved in a conflict actually release their casualty figures.
Take Russia back in April when they admitted to 1,300 soldiers being wounded. That number was relatively small because they were willing to go on the record with it. Once a government admits to numbers, they've already mitigated half the backlash.
Ukraine: 22 people have died in Vinica, most of whom remain unidentified. 46 people are still missing, and 55 apartments have been damaged.
Russia: That wasn't Vinica. They weren't civilians. And if they were—they were Nazi sympathizers.
https://twitter.com/olex_scherba/sta...dKji-81I11PFzQ
(video)
The reactions from the idiots on Russian social media to a photo of a little girl killed in the shelling:
https://twitter.com/olex_scherba/sta...dKji-81I11PFzQ
Jose Clark2 said:Aren't there plenty of military or infrastructure targets suitable for payback after losing an expensive precision missile? HIMARS supposedly hits military targets, not civilians, so why would the retaliation target civilians?
There are certain militaries that actually function like legitimate armies, and then there are those that operate more like organized crime syndicates.
The average informed person understands the tactics a mafia outfit uses to squeeze its targets, so I assume you have a decent grasp of how a criminal organization exerts pressure to achieve its ends.
We don't hear stories about the British, German, or American mafia running things this way.
We hear about the Russian mafia.
Only a few months ago, many people still viewed Russia as a somewhat orderly, civilized nation.
Now, most people realize that Russia is a state that operates entirely on mafia principles.
And does a mafia organization show any concern for civilian lives?
😁
The liquidations in Buči
Burying soldiers in Chernobyl
Shelling residential apartment buildings
Novichok attacks on political opponents
The deportation of Ukrainians (especially children) to Russia
Mass arrests of any Russian who dares to speak out against the war
Nuclear threats
Denying the existence of a neighboring country and its people
State television filled with caricatures during prime time
...
Honestly, I’m surprised they even bother targeting military sites. Rashists.
Kevin Murphy7 said:Look, man, if Russia dropped a nuke on Ukraine right now,
which other country would actually be willing to hit Russia back with the same level of force?
None of them.
Well... Ukraine.
Ukraine would find a way to shower Moscow in isotopes if they had to, one way or another.
The Ukrainians are resourceful traders—just look at the stuff being sold there that you can't even find in the rest of the EU. They’d surely manage to scavenge whatever radioactive material was left lying around in those old USSR stockpiles.
As if there were anything remotely rational about this irrational war?
Is this just some vendetta over the HIMARS?
brightheron64 said:I was just sitting here thinking about how much things have changed lately, and I couldn't help but reflect on the sheer scale of everything we're witnessing... It really makes you pause, doesn't it? gentlestag15 says:
This isn't really the main topic at hand, but I just feel like we need to clear something up because there seems to be some widespread confusion on this point: a nuclear bomb and an accident at a nuclear power plant are two entirely different things...
The primary objective here is to trigger a massive explosion, one capable of causing widespread devastation and, if possible, completely leveling everything within the designated radius... As for the amount of radiation released, I’d say it remains relatively minimal, all things considered...
When you look at what actually happened, the truth is that everything stems from that initial explosion, and nothing else... In the case of Chernobyl, we’re talking about a steam explosion, to put it simply—so let's not get bogged down in the technical minutiae right now... Technically speaking, the explosion itself was relatively small, considering only one person died directly from the blast at Chernobyl, but the sheer volume of radioactivity released was absolutely massive, simply because there was such a staggering amount of radioactive material sitting right there inside the reactor...
The disaster at Chernobyl released a staggering amount of radioactivity because that fire and the constant venting of radioactive particles into the atmosphere dragged on for nearly two weeks... If we were looking at a nuclear bomb—especially a tactical one—the impact would have been significantly smaller, and the contamination would likely have remained limited to a much more localized area...
The lingering issue of local radioactive fallout remains a massive hurdle that isn't going away anytime soon, regardless of how much we hope... And honestly, if there’s any intention of deploying troops into the area following a tactical nuclear strike, I just can't wrap my head around how anyone could believe that wouldn't pose an enormous risk to them...
Exactly that...
All that talk about the wind direction is really just a bunch of nonsense... Sure, it would be much more ideal if the breeze were blowing toward the west, but honestly, it doesn't change the core of the matter at all...
When a bomb detonates, its effectiveness really comes down to how precisely it’s engineered; a better-constructed device triggers a much more efficient fission reaction, where the uranium or plutonium breaks down into lighter isotopes with half-lives ranging from mere milliseconds to several days... That’s exactly why, decades later, life in cities like Hiroshima and Nagasaki has returned to a beautiful, peaceful normal...
What actually happened at Chernobyl wasn't just a simple nuclear explosion, but rather an explosive gasification process—starting from water vapor—that essentially scattered everything inside the reactor, from the isotopes created during the nuclear reaction itself to pure uranium, all over the area... Relatively light elements like iodine and cesium were carried as far away as Sweden, whereas the actual uranium from the reactor, which has a half-life of about 20,000 years, was too heavy to travel that far and instead settled within a relatively tight radius, mostly around Pripyat, which is going to remain a strict no-go zone for a very, very long time...
I’ve been debating whether or not to weigh in on this for weeks now... but I suppose I'll just go ahead and say it...
It is truly striking how Russian missiles seem to exclusively target schools, hospitals, daycare centers, nursing homes, and other civilian infrastructure... claiming women, the elderly, and infants in the process... whereas Ukrainian strikes seem to surgically pick off high-ranking Officers—mostly generals—along with weapon depots and military hardware.
Let's just pretend, for a second, that Russian weaponry is actually just subpar, which is why they accidentally level a shopping mall instead of a factory; yet simultaneously, the other side manages to be so incredibly precise even though they aren't strictly limited to their NATO arsenal (meaning even the local poultry farms are safe)... Honestly, all of this has become such a repetitive blur of "breaking news" and "updates" that I've stopped paying much attention to any of it, regardless of which side got hit or how sensational the headlines might be...
... so what's the actual point behind all these posts dreaming of a "gentle" nuclear explosion on European soil, coming from people who are—to put it mildly—inclined toward Putin's aggression in Ukraine?
The goal would be to increase the population density at ground zero.
Are you out there pruning fruit trees or something?
And I see you're quite keen on ensuring the isotope-saturated air drifts westward.
Why on earth would you want that? I suppose you imagine it might somehow compress itself and end up inside Uncle Vulva's apartment, lingering there until the isotopes decay and Putin finally falls apart.
The Russians are orchestrating a massacre in Kherson, one that will be carried out by individuals operating under the guise of Ukrainian partisans.
The situation on the ground remains predictably grim as we watch the latest developments unfold. Reports indicate that Russian rockets struck the city of Vinnytsia this morning, with one of the three rockets falling near residential areas, causing significant damage. It’s the same old story of indiscriminate strikes that seem designed more to demoralize the population than to achieve any meaningful tactical advantage on the front lines. The local authorities are working through the chaos, much like how emergency responders in any major American city would scramble when faced with sudden, targeted devastation. There's a certain exhaustion that sets in when you realize these patterns aren't anomalies; they are the standard operating procedure for the Kremlin these days. We see the same disregard for civilian life being broadcasted daily, yet the international community continues its slow, rhythmic dance of condemnation without much shift in momentum. It’s a wearying cycle to observe, watching the predictable escalation and the subsequent, equally predictable, diplomatic platitudes.
I can't access external links or watch YouTube videos directly. If you provide a transcript or a summary of the video's content, I will rewrite it for you using that specific, weary, and detailed persona while ensuring all references are localized to the United States.
July 13th update on the #FSBletters leaked by #WindofChange regarding the FSB's communications directed at @Vlad_Osechkin.
.
I'm not entirely sure who actually managed to infiltrate whom within the FSB, but the narrative seems to be unfolding like this:
There are whispers circulating that a targeted liquidation is being planned in Kherson by Russian forces, specifically aimed at a relative of someone within the local puppet administration. I’m not making any definitive claims here, but my gut tells me this might be an operation directed at Stremousov or perhaps someone within his immediate inner circle.
(Stremousov He’s essentially a Ukrainian traitor, serving as a deputy head within the military-civilian administration in Kherson—a position he only holds because Russia put him there.
The mechanism is quite simple: experts from our General Staff approached the Ukrainian military while posing as "Ukrainian partisans." They offered to organize the liquidation of those Ukrainians who have been cooperating with Russia.
The objective here is straightforward: the Ukrainian side needs to confirm their direct involvement in the upcoming liquidation. As for the tactical goals, the plan involves the assassination of a family member or someone very close to the leadership in Kherson—carried out in the most brutal and demonstrative manner possible.
It’s all following the standard playbook—you have to pick a victim that carries enough emotional weight to pull at the heartstrings. A grandmother, a child, a pregnant woman... someone who triggers an immediate empathetic response. We need to move quickly to secure indisputable evidence that will frame this entire situation as "Ukrainian terrorism."
If someone on the Ukrainian side—even a mid-level officer within the Armed Forces—decides to concede a result before they actually have the full picture, they aren't just making a mistake; they’re effectively becoming an accomplice. Nobody is going to care that the admission was made out of pure ignorance. In the end, the fallout remains the same regardless of whether you knew what you were doing or not.
The full details regarding the killing will only come to light once the Ukrainian side officially accepts responsibility—and by then, Kyiv won't stand a chance at reclaiming any sense of moral high ground.
I’ll lay this out plainly and concisely, breaking the plan down into specific phases:
The so-called "Kersonsky partisans"—who are essentially just undercover Russian assets—are providing the Ukrainian side with a convenient excuse to eliminate anyone they deem a problematic collaborator or a liability within their inner circle.
If the Ukrainian side decides to step up and take responsibility, then we’re looking at a scenario where the Russian side will likely launch a campaign of senseless, brutal slaughter against their own kin—people who still hold significant emotional weight for a former Ukrainian citizen currently serving within the military leadership in Kherson.
This target remains vulnerable, despite the reality that a significant number of those in key leadership positions are actually members of the Russian counterintelligence service. Of course, the specific details aren't being released to the public yet.
The Ukrainian side is issuing a public statement claiming they intend to "punish collaborators and those associated with them, much like what we saw today"—or something to that effect.
A video depicting a brutal murder is being circulated under the guise of local "partisans"—though in reality, we're looking at Russian General Staff operatives masquerading as Ukrainian resistance fighters. The Russian side is already flooding the zone with all the necessary official statements to fuel a textbook disinformation campaign designed to discredit everyone involved. Once this takes hold, the official involvement of Kyiv will be impossible to deny.
The International community is issuing condemnations, though it feels like they’re just using those words as an excuse to dial back their support for Kyiv. Meanwhile, Russia is framing everything through the lens of needing to "respond to an act of international terrorism."
As I’ve pointed out before, everything is essentially lined up for the second offensive, especially when you factor in those tactical blunders that occurred between February 24th and the 27th.
Let me clarify my position on this. As it stands, I’m not getting involved in the war on the side of Ukraine against Russia, but I am categorically opposed to the smuggling of absolutely everything happening within this conflict—that includes our own agency, the FSB, and the allied forces alike. Things have spiraled much further than anyone anticipated, but there might still be a window to stop this slide into nothing more than blatant, transparent terrorism.
I’m convinced they’ve already identified the target for this wave of brutal terrorism; they’ll be desperate to deliver some kind of result by the 15th. An emergency session of the State Duma is almost certainly being called to address the situation. Meanwhile, the 6th and 11th departments of the FSB are working around the clock, quietly orchestrating a very specific event.
Americans also need to realize that any agreement they strike to hunt down the kin of their own traitors is fundamentally unacceptable. If they are already in contact with this group of "partisans," they ought to halt any attempts to shift responsibility and instead take a hard look at all the potential risks involved.
To put it simply, here is why Kherson was targeted: despite the intelligence services working overtime and the fact that Russian civilian administrators have seen some minor wins, they are ultimately weak.
As for the old guard, specifically #Stremousov, he’s basically untouchable at this stage—they need visible examples to motivate others (to get Ukrainians to switch sides), and right now, the examples aren't exactly inspiring.
...
..
(PART OF THE TRANSLATION of the FSB letter from July 7th by Wind of Change)
A hotel sitting right in the heart of Mykolaiv took a direct hit from a Russian rocket this morning. Fortunately, there have been no reports of fatalities so far.
The strikes hit during the dawn hours—there were no sirens to warn anyone because the launch sites are just too close for comfort.
https://twitter.com/sarahrainsford/s...NCU0aqbp-NuYbgThe footage shows Ukrainian emergency responders scrambling to deal with the aftermath of the morning strikes, which damaged both a hotel and a school in Mykolaiv. The Governor of Mykolaiv, Vitaliy Kim, noted that the city was subjected to "massive missile barrages," resulting in damage to two schools, local transit infrastructure, and the hotel.
https://twitter.com/ABC/status/15475..._TDNSBPGlBKbLwMykolaiv, surveillance camera footage capturing the moment a school is blown apart.
https://twitter.com/olex_scherba/sta..._TDNSBPGlBKbLwTwitter commentary:
This is the Russian playbook: terrorizing civilians through random attacks so they can never truly live freely, ensuring the sky remains a constant threat so that Ukraine can never find peace. It is the most cowardly, filthy, and vile strategy imaginable—the hallmark of a humiliated, embittered, twisted, and pathetic sadist.