CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Jack Kelly5 › Posts

Posts by Jack Kelly5

391 posts shown.

2017 Azerbaijan Grand Prix: June 23–25 in Formula 1 ·
You’ve got a car that's basically a rocket ship in qualifying—like, a second and a half faster than everyone else—then the FIA hits Sebastian Vettel with a ten-second penalty, and he just goes out there and outclasses them all again anyway. I guess it doesn't matter what they throw at him, he still finds a way to make it look easy.
Lewis 😬
2017 Azerbaijan Grand Prix: June 23–25 in Formula 1 ·
Lance Stroll 🙏
Sebastian Vettel 🙏
Mercedes-Benz and the FIA 🙂

The car is basically a total wreck. Sebastian absolutely smoked Lewis Hamilton out there, which just goes to show he needs a car that's at least two seconds faster if he actually wants to stand a chance against him. It’s becoming pretty obvious that even someone like Nica wouldn't have stood a prayer if it weren't for all the help from Toto Wolff and Niki Lauda
Daniel Ricciardo totally embarrassed Max Verstappen's little setup.
2017 Azerbaijan Grand Prix: June 23–25 in Formula 1 ·
Someone get Valtteri Bottas on the radio, because Sebastian Vettel is just moving way too fast for him to handle!!!!!!
Mannnnnn 🙂
2017 Azerbaijan Grand Prix: June 23–25 in Formula 1 ·
What an absolute masterclass of a free-for-all.
🙏
2017 Azerbaijan Grand Prix: June 23–25 in Formula 1 ·
Man, what a total circus...
🤦
2017 Azerbaijan Grand Prix: June 23–25 in Formula 1 ·
Kimi is going all out against Hamoš, the orders seem pretty straightforward I guess.
😬
GP Las Vegas; Jun 23-25, 2017 in Formula 1 ·
Honestly, I think it was all just Valtteri Bottas's mess, really... he kind of stirred the whole pot himself, and if you ask me, he's probably looking at a penalty for the next race.
GP Las Vegas; Jun 23-25, 2017 in Formula 1 ·
Just put Lance Stroll on the grid, then we can call this whole circus complete.
😬
GP Las Vegas; Jun 23-25, 2017 in Formula 1 ·
Verstappen wrecked yet another car 😂
What a loser.
GP Las Vegas; Jun 23-25, 2017 in Formula 1 ·
Man, you really are just the embodiment of Pirelli, aren't you?
2017 NASCAR Season in Formula 1 ·
mellowtiger83 said:Well, whether Vettel is a genius or an alien, it doesn't change the reality of the situation.

In certain aspects, he's better than Hamilton; in others, he's worse. It's all quite close, really.

When you look at raw pace on track—when there's no need to baby the tires or conserve fuel—he might be slightly behind.

I think you've misread the situation. It would be wise to watch those final 20 laps Hamilton drives. Just because Vettel didn't have to manage things on a particular day doesn't mean he hasn't done it before or won't do it again.

If you look closely enough, the two of them are actually quite similar. Both are immense talents, and both possess massive egos.

You claim Vettel hasn't performed miracles. Go check the history at Spa-Francorchamps and try to guess which year I'm talking about. He didn't win that one, yet he put on one of the most impressive drives out there during a day where he didn't beat Hamilton.

I never claimed Hamilton was a genius simply because he saved his engine and tires. If anything, he used to be rather tedious. He seems to have lost that edge, almost as if he's matured, which isn't necessarily an improvement.

I mean, Formula 1 has never really been some kind of wild brawl, and honestly, I don't think there’s ever been an era where tire management or fuel consumption wasn't a massive deal.
At the end of the day, the winner is just the person who crosses the finish line first, and usually, that isn't the guy who spent the whole race driving like a maniac without a plan.
William Bennett53 said:Toro Rosso, this recent situation isn't even questionable; Kimi himself admitted he struggled during the first tire stint, but everything smoothed out after the pit stop. Therefore, he was simply driving as conservatively as possible to protect his position without compromising it.

Right. The whole issue with the US thing popped up when they tried tweaking the suspension right before qualifying, but then he ended up dealing with massive understeer. Who knows what they were actually aiming for, but on the softs, it looked way better for him.
We probably just need to wait for ABC News China and see how Ferrari's looking then. Los Angeles is such a weird one, so it doesn't really show where the true form is. I’m secretly hoping both of them end up being even stronger.
jadeseal7 said:Hey Tib, how’s everything going with you? 😁

By the way, looking at those times you posted...

It’s actually pretty fascinating to me how Kimi handled that Formula 1 lap—he just breezed through it without any drama, totally nonchalant, and then just rolled right back into his rhythm for the next lap like it was nothing.

It’s clear he had the pace; it just seems like Ferrari wasn't particularly worried about Red Bull Racing, so they were likely just cruising and being extremely conservative with the engine.

Honestly, Ferrari—even Kimi's car—was in a completely different league compared to Red Bull Racing. I’d bet anything that both Ferraris were running at maybe 90% during that last third of the race, and if I'm not mistaken, they probably could have pushed way harder if they wanted to. But since you're only allowed four engines before you start getting hit with penalties, it seems like a pretty smart move not to push it to the limit.
I actually think Kimi could’ve closed the gap to Valtteri Bottas, though maybe he wouldn't have made a real move on him, so I suppose they just settled for a mediocre weekend, grabbed their points, and let the engine rest.
Especially since Sebastian Vettel ended up taking the win anyway.
Ashley Ramirez4 said:The only thing that really bugs me was how Sebastian Vettel tried to hunt down Lewis on track—if Lewis had just stayed out for a few more laps, he would've been caught, since he was within less than a second before finally pulling into the pits.
Maybe if he’d just defended his position and slowed both himself and Vettel down enough, they both might have ended up finishing behind Max after the pit stops.

I mean, obviously he was going to go for it; Seb is a total fighter and always drives to grab the best possible spot. Those days of playing it safe and using timid tactics in the red car are pretty much long gone.
Raymond Anderson4 said:Was that at the Australian Grand Prix or was it with AMuS? It doesn't really matter now, but the Americans behind the wheel have such precise control that it might explain those clean launches. 😁

True, which is pretty funny considering Lewis Hamilton was already complaining about having zero grip in his starting spot during the warm-up lap.

Raymond Anderson4 said:Ferrari and Mercedes look close, but I’m still banking on Mercedes being the frontrunners for the next two races.
That race was a mess. We know Lewis can struggle when things go south right from the start, and he’s never been the best at managing tires. He also tends to get a bit defeatist with his radio calls and what he shares with us.
On the other hand, I think Valtteri Bottas's performance actually proves just how good that car really is. There's no way Bottas would have landed on the podium in his first race if that machine wasn't a winner.

By the way, what did you all think about the Magnussen-Ericsson incident? That was a close one; last year, Kevin Magnussen probably would have walked away with a penalty for that.

I have this nagging feeling we might be hearing a lot more of this kind of thing throughout the season, I guess.

😬
I mean, couldn't you maybe just assume that the Mercedes-Benz cars and Max Verstappen were on the racing line, while the Ferrari guys ended up stuck on the dirty part of the track?

graniteharbor502 said:Well, one must consider that Kimi was struggling quite significantly with the UltraSoft, and he did mention—quite clearly, I might add—that they finally pinpointed the root cause at the end of qualifying and intend to rectify it for the upcoming races. If one looks at his pace on the Soft tire, it actually appeared remarkably consistent with Sebastian Vettel's performance (and that of the Mercedes-Benz drivers as well):
http://en.mclarenf-1.com/index.php?p...stian%20Vettel

They kind of blew it during Saturday practice too, trying to squeeze out extra speed for qualifying and just totally messing it up.
At least they realized what happened, I guess.
darkmarlin16 said:Give the man a decent car and then we'll talk.

I mean, he probably could have had it, but he just kind of... messed it up, I guess. Though if he had, we probably wouldn't be celebrating those six decent top-six finishes quite so loudly, since Sebastian Vettel would’ve been the one grabbing all the wins instead.
😬
stormybadger8 said:Hamilton was struggling with his US tires (he wasn't even on the SS) during the first stint—or at least that's what he was whining about on the team radio... but the lap times didn't show any of that.
The real question is whether Sky was right about yesterday being a live timing error, or if Hamilton actually set his Q2 time on used rubber from Q1...
According to LT, his Q2 tires—the ones he started the race on—only had 6 laps on them (given the FL in Q1 and FL in Q2). If that's true, it sounds completely insane (I can't imagine why they'd be that stupid), which makes me think it was an LT error. But if he really did start on those old tires, it's no wonder they fell apart in the first stint...

Once they both pitted, Hamilton's pace leveled out, but only after Max cleared out of the way. By then, he was already a massive 6 seconds behind Vettel, so the whole thing was a lost cause.
Even if he had been driving qualifying laps the whole time, there's no way in hell he would've closed that gap without shredding his tires, let alone passing him...

Here are the times, take a look...
http://en.mclarenf-1.com/index.php?p...wis%20Hamilton

The gaps are almost non-existent. 😉
When you look at the fastest laps, it's 30 vs 27, so they were incredibly close...
Those weird time anomalies were just him fighting through traffic and weaving around the rest of the pack...

I’m not really sure what you’re trying to prove here?
After the pit stops, Lewis wasn't even catching Sebastian; he was actually losing ground to Valtteri Bottas. Whether he would've stayed ahead of Sebastian if Max hadn't gotten in his way, well, we'll never know. But in the moments when he "should" have been chasing Sebastian, Bottas was the one closing in on him.
The guy just didn't have a shot at winning today. Period.
stormybadger8 said:Not quite...
Lewis Hamilton was about 0.5 seconds faster than Sebastian Vettel once he exited the pits, he just completely fell apart once he ended up behind Max...
Honestly, Vettel definitely wouldn't have lost out to him given those pit strategies.

Before the pit stops, they were basically neck and neck—one lap Sebastian Vettel would be 0.100-0.200 ahead, then Lewis Hamilton would take it back by the same margin... essentially, they were both controlling the pace.

The only real silver lining is that Ferrari didn't lose their minds on the pit wall and try to play favorites with Lewis Hamilton...
Even when Sebastian Vettel was stuck behind a slow pack, they didn't panic and dive into the pits immediately; they played it cool. Sebastian just blasted past Lance Stroll and hit the pits the following lap once they had the window to come out ahead of Lewis Hamilton...

What's not true?
And what kind of pace did Lewis actually have once they both ended up on the SS?
If Lewis could've actually maintained that rhythm on the SS, he definitely wouldn't have pitted when Sebastian went in for the DRS.
Sebastian was just faster than Lewis today.
Kyle Edwards5 said:Kimi: "Look, we already knew how this was going to play out right after qualifying. We saw the writing on the wall, but by then, there just wasn't enough time to overhaul the setup before the race started. Things actually felt much more stable once we switched over to the soft tires. It’s clear to us—once we finally dial in the setup, we'll have a serious package on our hands. Still, a solid result for the team overall."

If this turns out to be true, then I guess that explains why the performance was kind of underwhelming. It’s basically just the classic runner-up driver narrative, isn't it? They're probably just testing out different setups during the race weekend, and I suppose they'll eventually stumble upon some conclusions or whatever.
mellowtiger83 said:So, unlike last year, did Mercedes actually mess up their strategy this time? Interesting.🙂

Not really, I mean... I think Sebastian Vettel was actually putting up better lap times before they hit the pits, but then he and Lewis Hamilton tried that early pit stop strategy to see if they could make up for all that damage. Maybe it worked, maybe it didn't, but that's what they were aiming for, I guess.
I guess Sebastian Vettel was actually looking pretty quick today, if you ask me.