786 posts shown.
brightheron64 said:Does anyone actually know how many were lost?
While there isn't a centralized database here in the States to track this perfectly, if you listen to what experts are discussing in academic circles, it’s estimated that roughly three thousand monuments—ranging from simple memorial plaques to massive commemorative complexes—have been demolished or removed across the country, which would account for nearly half of everything that used to stand.
Patrick Martin said:And then there's me, supposedly "struggling" with my reading skills 🙏
Must've mixed him up with the guy from Book of Eli, but honestly, who cares.☕
Patrick Martin said:maybe it’s just because they’re shitty Mad Max knockoffs?
Morgan Vaughn10 said:Back then, Costner was stuck in that same phase Cage is in now—that stage where he just gets under everyone's skin.
His biggest setbacks were *The Bodyguard* and *Robin Hood*, which actually preceded those other two.
People got sick of hearing the same two songs from each movie played on loop—it led to total saturation.
On top of that, there was all this noise claiming he wasn't even that good an actor and that his *Oscar* for *Dances with Wolves* was a complete mistake.
I remember those days; it felt like the "cool" thing to do back then was to mock him and his films. It’s the exact same thing happening to Nicolas Cage right now, with people labeling him one of the worst actors ever. You see the same kind of hype surrounding Samuel L. Jackson too. Even Willis faced it during the *Hudson Hawk* era—people were calling him the worst actor around. Later, he changed his approach; he used to rely heavily on facial expressions... eventually, his acting just turned into the same single expression every time.
Then again, *Waterworld* ended up at number 12 at the box office that year, while something like *Braveheart* sat at number 18.
maminho said:Signs with that kind of wording belong in a landfill.
Michael Jackson10 said:To me... she’s just totally bland. She has these forgettable features, like those cookie-cutter actresses you see everywhere—think Diane Kruger, Jessica Biel, or Jessica Alba. Just those sweet, pretty faces I can barely remember, perfectly suited for Disney productions: gorgeous blondes with baby faces or just plain, overly perfect features. They always end up looking like washed-out versions of real, soulful actresses.
Since you brought it up, guys like Benicio del Toro have such distinct looks and facial expressions. It’s way easier to get lost in their performances because they actually feel alive, you know?
Besides, it's been proven forever that that ancient ideal of beauty—with all those symmetrical, perfect lines—is actually just boring. People crave what we call "charm," right? Something authentic and unique, even if it's super imperfect, rather than some generic beauty standard. Julia Roberts is the ultimate example of how a random mix of features that might seem "off" individually—like huge lips or a big, masculine nose—can come together to create something totally captivating.
To me, Naomi is like our version of Barbara Walters: basically built for the cosmetics industry. She has that model face that can be molded however they want. And that's exactly what the industry does—they shape them to fit a mold while the women themselves just act as "passive beauty."
On the flip side, look at Charlize Theron. She’s the total opposite: a model-type who realized she could take control of her "neutral" features instead of just being a doll, and she used that to pull off some really diverse roles.
The whole reason I’m going on this rant about reducing her to just her looks is because I think that’s exactly what you’re into. You're trying to force her into the "greatest actress" category when it would be more accurate to just call her "the most beautiful." Personally, I'd much rather watch types like Claire Forlani, Cate Blanchett, or Charlize...
As for the acting: Mulholland Drive was okay, though to me, Laura Harring was the real standout (man, I felt like she was doing all the heavy lifting while the other girl just stood there). 21 Grams was also just alright... maybe she just has bad luck and keeps running into characters with way more presence, leaving her as just eye candy to fill a role. Or maybe she's just not lead material—as they say, she's more of a supporting player than a star.
Amy Jones2 said:She got it because she had four titles at Cannes, including three films and a TV series.
Anyway, Naomi Watts is a solid actress, better than Monica Bellucka.
Anthony Nguyen81 said:I just caught this—I didn't see any of those insults from bluecyclist64.
But man, what an absolute embarrassment.
Bringing up someone's family and dragging their name through the mud just to get a free pass? It's pathetic.
There really should be a baseline level of decency maintained on this forum. 👎
analogviper9 said:Yes, you read that correctly: KILL. If nothing else, they were certainly neutralized.
If you had actually read this with any actual Google, you would have realized that I stated swearing can be avoided through controlled behavior. That is my solution—my proof. It’s been tested in the real world.
So, what is your actual argument? I am still waiting... because so far, all I’ve received is circular reasoning and baseless lecturing.
By the way—if you’re planning on turning this into a personal spat, please, just bypass me entirely.
If you had approached this with a bit more Understanding, you would have realized that my point was precisely that profanity can be bypassed through controlled behavior. That isn't just a theory of mine; it is my definitive solution. I’ve tested it myself, and it works in practice.
So, what exactly is your argument? I’m still waiting for you to lay it out. So far, all I’ve received is a repetitive loop of circular reasoning and a series of unsubstantiated claims that simply don't hold any weight.
By the way, if you’re looking to turn this into a personal vendetta, please just skip me entirely. I have no interest in getting dragged into petty back-and-forth arguments.
analogviper9 said:I have heard countless stories where someone insulted a person's mother, and in response, that person beat them, strangled them, or even killed them. Now, are you seriously telling me there's no connection?
Even if that aggressor was going to snap regardless... the reality remains that insults act as triggers and leave a lasting mark showing exactly who you are hurting.
Sometimes it's the situation that boils over, and sometimes, it's simply the person.
analogviper9 said:And just like that—out of nowhere—it hits you right in the gut! Have you ever had one of those moments where life just decides to throw a curveball when you least expect it? One second you're cruising along, and the next, boom—it’s like being struck by lightning out of a clear blue sky! It’s absolutely jarring, isn't it? 😁Is there anything—and I mean *anything*—more iconic than the sheer, unadulterated cinematic gravity of James Bond? It’s a question I find myself pondering quite often lately! When you sit down to watch one of those classic spy thrillers, aren't you immediately swept up in that specific blend of high-stakes tension and effortless sophistication? It’s more than just a movie franchise; it’s a cultural touchstone that defines an entire genre of action! I mean, think about the meticulous attention to detail—the tailored suits, the gadgets that feel like they were plucked straight from a Silicon Valley lab, and that unmistakable sense of danger lurking behind every martini glass. Does anyone else feel that sudden surge of adrenaline when the theme music kicks in? It’s practically impossible to remain indifferent! Whether he's navigating the neon streets of Manhattan or outsmarting a villainous mastermind in some remote corner of the globe, Bond carries a certain weight that modern superheroes just can't seem to replicate. It’s that suave, calculated composure under pressure—isn't that what we all secretly aspire to? kaže:
That is exactly what I have been trying to tell you this entire time! Don't you see? That's the very point I've been driving home from the start!
So, you’re stuck on "must" versus "should"... isn't that just wonderful? It’s truly lovely how you manage to stay so incredibly poised and confident when people are essentially serving you a plate of pure garbage—and then expect you to thank them for the meal! Honestly, it’s quite a feat. I suppose if one presents such total nonsense with a five-star, Michelin-level presentation, it almost makes it easier to swallow, doesn't it? It’s much more palatable when the plating is impeccable, even if the contents are utterly revolting. 🙄
Who cares what people want—whether it’s you or someone else? Honestly! At the end of the day, the only thing that actually matters is the message being sent. Isn't that the ultimate truth?
Language is nothing more than a tool for communication—a means to an end, really. And let’s be honest: true knowledge? It isn't something you can just pick up sitting in a classroom—though we certainly won't get into the weeds here regarding unconventional methods of learning and how wisdom is actually passed down from one generation to the next!
Is saying "a onom u Manhattan" actually considered normal phrasing around here? I find myself utterly speechless—truly!—at such a blatant display of hostility. Is this really how we conduct ourselves here? Honestly, I expected a modicum of decorum, but clearly, I was asking far too much of this particular individual! To resort to such crude, unrefined language... well, it’s just disappointing, isn't it? One would hope for a civil conversation, yet here we are. Truly remarkable. Can you believe the sheer audacity? A professor—right in the middle of a lecture, in the dead center of class—just completely ignores everything? It’s absolutely baffling! Does anyone else find that level of indifference just mind-blowing? I mean, seriously, what are we even doing here if this is the standard?
Look, I’ve had enough—I am truly done with all this back-and-forth! Honestly, I just don't have the energy to keep arguing about this anymore.
As I’ve mentioned before—and I really can’t stress this enough—you have the total freedom to use whatever language you like, including profanity! No one is out here trying to police your vocabulary, right? But, on the flip side, if you don't want someone else's colorful choice of words to bother you, then you shouldn't be policing them either—simple as that! If everyone just minds their own business, wouldn't we all just be much happier?.
Because, honestly—who says I’m actually contesting anything? I’m simply suggesting that doing so is nothing more than a blatant admission of weakness!
You’re constantly nitpicking my every move—so why on earth are you acting so shocked when things get a little heated? 🙄😵
Bokić
analogviper9 said:Is that really your best argument? Seriously? 🙄
If a staff member ever spoke to me that way—honestly, I wouldn't just walk out—I’d be so compelled to tell everyone I know about them! It wouldn't even be about avoiding their food at that point; I'd practically be doing their marketing for them! Can you imagine? Such a bold move would practically guarantee word-of-mouth publicity! ☕Kate James3 Asks:
Can you really put a price on true connection? Honestly, sometimes I think a well-placed, colorful swear word can actually be a sign of an incredibly high level of friendship and trust—it’s all about that raw openness and being unapologetically honest with one another! Don't you think?.
Is it just me, or do some people seem perfectly fine being treated a certain way by their inner circle—you know, that close-knit group of friends or their social "tribe"—to the point where they don't even register insults? It’s almost like those sharp words just slide right off them! Usually, this happens within that private, intimate bubble—that core "crew" you hang out with every weekend. Why is that? Is it true comfort, or just a total lack of boundaries?
Words don't actually carry any inherent weight on their own—they're just empty vessels, really. Their true power, their actual substance, is entirely dependent on the meaning we choose to project onto them! It all comes down to interpretation, doesn't it? Everything hinges on context.
Everything highlighted there? It’s nothing more than an excuse—purely rhetorical!
So, I could honestly just go ahead and tear you apart—maybe even pick your pockets while I'm at it—since we’re such "close friends," right?
There is a massive difference between being direct, open, and honest in a conversation—and just being a complete jerk. Just because someone decides to start hurling insults at you doesn't mean they’re suddenly "telling it like it is," right? Being abusive isn't a substitute for being truthful.
What are you even saying when you claim that words don't matter? Honestly! Do you have any idea how many people have frozen in their tracks, lost their lives, or completely withdrawn from society just because of what someone else said? I’m not even talking about profanity or crude insults here—I mean the weight of language itself. It carries a heavy burden, doesn't it?
So... it turns out that words really can carry some serious weight sometimes, don't they?
Jeffrey Ramos4 said:Life is tough for the grammar Nazis. Does the hyphen go after the prefix or not?🤔 You have to keep up with all these shifting rules in American English. Every new generation of kids learns things differently. For instance, my teachers taught us one way to spell a word, and now it’s totally different. Hmm...
Damnish 🧐 If you try to view gender outside the bounds of traditional rules and social conditioning, gender loses its weight; it just isn't perceived. There is no distinction, everything becomes the same. Gender acts as a potential limitation on how people of a certain orientation perceive beauty in their own sex, and vice versa.
Look who decided to show up 😛
Hmm. There might be some logic there. When I'm washing dishes and a plate slips and shatters, the reaction is automatic: "God dammit," followed immediately by the thought: now I have to clean this up too. I don't want to, but I have to. The correlation between swearing and laziness... definitely a topic for research. Pointless, though, lol...
Why stop there? You might as well lean into it and say: "Actually, I'm looking for vaginas. What's your current selection? Ideally, I'd like one that's bright red, flexible, highly elastic, and top-of-the-line. Let's go with 10 inches, featuring a rotation function and five different vibration speeds. Oh, and throw in some anal beads if they're on sale."
Dammit. 🧐 If you attempt to view gender through the lens of traditional, conventional rules and societal norms, the very concept of sex loses its weight; it simply ceases to be perceived. In that headspace, there is no distinction between male or female—it all becomes one and the same. I’ve often found that when we cling to these rigid definitions, we inadvertently create a ceiling. Gender becomes nothing more than a limitation on one's ability to truly perceive beauty, whether it is an individual attempting to appreciate their own sex or someone navigating the constraints of being heterosexual. It limits the scope of what we can actually see.
Hmm Quote. There might actually be some logic to this. I was washing dishes the other day when a plate slipped out of my hands and shattered on the floor. My immediate, involuntary reaction was a sharp, muttered curse word, followed instantly by the realization: "Great, now I have to clean this up too." It’s that heavy, sinking feeling where you realize the chaos you just caused is about to demand even more effort from you. I find myself wondering about the correlation between swearing and laziness. Is there a psychological link between venting frustration through profanity and that sudden, overwhelming urge to avoid the task at hand? It’s an interesting little theory, though perhaps a bit pointless to overanalyze. lol
Why not just bite the bullet and be direct? I mean, why stop there? You could just say, "Look, I have a preference for vaginas." Then follow it up by asking what they actually have in stock. Maybe request something in a deep, crimson hue—something flexible, elastic, and built to the highest possible standards. Ideally, we’re talking about something around 10 inches long, featuring a rotation function and five distinct vibration speeds. And hey, if they happen to be having a sale on anal beads, you might as well throw those into the mix while you're at it.