Posts by Michelle Palmer6

Aww, you guys are just too sweet! 😍

I mean, let's be real—that’s just plain goofy! xD

Brenda Cook2 said:Corinthians 100 Anniversary Shirt, Nike

Absolutely 🙏stunning
![/IMG][/URL][/I]

Henry Cox78 said:Clearly, the trolls aren't feeling this. Now we need to hear from some actually constructive members like me and a few others on the Forum to see what the real consensus is. Personally, I'm all for 👍

Thanks, Henry Cox78, but I’m going to stay neutral on this one; honestly, I don't have much of an opinion either way.

Henry Cox78 said:hollowtrucker77 and Tindal, please stop blowing up my inbox. I am not going to be a moderator, period. Thanks! 🙂

So, what, we're releasing PDFs specifically designed for amoebas now? ☕

I would really love to moderate formal debate. It honestly seems like such a super cool, urban, and totally worthwhile PDF section. 🙂

The baker says the most likely main sponsor will be Split Bank. I really hope it doesn't look hideous 😁

Douglas Kern said:

Sevilla's new away kit

🙏🙏

I approve!

Hey, do you think you could make one for Delvecchi too?

urbanorca6 said:I agree. It’s not even politically correct.
They should have used the stars and stripes instead of the current design.

😁

But seriously, the Kansas City Chiefs kit has always been all about that clean, minimalist look—mostly white with very little going on (aside from the sponsors, obviously, just because they have to). This new design? It just doesn't feel like the Chiefs to me.

placidfalcon4 said:And I was thinking it would turn out great..😍

Just take off the sponsor—and maybe add some space between the stars and stripes for the crest—and 😍😍😍

Where can I actually get something like this made?🤷

Personally, I’m not feeling it. 🤷
It just doesn't feel right for the Kansas City Chiefs.

Jacob Foster11 said:Oh, you want me to prove it? 😁

Is it going to hurt?

Jacob Foster11 said:Alright, I went ahead and brightened up the background a bit. It wasn't pitch black anymore, so you can actually see the moderators' usernames now! 😛

Here’s how it looks:

By the way, what are those little cartoon characters hanging out in the corner?

Lacoste?
Total posers ☕

Quick question for the moderators on the Politics board: would I be allowed to start a thread discussing the public reaction to the January 15th events and what’s happening over in Warsaw now that you've all given it such a beautiful makeover?
I honestly think it's going to be a massive hit once the guys with the badges come charging in on horseback—or maybe something improvised if they haven't picked up horses yet—perhaps using some cargo to knock over an old lady who's busy banging a spoon against a pot.

steeleagle70 said:You've got two whole pages of "Clinton's" stuff on Offside. Seems like plenty to me, even though I mentioned earlier that like 90% of the action was happening over at the tavern.

And come on, you know as well as I do that you don't protest red cards or bans inside the specific thread—you take it to the main board. And let's be real, don't go expecting any "legal defense" to work here.

But hey, when it's time to pull out the receipts

We gotta stick together on this one. All of us.

I mean, they basically nuked half the PDF. Plus, there were at least that many fans involved.

So, what we actually have here is one single post and a handful of people who probably know whose clones they are—likely just the crowd from the Tavern—surrounded by about a hundred posts that have absolutely nothing to do with the issue at hand.
It’s a textbook call to arms, really. Honestly, just ban everyone!

steeleagle70 said:Nobody’s actually calling for it in their quotes, but it’s pretty obvious everyone knew what was going down. You can't listen to that one guy on this forum who claimed people were totally out of the loop—you know, the one who said folks were heading over to the Politics section and getting banned just because they didn't realize the mods there were unhappy with the direction the thread was taking. Plus, if you check page 4635, you can see exactly how long people had been aware of the situation.

Most of those "chaos" complaints were coming straight from the tavern, anyway.

People were simply posting about the very subject the thread was created for! They were protesting the fact that folks were being banned for doing exactly that. And if you look closely, it was entirely their own initiative, as

everything would have been fine if two different chats on the Soccer board hadn't been actively encouraging everyone to jump onto a specific thread and cause a ruckus since noon.

steeleagle70 said:Check it out—this is a post from Offside by Jimi Hendrix. It just goes to show that even in that thread, people were getting inappropriate, picking fights with the mods and trashing the topic itself. Even Clinton's crowd was jumping in. If you check page 4635, you can see them debating the whole thing and how the mods are handling stuff over on Politics.

If you head over to page 4635, there's a thread in Politics where you can clearly see people intentionally posting stuff they knew would get them banned. Pretty wild, right?

The whole thing just proves they weren't clueless about what was going down.

Seriously, where exactly are you seeing any trolling or chaos going on here?

steeleagle70 said:Like, 99% of it got wiped, but the mods and admins can see everything. You should probably just hit them up and ask, since I can't grab a link for you right now—believe me, if I could, I would have earlier.

Most of it actually came from the Tavern.

Plus, you'll find plenty of Clinton fans over on Offside, and people were already buzzing about this topic in Politics by around 3 PM. You can totally see it starting from page 4635 and onwards. So, there's no way people didn't know where things were heading. It’s not like they all got banned because they were clueless about the mods cracking down on the thread's direction.

Over on Offside, nothing ever gets deleted.