Posts by Michelle Palmer6

granitefox16 said:And seriously, wasn't the girl way hotter?

I see better looking girls on the streets of Washington, D.C. every three seconds.🙏

Hey, there are plenty of Southern belles up north.☕

Daniel Booth37 said:Exactly! Even though Ali G in Da House was a total flop, that specific character is easily his best work.

I couldn't agree more. It’s honestly such a shame that such a brilliant character got stuck in a mediocre movie. He really needs to bring that persona back—he could pull off something much bigger with him!

What our struggle actually achieved 🙏

🤦

Thomas Foster5 said:You guys clearly don't get how this forum works.
You could sit here posting for a hundred years about this or that—it won't change a thing.
Someone actually needs to send Bellwether a direct message containing a formal request, solid arguments, and proof that there’s actual public demand behind it.

Oh, please! Tell me 🙂 about it.
How else are people who actually care going to organize? Am I supposed to go around passing around a physical petition on street corners?

Taylor Gonzalez79 said:I sent a message over to President Carlos.

Now *that* is how you get things done! 👍

Thomas Foster5 said:http://www.mysmiley.net/free-mad-smileys.php

Anyway, I’d definitely go with this one:

Keep it moving, folks—if you don't have anything productive to contribute to the discussion, just head on out. We're all over here trying to earn the right to a good old-fashioned facepalm, yet some people are just flooding the thread with junk.

Let's try to keep things civil, shall we?

Kyle King4 said:That was the whole point. Is there even one sane thread on this entire site? :😁

edit:

Honestly, that emoji is kind of lame now that I've been staring at it for a while.

Don't overthink it; it tells you everything right away. Just say "bubblegum" twenty times fast Tyler Price and even that word starts sounding stupid, doesn't it? 😬

silentsailor5 said:My friends, this isn't exactly a picture book forum ☕

It's not even being neither a picture book forum either!
☕

(here's one for you 🤦)

Aaron Harris2 said:I find this quite compelling; it delivers such an intense, powerful message!


Let's give them hell, why shouldn't we! 👍

You aren't giving anything to anyone, get outta here! 🤣

And I’m requesting a vote from my esteemed colleagues: please stop spamming this thread with random emojis. This is a serious proposal/request. 🙂

feraltrucker5 said:Just give them 🤦 before everyone over at ESPN gets a massive caffeine overdose from all that intense ☕

Dana Miller2 said:🙄
You're just flirting with trouble at this point.
😁

🙂

Henry Cox78 said:I say we add this smiley to the official list

Requesting a vote

Grunfe, you aren't helping at all

Look how perfect this little icon is—it captures everything in one single image! 🙂

urbanhawk17 said:I’m thinking we should probably add this smiley icon to the forum.
Maybe they'll actually listen to the suggestion.

That was an incredibly well-argued point you made there! 😁

So, here is the deal. Even though the quality of discussions on this forum has been absolutely top-tier lately, we’re seeing all sorts of "trolls" popping up like mushrooms after a rainstorm. For a community of this size, it is honestly unacceptable that we don't have a dedicated facepalm emoji. ()
Just look at the NFL threads—you see more and more IBM fans showing up, and let me tell you, trying to have a rational debate with them is an exercise in futility! I truly believe adding this emoji would actually help reduce insults because it perfectly captures that exact feeling of "are you kidding me?" right when you need it most.

Anyway, fingers crossed that you guys will consider adding the 🤦 facepalm emoji 👋 to our toolkit!

Chloe White5 said:What a joke, honestly. Even worse than those guys in blue...🙄

Personally, I actually think it looks great! It definitely breaks away from the traditional style, but I honestly don't see what people are complaining about.🤷

It seems like nobody besides Real Madrid can pull off a decent jersey.🙄 Oh, and Atletico too, I guess.

Right now, the absolute priority for FC Barcelona should be purging the clowns from the roster and bringing in some actual workhorses. Honestly, though, I have my doubts that the club's board of directors will actually let that happen.

Matthew Anderson4 said:Lyonov away 🤣🤣

Putting Barcin third here too 🙏
http://www.football-shirts.co.uk/fan...3rd-shirt_4005
Check the comments below 🤣

i like it. it’s bee-autiful lol

I think it will look good on Eric Abel-dal and Gerard Bee-qué .. lol

you gotta be kidding me

🤣

Oh, stop playing with me!🤣🤣

Charles

If you don't have the answers in your head, you can always find them in the forum search bar!

crimsondriver54 said:If you had the power to rewrite the rules of soccer, what would you change?

I’ve been indulging in some hypothetical thinking lately, such as
reducing the squads from 11 players down to 10. Excluding goalkeepers, that would mean 18 players on the pitch instead of 20, creating much more room to maneuver—a concept once championed by the legendary Brazilian star Socrates.

Alternatively, rather than relying on a single match delegate, we could implement a three-person review committee. They could analyze disputed plays on monitors and overturn a referee's call if they spotted an error, similar to how tennis works. This would prevent a single bad call from dictating the entire outcome of a game.

We might also consider a rule limiting teams to a maximum of three foreign players. It feels somewhat disheartening when many top clubs across the major leagues have almost no domestic talent left on their rosters.

So far, the only significant changes I've seen are the away goals rule, stoppage time, and the fact that jersey numbers aren't restricted to 1 through 11 anymore.

These are just a few musings of mine, and I am quite curious to hear your thoughts on these or any other ideas you might have.

Is there even any room to breathe on this pitch? This setup is honestly a mess. It feels totally off, especially when you consider that the Socratic argument was that limited space gives physical teams the edge over technical ones. To me, that seems completely backwards—if you have more space, you need more athleticism to cover the ground, which should actually favor the more physical sides.

crimsondriver54 said:If you had the power to rewrite the rules of soccer, what would you change?

I’ve been indulging in some hypothetical thinking lately, such as
reducing the squads from 11 players down to 10. Excluding goalkeepers, that would mean 18 players on the pitch instead of 20, creating much more room to maneuver—a concept once championed by the legendary Brazilian star Socrates.

Alternatively, rather than relying on a single match delegate, we could implement a three-person review committee. They could analyze disputed plays on monitors and overturn a referee's call if they spotted an error, similar to how tennis works. This would prevent a single bad call from dictating the entire outcome of a game.

We might also consider a rule limiting teams to a maximum of three foreign players. It feels somewhat disheartening when many top clubs across the major leagues have almost no domestic talent left on their rosters.

So far, the only significant changes I've seen are the away goals rule, stoppage time, and the fact that jersey numbers aren't restricted to 1 through 11 anymore.

These are just a few musings of mine, and I am quite curious to hear your thoughts on these or any other ideas you might have.

People have been pushing for this for a while now, but if you ask me, it’s going to kill the game's momentum. It feels like we're heading toward a situation where someone is bound to complain that the flow is gone, but honestly, it just reminds me of hockey or those scenarios where everything grinds to a halt because everyone is waiting on a video review. It’s frustrating!
Let’s not forget that there was also a fair amount of disagreement among the commission members regarding how the whole situation unfolded.

crimsondriver54 said:If you had the power to rewrite the rules of soccer, what would you change?

I’ve been indulging in some hypothetical thinking lately, such as
reducing the squads from 11 players down to 10. Excluding goalkeepers, that would mean 18 players on the pitch instead of 20, creating much more room to maneuver—a concept once championed by the legendary Brazilian star Socrates.

Alternatively, rather than relying on a single match delegate, we could implement a three-person review committee. They could analyze disputed plays on monitors and overturn a referee's call if they spotted an error, similar to how tennis works. This would prevent a single bad call from dictating the entire outcome of a game.

We might also consider a rule limiting teams to a maximum of three foreign players. It feels somewhat disheartening when many top clubs across the major leagues have almost no domestic talent left on their rosters.

So far, the only significant changes I've seen are the away goals rule, stoppage time, and the fact that jersey numbers aren't restricted to 1 through 11 anymore.

These are just a few musings of mine, and I am quite curious to hear your thoughts on these or any other ideas you might have.

Impossible Quotes

crimsondriver54 said:If you had the power to rewrite the rules of soccer, what would you change?

I’ve been indulging in some hypothetical thinking lately, such as
reducing the squads from 11 players down to 10. Excluding goalkeepers, that would mean 18 players on the pitch instead of 20, creating much more room to maneuver—a concept once championed by the legendary Brazilian star Socrates.

Alternatively, rather than relying on a single match delegate, we could implement a three-person review committee. They could analyze disputed plays on monitors and overturn a referee's call if they spotted an error, similar to how tennis works. This would prevent a single bad call from dictating the entire outcome of a game.

We might also consider a rule limiting teams to a maximum of three foreign players. It feels somewhat disheartening when many top clubs across the major leagues have almost no domestic talent left on their rosters.

So far, the only significant changes I've seen are the away goals rule, stoppage time, and the fact that jersey numbers aren't restricted to 1 through 11 anymore.

These are just a few musings of mine, and I am quite curious to hear your thoughts on these or any other ideas you might have.

Did I miss anything? 😕

Roger Martinez97 said:That's awesome! 👍

Really 🤣good 🤣stuff 🤣here!

I see you, Raymond Sanchez7, starting up yet another NYC-Miami thread just so you can work through your issues.

Devil in the Snow said:you guys would probably lick the floor if someone told you to

a) Vinko Coce
b) Joseph Katelenic
c) Simona Gotovac
d) Zak Hudek
e) Tariq Filipovic

Coce, give it a rest🙏

btw. Yawn 🙂

Can I pay by credit card? 🍿

Should I leave my number here, or should I just fax it over to Avalon? 🤷