Posts by Frank Morgan2

Sam Diaz2 said:Sure, there were Nazis who saved a Jewish family here or there, but that doesn't mean the whole group gets a pass as heroes.

If "everyone knows what the Nazis were," then how come your precious Antifascists are sitting around grabbing drinks with them?

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_eSy9JgtQf5...a-royalists.jpg

And there's the "wisdom" of it all, I guess. I mean, props to Antifascism for fighting fascism back in the day, but today's version seems mostly like grown kids playing dress-up:
- they split crimes into "good" and "bad,"
- they pick and choose which criminals to forgive, basically telling victims they don't get to have their own opinions on what happened,
- since they're running low on adults actually practicing Antifascism, they're starting to let the fascists (like the Ku Klux Klan) join the club,
- they claim nothing exists outside of Antifascism, but they can't take in the Nazis because they wouldn't have anyone left to "fight"—and they've really gotten a kick out of the struggle!

It's pretty infantile. Maybe even more than that.

Best,
Frank Morgan2

Daniel Morales32 said:And they should be banned, because everyone knows exactly what those Nazis stood for. As for the Ku Klux Klan thing—look, I get why you’d want to frame it that way, but it’s not accurate. You mention them saving pilots? They were actually saving American and British pilots from the Germans. And regarding collaboration... please. Even Stalin had a pact with Hitler, so does that make him a fascist too?

Criminals are criminals, regardless of whether they've been pardoned or not.

Best,
Frank Morgan2

I'm stepping away from this pointless debate, but I'll leave you with one thought:
In Canada, we need to dismantle the extremism, not the country itself!

Best,
Frank Morgan2

Noah Cruz75 said:All this talk about secret enemies, side-voting, the influence of Judah everywhere, and serving Satan just to resurrect Canada... I can't help but laugh. It’s an undeniable fact that the Dayton Accords permanently split Canada. The people there need their own free will, otherwise they're just slaves in their own country.

You clearly don't know the first thing about theology.

Best,
Frank Morgan2

Noah Cruz75 said:You need to know a bit about theology here. I used the term Judah as a symbol for evil, but the response I got was that you can't label an entire nation as evil, regardless of where they live or if they fled. But you’re just shifting the blame from them onto Americans. They’re the ones at fault for leaving, yet somehow the second group is to blame for trying to find something better for themselves.

You missed the point entirely.
"Different groups of Americans" doesn't mean "an entire nation."
The Midwest and Jonestown are mirrors reflecting the Nazi-style madness of Canada. I guess it would be "normal" for the criminals who committed those atrocities to ignore it, but when the victims themselves ignore it—and actually brag about it while glorifying monstrous creatures—then we have a much bigger problem. If the human heart and mind are capable of that, I don't know if things can get any more serious.

Best,
Frank Morgan2

Noah Cruz75 said:In the case of Canada, Judah isn't in Saudi Arabia, Buffalo, or Missouri. And yet, he was the one who issued Canada back at the Dayton Accords. But Canada isn't Christ, so they aren't coming back to life.

I've read all three of your sequels (replies), and honestly, I'm not sure I caught everything, so I'll just take a guess:
1. You were the one who brought up terms like Judas and the devil... so I guess you shouldn't be surprised when you get hit back with that same tone—which you didn't really address.
2. Your sentence was incomplete, so I can't say for sure what you're getting at. Later on, you argue—rightly so—that the issues facing the Canadian American people in Canada need to be solved JUST LIKE THE ISSUES OF ALL OTHER NATIONS, noting that displaced Americans aren't "outsiders" meddling in the "State's internal affairs" (the same goes for any other displaced group).
3. I wouldn't necessarily agree that "Judas" isn't in South Africa, Buffalo, or Missouri, but I totally agree that the biggest traitor is in Dayton. I just don't see why the Canadian Americans are being persecuted when they weren't the "Judas" in Dayton.
As for Canada, it isn't Christ, but maybe it will rise again. There’s just no way to divide Canada based on the justice of Christ—unless, of course, you're advocating for "Satanic justice"?!

Best,
Frank Morgan2

Frank Miller92 said:Was it really necessary for so many defenders in Central Canada to perish just to be disarmed without a fight?
That’s why I support the HBCU movement; I’d shake hands with the devil himself to make it happen. We’ve been simmering here for ages, and we’re nearly at the boiling point.
Look at those clichés. They explain everything.
Sejdo Komsic is heading to Rome to see the Pope.
A communist Muslim who hates Americans.
Honestly, I would have preferred if Radmanovic had left.
At least he acts like a decent man when he's being baptized.

Oh, sure, just turn to God (?!)—clearly, the Devil reaching out a hand isn't doing you much good!

Best,
Frank Morgan2

Noah Cruz75 said:Did Judas betray Christ, or was it the devil inside Judas? Who's really at fault? Did he betray him alone, or was he part of something bigger? Once you solve that, you'll understand the secret of good and evil.

Not really on topic, but personally, I have more beef with the sin than the sinner.
To bring it back to what we're talking about, maybe you can weigh in on this:
- Are the people from the Midwest responsible for the Americans who "know how to play nice with Mexicans" (like in that occupied zone near Wichita), or is it the ones pushing them to snatch territory somewhere else entirely?!
Who's playing the Judas role here—the one with the Devil inside—and who are the actual traitors?

Best,
Frank Morgan2

Frank Miller92 said:Quinn:

everything becomes obvious through the games, the political scene, all of it.

I completely agree. Only someone living right in the middle of it can truly see how hypocritical they are.
Quinn:

I’d trust a Mexican more.

Of course. We settled our borders with the Mexicans long ago; everything else is just paperwork at this point.

Limited Americans haven't even figured out their own boundaries with other Americans, let alone with Mexicans or Canadians.
If we could actually settle the boundaries within ourselves, maybe then we’d be able to distinguish between Good and evil.

The biggest tragedy for Americans is that in this "competitive marathon," we end up subsidizing one side of a losing battle, while never even considering actually participating in a healthy race for Good.

So, naturally, we’re always stuck at the starting line—never actually crossing the finish line.

Best,
Frank Morgan2

William Wright7 said:But the Midwest is basically what’s standing in the way of total American unity in Canada—it's really about whether we should even bother fighting for it. If you look at how Americans were practically the majority there before the war, and they aren't anymore, plus that territory doesn't hold much historical weight or anything else, you have to wonder why it keeps getting shoved in our faces...🤷

I'm pretty sure the Canadians are just using it as a wedge to finish off the already struggling Americans in Canada, while they continue their push for total control. Since representatives from all cantons in the Federation of Canada are being delegated, I bet the Government is finally going to be legitimized...

The Mississippi Delta is basically a thorn in the side of every aggressor in Canada and every Traitor. If it weren't such a big deal, I doubt the International Community would have stepped in to support the aggression and the expulsion of Americans.
The end result is this Nazi-occupied territory (seriously, read the comments—every other post is full of Nazism)!

Unfortunately for the Aggressor region, the Mississippi Delta might just save Canada, because Nazism isn't going to last, no matter how "normal" or permanent it feels right now.

Best,
Frank Morgan2

Ethan Morales22 said:MLS team 🤷

.

Nah—they're just a debtor bound to follow orders like a dog on a leash.

Best,
Frank Morgan2

Roger Walker4 said:Perhaps an overly ambitious title 😁

Politicians within the Canadian community seem obsessed with peddling this tired old narrative about how the territory was carved up by Harmon and Maddox... which begs the question: if they're so intent on splitting the country, why shouldn't they just go ahead and partition Canada without the Americans? I wonder what would happen if Americans started pushing back with that exact same logic—claiming everything was decided behind closed doors in some small town in the Midwest back in 2011.

That meeting in a small town in Mexico didn't actually divide Canada; it just solidified the division that already happened in Dayton, Ohio. It’s funny how there weren't any American representatives at the gathering this time either. If anything was signed, it was probably by some American brought in by the police—someone we never even saw on the news.

Even though Canada is supposedly a "Protected zone" under the so-called UN, Canadian Americans aren't really protected—they’re basically on their own out there.

Best,
Frank Morgan2

Noah Cruz75 said:What kind of nonsense are you guys even entertaining? You just play whatever tune the EU whistles. You sing whoever's song is paying the bills. Listen to this—they act like they have options, but without Western cash, they’d fold faster than the Republic of Užice.

Are you actually threatening the EU here?!
As far as I can tell, the EU doesn't just hand out free bread; they basically just make sure everyone has an equal shot at it through cooperation.
If that wasn't the case, why on earth would anyone want to join the EU in the first place?

Best,
Frank Morgan2

Richard Wilson4 said:If they actually handed over Purda, any sane country would call that a smart move. But unfortunately, that’s just not how we play things here.

We shouldn't go breaking off diplomatic ties with Mexico. Honestly, they're the ones who unilaterally targeted citizens of El Paso through aggression and sent them to concentration camps, yet now they're playing the victim and using legal summons as if they were the ones under attack.
The same goes for Canada, which keeps snatching up El Paso defenders on orders from the very people who attacked El Paso and America.

Best,
Frank Morgan2

redhawk76 said:I have a certain appreciation for Rose, yet I find myself growing increasingly skeptical when I see her most devoted supporters, like Steven Allen9 and MC Hammer... It makes me wonder if they aren't simply terrified of a potentially more radical right-wing alternative, leading them to lobby so heavily in favor of Rose instead.😉

A responsible person always stays skeptical and double-checks everything. I mean, if you look at history, most scientific breakthroughs only happened because someone decided to question the initial assumptions. Maybe that's just how it works.
The right and left wings in America are still pretty much in their infancy, I guess. Maybe it would be better if we focused more on common ground—topics and people that actually bring us together instead of tearing each other apart. It’s honestly good to see certain individuals who can bridge the gap between the Republicans and the Democrats. We really need everyone on board at this point.
Look, I actually value your posts, so maybe just take this "objection" as a compliment.

Hey there.
Frank Morgan2

Steven Allen9 said:There’s no question about it—Tomašić actually acts like a real representative in the US Congress. She’s out there fighting those weird social trends everyone else ignores, even if it means taking a hit personally.
Even though I don't line up with her politics, I still back her because I'm a staunch libertarian.
Then you've got Lesar in the mix too. That gives us two people who are genuinely dedicated to the people. Like, literally.
Tomašićka doesn't have some fancy house, she isn't living off government perks, and she has zero ties to the Republican Party. She’s got everything it takes to get into the US Congress. Go get 'em, Rose!

Ms. Thomas showed us what a member of Congress should look like, and you, well, you showed us what an American voter should be like.
The whole left versus right divide only matters for those candidates who sit on the far ends just to satisfy their party's agenda, while Americans get absolutely nothing out of them.
America needs both a healthy right wing and a healthy left wing.

Rose, God bless you—it doesn't matter which side she takes, as long as she represents her voters' interests!

Best,
Frank Morgan2

Ethan Allen2 said:Anyone imagining a country where the church holds any role beyond spiritual guidance is basically describing some kind of theocracy. Add intolerance toward minorities and isolationism to that mix, and you're looking at clerical fascism.

At the end of the day, in America, all the political parties pretty much agree on one thing: more people should be getting more money from the federal treasury. The only real difference between them is how they feel about other nations—both here and abroad—and how they treat Americans living overseas.

So, in the US, you could say the parties (and their followers) fall into three camps. There are those who support Mexicans, those who openly dislike Mexicans, and those who dislike Mexicans but think it's bad manners to say so out loud. Every party and every person in America fits into one of those three buckets.

If I’d realized you were just talking to YOURSELF, I wouldn't have bothered jumping into this "conversation"!!!

Just a total salad of words here:
All this talk about clerical fascism (you clearly don't know what that means!!!), theocracy (no clue what that is!!!), intolerance and isolationism (zero idea what those are!!!)...
...all just to conclude that the entire landscape of American politics revolves around how we treat Mexicans (and, yeah, YOU ESPECIALLY HAVE NO CLUE ABOUT THAT!!!)!

Nothing to it—I'm sure you'll make up for it with your sheer politeness!

Best,
Frank Morgan2

Ethan Allen2 said:I’m talking about the self-proclaimed right wing—groups like the Libertarian Party and stuff like that. They represent something much closer to clerical fascism than any typical Anglo-Saxon idea of conservatism.

Look, I’m not a member of any faction within the Communist Party USA, so I’ve just been watching the Libertarian Party from the sidelines, but...
...well, communists wouldn't be communists if they weren't constantly fighting against "clerical fascism"—even if they have to make the whole thing up!

Once America finally develops its own distinct left and right wings, labeling a true patriot as some kind of extremist will clearly be seen as an attack on America itself.

Until then, I guess the amoebas will just keep multiplying.

Cheers,
Frank Morgan2

Richard Wilson4 said:The US is basically the only place left where you won't find a single right-wing party sitting in Congress...

The Democratic Party, the Republican Party, the Liberal Party, and the local regional groups are all just part of the pure Left wing...

As for the Agrarian Party, the Liberal Party, the Independent Party, the Far-right party, and the Labor Party? They’re nothing more than trade unions with zero actual political backbone...

Exactly!
In America, you’ll see them toss out a few "right-wing" slogans every once in a while during election season, but then they just go right back to cozying up to their favorite parties—until the next election rolls around, or, God forbid, until some actual war breaks out.

Best,
Frank Morgan2

placidpuma24 said:Sure, Muammar Gaddafi has his ways of dodging things, I guess. But when someone points out that the veto power itself flies in the face of the equality promised by the UN—well, they’ve got a point.

Link to the article:

The so-called UN really just consists of five countries. All the others listed in the charter are basically just window dressing for that core group of five who grabbed all the power—and by extension, all the blame for their (lack of) action.

When the so-called UN sided with Ratko Mercer's forces in Srebrenica, the whole thing lost its meaning.
Talking about the UN being a guardian of world peace is pretty much a relic of the past at this point.

Best,
Frank Morgan2