Posts by driftingfalcon3

Quote: Quote: Basta said:Check out this post
that viewpoint is totally biased and loaded with ideology...
As if!

Jerry Myers19 said:I’m seeing the exact same thing here. This totally random, malicious post just gets left standing:

KarayaOne said:Check out this post
It's not even about the Church caring about actual problems or dangers facing kids; it's all about clinging to medieval dogmas. They act like the world is flat, the sun orbits the Earth, being blinded by ego is fine, and they want to burn anyone who doesn't fit their mold... some dogmas have already fallen (after they finished burning heretics), but they’re still fighting tooth and nail against others.

while my post—where I'm literally just asking the author, "does that church really enter"—gets nuked.

@ Basta, eugenics is definitely lurking in the background, because if Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, and so many others say Otvoreno
that the global population is unsustainable and needs to be slashed by at least 2 billion, and according to
Rosetta Stone the ideal total world population should be under 1 billion, then
it shouldn't surprise anyone that this isn't some conspiracy theory, but rather the open proclamations of
Bilderberg spokespeople.
And once these agendas hit our schools, when the truth behind the swine flu vaccines comes out,
when chemtrails are demystified, when we see the real point behind GMO food politics, the distribution of harmful
(and unnecessary) drugs, and the bans on growing your own food, things will become clear even
to the average person...
But can any of you "truth-seeker" types following Johnson tell me this:
Quote:

Quote: According to the Secretary, teachers should prepare for class this way, and then during the lesson they should talk about the harms of pornography—basically the complete opposite. It's totally nonsensical, they claim. Now that a huge number of parents have revolted against this, the Secretary is trying to convince us that the curriculum will implement something completely contrary to what's in the textbooks, which is absurd, concludes Ilcic. Who is messing with whose head? Is it us Johnson followers, or is it you Johnsonites messing with us out of pure (eugenic) peace? If you can see from an airplane who is messing with whose head, how do you Johnsonites have the audacity to call white black and black white? Where do you get the moral strength to lie to yourselves and the rest of the world like this? Do you people even think with your own brains, or do you just listen to whatever Johnson says and then play it back like a broken record? Stop, think, and look yourselves in the mirror.

And now I'm getting this ban from Edge:

You’ve been flagged for an infraction on Reddit.

Reason: Offtopic/spam
-------

-------

This infraction carries a 10-point penalty and could lead to temporary account restrictions. Major violations stay on your record permanently.

I am seriously insisting—for the millionth time now, I don't even know how many times I've said this—that an admin actually needs to step up and respond to me!!!

Check out this quote I found on Wikipedia about Pope John Paul II:
He was actually the first Pope to ever send an email! It was this message sent to the Church in Oceania back on November 22, 2001. I saw it.
Is the internet actually a tool for evangelization? Some liberal theologians still insist on treating it like some kind of anti-modernist threat, though I don't see it that way at all. Some of them...
And there’s also the fact that... Some people actually had the nerve to claim back then that abortion was on the same level as the Holocaust., a When you look at what counts as one of the heavy sins...
He went ahead and lumped premarital sex, masturbation, and getting wasted all into the same category..
He was asking for forgiveness for the horrors committed in the name of the Catholic Church, seeking pardon for how the Church treated...
Look, we need to talk about how women have been treated throughout history—everything from those insane witch hunts to the way they’ve been forced into submission. It’s wild. And now, he’s gone and officially rehabilitated Galileo Galilei, who...
So, yeah, the Church actually condemned him back in the day just because of heliocentric theory. And then he went on to speak out against those horrific crimes committed against Native Americans, too.
To the Jews. He bowed his head in their memory at Auschwitz. He fought tirelessly against antisemitism. He was the first Pope who...
I visited a synagogue back in '86 while I was out in Rome.
He actually went and coined the whole concept of "theology of the body." Breaking it all down—and I’m talking about going totally against that old-school way of looking at things where...
Is the body—as opposed to the spirit—basically condemned to be nothing but a constant source of sin? I see the whole picture of what a human being actually is as...
It’s all about being whole—hitting those physical, mental, and spiritual goals all at once.He basically perfected that whole approach back when he was just around 129—it's like how John Paul II developed his way of doing things.
Back when he was giving those Wednesday talks between 1979 and 1984—the same Pope who authored the current Catechism of the Catholic Church—he was laying it all out there.
It was declared back in '92, and if you look at articles 2289 through 2298, it goes deep into the whole concept of the body and physicality... About business. In sections 2331 through 2386...So, let me break down what we're actually talking about when we dive into the Sixth Commandment—"You shall not commit adultery." It sounds straightforward on paper, right? Like a simple "don't cheat" rule, but if you really sit down and look at it through the lens of the Catechism of the Catholic Church, there is so much more depth to it than just physical infidelity. It’s about respect, dignity, and the sanctity of those deep, committed bonds we form. We aren't just talking about a single act here; we're talking about the whole spectrum of how we treat ourselves and our partners. It covers everything from lustful thoughts that treat people like objects to any kind of behavior that devalues the sacredness of marriage and intimacy. Honestly, it’s about protecting the integrity of love itself. It's an invitation to live with purity of heart and to honor the commitments we make, ensuring that our actions actually align with the respect we claim to have for others. It's bigger than just a list of "don'ts"—it's about building a life rooted in genuine, selfless affection.Physical health is truly "God's gift."
"God's gift" (2288), but... Christian irony is basically pushing back against this whole neo-pagan vibe that’s taking over, which...
It’s basically pushing this whole cult of the body where everyone’s expected to sacrifice everything just to worship physical perfection and athletic prowess.
Success is treated like some kind of god. (article 2289)
__________________

Quote: mestar said:It's clearly visible in all the recommended reading!

Ryan Vaughn7 said:Who?

crimsonjackal63 said:Look, just for the sake of basic decency, go skim through the first few pages of the thread about
Ms. Petir.

If you find absolutely zero insults in there, then I’ll take the hit.
But if you see even one bit of harassment, then Morgan Rodriguez57 needs to be banned.
Isn't that just common sense? Isn't that how civilized people act?
Thanks.

Regarding Francesca’s response to this: "I don't see any problem with it!" What exactly is the issue here, rushing
toward the altar? Personally, I think she fails to see the massive problem with arbitrarily picking and choosing the criteria
used to define good versus evil.
That is the fatal liberal legacy right there. It's that Dostoevsky idea: "If God does not exist, everything is permitted!"
That is the whole story—that is the absolute heart and root of the entire issue!
Someone actually tried to reply to a part of my deleted post by trying to relativize the concept of nakedness
by pointing out that there are tribes who walk around naked, yet they don't use their nudity
as an excuse for everyone to engage in nonstop group sex whenever the opportunity arises.
That's a fascinating topic to dive into, along with cannibalism and stuff like that, and even though I haven't studied those specifics
deeply, just looking at it "from a distance," I can tell you it's hard to find a single tribe where genitals aren't covered up one way or another.
In every tribe across the globe, no matter how primitive, there is a clearly noticeable
uniquely human sense of shame and modesty that places an individual's sexuality squarely
within the realm of the intimate and the private, making the distinction incredibly transparent
between being a human being (created in God's image) and animals, which is exactly what those neo-Darwinists still try
so aggressively to equate humans and humanity with.
@ Basta, that section regarding the inherent link between pedophilia and homosexuality is incredibly telling and
of immense importance for exposing the true nature and motives of those who tear down people and
destroy society in America, and not just in America.
You gave a great answer to the guy who doesn't seem to realize that the attacks on priests come from the exact same kitchen, and it was established long ago that the main goal of Satanic Freemasonry is to destroy the Catholic Church!
Why is that their primary objective?
Well, you should ask their master, whom Jesus called the father of lies and a murderer from the beginning! You can't
really explain anything without looking at things from the other side. That's why atheism makes for a fun little psychological game
while we're just bickering on a forum, but once we start using atheism to drive decisions
that dictate behavior and establish the values of a social community, then we see exactly
where that leads.
__________________

Ryan Vaughn7 said:And honestly, someone else is probably gonna jump in and sign off on that too.

Morgan Rodriguez57 said:I'm hunting through the "sex ed" threads over on Politics right now.

I honestly don't get how people can still defend this stuff, like, seriously. You look at the way modern science just keeps debunking these ancient myths and yet there's still this massive pushback from religious institutions trying to control what we learn in schools. It’s wild. Even when you have the Department of Education dealing with all these curriculum debates, you see those old-school arguments being dragged back into the light. And let me tell you, the way some people try to bridge the gap between faith and biology is just... ugh. They start talking about an "intelligent designer" as if that actually makes sense in a world where we have DNA sequencing and evolutionary theory right in front of our eyes. It feels like they're just grasping at straws to keep the old ways alive. driftingfalcon3 is totally hitting the nail on the head here too—it’s basically a battle of ideologies. You've got these groups trying to push their specific worldview, and against The mighty pull of institutional Religion One must set The mightier draw of science and Public opinion just to keep things grounded in reality. It shouldn't be this hard to prioritize facts over dogma! It's like watching a slow-motion train wreck where people refuse to look out the window even though the tracks are clearly gone.

Can someone please bring back that post one of the mods nuked?

Why the hell did they scrub this post from the politics board???
Short and sweet: who exactly deleted my post on politics and WHY?
I caught the live presentation from the Grape reps yesterday, and man, I’ve gotta say, it was seriously unsettling to watch. It’s genuinely worrying to see where things are headed.
I heard it all, saw it all, and honestly? It really just boils down to this:
So, the Department of Education actually went ahead and rolled out health education in schools right at the start of the school year:
They just totally botched the whole thing, making it look amateurish and leaving absolutely zero transparency in the process.
In that section where they talk about sexuality, they basically found a way to sneak it all in under the guise of "looking out for kids' health" in our schools.
The sheer amount of homosexual propaganda being shoved down our throats lately is just getting ridiculous.
It basically forced this whole ideology down everyone's throats—a complete worldview that just flat-out denies and ignores every single universal value we hold dear.
Sexuality, and how that clashes with the value system most parents actually hold—it’s a massive tension point right now.
It basically stripped parents right back, taking away their constitutional right to make their own calls when it comes to raising their kids.
When you look at that first point, I really think the most critical thing to wrap our heads around is how and why we’re actually pushing to bring health education into the school system in the first place.
Did they seriously just pull that move behind closed doors without any transparency?
Crimes usually just boil down to what's happening behind closed doors in those shady, non-transparent power plays.
Man, what I saw and heard at that presentation yesterday... honestly, it left me with this gut feeling that there’s some serious criminal activity going on behind the scenes.
And honestly, those criminals pulling this off are using the exact same terrorist-fascist tactics we see from the bad actors over in the States.
I mean, look at Kinsey—the guy was actually working alongside Nazis, running those absolutely sickening Mengele-style experiments on kids... it’s just beyond messed up.
So, get this—some guy was supposedly using a literal ruler to measure how long it takes for a kid at a certain age to reach orgasm while masturbating, and I... I can't even. Like, seriously? Just absolutely wild behavior.
Same exact garbage.
This whole thread is just such a glaringly obvious look at the real-world fallout that happens when you have these massive, fundamental divides between atheistic and religious worldviews.
It’s honestly just evolutionary terrorism at this point—this violent, aggressive push to force everyone to swallow scientifically proven lies as if they were gospel.
So, we’re really looking at the theory of evolution and that whole abiogenetic take on how life actually kicked off, right? It’s basically going head-to-head against everything people claim is just some undeniable scientific fact.
Look, there's just no getting around it—there are facts pointing straight toward the only possible reality when you look at how life and the entire universe were actually put together.
An intelligent designer, or rather, God.
It’s that classic line from Dostoevsky: If God doesn't exist, everything is permitted!
If we really believe humans just evolved from monkeys, then honestly, why can't everything just be relative? I mean, I don't see any actual barrier stopping us from looking at things that way.
Is everything just relative if we’re all basically just slightly more evolved monkeys?
So now they’re claiming people feel ashamed because we’re forcing these artificial norms down their throats, but honestly? A monkey doesn't feel shame, so why should we care what they say?
(their nakedness) because there’s obviously no code of shame established by the Monkey Council regarding monkey nudity, but seriously, is there?
Is that really how it goes?
So, get this—now they’re actually going to start teaching our kids in school that there’s absolutely nothing controversial about studying nudity.
So, we're talking about masturbation techniques, like how to practice putting a condom on a cucumber just to get used to the whole thing, basically getting acquainted with what you actually need before things get real.
Look, we seriously need to talk about protection against STIs and why there’s this desperate, urgent need for public disclosure when someone gets infected—like, everyone needs to know. It's just common sense at this point.
If we happen to suspect anything with the partners we've been hanging out with lately
or if a doctor actually confirms we've picked up an STI during a checkup, are we seriously going to
start teaching all that stuff to kids back in elementary school???
The reading material they're pushing was put together by this group called Queer!
And this literature basically promotes a worldview that questions the whole concept of male and
female distinctions, essentially advertising homosexuality as being just as valid as heterosexuality
as a lifestyle choice, plus they're teaching pornography as a psychological and
sociological phenomenon in early high school—it’s like these teenagers are supposed to be med students
specializing in some niche field of psychiatry or something.
It’s a disgusting, Masonic-liberal conspiracy targeting the core moral values of a healthy society, which
can only—even from a purely scientific and common-sense perspective—be built upon a family where
the backbone is a FATHER and a MOTHER! Look, if two dads or two moms can conceive a child naturally, fine,
let them have them and raise them, but clearly God
didn't create men and women so that one group (like guys) lives in the Western Hemisphere while the other (women)
lives in the Eastern Hemisphere, leaving everyone in the West as happy gays and everyone in
the East as happy lesbians.
God created the family as a union of man and woman so that children in both hemispheres grow up happy within
the warmth of a mother's love and a father's care. This fascist rape of our society's youngest members
by violently forcing through unnatural, psycho-destructive, atheist-monkey
values under the guise of "health education" is something every sane
person needs to speak out against, no matter what it takes.
NO TO THE FASCIST DICTATORSHIP OF LIBERAL DESTRUCTION OF THE CHILD PSYCHE!
__________________

Nicole James said:Hold on, I actually have to sit here and explain to you why you got flagged for a post where you were just commenting on the IQ levels of everyone who doesn't share your worldview? Seriously?!

You're totally right that I should've just sat tight and waited, but honestly, I've learned my lesson the hard way—if you look back at post #370 in this thread, you'll see I already filed a formal complaint about cosmictinker21's constant trolling. Since nothing actually got done when I spoke up last time, I figured history was just going to repeat itself, so I didn't waste any more time and went straight to the PDF for Messages, Complaints, and Comments.

Thanks for the red card for cosmictinker21, but honestly, the job isn't finished yet. I actually need that penalty lifted because I haven't insulted anyone here. Telling cosmictinker21 that she’s acting like a perfect entity by participating in something she OPENLY admits to supporting—specifically her stance on the official theory regarding the collapse of the World Trade Center—CANNOT BE CONSIDERED AN INSULT. How I choose to label the SYSTEMATIC LIES told by people who kill 3,000 innocent Americans and then try to pin it on some made-up group of Arabs is entirely up to me, and calling that despicable crime what I did is actually the mildest way I could have put it.

Look, at the end of the day, this isn't even about insulting cosmictinker21, because that just didn't happen. Taking a side in what I consider to be the GREATEST INSOLENCE imaginable is perfectly legitimate—just like it’s totally fair for someone bragging about being involved in it to claim they are the Perfect Entity for participating in such a thing. Honestly, anyone who is that hardcore a supporter of anything, even this Great Insolence (which is honestly the most polite way I can put it, given how much of a crime it actually is), is nothing more than the Perfect Entity for being part of it.

That isn't an insult by any damn standard! Are you seriously going to strip that red card from me, or am I gonna have to copy-paste this entire mess over to Messages, Complaints, and Comments again?

Thanks, and my bad for rushing through those messages, complaints, and comments earlier.
I said I was going to see this through to the end, and damn right I am, because I’m in the right here—I'm just a victim of that legendary, nonstop terror from ego.
__________________

Quote:

How much IQ do you actually need to not see that the link is pointing directly to the fact that those who brought that building down left an UNMISTAKABLE SIGNATURE behind? ego rustydrifter10 says: Nah, you didn't offend anyone. ☕

So, if you really ask me... Seriously though, what kind of IQ do you actually need to have to pull this off? What kind of connection is that even supposed to be?! Like, seriously, what does this have to do with insulting ANYONE? Honestly, it’s just straight-up terrifying how much you let yourself get away with. Giving me a red card over a question that was completely harmless is just insane. If people were getting banned for stuff like this, Reddit would probably shut down within twenty-four hours. 🙂

I’m asking for an URGENT reversal on this ABSOLUTELY UNJUST red card I just got!
Yo, you seriously need to go look at what the administrator and Kevin sent over—check out that whole mess regarding the religion complaint and the back-and-forth in the code of conduct and the book of religious complaints... 🤦 Seriously though, that's just mind-blowing.