Posts by Jeremy Brooks6

Robin Myers91 said:Has anyone here tried that new schizophrenia med that hit the US market about two months ago?
I finally managed to get my psychiatrist to prescribe it—had to fight tooth and nail because Zyprexa, Everbio, Risperdal, and Seroquel made me pack on over 90 pounds.
So far, I haven't noticed any side effects other than some mild drowsiness (which I don't even really feel), though apparently, people with heart conditions should stay away from it.
It doesn't cause weight gain at all; in fact, it actually kills my appetite so much that I’ve already dropped 11 pounds in just seven days. I'm still taking Zeldox 120 mg on the side.

Look, I’m not against medication, especially when it provides that strong, measurable impact needed for immediate results.
But generally speaking, I think we should try to avoid them whenever possible.
The reason is kind of simple—we live in such a fast-paced, high-energy world that demands you stay physically alert, which basically means being fully "present" in the moment.
Psychotropic drugs tend to dull that edge.
There are certain situations you just can't dodge—whether because of where you are or what's happening around you—but in every other scenario, I feel like you should try to be gentle and unobtrusive toward the world around you.
Take something that happened today—I was talking to someone dear to me, and we were actually sharing a good laugh, when suddenly this wave of aggression hits—and they start yelling at me to get out of the way.
In that split second, I was completely physically calm and alert—so I moved, watched the person (who was incredibly furious, honestly, I thought they might actually swing at me), as they stormed past me, probably not even hearing the quick apology I tossed their way.
It’s weird why they chose to pass right through that specific spot given how much open space there was, but that's beside the point.
Also, when you find yourself facing an dangerous person who is pushing things to the limit—using verbal or physical aggression against you (and often getting the crowd to back them up, since people usually side with the aggressor)—and you can't avoid the confrontation, it isn't really your physical strength that matters most (though that counts, of course). It's your mental fortitude—the ability to mentally crush an opponent so thoroughly that they won't even dream of trying that again with someone else.
I used real-life examples there just to make the point hit harder.
The same logic applies to life's general struggles and non-human problems that land in our laps.
Almost any psychiatric med, especially over the long haul, tends to blunt your reaction to the relationship between yourself and your environment.
I think it's healthy to feel the full spectrum—bravery and fear, victory and defeat, and yeah, even neurosis. You shouldn't run away from those mental and emotional states; you should experience them individually... without causing harm to the people around you.
😉

swiftsurfer27 said:Perhaps they are simply so ubiquitous today—occurring all around us constantly—that we have grown blind to them, treating what was once extraordinary as mere everyday routine. 😁

👍

Nicholas Walker88 said:I'm not entirely sure where this belongs—maybe under Law? If not, I'll let an admin move it somewhere more appropriate if they see it.

So, while messing around on Google Maps, I stumbled upon this island—it looks like a legitimate island, but according to everything else, it shouldn't actually exist. It’s not massive, though.
Width: 1.7 miles
Length: 2.1 miles
(I used the measurement tool in Google Maps)
I’ve been digging around online, and there's basically zero mention of this place existing at all.


If this really is some undiscovered patch of land, can I claim it?
Could I name it after myself?

Well, you could try to claim it. Whether we're talking about territorial waters or extra-territorial zones—regardless of whether it has an official name or not—you can technically lay claim to settle it and give it your own name, provided it's uninhabited. Even if people live there, if their presence hasn't been officially recognized or politically declared, you've got a shot.
Then again, when you finally make your way out there 😁 — just be prepared for whatever greets you. Ideally—and let's be honest, this is the dream scenario—you'd be met by a solitary woman, someone quite easy on the eyes, and definitely unarmed... maybe looking for a kind word, a warm hug, or just some creative companionship to deepen things. But, if she's been isolated for a long time, her survival instincts might kick in before the romance does; her body might decide whether to kill you or just take what it needs first. 😛
Even if the island is totally ignored by everyone for reasons known or unknown, Australia could always decide—if it feels like it—that you have no business meddling in its military affairs. If you happen to be faster than their patrol boats out in that emptiness, you might find yourself facing US fighter jets, or perhaps a US Navy submarine that was just passing through. Maybe the commander has been inactive for a while and decides this is the most interesting thing he's seen in decades—a chance to prove himself one last time before retirement...
And they won't stop to ask if you're Julian Assange: they'll just act, you can count on that...
😂

Jacob Sanchez7 said:Walking consciously toward death... only to realize it was just another transformation all along.

Offer death to every habit, every fear, every doubt, and every ounce of pain... grant them peace... grant them transformation...
They vanish into the flame. And we are reborn. Both figuratively and literally.
Become aware of every tiny death and every subsequent rebirth.
Realize this is happening every single moment... much like when a film strip slows down, shattering the illusion of continuity.

Sweet dreams.

Looking at your signature regarding the protests against Walmart: are you actually the founder of that Facebook group that pops up every few months—sort of like a Phoenix rising from the ashes—but somehow never manages to grow past 200 members?
I personally don't think real change is ever that loud; it usually happens spontaneously when enough individuals quietly cross things off their lists.
Anyway, I wish you luck with your boycott: I’d love to be proven wrong and see you hit 200,000 members.
All the best until next time.
👋

briskdrifter3 said:Go ahead—give me one example of a nation where every single strategic industry is handed over to foreign capital without the whole thing turning into a complete circus.
Granting foreign interests a monopoly over oil, water, electricity, and transportation is essentially national suicide. We’ve already sold off our banks, and now we’re dealing with the fallout—sky-high interest rates and a White House that's effectively toothless in that sector. We handed our oil interests over to the Canadians, and once they achieve total control, we'll see the fallout there too, via crippling raw material costs—something we're already witnessing with General Mills and Dow Chemical. If we sell off the power grid, the highways, and the water supply... well, at that point, we barely have a sovereign nation left.

👍
I wouldn't say the global system is collapsing every other week.
If you look at world history—from simple barter systems to modern trade—you'll see massive stretches of prosperity interrupted by much smaller periods of total collapse or decline.
The 20th and 21st centuries are defined by globalization, digitalization, and this intense drive to bring the entire system under centralized control.
Back in the mid-1900s, people were already talking about a United States of Europe, and just a week ago, Soros used that exact same statesmanlike phrase—not by accident, I'm sure.
My take? The state pulls in massive revenue by fueling energy needs everywhere from Solovetsky to the Soča river; the average person probably doesn't see any of that profit, but the government certainly isn't losing out. If Turkey runs into a wall
with the USA regarding gas rights in Cyprus, the first player to jump in and meddle will be Putin—and it won't be because he's checking up on Mesnevija before bed, but because of the deep economic ties between Turkey and Russia over the last decade.
Taxing banks at 20% or whatever else—it's all minor details when you hit even the slightest bit of global economic turbulence.
No amount of creativity or "out of the box" thinking helps there. During the first wave of the 2008 recession, it was the most slaughtered small and medium-sized businesses—the ones that were actually innovative and had potential. Those in that bracket who managed to survive? They became the giants.
And what does the middle class even look like in these smaller American-style developing states? It's mostly folks who suspiciously scraped together their first million, a large chunk of the privatized sector tied heavily to political influence, and various business types or talented intellectuals sitting on government payrolls.
How does this story end?
Either through a popular uprising, or—at least in the case of America (which will be part of the reformed
EU story in 2013, and we'll see how they navigate that)—through even heavier state centralization. Starting in 2012, the EU is going to push hard for digital centralization, making it so that whether you're in the Eurozone or not barely matters for most transactions. They'll likely try to mimic an American-style free market, reduce military reach (unless they decide to strike in Africa), and hand more authority over to police and civil oversight... well, we all know the rest. Those who adapt will move forward, and those who don't will fall behind, rapidly and likely permanently...
👋

We'll just have to wait and see what's rolling in from over the horizon.
My old handle back in the day on this site was Dream, and I actually stumbled upon my own post in that one thread about enrollments—the one that's actually worth a read—and I couldn't help but laugh at myself. I was basically consuming nonsense back then, and looking back, my style was just so childish and full of that total life naivety we all go through.
A lot of futurists and cultural philosophers generally argue that any theoretical concept can be quite effectively used within the New World Order to strengthen things on both a personal and social level—mostly by distributing it evenly to every single individual, though, of course, they probably won't even realize it's happening.
WikiLeaks could very easily become a new kind of mainstream media quite soon: everyone is talking about us, so what, let the humans enjoy themselves with the info. It doesn't really do any harm, since the system is only getting stronger from a practical and socio-global standpoint.
Can anyone actually stop staring at their screens?! 😁
It might sound a bit horrible, but this could take on much more serious dimensions soon, especially since 2011 is predicted to be the birth year for the synergy between mobile communications and the computing world.
Whether there's an entire community of that specific kind of raw honesty hiding behind Julian Assange... well, only time will tell.
Will he end up being absorbed by the Borg, or will the promise of the next spring blossoms hold true? We'll just have to see...
It feels to me like we're entering an era of much more intense global shifts. Whether the appearance of a ghost in the machine means a happy, unhappy, or just a messy outcome—and how that outcome will impact our entire civilization—is a question that even Julian Assange doesn't seem to lose sleep over.
😉

Ryan Wilson2 said:Let me put it this way: if you have an interest in the mob, if you start reaching out to them, if you actually go through the motions of joining the syndicate... after a while, you aren't the one running the game anymore. It’s the other way around. The organization begins to deal with you, and at that point, there is simply no escape.

👍
Just to add a little nuance here—it’s not so much about you choosing the mob, but rather the mob choosing you, because we're talking about energies that are quite a bit more sophisticated, both in terms of scale and substance.
And it works the exact same way in reverse when you look at forces of light.
But Nietzsche gets down to that one deep, singular truth—one that probably applies most to those today who fancy themselves lone wolves or wise counselors to everyone else. The reason the world is stuck in its current state might be because of them: in reality, they actually belong to the lower astral plane, and they tend to react—either consciously or, more often, unconsciously—to every single anomaly within the system.
Luckily, the higher astral is incredibly refined these days, largely because of the existence of that lower plane, and it always steps in whenever a certain level of intervention is required.
Take someone like Zlatko sudac, for instance—he does plenty of good, even though he knows how to manage hordes of energetically dark forces (whether you call it nationalism, fascism, clericalism, or just the one "correct" spiritual path—you could easily swap that for atheism, liberalism, anarcho-communism, or even the Taliban's spiritual path—the result is identical: it’s all about development and control over that negative lower astral, which Zlatko sudac belongs to as a commander, even if his energy sits slightly higher than the rest).
Does humanity need to experience some kind of universal agony, perhaps through natural decay, just to realize how far off track it's gone?
Look, I don't take pleasure in anyone else's misfortune, and the weight of our collective future rests on all of us to change it... even if I happen to be a collective pessimist, while remaining a personal optimist, of course.
😉

bluemason3 said:There's truth there, though you could look at it another way. By presenting himself as a monk, he was representing a specific institution and a certain ideal. It’s like when someone shows up in a white coat claiming to be a doctor; they carry a specific authority based on the trust a patient places in them. Or a mechanic when you hand over your car. If it turns out that the doctor is a fraud who ripped you off, aren't you going to feel cheated? They went to someone presenting as a religious figure expecting him to fulfill that "social function," which he completely botched. It's only natural they felt compelled to react. Honestly, given the sheer number of scammers out there in India, having some form of accountability—even this kind—isn't a bad thing.

I have no clue. I saw a few photos and statements, and the whole thing stinks from a mile away. You eventually learn how to sniff out these types. Some are more cunning, sure, but this guy was just a shallow, washed-out cliché. Based on what I've seen, I doubt he belongs to any real tradition; he just sounds like a superficial New Age hack. The question is whether he's actually a monk or just put on the robes without any initiation. Then again, anything is possible. Belonging to a group doesn't automatically make you legitimate.

It surprises me you didn't see through him immediately.
I actually called him out on an American forum a long time ago.
I wouldn't trust a person like that to hold my suitcase, let alone have a serious conversation with him—just look at that ridiculous, threatening, self-important laugh of his.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MLeVL...eature=channel
Tolle was at one gathering where they offered chairs to all the teachers; he was the only one who refused to sit, explaining he wasn't worthy of it. Eckhart wouldn't even notice if you walked past him, whereas this guy would probably try to pick up your wife in passing. 😁
His ego shows in everything, including how he used the Hare Krishna movement—specifically using songs by The Beatles (some of whom were devotees)—to win over followers in the West.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_10GLkCqc0g&feature=fvsr
Ranjith is clearly head over heels. What else would a Tamil actress who seemingly has everything be doing with him? You can see it in the next video, too, where Fox News didn't hold back (just listen to the background music). It’s pretty obvious we're looking at a standard manipulator; she's genuinely in love—maybe he gave her a bit of an "energetic touch" 😁—and she keeps throwing herself at him, while he, like a complete fool, just leaps out of bed (and I doubt that's some kind of yoga pose).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0nrak...eature=related
And if you want proof of how much she loves him, just look at this photo.

You can see the sheer scale of his ego in his own statements, where he completely ignores everything that's staring everyone else in the face.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8jlkXQLLLVU

It’s one thing to walk away from him and leave that whole mess in your rearview mirror—but, 😁 if you’re still stuck under his thumb while being dishonest with yourself (because let's be real, you can't truly find your footing when you're playing a part just to get by), then you've basically lost your way a long time ago.
😉

casualtiger2 said:If you ask me, the OP is an absolute train wreck...

People aren't inherently good or bad—you find all sorts depending on the circumstances (both inside and out).

👍

Ashley Robinson58 said:Your "friends" likely feel the exact same way about you. You aren't their person, and you aren't on the same wavelength. Stop wasting energy trying to force a bond that isn't there.
Friendship can't be manufactured. It’s either spontaneous or rooted in childhood.
If you're struggling to find people, learn to be fine on your own. Find ways to enjoy life where others aren't required. Eventually, you might stumble upon someone who actually sees you for who you are.

I really don't think what people think of you matters that much.
Take today, for instance—I was out in a big group recently, and it was a mixed bag: I agreed with some people on certain things, disagreed with others, and then, out of nowhere, this person shows up who is from a completely different world. Even though I was on a similar wavelength with someone else, we ended up having this little disagreement, which I actually found kind of charming because I could already see exactly where the conversation was heading.
Don't stress too much about people and their opinions—don't go trying to write the Constitution, after all, nobody asked you to draft it, so there's no need to volunteer for the job. 😉
Just live your life as best you can: take those little pieces of experience that fit you, like adding useful tiles to a jigsaw puzzle.
Learn how to be perfectly fine on your own.
People aren't the only thing that matters: stay connected to nature, too. Get away from the
TV screen and the computer screen as often as you can: travel whenever you get the chance. Don't blow your money on junk, but do spend it on things that actually make you a better person...
And so: build your own little philosophy. Life isn't a straight line going up forever, nor is it a constant slide downward; it's more like a winding road, and if all of this enriches you—especially within yourself—then there won't even be a need for these sort of superficial internet debates or opening up these kinds of topics.
😛

silentpilot6 said:So your definition of a good relationship is just a "friends with benefits" situation? 😁I don't see it that way at all. Is it really impossible to love someone, be in love, and still have great sex and easy conversation? I find I can't even fall in love without those elements being present.😬

In principle, yeah.
But it’s about way more than just physical intimacy. There has to be this underlying electricity between two people—you know, that pull. When it's there, it just happens naturally, physically. You don't need big, dramatic speeches or some technical breakdown trying to explain, "Look, I love you, but we just don't click in bed"... or whatever. It's simpler than that.
Then again, love comes in all shapes and sizes. It really depends on what's happening in your life—like, obviously, you can have a beautiful, loving connection even if one partner is in a wheelchair or dealing with a disability.
That doesn't mean love can magically fix everything, it just means that in this life, anything is possible. 😁

It’s pretty tough to change someone's core programming—I mean, you see it happen sometimes, sure, but those moments are rare outliers. And honestly? They almost always stem from some kind of profound personal growth through deep self-reflection—you know, that process of really getting to know yourself alongside a partner, a parent, a sibling, or even a grandparent. It isn't just about external circumstances...

silentpilot6 said:What am I supposed to do when you have such a trashy 🤣 avatar and I haven't even seen your actual username 😬
If you want me to find them, fine... but I don't have anything better to do. There's a search function if you're actually interested in looking.

You feel much better and more stable with someone you aren't in love with 😕
I don't follow. It's unlikely that I'm being stupid 😁, so please explain how that works for you... personally, I feel my best when I am actually in love with someone.
Is love a mess? No, even considering some of my great loves had unhappy 🙂 endings, I wouldn't say they were bad. They were beautiful while they lasted... now they are just the past.
And it seems to me you are confusing the concepts of "love" and "infatuation"...

The sweet spot is being with someone where the sex is great and you can just have a chill, casual conversation without any pressure.
Because people lack that genuine connection, love becomes this tired, cliché concept. People try to define it through escapism (cheating), money (ego), power (social status), beauty (showing off to others), or even honesty (using someone else as an emotional dumping ground for your own problems); stuff like that.
A little bit of all those things isn't necessarily bad, but they shouldn't be the main focus.
Ugh... that's a heavy burden to carry for the person on the receiving end.
😉

silentpilot6 said:If they truly feel zero connection to anyone "normal," then they are simply being irrational 🤷

Whether I’ve lived my whole life acting with complete logic is a difficult question. Perhaps I just possess a subconscious filter 😁 that instinctively weeds out people who might cause me harm, though that isn't always a certainty.
You can dive headfirst into a relationship "without thinking," but eventually, your reason should kick in to provide clarity and perspective.
For instance, my intuition told me to walk away from that married woman... and I have never once regretted that decision.

The idea of "losing one's mind" is also highly debatable. I understand those who lose their heads over someone genuinely kind and high-quality... but those who lose themselves over toxic jerks 😁, parasites, or manipulators 😬 are beyond my comprehension; I cannot understand or justify their actions in any way.
If you’ve been following this thread, you've seen—though there are always two sides to every story—that the people these individuals were obsessing over weren't exactly prizes or social favorites. Often, everyone around them 😁 was explicitly telling them to stay away from certain people... yet it didn't help.
To me, that is what it means to lose your head over a jerk, and it can never be justified.

Searching for Love... honestly, how does anyone actually fall for an obvious jerk? 🤷
Again, I am speaking from my own experience. I’ve had relationships that were "just casual"—I never fell in love.
I’ve also been with people who were clearly unstable, and I never fell for them either.
I’ve dealt with people who tried to manipulate me, and I walked away from them very quickly.
But the women I actually loved never made fools of me.

Regarding that last point, call me cold and calculating if you must 😁, but you should never lose sight of yourself for anyone else... especially not for someone you might be wonderful with today, only to pass them on a street in a year and look the other way. 👎

👍
🙂