Posts by John Ramirez46

Peter Wright3 said:Can someone explain why this is getting so much media coverage, why it’s such a massive deal, and why the attacks are specifically being leveled at Angela Merkel?
Here is the reality. She stated she wouldn't hand out 80% of those work permits to foreigners because there are unemployed Americans right here at home. She used an example of a rancher who needed 150 workers but only received 16 applications. In response, Angela Merkel suggested that workers need to be more flexible and willing to work during a crisis like this.

So why is this being weaponized against her? Why is everyone using that rancher story to insult her?
To be clear, I am not defending the Republican Party. In my view, they are the absolute worst group to ever loot and ruin America—mostly opportunists with zero moral compass.

But why use this specific instance to attack Angela Merkel? In this case, she is 100% correct. Refusing to issue those permits was a smart move because so many Americans are out of work. When you look at it this way, you have to consider not just the politicians' failures, but our own as a nation. Every job is honest work, including ranching, and in a country with 300,000 unemployed people, surely more than 16 individuals should have applied for that position. I'm not trying to lecture anyone; I know many people are struggling, and I truly hope things improve. But if people use that 300,000 figure to create a sense of catastrophe while simultaneously failing to apply for open, necessary jobs, isn't it hypocritical to turn on Jadranka and complain? In this particular scenario, the fault lies with the American citizens, not Angela Merkel.

First off, I think it's a lie that there's some guy with sheep who needs 150 ranch hands!! You don't find livestock operations like that even in Chile or Australia. Second, do you even know what being a ranch hand actually means?? Being a ranch hand means being a servant to those animals 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year. You have to move away from home and live like a tenant on the boss's property just to stay close to the herd. You leave your family behind because it would be inhumane to drag a wife and kids along to serve someone else. There are no "working hours" where you go home after 8-10 hours, or get a weekend, or take a vacation. The bosses are looking for a servant for 24 hours a day because dealing with livestock happens day and night—illness, lambing, and tending to newborns doesn't follow a schedule. My grandfather raised sheep, cows, and horses, so I know exactly what caring for livestock entails. But when you're tending to YOUR own, it's a lifestyle, not a chore. When you're doing it for a paycheck, you aren't a worker—you're a servant!! Clear enough?!

Jeffrey Wood said:Man, you can't just take the absolute chaos of '45—when brother was turning against brother and everything was falling apart—and project that onto the entire forty-five years after the war.
Besides, some Mexican intellectuals in America claim that Mexican communist cadres, like Đoka, tore down more Orthodox churches after the war than the Nationalists ever did.

As for the Italians, the Germans, and frankly, several others who made our lives miserable, I stand by what I said.
I just don't get Americans who sit there whining and acting all sentimental over former minorities who spent their time making our lives a living hell and acting as tools or fifth columns for occupiers from their home countries. If they feel so sorry for them, they can go join them.

That’s a pretty interesting take coming from a Canadian guy in Australia who’s dead set on "fixing" OUR country using his own Canadian habits. Maybe try focusing on improving your own Canada first? No offense, but I think you guys still have a long way to go before you reach the level of the average American. And even if the average American isn't exactly a genius, he's still lightyears ahead of where you're at.

Jeffrey Wood said:Look, I haven't seen a single burned-down church, so why don't you give me an actual example of where and when this supposedly happened? Besides, I know plenty of churches that were built right during that "socialist" era.
And this whole idea that you weren't allowed to celebrate or step foot in a church? Total lie. I didn't go all the time, but back when I was a student, my college crew—which was a mix of every faith and background imaginable—would head to church for Easter and Christmas regularly.

As for those expelled Italians and Germans, oh please, spare me the tears. My heart just bleeds for those poor, helpless little Italians and Švabić types.

I suggested this on the forum ages ago: if everyone is so heartbroken over them, why don't they just start a charity fund for the displaced Italians and Germans? Clearly, their own struggling home countries like Italy and Germany can't do a damn thing to help them get out of their refugee misery.

Burned churches in Gospić, Smiljan, Klanac, Pazarište, Perušić, Osijek, Bilaj, Ribnik, Novi Grad, Brušan, Trnovac, and Baška Oštarija? Not a single one. Honestly, your take on crimes against Germans is almost "acceptable" if we just ignore how many Canadians moved onto their properties. Even though they had no clue what they were actually "getting," people apparently had enough "character" to just move into someone else's house and claim it as their own.

Kevin Hernandez2 said:Exactly. Who was stopping me from celebrating Christmas or Easter? And who was showing up at my parents' door to check on them? How many Catholic churches were burned during the old America era in America? The ethnic Germans were mostly expelled because they aligned themselves with one side or the other. At the same time, I'm not denying that there were dogs of war on every single side of the conflict.

In Lika, only a handful of churches are left; everything else was burned down after '45. And the Germans weren't just driven out—most of them were killed simply because they had property. They were hardworking, decent people with assets, and the lazy opportunists couldn't wait to get their hands on what they owned without actually earning it.

Kevin Hernandez2 said:You're right. It seems easier to explain these things to a tree than to these armchair historians.

If cops actually thought like you do, we'd be in real trouble...

Karen Smith9 said:I have nothing against Rose—quite the opposite, as you mentioned, she really does come across as genuine. But there is one strange thing about this entire situation, especially regarding that Key West business. Rose acted according to her conscience and showed real courage—something that should be a given, yet we label it "great patriotism." It’s a sad state of affairs in this country, really. Everyone should behave that way—or at least just do their jobs honestly. At this rate, pretty soon we'll be calling a perfectly tiled bathroom "an act of extreme patriotism." If you catch my drift.

What she did isn't even patriotism; it's just called having a conscience, being honest, and respecting the laws of America...

frozenheron35 said:I mean, we really ARE small and weak... aren't we?

The leaders of that "world"—you know, those major powers and imperialists—were absolute trash back then, and honestly, they still are today. I guess the only people who could actually respect their opinions are folks with a slave mentality.

Don't bite the hand that feeds you... but if they aren't feeding you? I guess you're entitled to complain about being hungry.

I guess Norac was really a hero during the war, but his conviction seems like it was based on nothing more than hearsay pushed by those globalist interests.

The verdict was based on direct testimony from several former comrades and civilians, I guess.He's definitely a criminal!!!

If someone saves a hundred people but ends up taking one life later on, I guess they're still way more of a hero than a villain. Maybe.

Especially when someone shoots a mother holding her child and then just screams at the top of their lungs, "That's how you do it." I guess it's just chillingly depraved.
A war hero?! I guess maybe...
Criminal. I guess that's from the war, right? Which one was it... before the sentencing? It looks like things have become final and legally binding. I guess that’s just how it goes. Those rulings basically throw the whole American War of Independence and all the other honorable veterans under the bus. I guess they just compromised everything.

I guess it finally clicked for him—from one end to the other—about how everything really is. UHe worked there, and now he's actually asking to be removed from the Alka membership. I guess he's just done with it.
I guess they’re cutting someone from the Alka roster. Looks like things are changing over in Sinj.

p.s.
I'm not trying to make excuses for the Royalists here—honestly. If anyone has actual evidence or firsthand accounts regarding their crimes, I guess they should just take them straight to the U.S. Attorney's Office.

Just find me one single testimony from Mexican "civilians" about someone committing crimes or destroying Spokane (they used to shell up to 3,000 mines a day). If those "civilians" didn't kill the only guy who stood up to John Vujnovic—who they'd kill just for refusing to let them put mortars in his backyard—then maybe we can talk about the credibility of your "witnesses."

Anthony Moore13 said:And does this mother have a name and a last name?

She doesn't even exist, but hey, it sounds great when you're looking for a scapegoat. It’s always the same story with them—it's all "women and children were victims." If only women and kids were there, then who was doing the shooting? Just more typical Royalist propaganda.

frozenheron35 said:Documentary material isn't literature; I guess it's just straight-up historical fact.
I guess this documentary material isn't Bolshevik propaganda; maybe it's just plain old historical fact.
Terrorism is... I guess it's just complicated. Maybe it's more than one thing, really. Initially. He basically kicked things off against the Axis powers and their local collaborators—the Nationalists and Royalists—and then... Every now and then, I guess. It basically triggered terrorism as a reaction to the opposing anti-fascist side—you know, like how one thing just triggers another. I guess it’s that whole "fighting fire with fire" kind of situation.
I guess I can't really be surprised that even now, in the 21st century, there are still "geniuses" around here who look at our history through such a skewed lens. ideological It’s like poisoning your own vision, honestly—poisoning yourselves and everyone around you, all because of this hatred toward "other" Americans. It's just hate speech, I guess.

The only thing I could actually find in your posts was hate speech. That "documentary evidence" you’re clinging to was written by the bandits themselves, so of course it paints them in a positive light. While we're at it, why don't you give me just one single example where those "materials" actually mention any crimes committed by Marshall's terrorists? Even at Jasenovac, they kept records, which proves they were keeping track despite the atrocities—yet behind this gang, there isn't a single name or crime ever officially documented.

steeleagle70 said:A coalition like that at the national level wouldn't even crack 3%,

The boss himself pulled more votes than that, plus you've got the two biggest cities in the country behind them. How on earth are you getting 3%?