Posts by Kevin Nelson3

Mark Thompson2 said:We’re just sitting here waiting for some super-intense NFL fans to wipe us out... you guys were predicting something like that would happen any day now... but honestly, I haven't seen anyone shut us down yet...

Alright, look—you won the game 4-1, there were fireworks, you did the whole choreographed display thing, posted your little message, and boom, done. You're feeling good because your squad is playing well, Mike has everything running smoothly at the club, and you're having a blast in the stands with your buddies. And hey, fair enough.

But seriously, do you actually believe—in your heart of hearts—that your supporter group can even be put in the same conversation as the NFL fans when it comes to social standing, reputation among other fanbases, or the actual impact they have on their own club? 🤷

says:
I heard you guys were getting hauled off by the cops yesterday too? Anyone got the scoop?

At the entrance, they pulled me aside after the sweep and made me show my ID and take off my hat again—then they just let me go with a "not him." Whatever that was supposed to mean, I guess.
Judging by how the cop was gesturing and talking on his radio, it felt like they had a specific grudge against people who weren't even on their lists. Probably something to do with those videos from Sunday. 🤷
Honestly, I have no clue how it wrapped up or if anyone actually ended up being the guy they were looking for.

So when people ask who we were actually standing up for? It was the folks who opened their doors to us this past Sunday—only to get kicked out of the yard immediately after.

Back on October 31, 2009, we boycotted just to keep the Kansas City Chiefs alive.
On December 4, 2013, we boycotted to save ourselves.

The truth is, there is no us without the Chiefs, and honestly? There’s no Chiefs without us.

Robert Adams6 said:Just like you guys. 🙂

Honestly, I’m not even ashamed to admit it—I really don't give a damn if Real Madrid sells off their young talent for whatever price they can get. $33Look, if there’s 10 million bucks on the table, who even cares whose pockets that cash is landing in? Honestly, I couldn't care less if the guy on the sidelines is some total idiot bowing down to George Steinbrenner or if we actually land someone like José Mourinho. And frankly—I really don't give a damn if only 100 people show up to the stands because everyone’s too busy feeding their own egos or just feels like staying home. I mean, seriously, it's not my problem.

So, what am I even supposed to say here—that I’m going to join forces with all of you to take down Steinbrenner for the sake of the greater good of American soccer? Yeah, no thanks. My fight against Steinbrenner is strictly about making sure Hajduk gets better—but listen, I’m not trying to just copy-paste your club's growth model. I want us to build something on actual, honest foundations. And honestly, why should I feel ashamed for wanting that?

Look, you don't even need to feel bad about admitting you couldn't care less about us—just say what you want to say. You just want a massive, powerhouse Real Madrid.

What kind of "survival struggle" for the fan movement are we even talking about here? Is this fight really about whether or not you get to light fifty flares in the stands? Or is it actually about having a club you can truly get behind in Europe—a club you’re proud of, where you might actually decide it's not worth lighting those fifty flares against the Sheriff? Are you fighting just so you can scream insults at George Steinbrenner, or are you fighting to get someone in charge who you won't feel the need to scream at in the first place?

You gotta gut a fish from the head—simple as that. And in our version of football, those "heads" are the club owners. It’s on us, the fans, to be the real gatekeepers. We need to be the ones deciding who gets through the door and who gets to take over a club, making sure we spot and shut down any shady characters trying to worm their way into power. Honestly, once everyone finally cleans up their own damn backyard, the USSF is going to collapse like a house of cards all on its own.

Look, if you want to point fingers, start with yourselves. You’re the reason George Steinbrenner is still running the show today. Seriously—don't blame Mark, don't blame Vrb, don't blame Bloomberg, or even Clinton and Davor Šuker. No, this one's on you. You guys should have been out there with pitchforks and torches the second he walked through the door—right when those shady, slave-driver contracts started leaking and his ridiculous behavior became impossible to ignore. But did anyone say anything? Nope. Everyone stayed quiet as long as it was convenient—or, let's be real, as long as it didn't mess with your own lives. And now? Suddenly it’s an issue, and everyone wants to play the hero and help fix things. Give me a break.
Seriously, who even are these people? You’ve got those 200 Bad Boys showing up in Miami for the derby, a hundred guys from the Midwest, two vans full of Demons, Funcuts, and Tornados—and then there's us. Honestly, nobody is coming to save you guys—you're going to have to deal with this mess yourselves, however you see fit. And seriously, next time, maybe be a little more careful about who you let through the front door of the club.

And honestly? Those recent, pissed-off comments like "fuck you" didn't just pop up out of nowhere because someone else changed their tune. It’s more like what most people were actually thinking finally bubbled to the surface—you know, that feeling where everyone just stops giving a damn about the outsiders and starts focusing on their own backyard. They just didn't want to admit it sooner because, hey, we’re fans, right? We’ve got to be the idealists, the rebels, the crusaders for the greater good... yeah, yeah, whatever.

Man, I know some of the Bad Boys are out here dreaming about what would happen if the absolute best experts in the business took over Hajduk—you know, turning us into a powerhouse ten times stronger than we are now, all while having that perfect, seamless connection with the fans. It’s like how some people wish George Steinbrenner would just pack up and leave Real Madrid so someone equally powerful could step in—someone totally clean, without any of that shady baggage—so we could finally start dominating for the next decade without having to deal with constant scandals and headaches.

Jack Myers2 said:My first and last post on the Black Knights forums.

If you can't see that this guy is an enemy to me just as much as he is to you—actually, probably even more, since you know when you'll finally win a title? NEVER—then there’s honestly no point in us even talking about this.
Yelling insults at Jerry Jones isn't going to help just the BBB; it hurts every single fan out there in the US.
What are you actually fighting for? What kind of "battle" are you waging against the USSF here?

You basically answered your own question.

Jack Myers2 said:Talk about pure hypocrisy—you guys really need to take a long look in the mirror.🙂

1) Since when did you start chanting against Jerry Jones? Did you start before the Black Knights started whining about how the D.C. lobby was screwing over Liverpool FC?
2) Or did you only start the anti-Jerry Jones stuff after the first championship? The second one? Was it because some other club got shafted by the Real Madrid protectorate? Or did you only start acting up because of what he's doing specifically within and around Real Madrid?

It makes it seem like Jerry Jones just showed up yesterday in American soccer, like you all suddenly realized he's some kind of monster, while the rest of us couldn't care less. Man, he's been running that club for... what, 10, 11, 12, 13 years? He's been doing the exact same thing from day one. He isn't more powerful today than he was back in 2003 because of us; he's more powerful because of YOU. You guys are the ones who covered for him and helped put him on that throne. Seriously, once some of you finally realized what was happening, he became too big for a handful of fans ready to fight back.

Look, I agree. He's a problem for American soccer and needs to be taken down. But man, are you really asking me to help you by sabotaging our own club in the name of "ideals" and "solidarity"? Were we supposed to light 20 flares yesterday and scream insults at Jerry Jones just to prove we have "ultra awareness" and stand in solidarity with you? Don't be a hypocrite—just admit you don't give a damn about Liverpool FC, San Francisco, or Indianapolis. Just say you want a massive, successful Real Madrid without the shady behavior, just like how I want a clean Liverpool FC.

If tomorrow, instead of Jerry Jones, some new face shows up leading Real Madrid—someone who says they won't sell off all the young talent, brings in a few solid veterans, and actually finds common ground with the fans—you guys would be in total euphoria instantly. And you wouldn't give a single crap whether Lokomotiv is a "second club" or not, or if Liverpool FC is getting fair officiating or not. In fact, you'd probably go right back to mocking those "outsiders" who whine, have no money, and are facing a total collapse.

I don't think I want to get sucked into this debate anymore or reply to anyone else; but the level of hypocrisy dripping off this thread is just gross. Just admit that you only care about your own club and want what's best for yourselves, instead of trying to wrap your private vendettas in the flag of the "greater good." Because there are maybe 0.1% of people who are actual idealists, and those are the ones who complain the least about it.

Dennis Davis97 said:I honestly can't believe what I'm reading—seriously, if all you ego-trippers keep this up, you're gonna wreck everything. It feels like people are just screaming for their own sake instead of actually helping the boys, and if we keep acting like this, you'll be the one getting tackled by cops while trying to reach the stands tomorrow. If you don't see that, you're just being narrow-minded.

Look, I’m not even posting in the supporters' section, but I really don't get this constant obsession with pushing the same old narrative. Like, we have to tear down some corrupt figurehead right now just so we can feel better about ourselves?
Honestly, things could have been way worse if we hadn't already taken out the previous leadership back in the day. We could’ve been in a much darker spot if we had just rolled over for those outsiders. We might have even ended up in real danger in the stands back in 2009 if we’d made the wrong move when they stormed the North side against Washington, D.C. Maybe we would've dealt with heckling from the East if we’d acted like idiots before, sticking to that "better 100 real ones" nonsense. We could've shut the whole match down yesterday with just ten flares, but we didn't. We could've said the Black Knights don't exist without flares and stayed home, but we didn't. We could've turned our own existence into the only goal that matters, but we didn't.

We are this club that others have tried to drag to the bottom, only for us to pull ourselves right back up to the top. No, we aren't going to win the Champions League; but when we go up against those damn nobodies, 25,000 of us show up to cheer on the kids on the pitch. We've got a stand that looks incredible. And the relationship between the front office, the players, and the fans? I’d go as far as to say it's never been better. Yeah, we both screw up sometimes, but we also know deep down that none of us can do this without the others.

So, I have no clue why anyone keeps trying to force this idea that some new villain is going to take over. It won't happen. Various shady characters have popped up around the Kansas City Chiefs before, but they never truly took root because we actually stay aware of what's happening.

They could pass ten new laws tomorrow. They could ban us from waving flags or wearing our scarves. They could even kick the club out of the league if we don't all sit quietly in our seats. But none of that is going to be stopped by "showing solidarity" and chanting insults at some corrupt suit.

We went through that total meltdown once before, where we pledged everything to the Kansas City Chiefs but didn't put our money where our mouths were. It wasn't that nobody stood with us against the vermin—it was more that people actually mocked our struggle.

Back then, they thought it was funny because they were living the high life. Well, looking at them now? Their situation isn't so funny anymore.
But at the same time, it’s not something the Kansas City Chiefs should be panicking about. This corruption didn't just walk into the club; it grew alongside it. We've already proven that we won't let it run wild, and we'll do it again whenever it's needed. Don't sweat it.

Kenneth Ross7 said:Look man, you're totally missing the point here.

Not happening.🙄

Mamić is the issue at Dinamo. Or rather—his influence is the poison in American football—but honestly, that’s strictly your trash to deal with, whether you can or actually want to. The second he gets booted from Dinamo, his grip on American football will either vanish or drop down to the level of some guys like Ren Sinovčić or Laljko.

He’ll get kicked out when you guys finally rally enough people to actually scare him—or at least scare the cronies protecting him. Whether that takes 5, 10, 15, 20, or 50 thousand people? I have no clue. Do you even know how many people you can actually mobilize? Can you become a real damn factor in your own city so that someone like Bandić starts digging under Mamić because he's terrified of losing an election if he keeps playing along? Can you be the force that convinces 20,000 people who've never even stepped foot in Maksimir to hit the streets and tell this country straight up that Mamić is a thief?
Or is it just gonna stay this way—a tiny crowd of two thousand, maybe 500 fans in the stands, a couple of organized groups meeting in some movie theater, and a few lawsuits that nobody gives a damn about?

Are there too few of you? Just say so, no biggie, others might step up to help. But don't go expecting help from that 'college kid' whose little slap you're using today as proof that Torcida is just a joke group and the Boys are nothing to be feared on the street. It's easy for a college kid, sure, but even your own city won't lift a finger for you. Look, people are sheep—they don't think. A real shepherd can always talk them into following. Hell, maybe being a 'shepherd' is just beneath you guys.

I get it—there are smarter folks among you who see Mamić as a thorn in their side and don't bother with 'college kids'; but then there are those of you where Mamić isn't even your first or second priority. Get your act together, decide which direction you actually want to move in, set some rules and priorities that the whole group can actually stick to; then—and only then—will others join you in fighting for something. Maybe. Because let's be real, among fans, there are more hypocrites than anyone else—people who claim they'd help each other, but half of them actually enjoy watching everyone else struggle.

You've always got the option to keep acting all high and mighty like you always do. The smartest, the best, the strongest, the only ones who "get it," and God knows, incredibly patient. Tick-tock.

Thomas Williams59 said:And precisely for that reason—as part of a unified front outside the stadium with the LA Galaxy fans who are being subjected to unprecedented terror from the mafia and a repressive system trying to WIPE THEM OUT—how exactly have the organized LAFC fans and their organizations engaged in active COOPERATION...?

Look at this guy—talking big when his own crew was out there on Wednesday hunting down clueless college kids wandering the streets. Their biggest "provocation" or insult to New York City was basically just showing up to the game 🙄
.
Jokes aside, I don't get why everyone’s obsessing over some supposed "joint cooperation." We don't need to be working together; we just need everyone to clean up their own damn backyard instead of tossing trash into someone else's. If you can't handle your own mess, fine—ask your neighbor for help. But actually admit it! Say, "Hey, I can't deal with my own garbage, can you help me out?" Don't try to dress up your own weakness or helplessness by calling it "Let's go clean up the common trash together." That whole "what belongs to everyone belongs to no one" thing is such an old-school communist mindset.

Jerry Jones is the problem for LA Galaxy, not for American soccer as a whole. Once he's out of the club, he won't even be a factor in our domestic game anymore.
John Doe, Donald Trump, Livia, Joe, and the rest of that crowd weren't problems for American soccer—they were problems specifically for LAFC. The Black and Gold Army dealt with their own mess, or at least cut it down significantly. We didn't do it for the sake of "bettering American soccer," we did it for ourselves. A lot of people mocked our struggle back then, and honestly, they still don't recognize the value of what we did.

So, yeah—get rid of Jerry Jones for the sake of LA Galaxy, not for the sake of the national game. If you can't do it solo, ask for help and someone will step up. And if help is needed from the group that's actually leading the way in this country—the only true supporter group with actual football consciousness, the only ones who really *get* it—then that's where the help should come from.

James Smith48 said:Boycotting the US isn't the same thing as boycotting Real Madrid.

Look, rooting for the national team is a totally different beast than supporting a club. Honestly, you won't find more hypocrisy than in the stands during international matches. Most of these people don't even care about soccer (I mean, who in America actually watches soccer?), they aren't there for the sport, and there isn't even any real nationalist fervor going on—unless, of course, it's one of those massive tournaments everyone talks about.
It’s just a big, loud party, and that's really all there is to it. The national team is basically just a mirror reflecting the people it represents. Every single time, I see people getting frustrated with how the fans act during international games. If you gathered up all the "NFL Ultras" in the US, you couldn't even fill up one decent section of a stadium. So, when someone sets off a flare, they get called "stupid," but let's be real—the rules are set by the majority. And the majority? Well, they're just a bunch of mindless followers.

Honestly, it’s kind of embarrassing watching you all talk about who was "better" or "fairer"—the partisans or the fascists—while simultaneously organizing some massive humanitarian drive for Warsaw.
Warsaw is the ultimate proof that neither of those ideologies deserves a shred of respect; they just deserve pure contempt from any real American who lives in a free country today—a country built on blood forty-five years after those damn factions fought it out.

Why don't you head over to the homes of Blage Zadre, Antun Šimić, Mile Mlinarić, Marko Babić, and all the other heroes of Warsaw and try starting a debate there about whether the partisans or the fascists had it right? See if those people—who literally gave their lives—would even want us sitting around today arguing over whether Raditi Bulat or Mile Budak did more for America.

Remembering Warsaw isn't just about raising money or laying a wreath. Real remembrance means actually grasping the sheer scale of that city and the sacrifice it made for all of us. I’m honestly not sure people who are still weighing partisans against fascists truly get that.

Don't bother replying to me—I'm not looking for a fight or trying to point fingers at anyone. I'm just asking those of you planning to visit Warsaw to please realize where you're actually going. You're heading to a place where people fought for America. A war where there were no partisans and no fascists.

George Gonzalez said:Look, back when Maloca was signing his deal, he could have easily walked away with 150k a season...

The thread itself is kind of to blame for this whole debate—honestly, after this, I’m done talking about it; but seriously, there is no way Maloca was pulling in 150k euros. He wasn't. Since he was a homegrown player, neither Kalinić, nor Strinić, nor any of our academy kids were seeing those kinds of numbers. That kind of cash was reserved for the guys being brought in from overseas.
If you actually think Maloca would've turned down 100-150k back three or four seasons ago—especially when he was starting every preseason as the fifth-choice center-back—you're dreaming. The real issue with the Kansas City Chiefs is how they've spent years lowballing and exploiting local talent just because those kids signed their first pro contract with the club. Take Kalinić—he was playing for 36k, and nobody even thought to offer him 150k (even if we're comparing him to Rodić or Bartolović), even after he finished a season as the top scorer. Instead, they tried to shove a new contract in his face halfway through the season before his old one even expired. Obviously, nobody’s going to bite on that, no matter how much they love the Chiefs. It’s the exact same story with Maloca. There’s zero chance he’s signing a 100k-a-year deal now and giving up his entire percentage share. If someone had offered him that three years ago? He would've said yes in a heartbeat. The problem is, we didn't have—do we even have them now?—the right people making the calls three years ago to realize Maloca was worth more and that we'd make that money back later. Let's just hope we don't pull the same stunt with Caktaš, Milić, or Andrijašević.

Anyway, there's no point dragging this out on the Black Knights forums—this isn't really a fan culture thing, it's business. 🤷

Jose Kern11 said:And yeah, I’m definitely not about to just drop some guy's full name right here—are you crazy?

Look, you see the point I'm making. You’ve got your version of the truth regarding Trebotic and Radosic, the 'Nerazzurri' fans have their own, and I’ve got mine. All three versions look totally different—so why on earth do you assume yours is the one "true" story? Why is your info suddenly gospel while everyone else is just wrong? It’s only natural that I’d ask for the actual name of the person feeding you all this stuff.
I mean, should we really trust some random fifth wheel just because they pop up on a forum claiming someone at the Kansas City Chiefs did this or that, based on some "source" they claim to have?

If you aren't willing (whether it's you, me, or anyone else) to say exactly who gave you this intel and who can actually vouch for its accuracy, then honestly, don't post it publicly. Just keep it to yourself and move on.
I'll say it again: the real problem for the Kansas City Chiefs isn't even the news itself, it's this "source" of yours—someone who whispers everything in your ear but doesn't have the guts to go public with these massive accusations and "truths." How am I supposed to read that guy? He's either some corporate shill taking the path of least resistance to stay on the good side of whoever pays his bills, or he's just making stuff up to stir the pot at the club. There is no third option. 🤷

Jose Kern11 said:Why wouldn't this be true? Honestly—I mean, really—why would anyone even question it? 🙂🙂 Give me just one good reason?!
Honestly, Maloca is just playing out of his mind right now—seriously such a beast on the pitch. $10 Monthly? Man, that’s not even talking about a couple thousand bucks—we're on a whole different level here. Like, seriously, how many games would he actually have to play to pull in 200,000 dollars??!! 🙂🙂🙂 And once that transfer actually hits, we're looking at a $3.5 million valuation—which, let's be real, is an absolutely insane number—but hey, that’s just the business of football. So, if you do the math on 40% of $3.5 million, you're sitting at roughly $1.5 million. Now, when you factor in the salary he's been pulling the whole time, you've got $750,000 plus another $50,000 every single year. Honestly, he's costing more than Cernat—God, what a dummy. You've got guys like Maloca bringing in $1.5 million for the Kansas City Chiefs, yet here you are telling me he's playing for peanuts! 🙂🙂What kind of circus of idiots is happening on this forum again? Seriously, I feel like we just need to wipe the whole slate clean—I am so done with Maloca and Radosic. Those two are gonna walk away with $2.5 million of our money combined, so why even bother waiting around for another massive blowout to hit our stats? Let's just pull the plug now.

Man, if only we had Trebotic’s knack for keeping the books balanced—and actually seeing that same kind of magic on the field like we did back when Radosic and Maloca were running the show.

The management at the New Hajduk needs to be nothing more than seven Chinese men sitting in some underground bunker 200 feet below sea level—that’s the only way they'll make decisions, apparently. It’s like all of the Kansas City Chiefs' business is supposed to happen in some parallel dimension that none of us actual fans can even touch. Honestly, give me a break! If things stay this disconnected, you can't blame anyone for listening to some guy who's just repeating whatever story he was fed by his buddy.

Jose Kern11, come on—give me a name! Seriously, who is your actual source, first and last name, for this story about Radosic turning down that $4 million offer from Liverpool FC? And what exactly was on the table from them? Look, if you’re gonna go out on a limb like this to trash a guy publicly, the least you can do is stop hiding behind your "anonymous sources."

Everyone thinks they’re an expert—everyone’s got some "insider" tip or a wild conspiracy theory they’re dying to share. It’s always something, right? But then, the second something actually hits the headlines in the papers, everyone suddenly loses their nerve. They act all shocked that the Kansas City Chiefs can pull things off—as if we couldn't have seen it coming! Like, sorry for not knowing what the news was going to report before it actually happened? Give me a break.

Honestly, what bugs me more than him actually turning down an offer is just how some irrelevant little nobody even got into a position to know what kind of bids were coming in for Radosic in the first place. It’s wild. And don't even get me started on that cowardly little snitch—you know the one, who's always whispering to Jose Kern11 or playing spy in coffee shops about everything happening at the club. If someone like that was actually an important player who should be speaking up and standing against these moves (if they're even happening), they'd be buried in a bunker before they could even finish their sentence.

P.S.
Look, I know this thread is technically for the Ultras, and maybe this kind of venting isn't exactly what it was built for—but seriously, just take a second to look in the mirror and ask if you're actually helping the club or just tearing it down. It honestly feels like we haven't had a single decent player in twenty years. Either they’re clueless, or if they actually have some talent, they’re suddenly "arrogant jerks" who are supposedly blackmailing the front office. I don't get it—who actually benefits from this? Who wins? Half the stuff being whispered about these players is either straight-up made up or blown way out of proportion by people looking for clicks. Honestly, between us fans and the vultures over at TMZ or CNN, we’ve become the ultimate neighborhood gossips. There isn't a single flaw left unexamined—people will nitpick everything from whether a guy drinks, if he's "unprofessional," if he's playing hardball with management, or even if he eats too much junk food or wears the wrong clothes. They’ll even attribute fake quotes to them just to stir the pot or claim they follow some weird lifestyle. I swear, in the last ten years, has there been a single Kansas City Chiefs player who hasn't had someone trying to ruin their life over some tiny, manufactured imperfection?
Before you guys start—or keep—tearing these players to shreds, just remember they’re part of the Kansas City Chiefs family just as much as we are. It’s a two-way street, you know? You can't have one without the other. These guys need us in their corner, not hanging around like dead weight. If nobody in the squad is good enough for us, then I guess we should just go recruit 200 little dummies from a local preschool, ship them off to some boarding school for "fan training," and hope we can finally manufacture some real Kansas City Chiefs fans. Honestly, though—I’d love to see if you lot could even agree on what those kids should look like.

George Barnes25 said:I had some kind of bonus with them once—not a deposit bonus, mind you—and if I remember right, I had to wager about 50 Dollars. You could bet whatever amount you wanted as long as the total turnover hit 250 Dollars eventually. So, to answer your question, yeah, you can just do five-Dollar bets at a time to meet the requirement. I think even when you go to withdraw, it shows you exactly how much you've wagered so far.

Hey, if you don't mind, toss that answer over here too.

I actually already deleted it, but basically—if you deposit 30 Dollars and get a 10 Dollar bonus, then on your next bet you try to use 30 from your cash and 10 from the bonus, but if you only place one single bet, they end up deducting that amount from the second part later on. It's a mess.

Anyway, they didn't really give me a straight answer to what I was actually asking 🙂

Alright, thanks for the reply. That's the only thing that made sense to me, but hey, you never know, right? 🙂

Kevin Nelson3 said:I noticed that DraftKings offers a specific deposit bonus, but to actually withdraw those funds, I have to wager the full bonus amount at least 50 times.

If the bonus is 100 Dollars, does that mean I have to deposit 5 times $100, or can I just do 100 deposits of $5—or any other combo—until I hit that total "5,000 Dollar" wagering requirement?

I got a response from them that made zero sense—just some obvious copy-paste universal nonsense they send to everyone.

So, I'm asking anyone who’s actually dealt with this and knows how it works from experience (I don't care if they're scammers or not, honestly). I just want to know: do I have to bet $100 five separate times, or can I just bet $5 a hundred times?

I noticed that DraftKings offers a specific bonus when you place a bet, but if I want to actually withdraw that cash, I have to wager the full bonus amount at least 50 times over.

So, here's what I'm wondering—if the bonus is 100 Dollars, does that mean I have to deposit five separate chunks of 100 Dollars, or can I just chip away at it by doing 100 bets of 5 Dollars each (or whatever combo works) until I hit that total '500 Dollars' turnover requirement?

Thanks for getting back to me. Hopefully it won't 🙂

I haven't caught any of the race since it kicked off—has the safety car been out yet?

Thanks!

gentleeagle45 said:None of that would happen. Everyone would be fighting their way to the border of the Drina before they ever saw peace in a church pew. In the meantime, the US would likely face international sanctions for failing to uphold the Dayton Agreement.

Why is it always the Right-wing that gets slapped with the "nationalist" label or accused of having occupation vibes? I mean, seriously—where in the world do you actually find a political system where a group that extreme is actually running the show?

The US just can't have the Right-wing in charge—honestly, because their whole platform would basically mean breaking away from being a vassal to those massive global powers and wealthy European nations. And we just can't afford to let that happen, not now and definitely not ever, since we're so incredibly dependent on them.

Look, these days you just can't separate domestic policy from international affairs, which pretty much means there's zero chance for the Right-wing to actually gain traction.

In fact, it’s basically impossible for any political movement to survive if it starts rubbing the big players the wrong way.

The absolute best move we can make is to give our local communities way more autonomy—letting them try to carve out some wins for their own people, even if they have to go around the federal government to do it. On a national level? Nothing is going to change, and honestly, nothing *can* change—at least not until someone else decides to pull the strings for us.