14 posts shown.
Dana Howard4 said:I was in my non-fertile days; it happened 2-3 days after my period ended. My cycle is regular, usually 27 to 30 days.
I already bought a test, I just came here to "vent" first.
thanks for the help
See, for me, the math was all off... I was 24 weeks along... according to two different OB-GYNs, I actually conceived right after my period ended. 😁
Aside from those two pregnancies, my period has only been late once in my entire 12-year reproductive history. 😁
The only weird thing—which definitely played into this timing issue during my fertile window—was that my last two cycles before conceiving had shortened from a standard 28 days down to just 25.
Anyway, good luck... I really hope you get the result you're looking for once you take that test.🙂
Dana Howard4 said:So, what are the odds that this actually happened? And more importantly, how?
Well, here's the thing... men release pre-ejaculate before they even finish. If he just went in with the tip, he could have left enough behind in you. And if there was enough sperm in that fluid, it can hitch a ride on your cervical mucus straight toward the fallopian tubes. If you were ovulating, pregnancy is on the table.
THEORETICALLY speaking. Look, I studied probability and statistics at college, but honestly, I can't give you a specific percentage for your chances of being pregnant.
edit: At the end of the day, does the math even matter? Your period is late. You had unprotected, risky sex.
You can wait for your period, or you can take a test.
If you've decided to just sit around and wait for your period, then I don't really get why you're even interested in this thread. Anyone here is going to tell you the same thing: go take a test. It sounds like you're just scared to do it.
Statistics aren't going to help you here. You basically have two options.
And you've already picked one.
What I'm trying to say is, don't lean on the logic of: "But this rarely happens, so what are my chances?"
The odds of hitting the Jackpot in the lottery are basically zero, yet people still walk away with huge winnings every single day. 😁
Dana Howard4 said:Yeah, I get that. But the thing is, he literally just went in and pulled out immediately—and without a condom, too. I honestly don't see how anything could even happen in those few seconds. It would be incredibly frustrating if I got pregnant from that while other women struggle for years to conceive.🤷 🤷
It really doesn't matter if it was five seconds or five minutes. There’s pre-ejaculate, and sperm can hang around for up to five days. If the volume was enough, you could definitely end up pregnant.
Anyway, you can either spend the next few days stressing out while waiting for your period, or just go grab a $10 for a pregnancy test and finally get some peace of mind.
Dana Howard4 said:So, about three weeks ago, I had my first sexual encounter with this guy—if you can even call it that. Basically, he tried to go in without a condom, which totally freaked me out. I told him we needed one, but then the same thing happened twice more after that. We were both drinking, so I guess we weren't being careful enough. He didn't even finish, and the whole thing lasted maybe five minutes. Now, my period is two or three days late, and it’s usually incredibly punctual. I'm convinced I might be pregnant, though everyone keeps telling me to just relax and that there's no way. Honestly, I was dealing with finals at college until last week, so I've been under a massive amount of stress, which caused some digestive issues too. My breasts were also sore for a couple of days, though they usually hurt right before my period starts. I'm starting to panic a bit. My stomach is cramping like it does before my period, but everything just feels... off. I'm planning to see a doctor this Thursday because I can't deal with the anxiety anymore. What are the actual chances of pregnancy here? I'll admit, I'm really not well-informed about any of this, which is pretty pathetic, I know. I wasn't exactly planning on having sex, so I didn't bother researching anything beforehand. Thanks for any help.
You literally have an entire thread dedicated to "getting pregnant from pre-cum."
The odds aren't actually as low as people want you to believe; just look at how many women on this forum ended up pregnant after similar situations.
Ashley Price57 said:I honestly had no idea how much of a headache hair could be until I stumbled upon this 😬
Ladies, has anyone else noticed their skin reacting to jewelry—specifically earrings? I’m obsessed with accessories and have a huge collection, but I never had an issue until I became pregnant. Now, wearing my favorite earrings every day just isn't working out. My piercing holes feel incredibly sore and stinging, to the point where I have to leave them out for two or three days just to get some relief before I can even think about putting them back in. Is it possible that these hormonal shifts are causing this, or am I just experiencing a weird coincidence? Does anyone know what might be happening? It’s getting really frustrating 😢
The same thing is happening to me during this pregnancy; I haven't been able to wear earrings for four months now. It's not like I'm wearing cheap costume jewelry either—it's mostly silver and white gold, and I love my earrings—but they just won't stay in.
And honestly, I'm not sure if it's the pregnancy itself, because about two months ago I developed a small cyst behind my ear, and my doctor told me to stop wearing anything in my ears until it cleared up.🤷
It could easily be a combination of both.
I figured I’d jump in here because this topic really hits home for me. I’m dealing with the exact same thing—constant headaches, even though it’s been two years since I had my baby. Honestly, I don't think I ever dealt with headaches before pregnancy, but ever since, they've become a regular part of my life. They aren't all the same, either; sometimes it’s this sharp, stabbing pain right behind one eye, other times it’s a pulsing sensation at the base of my skull, and occasionally it’s just this dull, heavy ache that makes me want to crawl into a dark room and sit in total silence until it passes... and it goes on like that forever. My worst stretch was six days straight where I couldn't escape them; I'd go to bed with a headache and wake up with one. After those six days, I finally grabbed some Tylenol. I can't touch Aspirin or Advil because I'm overly sensitive to acetylsalicylic acid, so those are a no-go for me.
In the beginning, right after giving birth, everything seemed fine—I didn't have any issues during that first year—but these last few months have been absolutely unbearable, so I’m not even sure if I fall into that "postpartum" category. 😁
Oh, and I had an epidural during delivery. It’s just so strange to still be feeling the fallout two years later, if that's even what caused it in the first place.
placidorca16 said:I started out at, say, 6.5. Born on March 20th—I was basically a fully formed adult and a straight-A student, no issues whatsoever. It’s entirely possible your little one is already totally mature, Stefani. Some kids just hit those milestones earlier, others later. Honestly, if you're worried, just ask the pros—like child psychologists or something.
I was born on April 20th and started at 6 years and 5 months, and I was way more than ready for school...
And then there are kids who might not even be ready by 7.
I’m actually on the same page as Dobrica here; it feels like the curriculum today is much lighter than what we had to tackle back in the day. The real game-changer for kids now is having access to a second language starting in first grade—something most of us didn't get, at least I didn't. It's well-known that kids soak everything up like sponges before they hit seven or eight, so introducing another language then isn't an added burden; it’s honestly just doing them and their parents a massive favor, giving them a real shot at being bilingual by the time they graduate high school.
As for working with kids at home, I honestly don't even know where to start or how to respond to those posts where people indirectly ask, "Why do I need to help my kid with homework when there's a teacher in after-school care?" or "What am I supposed to review if they're already in school?" I was the top student in my class through the end of high school, but I moved around quite a bit—three different elementary schools and two different high schools across two different states 😁—and believe me, I definitely needed help at home sometimes. I remember first grade vividly; my mom basically sat by my side every single day, forcing me to do my homework because I used to think I didn't need to bother since I'd already learned it in class. I walked into first grade knowing how to write all my letters, but I couldn't actually read... I could only string a few letters together into tiny little syllables. Then there was third grade, when we were learning about the water cycle. I just couldn't wrap my head around it, no matter what. My dad tried explaining it until he was blue in the face, but nothing worked... until he finally took me into the bathroom, turned on the hot water in the tub, and waited for the steam to fog up the mirror. Once the mirror clouded over, things finally clicked. He explained that the water heater is like the top layer that creates steam, which eventually turns into rain... if he hadn't done that, I probably would have ended up in fourth grade still totally lost. From fifth to eighth grade, I kept bugging him whenever I hit a wall, though by then we were getting into physics and chemistry, so I needed a little extra help here and there.
I truly cannot fathom a parent who does absolutely nothing with their child. How can you not see how they're doing with math or writing? Maybe they're actually doing better than the teacher realizes... maybe they're gifted in certain areas or subjects... why wouldn't you want to nurture that potential?
Looking back, I realize how tough it is for teachers; the elementary years are even harder than the later grades. That's when you have to lay the foundation and instill habits—things like finishing homework, neat handwriting, organized notebooks, using clear headings... not to mention all the stuff teachers have to deal with that should have been handled at home, like basic politeness and manners.
Maybe some parents feel it's unfair that a 4 out of 5 is a B, or that a 19 out of 20 is also a B... but they really ought to look at the actual material being taught and study the tests to see what kind of questions are being asked. Most of the time, it's the absolute basics... and I really don't think that kind of grading is unfair.
Unfortunately, teachers today are way more restricted than they used to be. You can't even look at a kid the wrong way without some parent showing up at the school the next morning to demand a meeting. It used to be that these conversations could stay between the teacher and the parent, but that's just not possible anymore. If there's even the slightest issue, you have to involve a third party; the teacher ends up having to explain themselves to two or three different people, asking "why," "how," and "couldn't this have been handled differently?" After a few episodes like that, what happens? The teacher just gives the kid a C to wash their hands of the whole thing, the parent walks away feeling victorious... and meanwhile, the kid hits fourth grade without even knowing their multiplication tables. Why don't they know them? Who cares, right? They've got a calculator anyway... they'll just use that, or their classmate will.
Almost every day, I see some kind of outburst from kids. I once saw a little guy burst into tears because he got a C on a science quiz, and I was just stunned. I didn't get it... it was just science. By the end of the semester, he'll probably have a B or an A in that subject easily. He could even pull off an A without any trouble. But no, he can't study at home because he has three sisters who are all straight-A students, and that would cause too much drama. So, what are you supposed to do in that situation? Is it the teacher's fault for being too strict, or are the parents imposing the wrong expectations?
I’m currently working with fourth graders, and honestly, I can tell you firsthand that grading these days is anything but rigorous. When I asked one of the teachers at the start of the last semester how the kids were actually performing—just so I could get a feel for the class—she told me that scoring a 23 out of 27 still earns an A, which blew my mind. I had to ask her, "Wait, so what does it take to actually get an A?" And she just looked at me and said that even if a kid doesn't earn it, parents will show up... complain... nag... threaten everything under the sun until they eventually bully the teacher into handing over a pity grade.
It’s honestly depressing to see how much weight parents put on a single letter grade when we all know it isn't a true reflection of what a child actually knows, especially since the entire assessment rests on the shoulders of just one person.
I honestly think you should get your thyroid checked out; it sounds a lot like hyperthyroidism to me. I deal with it myself, which is why I’m speaking up—it’s the exact same thing I went through, especially if you feel like you're eating plenty but the scale just won't budge.
hollowangler4 said:I’ve heard nothing but glowing reviews myself, and honestly, after seeing and tasting what they offer, I can tell you the hype is entirely justified. We’re actually planning to have them handle our wedding cake through a gift from the venue, and since their pastries are absolutely top-tier, they’re our go-to choice. You really can't go wrong there. My advice? Ask them if they can whip up a couple of pounds of assorted treats for you to sample first... just make sure to reach out about a week in advance.
Just wanted to chime in here. Our wedding is set for April 24th, and back before Christmas, we swung by Casner in Dubac since we were passing through—mostly just to see what kind of cakes they offer, since it's included in our catering menu, but also to try some treats. The girl working at the bakery mentioned we should probably get in touch by February at the latest, which is like two and a half months before the big day, just to finalize the cake and any extra sweets.
I actually gave the lady from the business card a call the other day—the one at the production facility—and she stressed that we should come in as early as possible to settle the details for the cake and cookies.
So, if anyone is planning on ordering cookies, you definitely want to get that sorted early.
Also, regarding buying cookies, she said most of them are pretty much always available to try, though maybe not in those large quantities meant for weddings.
We stopped by around 8:00 PM and they still had one box left.
So, I see people are mentioning the bakery in Kansas City; they’re actually handling our cake as part of the set menu, but we're seriously considering picking up some extra pastries from them too, so we'll see how it goes. We tried some of their cakes—not wedding style, just standard ones—and honestly, they seemed pretty solid.
Yesterday my wife mentioned the price per pound is $27 if anyone was wondering.
Also, if there are any experts out there, I’d love an opinion on whether a cake looks significantly worse if you go with whipped cream instead of fondant. I've never been a fan of fondant, and we’d probably just do whipped cream on the outside, so I'm still weighing my options.
Kašnar is based somewhere over near Dubac—I can't quite pin down the exact spot—but they’re actually handling our wedding cake since it's bundled into our menu price and the restaurant has a contract with them.